Skip to content

Implantable Loop Recorder Versus Conventional Ambulatory Monitoring in Detecting Atrial Fibrillation After Pulmonary Vein Isolation

An Observational Study to Assess the Efficacy of Continuous Subcutaneous Arrhythmia Monitoring Versus Conventional Ambulatory ECG-monitoring in Detecting Atrial Fibrillation in Patients After Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00697359
Enrollment
57
Registered
2008-06-13
Start date
2008-06-30
Completion date
2016-06-30
Last updated
2016-09-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

Atrial fibrillation, Monitoring, Pulmonary vein isolation, Implantable loop recorder

Brief summary

The primary aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of continuous rhythm monitoring with an implantable loop recorder (ILR) compared to conventional ambulatory electrocardiography in detecting episodes of atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The secondary aim is to assess the efficacy of PVI during a two years follow-up and to assess the reliability of the implantable loop recorder in detecting atrial fibrillation. 50 patients will be enrolled into the study. After enrollment an implantable loop recorder will be implanted at least 6 weeks before scheduled PVI. All patients will be followed for 24 months after PVI. During the follow-up period a 72-hours ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring will be performed at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Transthoracic echocardiography will be performed at enrollment, 3, 12, and 24 months after PVI. Moreover, quality of life will be assessed at baseline, and 6 and 12 months after PVI.

Interventions

The ILR will be implanted subcutaneous following standard surgical procedure.

Sponsors

Odense University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age =\> 30 to =\< 70 years * Documentation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation * Documentation of persistent atrial fibrillation of \< 3 months duration termination either spontaneously or by DC cardioversion * Scheduled pulmonary vein isolation * Treatment with at least one class IC or class III antiarrhythmic drug tried

Exclusion criteria

* Atrial fibrillation episodes \> 3 months or permanent atrial fibrillation * No indication for pulmonary vein isolation * Contraindications for anticoagulation treatment * No informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of patients with atrial fibrillation detected by implantable loop recorder and number of patients with atrial fibrillation detected by conventional ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number of asymptomatic and symptomatic atrial fibrillation episodes12 months
Number of symptomatic and asymptomatic atrial fibrillation episodes12 months

Countries

Denmark, Russia, Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026