Skip to content

Efficacy of 0.05 % Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion Compare With Tear in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Efficacy of 0.05 % Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion Compare With Tear in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00705510
Enrollment
70
Registered
2008-06-26
Start date
2008-05-31
Completion date
2010-10-31
Last updated
2010-11-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Keywords

Cyclosporine, Unstable tear film, Meibomian gland, Meibomian gland dysfunction

Brief summary

To evaluate the efficacy of 0.05% cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion (Restasis® , Allergan) versus an artificial tears alone in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction that have abnormal tear quality and quantity by subjective symptoms and signs including tear breakup time

Detailed description

Meibomian gland dysfunction patients will divide into 2 groups. One group will have 0.05% cyclosporine opthalmic emulsion and the other will have non-preservative artificial tear twice daily, compare the result in 3 months.

Interventions

use the medication twice daily for 3 months

Sponsors

Mahidol University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males or females, of legal age of consent * Patient has a diagnosis of meibomian gland dysfunction with at least 1 symptom as the following; ocular burning, ocular discomfort, and grittiness * Had a slit-lamp diagnosis of meibomian gland dysfunction based on the presence of one of the following * meibomian gland inflammation by lid margin or tarsal erythema, bulbar conjunctiva hyperemia, telangiectasia or thickening irregularity of the eyelid margins * meibomian gland orifice inclusion (plugging) or abnormal of secretion * Non-invasive tear break up time (NTBUT) with Tear scope Plus(Keeler, Windsor, UK) ≤ 8 seconds * Ability to follow study instruction and likely to complete all required visits

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 18 years old * Patients with severe ocular disease from Steven Johnson syndrome burn, limbal deficiency * Patients used cyclosporine within past 1 year * Patients used oral cyclosporine or anticholinergic drug within past 2 months * Patients with HIV or autoimmune disease * Patients with active ocular infections and patients with a history of herpes keratitis * Patients with known or suspected hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients in the formula (cyclosporine, glycerin, castor oil, polysorbate 80, carbomer 1342) * Female patients are pregnant or nursing * Patients who wear contact lenses

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
NTBUT0,1,2,3 month

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
OSDI score, FTBUT, lid inflammation, meibomian gland secretion and expressibility, bulbar and tarsal conjunctival injection,fluorescein staining, rose bengal staining0,1,2,3 month

Countries

Thailand

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026