Skip to content

Cardiovascular and Neurohormonal Effects of Faster Atrial Pacing Rate

Cardiovascular and Neurohormonal Effects of Faster Atrial Pacing Rate for Six Hours in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure, Heart Rate <70 Beats Per Minute and Fluid Overload.

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00698139
Enrollment
3
Registered
2008-06-17
Start date
2011-04-30
Completion date
2012-09-30
Last updated
2018-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Keywords

heart failure, chronotropic incompetence

Brief summary

Many patients with heart failure are unable to increase their heart rate appropriately when their body needs increased blood flow. As a result, they may be unable to mobilize excess fluid that their body retains. We hypothesize that we can provide assistance to their body in mobilizing this fluid by artificially increasing their heart rate using a pacemaker. We plan to conduct a prospective clinical trial to evaluate this hypothesis. We will use a cross over design to study patients who already have biventricular pacemakers implanted or a narrow QRS and volume overload. We will screen them using a blood test that is a rough estimate of volume overload. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to have their pacemakers adjusted or to have no intervention during the first of 2 visits. They will be unaware of which group they are in. Following adjustment, they will be monitored for six hours. Prior to the pacemaker adjustment, several tests will be performed to evaluate heart function and the levels of hormones related that are affected by heart failure. These tests will be repeated at the end of the six hour intervention period in each visit. At the end of the visit patients who had their pacemakers adjusted will have it reset to their original settings.

Detailed description

Many patients with heart failure suffer from chronotropic incompetence, an inability to raise their heart rate in response to metabolic demand. Previous studies have shown that brief increases in pacing rates in patients with biventricular pacemakers can improve cardiac contractility. We hypothesize that the benefits of an increased biventricular pacing rate could be sustained and would improve cardiovascular and neurohormonal parameters in patients suffering from volume overload. We intend to prospectively evaluate this hypothesis in a single blind randomized cross-over design trial. We will screen 40 patients who have previously implanted biventricular pacemakers (or a narrow QRS) and an elevated B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) level. Following enrollment, patients will be randomly assigned to have their atrial pacing rate increased to 85 beats per minute or to be unchanged during the first of 2 visits. Patients will be unaware of their treatment assignment. They will be observed for six hours in a monitored setting. The primary outcome will be cardiac output, as measured noninvasively by NICOM (Cheetah Medical Inc., Israel) system before and after the observation period. Secondary outcomes will include changes in neurohormonal measures and thoracic impedance. If this proof-of-concept study demonstrates a positive effect, future research would evaluate the ability of increased pacing rates to prevent or abort decompensation of Congestive Heart Failure (CHF).

Interventions

DEVICEMedtronic Pacemaker

Patients will come to clinic in the morning for baseline measurements. Subsequently, the atrial pacing rate will be increased to 85bpm for 6 hours. The control group will be given the illusion that their pacer has been adjusted, but the settings will remain unchanged. Patients will eat a standard breakfast provided by the hospital prior to the treatment session, and then will fast for the six-hour observation period. Patients will remain in supine position and will be clinically monitored for 6 hours. All patients will be on continuous cardiac monitors. Vital signs and symptoms of congestion/ischemia will be recorded every hour.

Sponsors

Medtronic
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Columbia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age\>18 2. Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) (\>6 months duration) 3. Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) \<40% 4. Functional Class II-III 5. Stable oral treatment (\>1 month), 6. Implanted Medtronic pacemaker/defibrillator with a) an atrial pacing lead and biventricular leads, or b) an atrial pacing lead and a single ventricular lead in patients with a narrow (normal) QRS complex (\<120 msec) thus with no clinical indication for biventricular pacing. 7. Low heart rate (HR) (sinus rhythm (SR) or atrial pacing \<70 bpm) 8. Symptomatically stable (with no clinical requirement for adjustments in medical therapy, i.e. diuretics) 9. Increase in intrathoracic fluid as evidenced by rain natriuretic peptide (BNP) \>200.

Exclusion criteria

1. Atrial fibrillation 2. Stable or unstable angina 3. Myocardial infarction within 6 months before the study 4. Intravenous inotropic support 5. Pregnant or breast feeding women. Women of child bearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test prior to enrollment. 6. Severe renal failure (creatinine\> 2.5 mg/dl, hemodyalisis or peritoneal dialysis) 7. Known hepatic impairment (total bilirubin \>3 mg/dL, albumin \<2.8 mg/dL, or increased ammonia levels if performed) 8. Hemoglobin (hgb) \<8 mg %, or active bleeding requiring transfusion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Cardiac Output (CO)baseline and 6 hoursThe difference between post and pre CO

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Thoracic Impedencebaseline and 6 hoursImpedence will be measured using the pacemaker programmer to determine the difference in thoracic impedence pre- and post-procedure.
Changes in B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP)baseline and 6 hoursB-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) was measured for all subjects to determint the difference between pre- and post-procedure.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Overall 3 subjects completed the study. One subject underwent the intervention only (i.e., 6 hours of faster pacing). Subsequently the protocol was modified to a prospective, randomized single-blind, cross over design. Two subjects completed the protocol according to this modification and underwent both real and sham intervention.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention First, Then Control
Ambulatory out-patients will be identified at Columbia-Presbyterian and New York University Medical Centers. On the first encounter, patients will come to clinic in the morning for baseline measurements. Subsequently, the atrial pacing rate will be increased to 85bpm for 6 hours. Patients will eat a standard breakfast provided by the hospital prior to the treatment session, and then will fast for the six-hour observation period. Patients will remain in supine position and will be clinically monitored for 6 hours. All patients will be on continuous cardiac monitors. Vital signs and symptoms of congestion/ischemia will be recorded every hour. On the second encounter, patients will come to clinic in the morning for baseline measurements.Subsequently, they will be given the illusion that their pacer has been adjusted, but the settings will remain unchanged. The rest of the protocol will be as described for the first encounter.
1
Control First, Then Intervention
Ambulatory out-patients will be identified at Columbia-Presbyterian and New York University Medical Centers. On the first encounter, patients will come to clinic in the morning for baseline measurements.Subsequently, the control group will be given the illusion that their pacer has been adjusted, but the settings will remain unchanged. Patients will eat a standard breakfast provided by the hospital prior to the treatment session, and then will fast for the six-hour observation period. Patients will remain in supine position and will be clinically monitored for 6 hours. All patients will be on continuous cardiac monitors. Vital signs and symptoms of congestion/ischemia will be recorded every hour. On the second encounter, patients will come to clinic in the morning for baseline measurements. Subsequently, the atrial pacing rate will be increased to 85bpm for 6 hours. The rest of the protocol will be as described for the first encounter.
1
Intervention Only
Ambulatory out-patients will be identified at Columbia-Presbyterian and New York University Medical Centers. Patients will come to clinic in the morning for baseline measurements. Subsequently, the atrial pacing rate will be increased to 85bpm for 6 hours. Patients will eat a standard breakfast provided by the hospital prior to the treatment session, and then will fast for the six-hour observation period. Patients will remain in supine position and will be clinically monitored for 6 hours. All patients will be on continuous cardiac monitors. Vital signs and symptoms of congestion/ischemia will be recorded every hour.
1
Total3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIntervention First, Then ControlControl First, Then InterventionIntervention OnlyTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Age, Continuous48 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
85 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
84 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
69 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 10 / 10 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 10 / 10 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Cardiac Output (CO)

The difference between post and pre CO

Time frame: baseline and 6 hours

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention First, Then ControlChange in Cardiac Output (CO)1st Visit-0.14 L/minStandard Deviation 0
Intervention First, Then ControlChange in Cardiac Output (CO)2nd Visit0.95 L/minStandard Deviation 0
Control First, Then InterventionChange in Cardiac Output (CO)1st Visit-0.05 L/minStandard Deviation 0
Control First, Then InterventionChange in Cardiac Output (CO)2nd Visit2.15 L/minStandard Deviation 0
Intervention OnlyChange in Cardiac Output (CO)1st Visit1.36 L/minStandard Deviation 0
Intervention OnlyChange in Cardiac Output (CO)2nd VisitNA L/min
Secondary

Changes in B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP)

B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) was measured for all subjects to determint the difference between pre- and post-procedure.

Time frame: baseline and 6 hours

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention First, Then ControlChanges in B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP)1st Visit265 ng/LStandard Deviation 0
Intervention First, Then ControlChanges in B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP)2nd Visit261 ng/LStandard Deviation 0
Control First, Then InterventionChanges in B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP)1st Visit19 ng/LStandard Deviation 0
Control First, Then InterventionChanges in B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP)2nd Visit92 ng/LStandard Deviation 0
Intervention OnlyChanges in B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP)1st Visit110 ng/LStandard Deviation 0
Intervention OnlyChanges in B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP)2nd VisitNA ng/L
Secondary

Changes in Thoracic Impedence

Impedence will be measured using the pacemaker programmer to determine the difference in thoracic impedence pre- and post-procedure.

Time frame: baseline and 6 hours

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intervention First, Then ControlChanges in Thoracic Impedence1st Visit3.8 ohmStandard Deviation 0
Intervention First, Then ControlChanges in Thoracic Impedence2nd Visit2.6 ohmStandard Deviation 0
Control First, Then InterventionChanges in Thoracic Impedence1st Visit0 ohmStandard Deviation 0
Control First, Then InterventionChanges in Thoracic Impedence2nd Visit-1.4 ohmStandard Deviation 0
Intervention OnlyChanges in Thoracic Impedence1st Visit1.2 ohmStandard Deviation 0
Intervention OnlyChanges in Thoracic Impedence2nd VisitNA ohm

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026