Skip to content

Topical Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis With WR 279,396: A Phase 2 Study in the Old World

Topical Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis With WR 279,396: a Phase 2 Study in the Old World

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00703924
Enrollment
92
Registered
2008-06-24
Start date
2003-03-31
Completion date
2005-11-30
Last updated
2017-05-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cutaneous Leishmaniasis

Keywords

cutaneous leishmaniasis topical treatment safety efficacy

Brief summary

This study is to determine the effectiveness and safety of WR 279,396, a topical cream for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. This study is to be conducted with a placebo control under double-blind conditions in a local population group in Tunisia where leishmaniasis is endemic.

Detailed description

WR 279,396 is a paromomycin-based topical cream that has shown some suggestion of being effective for the treatment of non-serious, non-complicated cutaneous leishmaniasis in previous clinical studies. The goal of this study is to expand those observations in a larger, more rigorous study to clearly define the efficacy of this product and collect information about adverse effects. Subjects will be randomized to receive either WR 279,396 or vehicle placebo; applied twice a day for 20 days.

Interventions

A topical cream containing 15% paromomycin and 0.5% gentamicin. Approximately 0.0005 mL per mm2 of skin lesion

DRUGPlacebo

Topical cream vehicle. Approximately 0.0005 mL per mm2 of skin lesion

Sponsors

Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR)
CollaboratorFED
U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 5-75 years * Lesions must measure at least 1 cm and be primarily ulcerative * Have cutaneous leishmaniasis proven parasitologically in the lesion selected for study * Must have given written informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Known drug intolerance to aminoglycosides in the patient or immediate family * Previous use of antileishmanial drugs (within 3 months) or present use of routinely nephrotoxic or ototoxic drugs * Patients with tuberculosis under treatment * Potential for follow-up: have less than 7 months time remaining in present address and/or plan to leave the area for more than 30 days * Extent of disease: more than 5 lesions or lesion equal to or greater than 5 cm or a lesion less than 5 cm from the eye, or a lesion in the face that, in the opinion of the attending dermatologist could potentially cause significant disfigurement * Location of disease: mucosal involvement * Disseminated disease: clinically significant lymphadenitis with nodules that are painful and greater than 1 cm in size in the lymphatic drainage of the ulcer * Concomitant medical problems: significant medical problems of the kidney or liver as determined by history and by the following laboratory studies: * Hearing abnormality * Ongoing pregnancy or have plans to become pregnant * Females of child bearing age (Tunisia Only) * Signs or symptoms of peripheral neuropathy Kidney: clinically significant abnormalities of urine analysis, serum levels of creatinine, BUN, total proteins greater than the upper limit of normal for the laboratory. Liver: AST or ALT greater than the upper limit of normal for the laboratory General: glucose, Na+, or K+ greater than the upper limit of normal for the laboratory

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complete Clinical Response (CCR) of Lesion at Days 50, 100 and 180 (+7 Days)180 daysCCR is defined as at least 50% reduction, from baseline, in index lesion area of ulceration at study days 50, 100 and 180 (+ 7 days). Randomized subjects were compared using the uncorrected Fisher's exact test. Confidence intervals (95%) were constructed on the difference between the two group proportions. The log-rank test was used to compare the time to complete re-epithelialization of the index lesion without relapse. Cure of all subjects lesions was also compared using the Fisher's exact test. To adjust for baseline differences in the treatment groups, a linear model for the proportion of subjects achieving CCR was fit for each baseline variable of interest with covariates for treatment group and the baseline variable. The Breslow-Day test was used to examine whether the effect of WR 279,396 varied between subgroups
Safety of WR 279,396 (AEs and SAEs)180 daysSafety was evaluated on each day during daily administration of the topical products. Subjects were observed and questioned for the occurrence of solicited local side effects (eg, pain, erythema, edema) and solicited systemic side effects (eg, vertigo, tinnitus, diminished hearing). Non-solicited AE evaluations included spontaneous reports from subjects and clinical observations.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Complete Re-epithelialization of the Index Lesion Ulcer Without Relapse180 days100% re-epithelialization of the index lesion without having had a relapse. The log-rank test was used to compare the time to complete re-epithelialization.
Final Cure Rate by Subject of All Lesions180 daysFinal cure rate by subject was determined using the Fisher's exact test. To adjust for baseline differences in the treatment groups, a linear model for the proportion of subjects achieving CCR was fit for each baseline variable of interest with covariates for treatment group and the baseline variable.
Rate of Relapse180 daysRelapse is defined as enlargement of the index lesion compared to previous measurement at any time after day 50 (+ 7 days) or not demonstrating CCR by study day 180. CCR was compared using uncorrected Fisher's exact test. Confidence intervals (95%) were constructed on the difference between the two group proportions. The log-rank test was used to compare the time to complete re-epithelialization of the index lesion without relapse. Cure of all subjects lesions was also compared using the Fisher's exact test. To adjust for baseline differences in the treatment groups, a linear model for the proportion of subjects achieving CCR was fit for each baseline variable of interest with covariates for treatment group and the baseline variable.

Countries

France, Tunisia

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
WR 279,396
WR 279,396 is a topical antibiotic cream containing paromomycin and gentamicin WR 279,396: A topical cream containing 15% paromomycin and 0.5% gentamicin. Approximately 0.0005 mL per mm2 of skin lesion
50
Placebo
Topical cream vehicle containing all of the components in WR 279,396 except the active ingredients. Placebo: Topical cream vehicle. Approximately 0.0005 mL per mm2 of skin lesion
42
Total92

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicWR 279,396PlaceboTotal
Age, Customized
<18 years
47 years33 years80 years
Age, Customized
>18 years
3 years9 years12 years
Region of Enrollment
France
5 participants5 participants10 participants
Region of Enrollment
Tunisia
45 participants37 participants82 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants15 Participants38 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants27 Participants54 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
16 / 5012 / 42
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 500 / 42

Outcome results

Primary

Complete Clinical Response (CCR) of Lesion at Days 50, 100 and 180 (+7 Days)

CCR is defined as at least 50% reduction, from baseline, in index lesion area of ulceration at study days 50, 100 and 180 (+ 7 days). Randomized subjects were compared using the uncorrected Fisher's exact test. Confidence intervals (95%) were constructed on the difference between the two group proportions. The log-rank test was used to compare the time to complete re-epithelialization of the index lesion without relapse. Cure of all subjects lesions was also compared using the Fisher's exact test. To adjust for baseline differences in the treatment groups, a linear model for the proportion of subjects achieving CCR was fit for each baseline variable of interest with covariates for treatment group and the baseline variable. The Breslow-Day test was used to examine whether the effect of WR 279,396 varied between subgroups

Time frame: 180 days

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
WR 279,396Complete Clinical Response (CCR) of Lesion at Days 50, 100 and 180 (+7 Days)CCR47 Participants
WR 279,396Complete Clinical Response (CCR) of Lesion at Days 50, 100 and 180 (+7 Days)CCR Failure3 Participants
PlaceboComplete Clinical Response (CCR) of Lesion at Days 50, 100 and 180 (+7 Days)CCR30 Participants
PlaceboComplete Clinical Response (CCR) of Lesion at Days 50, 100 and 180 (+7 Days)CCR Failure12 Participants
Primary

Safety of WR 279,396 (AEs and SAEs)

Safety was evaluated on each day during daily administration of the topical products. Subjects were observed and questioned for the occurrence of solicited local side effects (eg, pain, erythema, edema) and solicited systemic side effects (eg, vertigo, tinnitus, diminished hearing). Non-solicited AE evaluations included spontaneous reports from subjects and clinical observations.

Time frame: 180 days

Population: All solicited local and systemic AEs and SAEs including immediate and delayed reactions that occurred during this study are summarized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
WR 279,396Safety of WR 279,396 (AEs and SAEs)Solicited AEs- Severe2 Adverse Events
WR 279,396Safety of WR 279,396 (AEs and SAEs)Non-Solicited AEs- Moderate10 Adverse Events
WR 279,396Safety of WR 279,396 (AEs and SAEs)Solicited AEs- Moderate11 Adverse Events
WR 279,396Safety of WR 279,396 (AEs and SAEs)Non-Soliciated AEs- Severe0 Adverse Events
WR 279,396Safety of WR 279,396 (AEs and SAEs)Non-Solicited AEs- Mild13 Adverse Events
WR 279,396Safety of WR 279,396 (AEs and SAEs)SAEs1 Adverse Events
WR 279,396Safety of WR 279,396 (AEs and SAEs)Solicated AEs- Mild49 Adverse Events
PlaceboSafety of WR 279,396 (AEs and SAEs)SAEs0 Adverse Events
PlaceboSafety of WR 279,396 (AEs and SAEs)Solicated AEs- Mild40 Adverse Events
PlaceboSafety of WR 279,396 (AEs and SAEs)Solicited AEs- Moderate5 Adverse Events
PlaceboSafety of WR 279,396 (AEs and SAEs)Solicited AEs- Severe2 Adverse Events
PlaceboSafety of WR 279,396 (AEs and SAEs)Non-Solicited AEs- Mild20 Adverse Events
PlaceboSafety of WR 279,396 (AEs and SAEs)Non-Solicited AEs- Moderate10 Adverse Events
PlaceboSafety of WR 279,396 (AEs and SAEs)Non-Soliciated AEs- Severe0 Adverse Events
Secondary

Final Cure Rate by Subject of All Lesions

Final cure rate by subject was determined using the Fisher's exact test. To adjust for baseline differences in the treatment groups, a linear model for the proportion of subjects achieving CCR was fit for each baseline variable of interest with covariates for treatment group and the baseline variable.

Time frame: 180 days

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
WR 279,396Final Cure Rate by Subject of All LesionsCCR46 Participants
WR 279,396Final Cure Rate by Subject of All LesionsTreatment Failure4 Participants
PlaceboFinal Cure Rate by Subject of All LesionsCCR29 Participants
PlaceboFinal Cure Rate by Subject of All LesionsTreatment Failure13 Participants
Secondary

Rate of Relapse

Relapse is defined as enlargement of the index lesion compared to previous measurement at any time after day 50 (+ 7 days) or not demonstrating CCR by study day 180. CCR was compared using uncorrected Fisher's exact test. Confidence intervals (95%) were constructed on the difference between the two group proportions. The log-rank test was used to compare the time to complete re-epithelialization of the index lesion without relapse. Cure of all subjects lesions was also compared using the Fisher's exact test. To adjust for baseline differences in the treatment groups, a linear model for the proportion of subjects achieving CCR was fit for each baseline variable of interest with covariates for treatment group and the baseline variable.

Time frame: 180 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
WR 279,396Rate of Relapse0 Participants
PlaceboRate of Relapse3 Participants
Secondary

Time to Complete Re-epithelialization of the Index Lesion Ulcer Without Relapse

100% re-epithelialization of the index lesion without having had a relapse. The log-rank test was used to compare the time to complete re-epithelialization.

Time frame: 180 days

Population: Days to 100% re-epithelialization of index lesion. Volunteer Identification Number (VIN). VINs 17, 72, and 109 failed to meet 100% re-epithelialization

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
WR 279,396Time to Complete Re-epithelialization of the Index Lesion Ulcer Without RelapseWR 279,39610 Participants
WR 279,396Time to Complete Re-epithelialization of the Index Lesion Ulcer Without RelapsePlacebo20 Participants
PlaceboTime to Complete Re-epithelialization of the Index Lesion Ulcer Without RelapsePlacebo10 Participants
PlaceboTime to Complete Re-epithelialization of the Index Lesion Ulcer Without RelapseWR 279,39634 Participants
Day 100Time to Complete Re-epithelialization of the Index Lesion Ulcer Without RelapseWR 279,3964 Participants
Day 100Time to Complete Re-epithelialization of the Index Lesion Ulcer Without RelapsePlacebo9 Participants
Day 180 (+7 Days)Time to Complete Re-epithelialization of the Index Lesion Ulcer Without RelapseWR 279,3961 Participants
Day 180 (+7 Days)Time to Complete Re-epithelialization of the Index Lesion Ulcer Without RelapsePlacebo1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 3, 2026