Skip to content

Evaluate the Maintenance of Effect After Long-term Treatment With Sativex® in Subjects With Symptoms of Spasticity Due to Multiple Sclerosis

A Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group, Randomised Withdrawal Study of Subjects With Symptoms of Spasticity Due to Multiple Sclerosis Who Are Receiving Long-term Sativex®.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00702468
Enrollment
36
Registered
2008-06-20
Start date
2007-11-30
Completion date
2009-01-31
Last updated
2023-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis, Spasticity

Keywords

Spasticity, Multiple Sclerosis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the maintenance of effect after long-term treatment with Sativex® in subjects with symptoms of spasticity due to Multiple Sclerosis (MS) who have been receiving long-term benefit from treatment with Sativex®.

Detailed description

This five week (one week baseline and four weeks randomised treatment period), multi-centre, placebo controlled, parallel group, randomized withdrawal study will evaluate the maintenance of effect after long-term treatment with Sativex® in subjects with symptoms of spasticity due to MS who have been receiving long-term benefit from treatment with Sativex®. Subjects will be selected from the Supply of Unlicensed Sativex® (SUS) or named patient supply programmes and must have been receiving Sativex® for at least 12 weeks prior to study entry. Following informed consent and screening, eligible subjects will enter the study (Visit 1, Day 1) and commence a seven day open label baseline period, before returning for a randomisation visit (Visit 2, Day 7), at which point they are randomised to receive either Sativex® or placebo (randomised withdrawal period). Subjects will return to the centre for an end of study visit at week five (Visit 3, Day 35) or earlier if they withdraw from treatment. Spasticity and sleep disruption review and dosing diaries will be completed each day from the start of the baseline period until completion or withdrawal.

Interventions

DRUGSativex

containing delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)(27 mg/ml):cannabidiol (CBD)(25 mg/ml), in ethanol:propylene glycol (50:50) excipients, with peppermint oil (0.05%) flavouring. Dose: 100 µl oromucosal spray, as required for symptom relief

DRUGPlacebo

Contains no active drug and is delivered in 100 microlitre actuations by a pump action oromucosal spray

Sponsors

Jazz Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Willing and able to give written informed consent for participation in the study. * Male or female, aged 18 years or above. * Subject is able (in the investigator's opinion) and willing to comply with all study requirements. * Diagnosed with MS. * Received Sativex for the relief of spasticity for at least 12 weeks prior to screening and willing to stop dosing with their own supply for the duration of the study. * Judged to have been receiving benefit from and shown tolerability to Sativex, in the investigators' and subjects' opinion. * Takes a minimum dose of Sativex of two sprays per day. * If receiving disease-modifying medications, these must have been at a stable dose for at least three months prior to screening, and willing to maintain this for the duration of the study. * Has had a stable regimen for at least 30 days prior to study entry, for all medications and non-pharmacological therapies that may have an affect on spasticity; and willing to maintain this for the duration of the study (N.B. This should be three months prior to study entry, in the case of Interferon therapy). * Willing to allow his or her general practitioner and consultant, if appropriate, to be notified of participation in the study. * Willing for his or her name to be notified to the responsible authorities for participation in this study

Exclusion criteria

* Has any concomitant disease or disorder that has symptoms of spasticity or that may influence the subject's level of spasticity. * Unable to rate their level of spasticity or distinguish it from other MS symptoms. * Currently receiving a prohibited medication (Botulinum Toxin, or Acomplia (Rimonabant), and unwilling to stop or comply for the duration of the study or had received said medication/ therapy within three months prior to the screening visit. * Unwilling to stop their own Sativex treatment for the duration of the study. * Any known or suspected immediate family history of schizophrenia, other psychotic illness, severe personality disorder or other significant psychiatric disorder other than depression associated with their underlying condition. * Has evidence of cardiomyopathy. * Has experienced myocardial infarction or clinically relevant cardiac dysfunction within the last 12 months or has a cardiac disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator would put the subject at risk of a clinically relevant arrhythmia or myocardial infarction. * Has a QT interval of \> 450 ms (males) or \> 470 ms (females) at Visit 1. * Has a secondary or tertiary atrioventricular (AV) block or sinus bradycardia (HR \<50bpm unless physiological) or sinus tachycardia (HR\>110bpm) at Visit 1. * Has a diastolic blood pressure of \<50 mmHg or \>105 mmHg (when measured in a sitting position at rest for five minutes) prior to randomisation * Has impaired renal function e.g. creatinine clearance is lower than 50ml/min at Visit 1 and is indicative of renal impairment. * Has significantly impaired hepatic function, at Visit 1, in the investigator's opinion. * Female subjects of child bearing potential and male subjects whose partner is of child bearing potential, unless willing to ensure that they or their partner use effective contraception during the study and for three months thereafter. * Female subject who is pregnant, lactating or planning pregnancy during the course of the study and for three months thereafter. * Subjects who have received any IMP within the 12 weeks before Visit 1. * Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the investigator, may either put the subject at risk because of participation in the study, may influence the result of the study, or the subject's ability to participate in the study. * Following a physical examination, the subject has any abnormalities that, in the opinion of the investigator, would prevent them from safely participating in the study. * Travel outside the UK planned during the study. * Unwilling to abstain from donation of blood during the study. * Subjects previously randomised into this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Subjects Who Experience Treatment Failure.Week 1- Week 5The time to treatment failure was calculated as the number of days from the first day of treatment up to the day of treatment failure. The day of treatment failure was the earliest of:the day of premature cessation of study medication;the first day of the longest period, ending on the last day of treatment, where the mean spasticity NRS had increased by at least 20% and at least 1 unit from the treatment baseline; the day of a clinically relevant increase in anti-spasticity or disease modifying medication. The number of subjects who failed treatment were calculated.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Modified Ashworth Scale.Day 7 to Day 28The Modified Ashworth Scale was completed at baseline and at the end of treatment at approximately the same time of day. All 20 muscle groups were assessed for spasticity (using a 0=no increase in muscle tone to 4 scale=affected part rigid in flexion or extensions), to result in a total score out of 80. The higher the score the worse the spasticity is. The change from baseline to end of study was assessed. The higher the score the better
Change in Motricity IndexWeek 2 and Week 5The Motricity Index involves assessing three movements in both the arms and the legs. In the arm the three movements are; pinch grip, elbow flexion and shoulder abduction and the three leg movements are, ankle dorsiflexion, knee extension and hip flexion. The total arm/leg score is then the addition of the score for the three arm/leg movements. One point is then added to each limb score so that the maximum score is 100 points. The higher the score the better the limb movement.
Timed 10-metre Walk.Week 2 and Week 5The time taken to travel 10 metres.
Change in Mean Daily Spasticity Severity as Measured on a Spasticity Severity 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).Baseline (Week 1) to Week 5Spasticity NRS was completed daily by answering the following question: On a scale of '0 to 10' please indicate the average level of your spasticity over the last 24 hours with the anchors: 0 = 'no spasticity' and 10 = 'worst possible spasticity'. The change in mean spasticity severity NRS from baseline to end of study (last seven days)was calculated. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement in spasticity.
Subject Global Impressions of Change.Day 35At baseline subjects will write a brief description of their spasticity caused by MS and how it affects them emotionally, physically and their ability to function with day to day activities. This will be used to aid their memory before they answer the following question which is rated on a seven-point scale. Please assess the change in your spasticity due to MS since immediately before receiving the first course of study treatment (Baseline) using the scale below The markers are: Very much worse, Much worse, Minimally worse, No change, Minimally better, Much better, Very much better.
Carer Global Impressions of Change for Functional AbilityDay 35The main carer will be asked to assess the change in the subject's condition at the end of the study (completion or withdrawal). It consists of 2 question which is rated on a seven-point scale: Very much worse, Much worse, Minimally worse, No change, Minimally better, Much better, Very much better. The carer will be asked since visit 2 (baseline): How has the subject's general functional abilities changed? How has the subject's ease of transfer? Not all subjects had carers; a total of 18 subjects from each treatment, of which 10 from Sativex and 14 from placebo completed it.
Carer Global Impressions of Change for Ease of TransferDay 35The main carer will be asked to assess the change in the subject's condition at the end of the study (completion or withdrawal). It consists of 2 question which is rated on a seven-point scale: Very much worse, Much worse, Minimally worse, No change, Minimally better, Much better, Very much better. The carer will be asked since visit 2 (baseline): How has the subject's general functional abilities changed? How has the subject's ease of transfer? Not all subjects had carers; a total of 18 subjects from each treatment, of which 10 from Sativex and 14 from placebo completed it.
Daily Sleep Disruption NRSWeek 1- Week 5Subjects will be asked: On a scale of 0-10 please indicate how your spasticity disrupted your sleep last night with the anchors 0 = 'did not disrupt sleep', 10 = 'completely disrupted (unable to sleep at all)'.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sativex
Subjects received study medication delivered in 100 microlitre actuations by a pump action oromucosal spray. Maximum permitted dose of eight actuations in any three hour period and 48 actuations (delat9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)130 mg: 27 mg/ml: cannabidiol (CBD) 120 mg) in 24 hours.
18
Placebo
Subjects received placebo delivered in 100 microlitre actuations by a pump action oromucosal spray. Maximum permitted dose of eight actuations in any three hour period and 48 actuations in 24 hours.
18
Total36

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSativexPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous59.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.97
54.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.42
57.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.94
Baseline Spasticity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score3.60 Score on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.67
4.13 Score on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.23
3.87 Score on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.96
Duration of Multiple Sclerosis (MS)17.84 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.48
15.05 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.07
16.44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.29
Duration of Spasticity14.38 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
11.01 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.25
12.69 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.14
Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score7.0 Score on scale
FULL_RANGE 1.67
7.0 Score on scale
FULL_RANGE 2.23
7.0 Score on scale
FULL_RANGE 1.96
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants12 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants6 Participants15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 1814 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 180 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Subjects Who Experience Treatment Failure.

The time to treatment failure was calculated as the number of days from the first day of treatment up to the day of treatment failure. The day of treatment failure was the earliest of:the day of premature cessation of study medication;the first day of the longest period, ending on the last day of treatment, where the mean spasticity NRS had increased by at least 20% and at least 1 unit from the treatment baseline; the day of a clinically relevant increase in anti-spasticity or disease modifying medication. The number of subjects who failed treatment were calculated.

Time frame: Week 1- Week 5

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SativexNumber of Subjects Who Experience Treatment Failure.8 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Who Experience Treatment Failure.17 Participants
p-value: 0.01390% CI: [0.162, 0.691]Chi-squared
Secondary

Carer Global Impressions of Change for Ease of Transfer

The main carer will be asked to assess the change in the subject's condition at the end of the study (completion or withdrawal). It consists of 2 question which is rated on a seven-point scale: Very much worse, Much worse, Minimally worse, No change, Minimally better, Much better, Very much better. The carer will be asked since visit 2 (baseline): How has the subject's general functional abilities changed? How has the subject's ease of transfer? Not all subjects had carers; a total of 18 subjects from each treatment, of which 10 from Sativex and 14 from placebo completed it.

Time frame: Day 35

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SativexCarer Global Impressions of Change for Ease of TransferMinimally Better0 paticipants
SativexCarer Global Impressions of Change for Ease of TransferMinimally Worse5 paticipants
SativexCarer Global Impressions of Change for Ease of TransferMuch Better0 paticipants
SativexCarer Global Impressions of Change for Ease of TransferMuch Worse2 paticipants
SativexCarer Global Impressions of Change for Ease of TransferNo Change3 paticipants
SativexCarer Global Impressions of Change for Ease of TransferVery Much Worse0 paticipants
SativexCarer Global Impressions of Change for Ease of TransferVery Much Better0 paticipants
PlaceboCarer Global Impressions of Change for Ease of TransferVery Much Worse1 paticipants
PlaceboCarer Global Impressions of Change for Ease of TransferVery Much Better0 paticipants
PlaceboCarer Global Impressions of Change for Ease of TransferMuch Better0 paticipants
PlaceboCarer Global Impressions of Change for Ease of TransferMinimally Better0 paticipants
PlaceboCarer Global Impressions of Change for Ease of TransferNo Change2 paticipants
PlaceboCarer Global Impressions of Change for Ease of TransferMinimally Worse5 paticipants
PlaceboCarer Global Impressions of Change for Ease of TransferMuch Worse6 paticipants
p-value: 0.115190% CI: [0.948, 13.718]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Carer Global Impressions of Change for Functional Ability

The main carer will be asked to assess the change in the subject's condition at the end of the study (completion or withdrawal). It consists of 2 question which is rated on a seven-point scale: Very much worse, Much worse, Minimally worse, No change, Minimally better, Much better, Very much better. The carer will be asked since visit 2 (baseline): How has the subject's general functional abilities changed? How has the subject's ease of transfer? Not all subjects had carers; a total of 18 subjects from each treatment, of which 10 from Sativex and 14 from placebo completed it.

Time frame: Day 35

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SativexCarer Global Impressions of Change for Functional AbilityMinimally Better0 paticipants
SativexCarer Global Impressions of Change for Functional AbilityMinimally Worse5 paticipants
SativexCarer Global Impressions of Change for Functional AbilityMuch Better0 paticipants
SativexCarer Global Impressions of Change for Functional AbilityMuch Worse2 paticipants
SativexCarer Global Impressions of Change for Functional AbilityNo Change3 paticipants
SativexCarer Global Impressions of Change for Functional AbilityVery Much Worse0 paticipants
SativexCarer Global Impressions of Change for Functional AbilityVery Much Better0 paticipants
PlaceboCarer Global Impressions of Change for Functional AbilityVery Much Worse2 paticipants
PlaceboCarer Global Impressions of Change for Functional AbilityVery Much Better0 paticipants
PlaceboCarer Global Impressions of Change for Functional AbilityMuch Better0 paticipants
PlaceboCarer Global Impressions of Change for Functional AbilityMinimally Better0 paticipants
PlaceboCarer Global Impressions of Change for Functional AbilityNo Change0 paticipants
PlaceboCarer Global Impressions of Change for Functional AbilityMinimally Worse3 paticipants
PlaceboCarer Global Impressions of Change for Functional AbilityMuch Worse9 paticipants
p-value: 0.001190% CI: [3.942, 118.773]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Change in Mean Daily Spasticity Severity as Measured on a Spasticity Severity 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).

Spasticity NRS was completed daily by answering the following question: On a scale of '0 to 10' please indicate the average level of your spasticity over the last 24 hours with the anchors: 0 = 'no spasticity' and 10 = 'worst possible spasticity'. The change in mean spasticity severity NRS from baseline to end of study (last seven days)was calculated. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement in spasticity.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 1) to Week 5

Population: It is important to note that 17 of the placebo subjects withdrew from the study early. All subjects were accounted for in this analysis by use of a last-observation-carried-forward approach.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SativexChange in Mean Daily Spasticity Severity as Measured on a Spasticity Severity 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).1.11 points on scaleStandard Deviation 1.92
PlaceboChange in Mean Daily Spasticity Severity as Measured on a Spasticity Severity 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).1.10 points on scaleStandard Deviation 1.91
p-value: 0.7290% CI: [-1.22, 0.79]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Modified Ashworth Scale.

The Modified Ashworth Scale was completed at baseline and at the end of treatment at approximately the same time of day. All 20 muscle groups were assessed for spasticity (using a 0=no increase in muscle tone to 4 scale=affected part rigid in flexion or extensions), to result in a total score out of 80. The higher the score the worse the spasticity is. The change from baseline to end of study was assessed. The higher the score the better

Time frame: Day 7 to Day 28

Population: ITT. The reason for not including some of the data in this analysis is that a number of the subjects who withdrew early from the study restarted their own Sativex before the assessment was done.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SativexChange in Modified Ashworth Scale.21.5 score on scaleStandard Deviation 12.73
PlaceboChange in Modified Ashworth Scale.22.9 score on scaleStandard Deviation 17.11
p-value: 0.8690% CI: [-4.68, 5.74]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Motricity Index

The Motricity Index involves assessing three movements in both the arms and the legs. In the arm the three movements are; pinch grip, elbow flexion and shoulder abduction and the three leg movements are, ankle dorsiflexion, knee extension and hip flexion. The total arm/leg score is then the addition of the score for the three arm/leg movements. One point is then added to each limb score so that the maximum score is 100 points. The higher the score the better the limb movement.

Time frame: Week 2 and Week 5

Population: ITT. The reason for not including some of the data in this analysis is that a number of the subjects who withdrew early from the study restarted their own Sativex before the assessment was done.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SativexChange in Motricity IndexArm72.4 points on scaleStandard Deviation 6.26
SativexChange in Motricity IndexLeg43.6 points on scaleStandard Deviation 31.4
PlaceboChange in Motricity IndexArm92.5 points on scaleStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboChange in Motricity IndexLeg47.0 points on scaleStandard Deviation 21.38
Secondary

Daily Sleep Disruption NRS

Subjects will be asked: On a scale of 0-10 please indicate how your spasticity disrupted your sleep last night with the anchors 0 = 'did not disrupt sleep', 10 = 'completely disrupted (unable to sleep at all)'.

Time frame: Week 1- Week 5

Population: It is important to note that 16 of the placebo subjects withdrew from the study early. All subjects were accounted for in this analysis by use of a last-observation-carried-forward approach.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SativexDaily Sleep Disruption NRS2.90 points on scaleStandard Deviation 2.48
PlaceboDaily Sleep Disruption NRS3.36 points on scaleStandard Deviation 2.18
p-value: 0.27190% CI: [-1.6, 0.33]ANCOVA
Secondary

Subject Global Impressions of Change.

At baseline subjects will write a brief description of their spasticity caused by MS and how it affects them emotionally, physically and their ability to function with day to day activities. This will be used to aid their memory before they answer the following question which is rated on a seven-point scale. Please assess the change in your spasticity due to MS since immediately before receiving the first course of study treatment (Baseline) using the scale below The markers are: Very much worse, Much worse, Minimally worse, No change, Minimally better, Much better, Very much better.

Time frame: Day 35

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SativexSubject Global Impressions of Change.Minimally better0 participants
SativexSubject Global Impressions of Change.Minimally worse6 participants
SativexSubject Global Impressions of Change.Much better0 participants
SativexSubject Global Impressions of Change.Much worse5 participants
SativexSubject Global Impressions of Change.No change6 participants
SativexSubject Global Impressions of Change.Very much worse1 participants
SativexSubject Global Impressions of Change.Very much better0 participants
PlaceboSubject Global Impressions of Change.Very much worse3 participants
PlaceboSubject Global Impressions of Change.Very much better0 participants
PlaceboSubject Global Impressions of Change.Much better0 participants
PlaceboSubject Global Impressions of Change.Minimally better0 participants
PlaceboSubject Global Impressions of Change.No change1 participants
PlaceboSubject Global Impressions of Change.Minimally worse5 participants
PlaceboSubject Global Impressions of Change.Much worse9 participants
p-value: 0.01790% CI: [1.585, 13.997]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Timed 10-metre Walk.

The time taken to travel 10 metres.

Time frame: Week 2 and Week 5

Population: ITT. Only 4 placebo subjects were included in the analysis and 11 of the Sativex subjects. The reason for not including some of the data in this analysis is that a number of the subjects who withdrew early from the study restarted their own Sativex before the assessment was done.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SativexTimed 10-metre Walk.47.3 SecondsStandard Deviation 50.29
PlaceboTimed 10-metre Walk.18.3 SecondsStandard Deviation 4.5
Comparison: It is important to emphasise that only four placebo subjects were included in the analysis and 11 of the Sativex subjects - this sample size is too small for a meaningful comparison between treatments. The reason for not including some of the data in this analysis is that a number of the subjects who withdrew early from the study restarted their own Sativex before the assessment was done.p-value: 0.8190% CI: [-14.52, 10.96]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026