Skip to content

Follow up of Nasolacrimal Intubation in Adults

Long Term Follow up of Nasolacrimal Intubation in Adults With Mild Epiphora

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00706251
Enrollment
180
Registered
2008-06-27
Start date
2000-01-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2008-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dacryocystitis, Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases

Brief summary

For patients with chronic epiphora, Dacryocystorhinostomy is currently the gold standard treatment, with a success rate of 80-90% according to literature. Another available treatment, which is far less used, in nasolacrimal intubation, using a silicone tube. In our study, we would like to find the efficacy of nasolacrimal duct intubation, which was performed in our medical center on a few hundred patients with mild epiphora. Study hypothesis: nasolacrimal intubation in adults, with a clinically mild epiphora, is close in it's efficacy to the Dacryocystorhinostomy procedure.

Detailed description

Under normal conditions, the amount of tears excreted from lacrimal glands to the eye is equal to the amount drained through the tear duct. Epiphora in adults usually involves a blockage of the lacrimal sac or the nasolacrimal duct. Epiphora causes tearing in patients, which can be treated sympthomatically in a conservative way (antibiotic treatment, probing of the tear duct, pressure irrigation of the tear duct) or therapeutic in an invasive way. The invasive treatment includes one of the following: 1. Dacryocystorhinostomy - surgery for reconstructing an alternative path for tear drainage. 2. Nasolacrimal intubation - inserting a silicone tube through the tear duct. The tube is usually removed after 3-6 months. Currently, there are only a few reports regarding the efficacy of nasolacrimal intubation, all with a small number of research subjects. Also, these reports have stratified the patients according to the location of the tear duct blockage, and didn't take into account the severity of the blockage (ie the severity of symptoms) prior to performing the intubation. In our research, we would like to find the efficacy of nasolacrimal intubation which was performed in our medical center on a few hundred patients with mild epiphora, and to compare in with the efficacy of the Dacryocystorhinostomy - which is 80-90% according to literature.

Interventions

Silicone tube which is inserted into the tear duct through the punctum in the eyelid, then passed through the tear duct till it enters the nose and secured in place using a surgical knot. The tube remains in place for 3-6 months, than take out by the surgeon.

Sponsors

Shaare Zedek Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of mild epiphora. * Underwent nasolacrimal intubation during 01/2000 - 12/2007.

Exclusion criteria

* Purulent excretions from nasolacrimal duct on day of admission or intubation. * Nasolacrimal intubation in the past. * Dacryocystorhinostomy in the past.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Patient being completely free of tearing.1 year.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Following nasolacrimal intubation, did the patient need a Dacryocystorhinostomy surgery.1 year

Countries

Israel

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026