Skip to content

Imatinib Mesylate to Treat Skin Changes in Patients With Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease

A Phase II Study of Imatinib Mesylate in Children and Adults With Sclerotic Skin Changes of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00702689
Enrollment
20
Registered
2008-06-20
Start date
2008-12-15
Completion date
2020-02-26
Last updated
2020-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Imatinib Mesylate, Sclerotic Graft Versus Host Disease

Keywords

Skin Sclerosis, Graft Versus Host Disease

Brief summary

Background: Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common complication of stem cell transplant, resulting from the donor's immune cells attacking the cells of the body of the recipient. One effect of GVHD is fibrosis (scarring) of the skin that can lead to impaired function, decreased quality of life and increased risk of death. This is known as sclerotic skin changes of GVHD, or sclerodermatous graft versus host disease (ScGVHD). Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) is a drug that has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration to treat cancer in humans and fibrosing conditions in animals. Objectives: To see if imatinib mesylate can improve ScGVHD and evaluate its effect on other GVHD symptoms To assess the side effects of imatinib mesylate in patients with GVHD To evaluate blood, body fluids and tissue samples in patients to try to better understand the biology of ScGVHD Eligibility: Patients 4 years of age and older with ScGVHD Design: Initial treatment: Participants take imatinib mesylate tablets once a day for up to 6 months, as long as their GVHD does not get worse and they do not develop unacceptable side effects of the drug. Evaluations: Participants are evaluated at 1, 3 and 6 months at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center with procedures that may include the following: Medical history and physical examination Blood and urine tests Lung function test Skin biopsy Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan Specialty consultations (e.g., physical or rehabilitative therapy, dentist, eye doctor, dermatologist) Electrocardiogram (EKG) Echocardiogram (ultrasound test of the heart) Muga scan (nuclear medicine test of the heart) Quality-of-life questionnaires Apheresis (procedure for collecting quantities of white blood cells) Office visits with local physician once a week for 1 month, then once every 2 weeks for 5 months Followup visits at National Institutes of Health (NIH) every 6 months for 1 year Continuing treatment: Patients who improve continue to receive imatinib mesylate for up to 6 months after their best response and are followed for up to 2 years. Patients who continue to respond or who become worse after stopping treatment may receive additional treatment for up to 2 years.

Detailed description

Background: Chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) is a major complication of allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT). The sclerotic skin manifestations of chronic cutaneous GVHD (ScGVHD) can lead to significant functional impairment and no satisfactory therapy exists to adequately treat this form of cGVHD. Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) is a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor with potent activity against platelet derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) signaling, a key cytokine pathway which has been implicated in fibrotic disease in general, and in extensive cGVHD in particular. We hypothesize that treatment with imatinib mesylate will reduce the sclerotic manifestations of cGVHD as assessed by quantitative range of motion assessment of an affected joint. Objectives: Primary Objective: To investigate whether imatinib mesylate results in clinical improvement in skin fibrosis in children and adults with ScGVHD using range of motion assessment of affected joints. To determine if imatinib mesylate 200 mg daily is tolerated by patients with cGVHD. Secondary Objectives: To assess toxicity associated with imatinib mesylate in patients with cGVHD. To establish outcome criteria for the evaluation of ScGVHD using multi-modality objective and subjective assessments, including magnetic resonance imaging, skin scoring, and patient self-reported measures. To evaluate biomarkers of disease activity and correlative response measures to treatment with imatinib mesylate. To assess quality of life and functional measures of disease activity and to evaluate changes through the course of therapy. To evaluate the response of other organ manifestations affected by cGVHD to treatment with imatinib mesylate. To evaluate steady-state pharmacokinetics of imatinib mesylate in the cGVHD patient population. Eligibility: Patients age 4 years of age or older with the diagnosis of ScGVHD. Design: This is an open-label, pilot study of imatinib mesylate. Treatment cycles are 28-day cycles with no rest period between cycles. A target of 10 evaluable patients will be enrolled on this trial.

Interventions

DRUGGleevec, STI571(Imatinib Mesylate)

Cohort 1 - Pts 1-8:Adults: 400mg imatinib mesylate daily; Children: 260mg/m\^2 daily (400mg maximum), followed by dose de-escalation for adverse events. Cohort 2 - Pts 9-20:Adults - 100 mg oral dose daily (increase to 200 mg daily after 28 days if well tolerated). Children - 65 mg/m\^2 oral dose daily (increase to 130 mg/m\^2 daily after 28 days if well tolerated)

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* INCLUSION CRITERIA: * Sclerodermatous graft versus host disease (ScGVHD) manifesting after at least 100 days following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is considered diagnostic for chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) according to National Institutes of Health (NIH) cGVHD Consensus Statement diagnostic criteria. This diagnosis can be made clinically or by histopathology. The diagnosis must be confirmed by the principal investigator (PI), or lead associate investigator (LAI). Skin biopsies will be reviewed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Laboratory of Pathology to confirm the diagnosis of ScGVHD. * Patients must have measurable limitation in range of motion, defined as ScGVHD with or without fasciitis, restricting range of motion (ROM) of at least one joint with a minimum deficit of 25 percent. * Prior therapy: Patients must have cGVHD refractory to at least one treatment regimen for cGVHD. One prior regimen must have included systemic corticosteroids at the equivalent prednisone dosing of 1mg/kg/day times 14 days. Patients in whom calcineurin inhibitors or corticosteroids are medically contraindicated may also be eligible for enrollment. Patients who have had stabilization of disease on calcineurin inhibitors or steroids, but in whom these medications cannot be tapered without disease flare are also eligible. Patient must be on stable or tapering immunosuppressive regimen for at least one month. * Age: 4 years of age or older at the time of enrollment. Lower age limit set by lower established age limit norms of ROM scores for measurement criteria. * Life expectancy of greater than 6 months. * Karnofsky greater than or equal to 60 percent. * Patients must be platelet transfusion and growth factor independent at the time of study entry. Patients must have adequate organ and marrow function as defined below. Patients with Gilbert syndrome are excluded from the requirement of a normal bilirubin. (Gilbert syndrome is found in 3-10 percent of the general population, and is characterized by mild, chronic unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia in the absence of liver disease or overt hemolysis). * absolute neutrophil count greater than or equal to 1,000/mcL * platelets greater than or equal to 50,000/mcL * total bilirubin less than 3 times upper limit of normal * aspartate aminotransferase (AST)serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT)serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) less than 5 times upper limit of normal * creatinine age-adjusted within normal limits OR * creatinine clearance greater than 20mL/min/1.73 m\^2 for adults and pediatric patients with body surface area (BSA) greater than 0.97 m\^2 with creatinine levels above institutional normals and greater than or equal to 40 mL/min 1.73 m\^2 for pediatric patients with BSA less than 0.97 m\^2. * Age less than 5 years old Maximum Serum Creatinine 0.8 mg/dL * Age 5 or less than 10 years old Maximum Serum Creatinine 1.0 mg/dL * Age 10 or less than 15 years old Maximum Serum Creatinine 1.2 mg/dL * Age 15 years old or greater Maximum Serum Creatinine 1.5 mg/dL * Normal cardiac function for age as determined by echocardiogram (ECHO) or multi-gated acquisition scan (MUGA) (normal left ventricular (LV) function as measured by ejection fraction or shortening fraction). * The effects of imatinib mesylate on the developing human fetus at the recommended therapeutic dose are unknown. For this reason, women of child-bearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to study entry, for the duration of study participation, and for six months following completion of therapy. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately. * Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document. All patients or their legal guardian (for patients less than 18 years old) must sign an institutional review board (IRB) approved document of informed consent (chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) natural history or any National Cancer Institute (NCI) protocol allowing for screening procedures) prior to performing studies to determine patient eligibility. After confirmation of patient eligibility all patients or their legal guardian must sign the protocol-specific informed consent. Pediatric patients will be included in age appropriate discussions and age appropriate assent will be obtained in accordance with National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines. * Durable Power of Attorney (DPA): All patients 18 years of age at the time of enrollment will be offered the opportunity to assign DPA so that another person can make decisions about their medical care if they become incapacitated or cognitively impaired.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who have had chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy within 4 weeks (6 weeks for nitrosoureas or mitomycin C) prior to entering the study or those who have not recovered from adverse events due to agents administered more than 4 weeks earlier. * Patients may not be receiving any other investigational agents, including extracorporeal photopheresis. Patients may not have received monoclonal antibody therapy within 6 weeks. * Patients with known brain metastases should be excluded from this clinical trial because of their poor prognosis and because they often develop progressive neurologic dysfunction that would confound the evaluation of neurologic and other adverse events. * History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to imatinib mesylate. * Patients receiving any of the following medications or substances that are inhibitors or inducers of P450 3A4 are ineligible. Use of the following medications must be discontinued at least two weeks prior to starting therapy: * Alfuzosin * Aprepitant * Carbamazepine * Clarithromycin * Eletriptan * Erythromycin * Pimozide * St John's Wort * Warfarin * A list of medications and substances known or with the potential to interact with the P450 3A4 isoenzyme is provided in Section 8. Imatinib mesylate is likely to increase the blood level of drugs that are substrates of CYP2C9, CYP2D6 and CYP3A4/5. Close monitoring is warranted when using agents metabolized by these enzymes. Grapefruit juice should not be consumed while on therapy. * Prior treatment with imatinib mesylate or other tyrosine kinase inhibitor after the date of transplant. * Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, pulmonary, hepatic, or other organ dysfunction, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements or compromise the patient's ability to tolerate protocol therapy. * Pregnant women are excluded from this study because imatinib mesylate is an agent with the potential for teratogenic or abortifacient effects. Because there is an unknown but potential risk for adverse events in nursing infants secondary to treatment of the mother with imatinib mesylate, breastfeeding should be discontinued if the mother is treated with imatinib mesylate. * Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients on combination antiretroviral therapy are ineligible because of the potential for pharmacokinetic interactions with imatinib mesylate and the possibility of associated severe immunosuppression. * Patients with active hepatitis C or hepatitis B infection as defined by seropositivity for hepatitis C or hepatitis B (HepBSAg) and elevated transaminases, as GVHD manifestations involving the liver will be indistinguishable and drug-toxicity uninterpretable. * Persistent malignancy, requiring ongoing therapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change in Absolute Range of Motion (ROM) From Baseline to 6 Months6 monthsA change in ROM is 25% or greater from baseline. A partial response required improvement in 25% or more in ROM. Progression required 25% or greater loss of ROM.Patients with negative values in the Table are those who lost ROM. Percent improvement in ROM for 1-3 target joints. For patients with \>1 target joint, the average ROM improvement was calculated. The average percentage change in ROM deficit from baseline to 6 months was obtained based on the number of degrees of ROM change (6 months)/total ROM deficit (baseline) at each joint.
Primary Range of Motion (ROM) Response6 monthsProgressive disease is defined as joint ROM: decrease of \>25% in composite ROM score on 2 consecutive evaluations at least 2 weeks apart, but not greater than 4 weeks apart or steroid pulse: \>1 steroid pulse per 3 month period if administered for sclerotic-type chronic graft versus host disease (ScGVHD). Response is joint ROM: increase of \>25% in composite ROM score. Maximal response is a response with no further improvement over 2 sequential 3-month evaluations. Stable disease does not meet the criteria for progression, response, or maximal response.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Skin Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsBaseline and 6 MonthsTotal skin score was graded by the National Institutes of Health Consensus Criteria. Skin score was calculated by dividing the total score by seven domains (skin, eye, oral, joint, gastrointestinal, hepatic, pulmonary) in men and 8 domains in women (previous domains noted plus gynecologic). Total skin score is a percentage of body surface area (BSA) involvement (range 0-100%). It was calculated from the sum of moveable body surface BSA and non-moveable BSA. Higher numbers = greater body surface area affected.
Total Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsBaseline and 6 monthsThe provider global rating is a physician impression of severity of cGVHD symptoms from a scale of zero (no symptoms) to 10 (most severe GVHD symptoms possible).
Average Percentage Change in Range of Motion (ROM) Deficit6 monthsOne or more joints were assessed for ROM deficit by a physiatrist with expertise in graft versus host disease and joint ROM.
Change in Immunosuppression6 monthsChange in immunosuppression was defined by an increase or decrease in steroid use form baseline.
Lung Function Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsBaseline and 6 MonthsLung function was graded by the National Institutes of Health Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease organ response criteria. The Lung function score = forced expiratory volume 1 (FEV1) score + carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) score, with a possible range of 2 (better outcome)-12 (worst outcome). The percent predicted FEV1 and DLCO (adjusted for hematocrit but not alveolar volume) should be converted to a numeric score as follows: \>80% =1; 70-79% = 2; 60-69% = 3; 50-59% = 4; 40-49% = 5; \<40% = 6.
Number of Participants With Adverse EventsDate treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately, 41 months, 27 daysHere is the number of participants with serious and non-serious adverse events assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0). A non-serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence. A serious adverse event is an adverse event or suspected adverse reaction that results in death, a life-threatening adverse drug experience, hospitalization, disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect or important medical events that jeopardize the patient or subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previous outcomes mentioned.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHD
Cohort 1 - Pts 1-8:Adults: 400mg imatinib mesylate daily; Children: 260mg/m\^2 daily (400mg maximum), followed by dose de-escalation for adverse events. Cohort 2 - Pts 9-20:Adults - 100 mg oral dose daily (increase to 200 mg daily after 28 days if well tolerated). Children - 65 mg/m\^2 oral dose daily (increase to 130 mg/m\^2 daily after 28 days if well tolerated)
20
Total20

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1
Overall StudyRecurrent malignancy1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject4

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicImatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHD
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
2 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
18 Participants
Age, Continuous42.59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.49
Assessable Joints at Baseline
Patient 1
3 joints
Assessable Joints at Baseline
Patient 10
3 joints
Assessable Joints at Baseline
Patient 11
3 joints
Assessable Joints at Baseline
Patient 12
3 joints
Assessable Joints at Baseline
*Patient 13
3 joints
Assessable Joints at Baseline
Patient 14
3 joints
Assessable Joints at Baseline
Patient 15
3 joints
Assessable Joints at Baseline
Patient 16
1 joints
Assessable Joints at Baseline
Patient 17
3 joints
Assessable Joints at Baseline
Patient 18
3 joints
Assessable Joints at Baseline
Patient 19
3 joints
Assessable Joints at Baseline
Patient 2
3 joints
Assessable Joints at Baseline
Patient 20
3 joints
Assessable Joints at Baseline
Patient 3
2 joints
Assessable Joints at Baseline
Patient 4
3 joints
Assessable Joints at Baseline
Patient 5
3 joints
Assessable Joints at Baseline
Patient 6
3 joints
Assessable Joints at Baseline
Patient 7
3 joints
Assessable Joints at Baseline
Patient 8
3 joints
Assessable Joints at Baseline
Patient 9
3 joints
Average National Institutes of Health Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Score at Baseline
Patient 1
1.28 scores on a scale
Average National Institutes of Health Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Score at Baseline
Patient 10
1.43 scores on a scale
Average National Institutes of Health Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Score at Baseline
Patient 11
1.75 scores on a scale
Average National Institutes of Health Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Score at Baseline
Patient 12
1.43 scores on a scale
Average National Institutes of Health Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Score at Baseline
Patient 13
1.38 scores on a scale
Average National Institutes of Health Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Score at Baseline
Patient 14
1.29 scores on a scale
Average National Institutes of Health Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Score at Baseline
Patient 15
1.43 scores on a scale
Average National Institutes of Health Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Score at Baseline
Patient 16
.86 scores on a scale
Average National Institutes of Health Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Score at Baseline
Patient 17
1.13 scores on a scale
Average National Institutes of Health Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Score at Baseline
Patient 18
1.57 scores on a scale
Average National Institutes of Health Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Score at Baseline
Patient 19
1.14 scores on a scale
Average National Institutes of Health Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Score at Baseline
Patient 2
1.14 scores on a scale
Average National Institutes of Health Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Score at Baseline
Patient 20
2.00 scores on a scale
Average National Institutes of Health Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Score at Baseline
Patient 3
.75 scores on a scale
Average National Institutes of Health Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Score at Baseline
Patient 4
1.0 scores on a scale
Average National Institutes of Health Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Score at Baseline
Patient 5
1.48 scores on a scale
Average National Institutes of Health Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Score at Baseline
Patient 6
1.86 scores on a scale
Average National Institutes of Health Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Score at Baseline
Patient 7
1.90 scores on a scale
Average National Institutes of Health Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Score at Baseline
Patient 8
1.57 scores on a scale
Average National Institutes of Health Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Score at Baseline
Patient 9
1.71 scores on a scale
Baseline Range of Motion (ROM) Percent (of Predicted)
Patient 1
37 ROM Percent of Predicted
Baseline Range of Motion (ROM) Percent (of Predicted)
Patient 10
-7 ROM Percent of Predicted
Baseline Range of Motion (ROM) Percent (of Predicted)
Patient 11
56 ROM Percent of Predicted
Baseline Range of Motion (ROM) Percent (of Predicted)
Patient 12
37 ROM Percent of Predicted
Baseline Range of Motion (ROM) Percent (of Predicted)
Patient 13
27 ROM Percent of Predicted
Baseline Range of Motion (ROM) Percent (of Predicted)
Patient 14
32 ROM Percent of Predicted
Baseline Range of Motion (ROM) Percent (of Predicted)
Patient 15
22 ROM Percent of Predicted
Baseline Range of Motion (ROM) Percent (of Predicted)
Patient 16
71 ROM Percent of Predicted
Baseline Range of Motion (ROM) Percent (of Predicted)
Patient 17
64 ROM Percent of Predicted
Baseline Range of Motion (ROM) Percent (of Predicted)
Patient 18
54 ROM Percent of Predicted
Baseline Range of Motion (ROM) Percent (of Predicted)
Patient 19
33 ROM Percent of Predicted
Baseline Range of Motion (ROM) Percent (of Predicted)
Patient 2
56 ROM Percent of Predicted
Baseline Range of Motion (ROM) Percent (of Predicted)
Patient 20
-5 ROM Percent of Predicted
Baseline Range of Motion (ROM) Percent (of Predicted)
Patient 3
73 ROM Percent of Predicted
Baseline Range of Motion (ROM) Percent (of Predicted)
Patient 4
7 ROM Percent of Predicted
Baseline Range of Motion (ROM) Percent (of Predicted)
Patient 5
34 ROM Percent of Predicted
Baseline Range of Motion (ROM) Percent (of Predicted)
Patient 6
47 ROM Percent of Predicted
Baseline Range of Motion (ROM) Percent (of Predicted)
Patient 7
61 ROM Percent of Predicted
Baseline Range of Motion (ROM) Percent (of Predicted)
Patient 8
35 ROM Percent of Predicted
Baseline Range of Motion (ROM) Percent (of Predicted)
Patient 9
42 ROM Percent of Predicted
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) category
Classic
95 percentage of participants
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) category
Late acute
0 percentage of participants
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) category
Overlap
5 percentage of participants
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease presentation
De novo
30 Percentage of participants
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease presentation
Progressive
50 Percentage of participants
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease presentation
Quiescent
20 Percentage of participants
Concomitant Immunosuppressive Medication (ISM)
MPred/MTX
1 Participants
Concomitant Immunosuppressive Medication (ISM)
MPred/tacro/MMF
1 Participants
Concomitant Immunosuppressive Medication (ISM)
MPred/tacro/siro/MMF
1 Participants
Concomitant Immunosuppressive Medication (ISM)
None
1 Participants
Concomitant Immunosuppressive Medication (ISM)
Pred
1 Participants
Concomitant Immunosuppressive Medication (ISM)
Pred/MMF
1 Participants
Concomitant Immunosuppressive Medication (ISM)
Pred/siro
2 Participants
Concomitant Immunosuppressive Medication (ISM)
Pred/siro/MMF
2 Participants
Concomitant Immunosuppressive Medication (ISM)
Pred/siro/tacro
1 Participants
Concomitant Immunosuppressive Medication (ISM)
Pred/tacro
2 Participants
Concomitant Immunosuppressive Medication (ISM)
Pred/tacro/siro
1 Participants
Concomitant Immunosuppressive Medication (ISM)
Siro
1 Participants
Concomitant Immunosuppressive Medication (ISM)
Siro/MMF
1 Participants
Concomitant Immunosuppressive Medication (ISM)
Tacro
1 Participants
Concomitant Immunosuppressive Medication (ISM)
Tacro/MMF
3 Participants
Donor Match (6/6)90 Percentage of participants
Donor Source
Bone marrow
10 Percentage of participants
Donor Source
Cord
0 Percentage of participants
Donor Source
Peripheral blood
90 Percentage of participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
18 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Global National Institutes of Health Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) score
Mild (1)
0 Percentage of participants
Global National Institutes of Health Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) score
Moderate (2)
0 Percentage of participants
Global National Institutes of Health Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) score
Severe (3)
100 Percentage of participants
Measure of Number of Organs with Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
Patient 1
5 affected organs
Measure of Number of Organs with Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
Patient 10
5 affected organs
Measure of Number of Organs with Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
Patient 11
7 affected organs
Measure of Number of Organs with Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
Patient 12
6 affected organs
Measure of Number of Organs with Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
Patient 13
6 affected organs
Measure of Number of Organs with Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
Patient 14
5 affected organs
Measure of Number of Organs with Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
Patient 15
6 affected organs
Measure of Number of Organs with Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
Patient 16
2 affected organs
Measure of Number of Organs with Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
Patient 17
4 affected organs
Measure of Number of Organs with Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
Patient 18
4 affected organs
Measure of Number of Organs with Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
Patient 19
4 affected organs
Measure of Number of Organs with Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
Patient 2
4 affected organs
Measure of Number of Organs with Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
Patient 20
7 affected organs
Measure of Number of Organs with Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
Patient 3
3 affected organs
Measure of Number of Organs with Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
Patient 4
4 affected organs
Measure of Number of Organs with Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
Patient 5
6 affected organs
Measure of Number of Organs with Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
Patient 6
7 affected organs
Measure of Number of Organs with Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
Patient 7
7 affected organs
Measure of Number of Organs with Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
Patient 8
6 affected organs
Measure of Number of Organs with Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
Patient 9
7 affected organs
Months from Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) diagnosis39.85 Months
Months from transplant55.4 Months
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Moveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 1
57.15 Percent BSA moveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Moveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 10
0 Percent BSA moveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Moveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 11
82.08 Percent BSA moveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Moveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 12
12.6 Percent BSA moveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Moveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 13
1.8 Percent BSA moveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Moveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 14
5.4 Percent BSA moveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Moveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 15
49.77 Percent BSA moveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Moveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 16
0 Percent BSA moveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Moveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 17
84.24 Percent BSA moveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Moveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 18
15.84 Percent BSA moveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Moveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 19
9.45 Percent BSA moveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Moveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 2
2.7 Percent BSA moveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Moveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 20
0 Percent BSA moveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Moveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 3
6.3 Percent BSA moveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Moveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 4
0.18 Percent BSA moveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Moveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 5
8.1 Percent BSA moveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Moveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 6
59.4 Percent BSA moveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Moveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 7
29.7 Percent BSA moveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Moveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 8
15.3 Percent BSA moveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Moveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 9
3.33 Percent BSA moveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Nonmoveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 1
7.56 Percent BSA nonmoveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Nonmoveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 10
8.28 Percent BSA nonmoveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Nonmoveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 11
0 Percent BSA nonmoveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Nonmoveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 12
8.64 Percent BSA nonmoveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Nonmoveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 13
71.1 Percent BSA nonmoveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Nonmoveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 14
31.5 Percent BSA nonmoveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Nonmoveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 15
10.8 Percent BSA nonmoveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Nonmoveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 16
9.54 Percent BSA nonmoveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Nonmoveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 17
0 Percent BSA nonmoveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Nonmoveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 18
4.5 Percent BSA nonmoveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Nonmoveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 19
11.7 Percent BSA nonmoveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Nonmoveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 2
56.7 Percent BSA nonmoveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Nonmoveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 20
23.4 Percent BSA nonmoveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Nonmoveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 3
36.9 Percent BSA nonmoveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Nonmoveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 4
19.98 Percent BSA nonmoveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Nonmoveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 5
77.94 Percent BSA nonmoveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Nonmoveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 6
0 Percent BSA nonmoveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Nonmoveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 7
32.4 Percent BSA nonmoveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Nonmoveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 8
36.9 Percent BSA nonmoveable sclerosis
Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Nonmoveable Sclerosis at Baseline
Patient 9
9 Percent BSA nonmoveable sclerosis
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
17 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change in Absolute Range of Motion (ROM) From Baseline to 6 Months

A change in ROM is 25% or greater from baseline. A partial response required improvement in 25% or more in ROM. Progression required 25% or greater loss of ROM.Patients with negative values in the Table are those who lost ROM. Percent improvement in ROM for 1-3 target joints. For patients with \>1 target joint, the average ROM improvement was calculated. The average percentage change in ROM deficit from baseline to 6 months was obtained based on the number of degrees of ROM change (6 months)/total ROM deficit (baseline) at each joint.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDPercent Change in Absolute Range of Motion (ROM) From Baseline to 6 MonthsPt 2 6mo response% change in deficit from baseline94 Percent change from baseline
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDPercent Change in Absolute Range of Motion (ROM) From Baseline to 6 MonthsPt 7 6mo response% change in deficit from baseline35 Percent change from baseline
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDPercent Change in Absolute Range of Motion (ROM) From Baseline to 6 MonthsPt 8 6mo response% change in deficit from baseline16 Percent change from baseline
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDPercent Change in Absolute Range of Motion (ROM) From Baseline to 6 MonthsPt10 6mo response% change in deficit from baseline21 Percent change from baseline
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDPercent Change in Absolute Range of Motion (ROM) From Baseline to 6 MonthsPt12 6mo response% change in deficit from baseline16 Percent change from baseline
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDPercent Change in Absolute Range of Motion (ROM) From Baseline to 6 MonthsPt13 6mo response% change in deficit from baseline61 Percent change from baseline
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDPercent Change in Absolute Range of Motion (ROM) From Baseline to 6 MonthsPt14 6mo response% change in deficit from baseline27 Percent change from baseline
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDPercent Change in Absolute Range of Motion (ROM) From Baseline to 6 MonthsPt15 6mo response% change in deficit from baseline22 Percent change from baseline
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDPercent Change in Absolute Range of Motion (ROM) From Baseline to 6 MonthsPt16 6mo response% change in deficit from baseline3 Percent change from baseline
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDPercent Change in Absolute Range of Motion (ROM) From Baseline to 6 MonthsPt17 6mo response% change in deficit from baseline-25 Percent change from baseline
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDPercent Change in Absolute Range of Motion (ROM) From Baseline to 6 MonthsPt18 6mo response% change in deficit from baseline-2 Percent change from baseline
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDPercent Change in Absolute Range of Motion (ROM) From Baseline to 6 MonthsPt19 6mo response% change in deficit from baseline31 Percent change from baseline
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDPercent Change in Absolute Range of Motion (ROM) From Baseline to 6 MonthsPt20 6mo response% change in deficit from baseline15 Percent change from baseline
Primary

Primary Range of Motion (ROM) Response

Progressive disease is defined as joint ROM: decrease of \>25% in composite ROM score on 2 consecutive evaluations at least 2 weeks apart, but not greater than 4 weeks apart or steroid pulse: \>1 steroid pulse per 3 month period if administered for sclerotic-type chronic graft versus host disease (ScGVHD). Response is joint ROM: increase of \>25% in composite ROM score. Maximal response is a response with no further improvement over 2 sequential 3-month evaluations. Stable disease does not meet the criteria for progression, response, or maximal response.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDPrimary Range of Motion (ROM) ResponsePartial Response5 participants
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDPrimary Range of Motion (ROM) ResponseStable Disease7 participants
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDPrimary Range of Motion (ROM) ResponseProgressive Disease2 participants
Secondary

Average Percentage Change in Range of Motion (ROM) Deficit

One or more joints were assessed for ROM deficit by a physiatrist with expertise in graft versus host disease and joint ROM.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: This outcome is the average percentage change in ROM deficit among 13 evaluable patients based on each patients baseline range of motion deficit compared to his/her ROM deficit at 6 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDAverage Percentage Change in Range of Motion (ROM) Deficit24.2 Percent change
p-value: 0.011Paired t-test
Secondary

Change in Immunosuppression

Change in immunosuppression was defined by an increase or decrease in steroid use form baseline.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Pred:prednisone; tacro:tacrolimus; MPred:methylprednisolone; siro:sirolimus; and MMF:mycophenolate mofetil

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDChange in Immunosuppression↓ Pred 20 mg everyday (qd )to 5 mg every other day1 participants
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDChange in Immunosuppression↓ MPred 16 mg every other day(qod) to 4 mg qod1 participants
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDChange in Immunosuppression↓ Pred:24mg every day(qd) to 20mg qd1 participants
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDChange in ImmunosuppressionNo change5 participants
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDChange in Immunosuppression↓ Tacro 2mg every am 1.5mg every pm to .5mg bid1 participants
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDChange in ImmunosuppressionPred↓ 25mg qd to 15mg qd;Tacro↓ 2mg bid to 1mg bid1 participants
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDChange in ImmunosuppressionPred↓ 2.5mg qd to 2.5mg every other day1 participants
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDChange in Immunosuppression↓ Siro:2mg qd to 1 mg qd1 participants
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDChange in ImmunosuppressionPred wean then ↑ 10 12.5mg bid;Tacro↑1.0 to 1.5bid1 participants
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDChange in ImmunosuppressionMMF↓ 1g/bid to discontinued1 participants
Secondary

Lung Function Score at Baseline and 6 Months

Lung function was graded by the National Institutes of Health Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease organ response criteria. The Lung function score = forced expiratory volume 1 (FEV1) score + carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) score, with a possible range of 2 (better outcome)-12 (worst outcome). The percent predicted FEV1 and DLCO (adjusted for hematocrit but not alveolar volume) should be converted to a numeric score as follows: \>80% =1; 70-79% = 2; 60-69% = 3; 50-59% = 4; 40-49% = 5; \<40% = 6.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 Months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDLung Function Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #2 at Baseline2 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDLung Function Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #2 at 6 Months2 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDLung Function Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #3 at Baseline9 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDLung Function Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #3 at 6 MonthsNA units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDLung Function Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #7 at Baseline3 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDLung Function Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #7 at 6 Months8 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDLung Function Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #8 at Baseline5 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDLung Function Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #8 at 6 Months6 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDLung Function Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #12 at 6 Months5 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDLung Function Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #10 at Baseline3 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDLung Function Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #10 at 6 Months3 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDLung Function Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #12 at Baseline4 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDLung Function Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #13 at Baseline4 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDLung Function Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #13 at 6 Months4 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDLung Function Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #14 at Baseline5 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDLung Function Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #14 at 6 Months5 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDLung Function Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 15 at Baseline7 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDLung Function Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #15 at 6 Months6 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDLung Function Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #16 at Baseline3 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDLung Function Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #16 at 6 Months2 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDLung Function Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #17 at Baseline5 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDLung Function Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #17 at 6 months6 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDLung Function Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #18 at Baseline8 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDLung Function Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #18 at 6 Months8 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDLung Function Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #19 at Baseline9 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDLung Function Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #19 at 6 Months9 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDLung Function Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #20 at Baseline2 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDLung Function Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #20 at 6 Months2 units on a scale
p-value: 0.29t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Here is the number of participants with serious and non-serious adverse events assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0). A non-serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence. A serious adverse event is an adverse event or suspected adverse reaction that results in death, a life-threatening adverse drug experience, hospitalization, disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect or important medical events that jeopardize the patient or subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previous outcomes mentioned.

Time frame: Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately, 41 months, 27 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDNumber of Participants With Adverse Events20 Participants
Secondary

Total Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 Months

The provider global rating is a physician impression of severity of cGVHD symptoms from a scale of zero (no symptoms) to 10 (most severe GVHD symptoms possible).

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #8 at Baseline6 Provider Global Rating Score
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #2 at Baseline5 Provider Global Rating Score
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #2 at 6 Months4 Provider Global Rating Score
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #3 at Baseline3 Provider Global Rating Score
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #3 at 6 MonthsNA Provider Global Rating Score
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #7 at Baseline6 Provider Global Rating Score
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #7 at 6 Months8 Provider Global Rating Score
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #8 at 6 Months7 Provider Global Rating Score
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #10 at Baseline5 Provider Global Rating Score
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #10 at 6 Months4 Provider Global Rating Score
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #12 at Baseline6 Provider Global Rating Score
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #12 at 6 Months7 Provider Global Rating Score
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #13 at Baseline6 Provider Global Rating Score
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #13 at 6 Months4 Provider Global Rating Score
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #14 at Baseline7 Provider Global Rating Score
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #14 at 6 Months6 Provider Global Rating Score
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 15 at Baseline7 Provider Global Rating Score
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #15 at 6 Months6 Provider Global Rating Score
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #16 at Baseline5 Provider Global Rating Score
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #16 at 6 Months4 Provider Global Rating Score
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #17 at Baseline6 Provider Global Rating Score
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #17 at 6 months8 Provider Global Rating Score
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #18 at Baseline8 Provider Global Rating Score
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #18 at 6 Months8 Provider Global Rating Score
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #19 at Baseline8 Provider Global Rating Score
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #19 at 6 Months5 Provider Global Rating Score
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #20 at Baseline8 Provider Global Rating Score
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient #20 at 6 Months8 Provider Global Rating Score
p-value: 0.47t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Total Skin Score at Baseline and 6 Months

Total skin score was graded by the National Institutes of Health Consensus Criteria. Skin score was calculated by dividing the total score by seven domains (skin, eye, oral, joint, gastrointestinal, hepatic, pulmonary) in men and 8 domains in women (previous domains noted plus gynecologic). Total skin score is a percentage of body surface area (BSA) involvement (range 0-100%). It was calculated from the sum of moveable body surface BSA and non-moveable BSA. Higher numbers = greater body surface area affected.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 Months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Skin Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 2 - Baseline66.6 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Skin Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 2 - 6 months54 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Skin Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 3 - Baseline43.38 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Skin Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 3 - 6 monthsNA units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Skin Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 7 - Baseline66.24 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Skin Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 7 - 6 months55.53 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Skin Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 8 - Baseline53.1 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Skin Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 8 - 6 months55.26 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Skin Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 10 - Baseline10.8 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Skin Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 10 - 6 months6.12 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Skin Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 12 - Baseline21.24 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Skin Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 12 - 6 months30.06 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Skin Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 13 - Baseline79.2 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Skin Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 13 - 6 months62.28 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Skin Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 14 - Baseline39.96 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Skin Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 14 - 6 months40.5 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Skin Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 15 - Baseline71.46 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Skin Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 15 - 6 months61.83 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Skin Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 16 - Baseline9.54 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Skin Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 16 - 6 months8.1 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Skin Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 17 - Baseline84.96 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Skin Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 17 - 6 months85.11 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Skin Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 18 - Baseline26.64 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Skin Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 18 - 6 months24.3 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Skin Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 19 - Baseline21.15 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Skin Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 19 - 6 months37.8 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Skin Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 20 - Baseline23.4 units on a scale
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHDTotal Skin Score at Baseline and 6 MonthsPatient # 20 - 6 months25.2 units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026