Skip to content

Impact of an Automated Telephone Intervention on Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) in Type 2 Diabetes

The Impact of an Automated Telephone Intervention on HbA1c in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00700908
Enrollment
120
Registered
2008-06-19
Start date
2007-06-30
Completion date
2008-06-30
Last updated
2013-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 Diabetes

Keywords

type 2 diabetes, telephone intervention, automated

Brief summary

Aim 1. Determine the impact of a daily, automated telephone intervention on HbA1c levels compared to standard care in older patients with type 2 diabetes. Aim 2. Determine the impact of the automated telephone intervention compared to standard care on adherence to prescribed SMBG frequency in older patients with type 2 diabetes. Aim 3. Determine the impact of the automated telephone intervention compared to standard care on self-reported diabetic control problems in older patients with type 2 diabetes. Aim 4. Determine the impact of the automated telephone intervention compared to standard care on self-reported attitudes and health beliefs concerning diabetes in older patients with type 2 diabetes

Interventions

BEHAVIORALautomated telephone intervention vs. usual care

Sponsors

Novo Nordisk A/S
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Minnesota
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age greater or equal to 55 * Type 2 diabetes * English speaking * Ability to use glucose meter

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to give informed consent * Unwilling to allow SMBG levels to be shard with primary care physician

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in HbA1cthree months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change in adherence to SMBG frequencythree months

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026