Skip to content

Meat Protein and Calcium: Do They Interact Synergistically or Antagonistically?

Meat Protein and Calcium: Do They Interact Synergistically or Antagonistically?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00700804
Enrollment
34
Registered
2008-06-19
Start date
2003-06-30
Completion date
2005-01-31
Last updated
2018-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dietary Proteins

Keywords

Calcium retention, dietary protein, dietary calcium

Brief summary

The primary objective is to determine whether meat interacts positively with calcium to improve calcium retention. The secondary objective is to determine whether any interaction between dietary protein and calcium affects biomarkers of bone metabolism.

Detailed description

This study tests the effects of dietary protein and calcium on calcium retention and indices of bone metabolism. It is a controlled feeding trial with a randomized crossover design (2x2 Factorial), studying 34 healthy post-menopausal women. The women are blocked on Body Mass Index (weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared)and randomly assigned to a high calcium (HC,1500 milligrams per day) or low calcium (LC, 600 milligrams per day) group, and consume both low protein (LP,10% protein) and high protein (HP, 20% protein) diets for 7 weeks each. There is a 3-week washout between dietary periods, during which the subjects consume self-selected diets. After 3 week equilibration to each diet, the 2-day rotating menu is extrinsically labeled with a Calcium-47 radiotracer and retention is monitored for 28 days by whole body scintillation counting. In addition to Calcium retention, other endpoints include urinary indices of acid excretion and urine serum indices of bone resorption.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALHigh Protein Diet

High and low protein diets with meat as a primary protein source, tested in a cross-over design for each arm

High and low protein diets with meat as a primary protein source, tested in a cross-over design for each arm

Sponsors

National Cattlemen's Beef Association, a contractor to the Beef Checkoff
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
USDA Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
50 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* at least 3 years since last menses * bone mineral density equal to or greater than 2.5 standard deviations from average bone mineral density for young adults, * body mass index equal to or less than 35 kilograms/meter squared

Exclusion criteria

* taking prescription medication other than hormone replacement therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Calcium Absorption17 weeksRetention of Calcium-47 was monitored for 28 days by whole body scintillation counting. The percentage of Calcium-47 absorbed was estimated from the y-intercept of the linear portion of a semilogarithmic retention plot of percent Calcium-47 retained vs time

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Serum Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1)7 weeks

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Post menopausal women willing to eat controlled diet at United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center for 14 weeks

Pre-assignment details

Subjects were assigned to either the High or Low Calcium diets. The subjects then consumed the high and low protein diets in random order, i.e. half of the subjects consumed high protein, then low protein while the other half consumed low protein, then the high protein diet. Drop-outs were replaced.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
High Calcium Diet
Women consumed diets containing 1500 milligrams of calcium daily
17
Low Calcium Diet
Women consumed diets containing 600 milligrams of calcium daily
17
Total34

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLoose Stools11
Overall StudyProtocol Violation11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHigh Calcium DietLow Calcium DietTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
16 Participants14 Participants30 Participants
Age, Continuous57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants17 Participants34 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 170 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 170 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

Calcium Absorption

Retention of Calcium-47 was monitored for 28 days by whole body scintillation counting. The percentage of Calcium-47 absorbed was estimated from the y-intercept of the linear portion of a semilogarithmic retention plot of percent Calcium-47 retained vs time

Time frame: 17 weeks

Population: Only participants which completed both protein diet periods were included in the statistical analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High Calcium DietCalcium AbsorptionHigh Protein Diet18.1 percentage of Calcium absorbedStandard Deviation 2.5
High Calcium DietCalcium AbsorptionLow Protein Diet18.0 percentage of Calcium absorbedStandard Deviation 2.5
Low Calcium DietCalcium AbsorptionHigh Protein Diet29.5 percentage of Calcium absorbedStandard Deviation 2.5
Low Calcium DietCalcium AbsorptionLow Protein Diet26 percentage of Calcium absorbedStandard Deviation 2.5
p-value: 0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Serum Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1)

Time frame: 7 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
High Calcium DietSerum Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1)High Protein Diet5.23 nanomoles per liter (nmols/L)Standard Error 0.12
High Calcium DietSerum Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1)Low Protein Diet4.96 nanomoles per liter (nmols/L)Standard Error 0.12
Low Calcium DietSerum Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1)High Protein Diet5.07 nanomoles per liter (nmols/L)Standard Error 0.12
Low Calcium DietSerum Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1)Low Protein Diet4.87 nanomoles per liter (nmols/L)Standard Error 0.12

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026