Skip to content

Bone Adaptation to Impact Loading

Bone Adaptation to Impact Loading - Significance of Loading Intensity

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00697957
Enrollment
120
Registered
2008-06-16
Start date
2002-05-31
Completion date
2003-06-30
Last updated
2008-06-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoporosis

Keywords

acceleration, bone density, cardiovascular diseases, exercise, female, fragility fractures, impact intensity, intervention studies, osteoporosis, premenopause

Brief summary

Ageing populations have made osteoporosis and fragility fractures a major public health concern worldwide. Half of all women and 30% of all men will suffer a fracture related to osteoporosis during their lifetime. While medical prevention of this immense problem is impossible at population level, it is necessary to find efficient preventive strategies. Exercise is one of the major prevention approaches because one reason behind the increasing burden of osteoporosis is the modern sedentary lifestyle. However, the optimal type, intensity, frequency, and duration of exercise that best enhances skeletal integrity are still largely unknown. We conducted a 12-month population-based randomized controlled exercise intervention in 120 premenopausal women. The aim was to investigate the effect of impact exercise on bone mineral density, geometry and metabolism in healthy women with the intention of assessing the intensity and amount of impact loading with a novel accelerometer-based measurement device. Training effects on risk factors of osteoporotic fractures, physical performance and risk factors of cardiovascular diseases were also evaluated. This study demonstrated that 12 months of regular impact exercise favoured bone formation, increased bone mineral density in weight-bearing bones, especially at the hip, and led to geometric adaptations by increasing periosteal circumference. Bone adaptations had a dose- and intensity-dependent relationship with measured impact loading. Changes in proximal femur were threshold-dependent, indicating the importance of high impacts exceeding acceleration of 4 g as an osteogenic stimulus. The number of impacts needed to achieve this stimulation was 60 per day. Impact exercise also had a favourable effect on physical performance and cardiorespiratory risk factors by increasing maximal oxygen uptake, dynamic leg strength and decreasing low-density lipoproteins and waist circumference. Changes were dose-dependent with impact loading at wide intensity range. Bone adapts to impact loading through various mechanisms to ensure optimal bone strength. The number of impacts needed to achieve bone stimulation appeared to be 60 per day, comparable to the same number of daily jumps. If done on a regular basis, impact exercise may be an efficient and safe way of preventing osteoporosis.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALExercise

Progressive impact exercise

Sponsors

Oulu Deaconess Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
UKK Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health
CollaboratorOTHER
The Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation (TEKES)
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Newtest Ltd
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
CCC Group Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Fastrax Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Oulu
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
35 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Random population-based sample of women: * Age 35-40 yr * residing in the city of Oulu, Finland * in March 2002

Exclusion criteria

* cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, respiratory, or other chronic diseases that might limit training and testing * diseases or medication affecting the bone * pregnancy and breastfeeding * regular current or previous participation in impact-type exercises and long-distance running more than three times a week

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
bone mineral density0 and 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
muscle strength0 and 12 months

Countries

Finland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 2, 2026