Skip to content

Vessel Wall Response of the Zotarolimus Drug-eluting Stent Implanted in AMI Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography

Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Arm Study Comparing the Coverage of the Zotarolimus-eluting Stent vs Bare Metal Stent Implanted in ST- Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI).

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00704561
Acronym
OCTAMI
Enrollment
44
Registered
2008-06-25
Start date
2008-04-30
Completion date
2009-10-31
Last updated
2022-05-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Myocardial Infarction

Keywords

Acute Myocardial Infarction, Percutaneous Coronary Interventions, Optical Coherence Tomography, Thrombus

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the completeness of struts coverage and vessel wall response (strut malapposition, neointima disomogeneities in texture) to the ENDEAVOR drug-eluting stent vs the DRIVER stent (bare metal stent of identical metallic platform) implanted for the treatment of the culprit lesion in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). To investigate the completeness of the coverage as well as the number of uncovered stent struts per section (embedded, uncovered, malapposed) and the neointima texture, high resolution (\ 10-15 µm axial) intracoronary optical coherence tomography (OCT)will be used.

Detailed description

Major concerns have been raised with regard to the safety of drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). Data from registry studies have suggested that implantation of DES during primary PCI could be associated with an increased risk for stent thrombosis, probably due to delayed arterial healing. Unlike first generation DES, zotarolimus-eluting stents seems to be associated with complete and uniform neointimal coverage. The objective of this prospective study is to measure the completeness of strut coverage and vessel wall response to the ENDEAVOR zotarolimus-eluting stent vs the DRIVER stent (bare metal stent of identical metallic platform) implanted in STEMI patients. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) that detects smaller degrees of stent strut coverage more accurately than IVUS will be used at 6 months follow-up. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) will be performed as per normal practice at any index procedures and at 6 months follow-up.

Interventions

DEVICEENDEAVOR® drug-eluting stent (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA)

ENDEAVOR® drug-eluting stent implanted in acute myocardial infarction

DEVICEDRIVER bare metal stent (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, Ca)

DRIVER bare metal stent implanted in acute myocardial infarction

Comparison of Drug Eluting versus Bare Metal Stent

Comaprison between Drug Eluting and Bare Metal Coronary Stents

Sponsors

Case Western Reserve University
CollaboratorOTHER
Medtronic
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
A.O. Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Acute Myocardial MI with ST segment Elevation, within 12 hours from symptoms onset * Native coronary artery disease with \>70% diameter stenosis (no prior stent implant, no prior brachytherapy) * Vessel size in between 2.5 and 3.75 mm * Signed patient informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Lesions in coronary artery bypass grafts * Significant left main disease * Killip class IV * Reecent major bleeding (6 months) * Renal failure with creatinine value \> 2.5 mg/dl * Allergy to aspirin and or clopidogrel/ticlopidine * Patient in anticoagulant therapy * IMA due to a stent thrombosis * No suitable anatomy for OCT scan: (only ostial location, very tortuous anatomy, very distal or large vessels \[≥ 3.75 mm in diameter\])

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Non inferiority OCT Number of uncovered Stent struts for Endeavor drug eluting stent vs Driver BMSbare metal stent6 monthsNon inferiority

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
number of well apposed stent struts without neointima6 monthsnumber of well apposed stent struts without neointima
number of malapposed stent struts without neointima6 monthsnumber of malapposed stent struts without neointima
Number of sections with incomplete strut apposition6 monthsNumber of sections with incomplete strut apposition
Adjudicated MACE(Death, re-MI, TLR) rate at 30 days and 6 months (non inferiority)6 monthsAdjudicated MACE(Death, re-MI, TLR) rate at 30 days and 6 months (non inferiority)
In segment OCT neontimal volume6 monthsIn segment OCT neontimal volume
number of sections with > 30% uncovered struts/total struts6 monthsnumber of sections with \> 30% uncovered struts/total struts

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 31, 2026