Skip to content

Effect of Insulin Resistance on the Safety and Efficacy of Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin Treatment in HCV (Study P05562)

Observational Multicenter Study to Evaluate Influence of Insulin Resistance on the Safety and Efficacy (as Measured by Sustained Virological Response) of Treatment With Any Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin (Standard of Care) in Different Populations of HCV Patients in Russia.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00705224
Enrollment
250
Registered
2008-06-25
Start date
2008-05-31
Completion date
2010-08-31
Last updated
2015-07-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatitis C, Chronic, Hepatitis C Virus

Brief summary

Naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) of any genotype will be treated with a standard treatment regimen (pegylated interferon and ribavirin) according to routine clinical practice in Russia. The objective of this study is to examine the influence of insulin resistance on the safety and efficacy of treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin and to determine the prevalence of insulin resistance in different populations of CHC patients.

Detailed description

consecutive patient sampling

Interventions

BIOLOGICALPegylated Interferon

Routine treatment with a combination of any pegylated interferon and ribavirin was used according to the label/local practice in Russia. The treatment course duration complied with the labeled dosage regimen. Each dose of pegylated interferon was administered as a subcutaneous injection calculated as 1.5 mcg/kg once a week. Therapy duration varied from 24 to 48 weeks depending on Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype, viral load, activity and stage of hepatitis C. The Sponsor did not provide formal drug supply.

DRUGRibavirin

Routine treatment with a combination of any pegylated interferon and ribavirin was used according to the label/local practice in Russia. The treatment course duration complied with the labeled dosage regimen. Ribavirin was taken orally as 200 mg gelatinous capsules. The daily dose varied from 800 to 1200 mg (depending on patient's body weight) twice daily in the morning and in the evening with meal. Therapy duration varied from 24 to 48 weeks depending on HCV genotype, viral load, activity and stage of hepatitis C. The Sponsor did not provide formal drug supply.

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Confirmed diagnosis of CHC according to local regulations * Naïve Pegylated Interferon (PEG-IFN) CHC patient * No contraindications for PEG-IFN CHC therapy * Negative urine pregnancy test result (for females of childbearing potential) documented within the 24-hour period prior to the first dose of study drugs. Additionally, all female patients of childbearing potential and all males with female partners of childbearing potential must use two forms of effective contraception (combined) during treatment and 6 months after treatment end * Willingness to give written informed consent and willingness to participate in and comply with the study requirements.

Exclusion criteria

* PEG-IFN treatment in history * Contraindications for PEG-IFN CHC therapy * Females who are pregnant or breast-feeding * Male partners of females who are pregnant * Potentially unreliable participants, and those judged by the investigator to be unsuitable for the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at End of Study24 weeks following completion of 24 or 48 weeks of therapySustained Virological response (SVR) was assessed at the end of the study (Visit 4) to investigate the presence or absence of SVR. SVR was defined as undetectable plasma hepatitis C virus RNA (HCV-RNA) at 24 weeks after termination of treatment. Visit 4 was considered Week 48 or Week 72 depending on a treatment duration of 24 or 48 weeks respectively.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at Baseline24 weeks following completion of 24 or 48 weeks of therapySVR was assessed at the end of the study (Visit 4) by HCV genotype (I, II, III, or other) and presence of insulin-resistance at baseline (defined as Homeostasis model assessment - of insulin-resistance \[HOMA-IR\] \>3) to investigate the presence or absence of SVR. SVR was defined as undetectable plasma HCV-RNA at 24 weeks after termination of treatment. Visit 4 was considered Week 48 or Week 72 depending on a treatment duration of 24 or 48 weeks respectively.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Response Following Treatment as Assessed at End of Treatment by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineWeek 24 or 48 after treatment startResponse following treatment (RFT) was assessed at the end of treatment (Visit 3) by HCV genotype (I, II, III, or other) and presence of insulin-resistance at baseline (defined as HOMA-IR \>3) to investigate the presence or absence of RFT. RFT was defined as undetectable plasma HCV-RNA at end of treatment. Visit 3 was considered Week 24 or Week 48 after treatment start depending on treatment duration.
Percentage of Participants Who Demonstrated Virological Relapse as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at Baseline24 weeks following completion of 24 or 48 weeks of therapyVirological relapse (VR) was assessed at the end of the study (Visit 4) by HCV genotype (I, II, III, or other) and presence of insulin-resistance at baseline (defined as HOMA-IR \>3) to investigate the percentage of participants who demonstrated VR. VR was defined as undetectable plasma HCV-RNA (RFT +) at end of treatment (Visit 3- considered Week 24 or Week 48 after treatment start depending on treatment duration), but lost RFT (considered sustained non-Responders) at end of study (Visit 4- considered Week 48 or Week 72 depending on a treatment duration of 24 or 48 weeks respectively).
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Early Virological Response as Assessed at Visit 2 by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineWeek 12 after treatment startEarly Virological response (EVR) was assessed at 12 weeks after treatment start (Visit 2) by HCV genotype (I, II, III, or other) and presence of insulin-resistance at baseline (defined as HOMA-IR \>3) to investigate the percentage of participants who achieved EVR. EVR was defined as a substantial (greater than 2 log10) decrease in viral load (measured as International Units/milliliter) and/or negative Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based viral load qualitative result as assessed at visit 2 of the study.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin
Naïve patients with CHC of any genotype treated with a standard treatment regimen of pegylated interferon and ribavirin according to routine clinical practice in Russia. Each dose of pegylated interferon was administered as a subcutaneous injection calculated as 1.5 mcg/kg once a week. The doses were corrected in case adverse events related to pegylated interferon registered. Ribavirin was taken orally as 200 mg gelatinous capsules. The daily dose varied from 800 to 1200 mg (depending on patient's body weight) twice daily in the morning and in the evening with meal. Therapy duration varied from 24 to 48 weeks depending on HCV genotype, viral load, activity and stage of hepatitis C.
250
Total250

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy2
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up5
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPegylated Interferon and Ribavirin
Age, Continuous36.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.78
Sex: Female, Male
Female
104 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
146 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
177 / 250
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 250

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at End of Study

Sustained Virological response (SVR) was assessed at the end of the study (Visit 4) to investigate the presence or absence of SVR. SVR was defined as undetectable plasma hepatitis C virus RNA (HCV-RNA) at 24 weeks after termination of treatment. Visit 4 was considered Week 48 or Week 72 depending on a treatment duration of 24 or 48 weeks respectively.

Time frame: 24 weeks following completion of 24 or 48 weeks of therapy

Population: Completer set for the primary analysis included all participants who were administered at least one dose of the study treatment and provided the SVR data at end of study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pegylated Interferon and RibavirinPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at End of Study81.2 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Early Virological Response as Assessed at Visit 2 by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at Baseline

Early Virological response (EVR) was assessed at 12 weeks after treatment start (Visit 2) by HCV genotype (I, II, III, or other) and presence of insulin-resistance at baseline (defined as HOMA-IR \>3) to investigate the percentage of participants who achieved EVR. EVR was defined as a substantial (greater than 2 log10) decrease in viral load (measured as International Units/milliliter) and/or negative Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based viral load qualitative result as assessed at visit 2 of the study.

Time frame: Week 12 after treatment start

Population: Completer set for the primary analysis (N=223) included all participants who were administered at least one dose of the study treatment and provided the SVR data at end of study. Of the 223 participants in this population, 210 participants demonstrated early virological response (N=158 and N=50). 2 participants of the 210 had missing values.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pegylated Interferon and RibavirinPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Early Virological Response as Assessed at Visit 2 by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineGenotype III34.8 Percentage of Participants
Pegylated Interferon and RibavirinPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Early Virological Response as Assessed at Visit 2 by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineGenotype II12.7 Percentage of Participants
Pegylated Interferon and RibavirinPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Early Virological Response as Assessed at Visit 2 by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineOther1.3 Percentage of Participants
Pegylated Interferon and RibavirinPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Early Virological Response as Assessed at Visit 2 by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineGenotype I51.3 Percentage of Participants
HOMA-IR >3Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Early Virological Response as Assessed at Visit 2 by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineOther0 Percentage of Participants
HOMA-IR >3Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Early Virological Response as Assessed at Visit 2 by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineGenotype II6.0 Percentage of Participants
HOMA-IR >3Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Early Virological Response as Assessed at Visit 2 by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineGenotype III40.0 Percentage of Participants
HOMA-IR >3Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Early Virological Response as Assessed at Visit 2 by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineGenotype I54.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Response Following Treatment as Assessed at End of Treatment by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at Baseline

Response following treatment (RFT) was assessed at the end of treatment (Visit 3) by HCV genotype (I, II, III, or other) and presence of insulin-resistance at baseline (defined as HOMA-IR \>3) to investigate the presence or absence of RFT. RFT was defined as undetectable plasma HCV-RNA at end of treatment. Visit 3 was considered Week 24 or Week 48 after treatment start depending on treatment duration.

Time frame: Week 24 or 48 after treatment start

Population: Completer set for the primary analysis (N=223) included all participants who were administered at least one dose of the study treatment and provided the SVR data at end of study. Of the 223 participants in this population, 208 achieved RFT (N=156 and N=51) and were therefore included in this analysis. 1 participant of the 208 had missing values.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pegylated Interferon and RibavirinPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Response Following Treatment as Assessed at End of Treatment by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineGenotype I50.6 Percentage of Participants
Pegylated Interferon and RibavirinPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Response Following Treatment as Assessed at End of Treatment by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineGenotype II12.2 Percentage of Participants
Pegylated Interferon and RibavirinPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Response Following Treatment as Assessed at End of Treatment by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineGenotype III35.9 Percentage of Participants
Pegylated Interferon and RibavirinPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Response Following Treatment as Assessed at End of Treatment by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineOther1.3 Percentage of Participants
HOMA-IR >3Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Response Following Treatment as Assessed at End of Treatment by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineOther0 Percentage of Participants
HOMA-IR >3Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Response Following Treatment as Assessed at End of Treatment by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineGenotype I52.9 Percentage of Participants
HOMA-IR >3Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Response Following Treatment as Assessed at End of Treatment by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineGenotype III41.2 Percentage of Participants
HOMA-IR >3Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Response Following Treatment as Assessed at End of Treatment by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineGenotype II5.9 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at Baseline

SVR was assessed at the end of the study (Visit 4) by HCV genotype (I, II, III, or other) and presence of insulin-resistance at baseline (defined as Homeostasis model assessment - of insulin-resistance \[HOMA-IR\] \>3) to investigate the presence or absence of SVR. SVR was defined as undetectable plasma HCV-RNA at 24 weeks after termination of treatment. Visit 4 was considered Week 48 or Week 72 depending on a treatment duration of 24 or 48 weeks respectively.

Time frame: 24 weeks following completion of 24 or 48 weeks of therapy

Population: Completer set for the primary analysis (N=223) included all participants who were administered at least one dose of the study treatment and provided the SVR data at end of study. Of the 223 participants in this population, 181 achieved SVR (N=140 and N=40) and were therefore included in this analysis. 1 participant of the 181 had missing values.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pegylated Interferon and RibavirinPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineGenotype I45.7 Percentage of Participants
Pegylated Interferon and RibavirinPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineGenotype III38.6 Percentage of Participants
Pegylated Interferon and RibavirinPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineGenotype II14.3 Percentage of Participants
Pegylated Interferon and RibavirinPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineOther1.4 Percentage of Participants
HOMA-IR >3Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineGenotype II7.5 Percentage of Participants
HOMA-IR >3Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineGenotype I47.5 Percentage of Participants
HOMA-IR >3Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineOther0 Percentage of Participants
HOMA-IR >3Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineGenotype III45.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Demonstrated Virological Relapse as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at Baseline

Virological relapse (VR) was assessed at the end of the study (Visit 4) by HCV genotype (I, II, III, or other) and presence of insulin-resistance at baseline (defined as HOMA-IR \>3) to investigate the percentage of participants who demonstrated VR. VR was defined as undetectable plasma HCV-RNA (RFT +) at end of treatment (Visit 3- considered Week 24 or Week 48 after treatment start depending on treatment duration), but lost RFT (considered sustained non-Responders) at end of study (Visit 4- considered Week 48 or Week 72 depending on a treatment duration of 24 or 48 weeks respectively).

Time frame: 24 weeks following completion of 24 or 48 weeks of therapy

Population: Completer set for the primary analysis (N=223) included all participants who were administered at least one dose of the study treatment and provided the SVR data at end of study. Of the 223 participants in this population, 29 participants demonstrated virological relapse (N=18 and N=11) and were therefore included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pegylated Interferon and RibavirinPercentage of Participants Who Demonstrated Virological Relapse as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineGenotype II0 Percentage of Participants
Pegylated Interferon and RibavirinPercentage of Participants Who Demonstrated Virological Relapse as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineOther0 Percentage of Participants
Pegylated Interferon and RibavirinPercentage of Participants Who Demonstrated Virological Relapse as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineGenotype III16.7 Percentage of Participants
Pegylated Interferon and RibavirinPercentage of Participants Who Demonstrated Virological Relapse as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineGenotype I83.3 Percentage of Participants
HOMA-IR >3Percentage of Participants Who Demonstrated Virological Relapse as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineOther0 Percentage of Participants
HOMA-IR >3Percentage of Participants Who Demonstrated Virological Relapse as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineGenotype III27.3 Percentage of Participants
HOMA-IR >3Percentage of Participants Who Demonstrated Virological Relapse as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineGenotype I72.7 Percentage of Participants
HOMA-IR >3Percentage of Participants Who Demonstrated Virological Relapse as Assessed at End of Study by HCV Genotype and Presence of Insulin-Resistance at BaselineGenotype II0 Percentage of Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026