Skip to content

Efficacy of Temporary Positive Expiratory Pressure (TPEP) in Chronic Hypersecretion

Multicenter Controlled Trial on Efficacy of TPEP Device in Adult Patients With Chronic Hypersecretion

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00700388
Acronym
UNIKO
Enrollment
100
Registered
2008-06-18
Start date
2008-07-31
Completion date
2010-12-31
Last updated
2011-08-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Hypersecretions

Keywords

Chronic bronchitis, COPD, Bronchiectasis

Brief summary

Mechanical devices to increase the individual's bronchial hygiene are commonly used in patients with chronic retention of secretions and abnormal cough reflex. In this clinical context a new technology (namely TPEP® - Temporary Positive Expiratory Pressure) has been recently developed with the aim to improve the respiratory condition in patients suffering from chronic respiratory diseases. This trial has the aim to assess the clinical efficacy of TPEP in patients with chronic hypersecretion and airways obstruction, but with a normal competence of the cough reflex

Detailed description

This is a single-blind multicentre controlled randomized trial with consecutive recruitment. Randomization list by blocks will be available. Group comparison will be made between active therapies including TPEP added to conventional MABT (Intervention) or MABT alone (Control). Active therapy will last 10 consecutive daily sessions in both groups. Primary outcome Efficacy comparison on change in: a.arterial oxygenation (as assessed by PaO2/FiO2 ratio and/or SatO2 index) Secondary outcomes Efficacy comparison on change in: 1. Sputum characteristics 2. Daily sputum volume 3. Perceived sensation 4. Lung functions (as assessed by spirometry and RM strength)

Interventions

DEVICETPEP device (UNIKO)

This technique is mainly based on a continuous low-pressure insufflation in the airways, which is likely to reduce (or even avoid) the potential pressure-related damages of other commonly used devices. This device should be used only in those individuals who are showing a normal competence of their cough reflex, thus it should be considered as a means which may help those techniques normally adopted for the individual's bronchial hygiene.

PROCEDUREMABT (Manually assisted breathing techniques)

Conventionally manually assisted breathing techniques

Sponsors

University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
CollaboratorOTHER
Villa Pineta Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* chronic hypersecretion as defined by \> 30 mL/die sputum production (7) * chronic airway obstruction (by definition) * COPD, bronchiectasis, asthma, cystic disease, etc. with or without chronic respiratory failure * adulthood * smoking or non-smoking habit * Peak Cough Expiratory Flow \> 150 L\*min-1 (5) * willingness to participate

Exclusion criteria

* childhood * presence of acute exacerbation * severe concomitant cardiovascular diseases * concomitant neoplastic diseases * non compliance/adherence to TPEP * concomitant use of chronic mechanical ventilation * use of amynophyllines and/or any active drugs (e.g. N-Acetyl-Cysteine)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
arterial oxygenation (as assessed by PaO2/FiO2 ratio and/or SatO2 index)Day 10

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Sputum volumeDay 1 to 10
Sputum characteristicsDay 1 to 10
Individual's perceived sensation (VAS scale)Day 1 to 10
Lung function (volumes and respiratory muscle performance)Day 1 - 3 - 10

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026