Skip to content

Comparison of Low and High Ligation in the Rectal Cancer

Comparison of Functional Results of High Ligation and Low Ligation After Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer - Randomized Controlled Trial-

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00701012
Enrollment
100
Registered
2008-06-19
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2013-12-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rectal Cancer

Keywords

low or high ligation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the defecatory function when nerve fibers around the inferior mesenteric artery(IMA) and left colic artery(LCA) are preserved(so called low ligation ) or not(high ligation) in the rectosigmoid and rectal cancer surgery.

Detailed description

Fecal incontinence after anterior resection are often observed. Whether or not postoperative bowel function is influenced by the preservation of nerve fibers around the root of IMA and LCA (low ligation) is still unknown. So in this randomized controlled trial, we evaluate the efficacy of low ligation in terms of the bowel function.

Interventions

PROCEDUREpreservation of nerve fibers around IMA

low ligation

PROCEDUREresection of nerve fibers around IMA

high ligation

Sponsors

Wakayama Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* On the basis of whether anterior resection was anticipated at WMUH for rectosigmoid and rectal cancer, and appropriate informed consent was obtained.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who could not respond to medical interview for own bowel function * Patients without an informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Assessment of bowel function1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
comparison of leakage rate2 weeks

Countries

Japan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026