Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety Study of ARC-4558 for Management of Pain Associated With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Clonidine Topical Gel, 0.1% With Placebo in the Management of Pain Associated With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00695565
Enrollment
180
Registered
2008-06-12
Start date
2008-05-31
Completion date
2010-02-28
Last updated
2016-11-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether ARC-4558 is effective in managing pain associated with painful diabetic neuropathy.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo Gel

TID x 12 weeks

DRUGClonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)

TID x 12 weeks

Sponsors

Arcion Therapeutics Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* has Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus * has a history of chronic pain attributable to a symmetrical stocking distribution neuropathy in the lower extremities for a duration of at least six months but less than or equal to five years prior to Screening

Exclusion criteria

* has neuropathy secondary to non-diabetic causes * has a significant neurological disorder or a condition that can cause symptoms that mimic peripheral neuropathy or might confound assessment of PDN * has other chronic pain with intensity at or greater than the bilateral pain in the feet/toes * is using an implanted medical device (eg, spinal cord stimulator, intrathecal pump, or peripheral nerve stimulator) for the treatment of pain * is pregnant or lactating

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Average Daily Pain NPRS (Numeric Pain Rating Scale) Score; mLOCF ImputationBaseline (average of Days -7 to -1) and Week 12 (Average of Days 78 to 84)Pain in the feet was scored daily at bedtime by the subject on a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) through Day 84. Subjects were asked to record average pain in the feet over the past 24 hours. A score of 0 indicated no pain and a score of 10 was worst possible pain. The change in pain is represented as Week 12 minus Baseline, so greater negative numbers represent more improvement (more pain relief).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationBaseline (average of Days -7 to -1) and Weeks 1 through 12 (weekly averages)Pain in the feet was scored daily at bedtime by the subject on a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale (NPRS). Subjects were asked to record average pain in the feet over the past 24 hours. A score of 0 indicated no pain and a score of 10 was worst possible pain. A weekly average was calculated from the daily scores for each week. The change in pain is represented as the average weekly score minus Baseline, so greater negative numbers represent more improvement (more pain relief).
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Worst Daily Pain NPRS Score; mLOCF ImputationBaseline (average of Days -7 to -1) and Week 12 (average of Days 78 to 84)Pain in the feet was scored daily at bedtime by the subject on a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale. Subjects were asked to record the worst pain in their feet over the past 24 hours. A score of 0 indicated no pain and a score of 10 was worst possible pain. The change in pain is represented as Week 12 minus Baseline, so greater negative numbers represent greater improvement (greater pain relief).
Percentage of Subjects Who Experience at Least 30% Reduction in Average Daily Pain From Baseline; mLOCF ImputationBaseline (average of Days -7 to -1) and Week 12 (average of Days 78 to 84)Pain in the feet was scored daily at bedtime by the subject on a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale (NPRS). Subjects were asked to record average pain in the feet over the past 24 hours. A score of 0 indicated no pain and a score of 10 was worst possible pain.
Percentage of Subjects Who Experience at Least 50% Reduction in Average Daily Pain From Baseline; mLOCF ImputationBaseline (average of Days -7 to -1) and Week 12 (average of Days 78 to 84)Pain in the feet was scored daily at bedtime by the subject on a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale (NPRS). Subjects were asked to record average pain in the feet over the past 24 hours. A score of 0 indicated no pain and a score of 10 was worst possible pain.
Change From Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory Functional Interference Scale at Week 12; mLOCF ImputationBaseline and Week 12The Brief Pain Inventory was completed by the subject at clinic visits. The Functional Interference Scale (of 0 to 70) is a composite score that measures the degree to which pain interferes with mood, walking, work, relationships, sleep, general activity, and enjoyment of life. The composite score is a sum of the seven individual question scores. Each individual question is rated in reference to pain over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 indicates that pain does not interfere and 10 indicates that pain completely interferes with that function, so lower scores represent better outcomes on this scale. The change in functional interference is represented as Week 12 minus Baseline, so greater negative numbers represent more improvement.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Overall Quality of Sleep (Chronic Pain Sleep Inventory)Baseline and Week 12Subjects rated overall quality of sleep over the past week using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) where 100=Excellent and 0=Very Poor. This scale was completed during clinic visits. Change from Baseline is a positive value where quality of sleep improved.
Change From Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Severity Scale at Week 12; mLOCF ImputationBaseline and Week 12The Brief Pain Inventory was completed by the subject at clinic visits. The Severity Scale (of 0 to 40) is a composite score, which is the sum of the individual ratings for worst pain, least pain, average pain, and current pain. Each individual question is rated on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 indicates No Pain and 10 indicates Pain as bad as you can imagine. The change in pain severity is represented as Week 12 minus Baseline, so greater negative numbers represent greater improvement (pain relief).
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Anxiety Score of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)Baseline and Week 12The HADS was completed at the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. The Anxiety Score component of the HADS includes 7 questions, each with 4 possible answer choices (rated 0 to 3). The composite score is created by adding the scores of the 7 individual questions. A score of 0 to 7 is Normal, 8-10 indicates Mild Anxiety, 11-14 indicates Moderate Anxiety, and 15-21 indicates Severe Anxiety. The change from Baseline is calculated as the Week 12 composite score minus the Baseline composite score.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the McGill Pain Questionnaire (Short Form) Total ScoreBaseline and Week 12The McGill Pain Questionnaire asks subjects to rate 15 different kinds of pain, each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe). The total score is a sum of the individual ratings and has a range from 0 to 45, where higher numbers indicate more pain. The 15 types of pain assessed are throbbing, shooting, stabbing, sharp, cramping, gnawing, hot-burning, aching, heavy, tender, splitting, tiring-exhausting, sickening, fearful, and punishing-cruel. This scale was completed at the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. The change from Baseline is calculated as the Week 12 total score minus the Baseline total score, so greater negative numbers indicate more improvement (pain relief).
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 12Week 12At Week 12 the subject was asked to rate their total improvement relative to Baseline, whether or not, in their judgement, it was due entirely to study drug treatment or not. Answer choices were: (+3) very much improved, (+2) much improved, (+1) minimally improved, (0) no change, (-1) minimally worse, (-2) much worse, (-3) very much worse.
Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Week 12Week 12At Week 12, the Investigator was asked to independently rate the subject's total improvement relative to Baseline, whether or not, in their judgement, it was due entirely to study drug treatment or not. Answer choices were: (+3) very much improved, (+2) much improved, (+1) minimally improved, (0) no change, (-1) minimally worse, (-2) much worse, (-3) very much worse.
Change in Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 12Baseline and Week 12Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure were measured at clinic visits. This outcome assesses the change in blood pressure from Baseline to Week 12 of treatment.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Depression Score of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)Baseline and Week 12The HADS was completed at the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. The Depression Score component of the HADS includes 7 questions, each with 4 possible answer choices (rated 0 to 3). The composite score is created by adding the scores of the 7 individual questions. A score of 0 to 7 is Normal, 8-10 indicates Mild Depression, 11-14 indicates Moderate Depression, and 15-21 indicates Severe Depression. The change from Baseline is calculated as the Week 12 composite score minus the Baseline composite score.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited from May 2008 until September 2009. All study sites were medical clinics.

Pre-assignment details

Subjects were required to meet all eligibility criteria at both the Screening and Baseline visits. If a subject met the Screening criteria but not the Baseline criteria, the subject was not eligible for enrollment. Two subjects were randomized but were not treated because they were found ineligible. They are not counted in the 180 enrolled.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo Gel
Placebo Gel is vehicle without clonidine
90
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)
Clonidine Topical Gel contains 0.1% clonidine hydrochloride
90
Total180

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event31
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy11
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up44
Overall StudyProtocol Violation31
Overall StudySubject did not follow instructions11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo GelClonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Total
Age, Continuous57.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
59.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
58.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
Region of Enrollment
United States
90 participants90 participants180 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
48 Participants46 Participants94 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
42 Participants44 Participants86 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
28 / 9019 / 90
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 903 / 90

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Average Daily Pain NPRS (Numeric Pain Rating Scale) Score; mLOCF Imputation

Pain in the feet was scored daily at bedtime by the subject on a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) through Day 84. Subjects were asked to record average pain in the feet over the past 24 hours. A score of 0 indicated no pain and a score of 10 was worst possible pain. The change in pain is represented as Week 12 minus Baseline, so greater negative numbers represent more improvement (more pain relief).

Time frame: Baseline (average of Days -7 to -1) and Week 12 (Average of Days 78 to 84)

Population: One treated subject had no recorded scores and could not be included. Imputation was mLOCF (modified Last Observation Carried Forward): LOCF for subjects who discontinued early, except if withdrawal was associated with an adverse event (AE) potentially related to study medication (in which case Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF) was used).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo GelChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Average Daily Pain NPRS (Numeric Pain Rating Scale) Score; mLOCF ImputationAll subjects-1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Placebo GelChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Average Daily Pain NPRS (Numeric Pain Rating Scale) Score; mLOCF ImputationCapsaicin response ≥ 2-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Average Daily Pain NPRS (Numeric Pain Rating Scale) Score; mLOCF ImputationAll subjects-2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Average Daily Pain NPRS (Numeric Pain Rating Scale) Score; mLOCF ImputationCapsaicin response ≥ 2-2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Comparison: This analysis does not take into account the subjects' screening capsaicin response (measure of nociceptor function).p-value: 0.168Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Each subject was screened for responsiveness of nociceptors in the skin to a capsaicin stimulus (rated on 0-10 pain scale; 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain). The interaction term composed of treatment assignment and capsaicin threshold was examined at the prespecified alpha level of 0.1.~This analysis includes subjects with a capsaicin rating of ≥ 2. Thirty (30) subjects in the Placebo group and 33 subjects in the active Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558) group had capsaicin scores ≥ 2.p-value: 0.014Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF Imputation

Pain in the feet was scored daily at bedtime by the subject on a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale (NPRS). Subjects were asked to record average pain in the feet over the past 24 hours. A score of 0 indicated no pain and a score of 10 was worst possible pain. A weekly average was calculated from the daily scores for each week. The change in pain is represented as the average weekly score minus Baseline, so greater negative numbers represent more improvement (more pain relief).

Time frame: Baseline (average of Days -7 to -1) and Weeks 1 through 12 (weekly averages)

Population: One treated subject had no recorded scores and could not be included. Imputation was a modified LOCF (LOCF for subjects who discontinued early, except if withdrawal was associated with an adverse event (AE) potentially related to study medication, in which case BOCF was used). Additional BOCF analyses have been published (Pain 2012, see citation)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo GelChange From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationWeek 1-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
Placebo GelChange From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationWeek 2-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Placebo GelChange From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationWeek 3-1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.47
Placebo GelChange From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationWeek 4-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.63
Placebo GelChange From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationWeek 5-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.77
Placebo GelChange From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationWeek 6-1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.84
Placebo GelChange From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationWeek 7-1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.83
Placebo GelChange From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationWeek 8-1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.93
Placebo GelChange From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationWeek 9-1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.96
Placebo GelChange From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationWeek 10-1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.98
Placebo GelChange From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationWeek 11-1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.93
Placebo GelChange From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationWeek 12-1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.91
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationWeek 11-2.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.12
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationWeek 1-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.34
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationWeek 7-2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.86
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationWeek 2-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.45
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationWeek 10-2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.06
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationWeek 3-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.58
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationWeek 8-2.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.92
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationWeek 4-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.71
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationWeek 12-2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.12
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationWeek 5-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.65
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationWeek 9-2.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.95
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationWeek 6-1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.74
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Severity Scale at Week 12; mLOCF Imputation

The Brief Pain Inventory was completed by the subject at clinic visits. The Severity Scale (of 0 to 40) is a composite score, which is the sum of the individual ratings for worst pain, least pain, average pain, and current pain. Each individual question is rated on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 indicates No Pain and 10 indicates Pain as bad as you can imagine. The change in pain severity is represented as Week 12 minus Baseline, so greater negative numbers represent greater improvement (pain relief).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: One subject in the active Clonidine Gel group was lost to follow-up before Baseline pain scores were confirmed and before any post-baseline efficacy evaluations were performed. This subject was excluded from the efficacy analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo GelChange From Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Severity Scale at Week 12; mLOCF Imputation-7.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.5
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Change From Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Severity Scale at Week 12; mLOCF Imputation-9.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory Functional Interference Scale at Week 12; mLOCF Imputation

The Brief Pain Inventory was completed by the subject at clinic visits. The Functional Interference Scale (of 0 to 70) is a composite score that measures the degree to which pain interferes with mood, walking, work, relationships, sleep, general activity, and enjoyment of life. The composite score is a sum of the seven individual question scores. Each individual question is rated in reference to pain over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 indicates that pain does not interfere and 10 indicates that pain completely interferes with that function, so lower scores represent better outcomes on this scale. The change in functional interference is represented as Week 12 minus Baseline, so greater negative numbers represent more improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: One subject in the active Clonidine Gel group was lost to follow-up before Baseline pain scores were confirmed and before any post-baseline efficacy evaluations were performed. This subject was excluded from the efficacy analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo GelChange From Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory Functional Interference Scale at Week 12; mLOCF Imputation-15.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.9
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Change From Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory Functional Interference Scale at Week 12; mLOCF Imputation-17.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.5
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Overall Quality of Sleep (Chronic Pain Sleep Inventory)

Subjects rated overall quality of sleep over the past week using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) where 100=Excellent and 0=Very Poor. This scale was completed during clinic visits. Change from Baseline is a positive value where quality of sleep improved.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: One subject in the active Clonidine Gel group was lost to follow-up before Baseline pain scores were confirmed and before any post-baseline efficacy evaluations were performed. This subject was excluded from the efficacy analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo GelChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Overall Quality of Sleep (Chronic Pain Sleep Inventory)17.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.4
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Overall Quality of Sleep (Chronic Pain Sleep Inventory)19.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Anxiety Score of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

The HADS was completed at the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. The Anxiety Score component of the HADS includes 7 questions, each with 4 possible answer choices (rated 0 to 3). The composite score is created by adding the scores of the 7 individual questions. A score of 0 to 7 is Normal, 8-10 indicates Mild Anxiety, 11-14 indicates Moderate Anxiety, and 15-21 indicates Severe Anxiety. The change from Baseline is calculated as the Week 12 composite score minus the Baseline composite score.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: One subject in the active Clonidine Gel group was lost to follow-up before Baseline pain scores were confirmed and before any post-baseline efficacy evaluations were performed. This subject was excluded from the efficacy analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo GelChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Anxiety Score of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.67
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Anxiety Score of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.14
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Depression Score of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

The HADS was completed at the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. The Depression Score component of the HADS includes 7 questions, each with 4 possible answer choices (rated 0 to 3). The composite score is created by adding the scores of the 7 individual questions. A score of 0 to 7 is Normal, 8-10 indicates Mild Depression, 11-14 indicates Moderate Depression, and 15-21 indicates Severe Depression. The change from Baseline is calculated as the Week 12 composite score minus the Baseline composite score.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: One subject in the active Clonidine Gel group was lost to follow-up before Baseline pain scores were confirmed and before any post-baseline efficacy evaluations were performed. This subject was excluded from the efficacy analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo GelChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Depression Score of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Depression Score of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the McGill Pain Questionnaire (Short Form) Total Score

The McGill Pain Questionnaire asks subjects to rate 15 different kinds of pain, each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe). The total score is a sum of the individual ratings and has a range from 0 to 45, where higher numbers indicate more pain. The 15 types of pain assessed are throbbing, shooting, stabbing, sharp, cramping, gnawing, hot-burning, aching, heavy, tender, splitting, tiring-exhausting, sickening, fearful, and punishing-cruel. This scale was completed at the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. The change from Baseline is calculated as the Week 12 total score minus the Baseline total score, so greater negative numbers indicate more improvement (pain relief).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: One subject in the active Clonidine Gel group was lost to follow-up before Baseline pain scores were confirmed and before any post-baseline efficacy evaluations were performed. This subject was excluded from the efficacy analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo GelChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the McGill Pain Questionnaire (Short Form) Total Score-7.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the McGill Pain Questionnaire (Short Form) Total Score-8.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Worst Daily Pain NPRS Score; mLOCF Imputation

Pain in the feet was scored daily at bedtime by the subject on a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale. Subjects were asked to record the worst pain in their feet over the past 24 hours. A score of 0 indicated no pain and a score of 10 was worst possible pain. The change in pain is represented as Week 12 minus Baseline, so greater negative numbers represent greater improvement (greater pain relief).

Time frame: Baseline (average of Days -7 to -1) and Week 12 (average of Days 78 to 84)

Population: One treated subject had no recorded scores and could not be included. Imputation was a modified LOCF (LOCF for subjects who discontinued early, except if withdrawal was associated with an adverse event (AE) potentially related to study medication, in which case BOCF was used). Additional BOCF analyses have been published (Pain 2012, see citation).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo GelChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Worst Daily Pain NPRS Score; mLOCF Imputation-2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Worst Daily Pain NPRS Score; mLOCF Imputation-2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Secondary

Change in Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 12

Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure were measured at clinic visits. This outcome assesses the change in blood pressure from Baseline to Week 12 of treatment.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: ITT (Intent-to-Treat)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo GelChange in Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 12Change in Systolic BP-0.4 mmHgStandard Deviation 20.6
Placebo GelChange in Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 12Change in Diastolic BP-0.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 9.4
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Change in Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 12Change in Systolic BP1.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 13.9
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Change in Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 12Change in Diastolic BP1.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 8.8
Secondary

Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Week 12

At Week 12, the Investigator was asked to independently rate the subject's total improvement relative to Baseline, whether or not, in their judgement, it was due entirely to study drug treatment or not. Answer choices were: (+3) very much improved, (+2) much improved, (+1) minimally improved, (0) no change, (-1) minimally worse, (-2) much worse, (-3) very much worse.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All subjects with a CGIC score were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo GelClinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Week 12Very Much Improved5.8 percentage of subjects
Placebo GelClinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Week 12Much Improved38.4 percentage of subjects
Placebo GelClinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Week 12Minimally Improved27.9 percentage of subjects
Placebo GelClinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Week 12No Change25.6 percentage of subjects
Placebo GelClinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Week 12Minimally Worse2.3 percentage of subjects
Placebo GelClinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Week 12Very Much Worse0 percentage of subjects
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Week 12Minimally Worse1.2 percentage of subjects
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Week 12Very Much Improved16.5 percentage of subjects
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Week 12No Change27.1 percentage of subjects
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Week 12Much Improved30.6 percentage of subjects
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Week 12Very Much Worse0 percentage of subjects
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Week 12Minimally Improved24.7 percentage of subjects
Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 12

At Week 12 the subject was asked to rate their total improvement relative to Baseline, whether or not, in their judgement, it was due entirely to study drug treatment or not. Answer choices were: (+3) very much improved, (+2) much improved, (+1) minimally improved, (0) no change, (-1) minimally worse, (-2) much worse, (-3) very much worse.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: All subjects with a PGIC score were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo GelPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 12Very Much Improved11.8 percentage of subjects
Placebo GelPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 12Much Improved32.9 percentage of subjects
Placebo GelPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 12Minimally Improved31.8 percentage of subjects
Placebo GelPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 12No Change21.2 percentage of subjects
Placebo GelPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 12Minimally Worse1.2 percentage of subjects
Placebo GelPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 12Very Much Worse1.2 percentage of subjects
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 12Minimally Worse1.2 percentage of subjects
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 12Very Much Improved21.2 percentage of subjects
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 12No Change22.4 percentage of subjects
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 12Much Improved27.1 percentage of subjects
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 12Very Much Worse0 percentage of subjects
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 12Minimally Improved28.2 percentage of subjects
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects Who Experience at Least 30% Reduction in Average Daily Pain From Baseline; mLOCF Imputation

Pain in the feet was scored daily at bedtime by the subject on a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale (NPRS). Subjects were asked to record average pain in the feet over the past 24 hours. A score of 0 indicated no pain and a score of 10 was worst possible pain.

Time frame: Baseline (average of Days -7 to -1) and Week 12 (average of Days 78 to 84)

Population: One treated subject had no recorded scores and could not be included. Imputation was a modified LOCF (LOCF for subjects who discontinued early, except if withdrawal was associated with an adverse event (AE) potentially related to study medication, in which case BOCF was used). Additional BOCF analyses have been published (Pain 2012, see citation).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo GelPercentage of Subjects Who Experience at Least 30% Reduction in Average Daily Pain From Baseline; mLOCF Imputation47 percentage of subjects
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Percentage of Subjects Who Experience at Least 30% Reduction in Average Daily Pain From Baseline; mLOCF Imputation52 percentage of subjects
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects Who Experience at Least 50% Reduction in Average Daily Pain From Baseline; mLOCF Imputation

Pain in the feet was scored daily at bedtime by the subject on a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale (NPRS). Subjects were asked to record average pain in the feet over the past 24 hours. A score of 0 indicated no pain and a score of 10 was worst possible pain.

Time frame: Baseline (average of Days -7 to -1) and Week 12 (average of Days 78 to 84)

Population: One treated subject had no recorded scores and could not be included. Imputation was a modified LOCF (LOCF for subjects who discontinued early, except if withdrawal was associated with an adverse event (AE) potentially related to study medication, in which case BOCF was used). Additional BOCF analyses have been published (Pain 2012, see citation).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo GelPercentage of Subjects Who Experience at Least 50% Reduction in Average Daily Pain From Baseline; mLOCF Imputation32 percentage of subjects
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Percentage of Subjects Who Experience at Least 50% Reduction in Average Daily Pain From Baseline; mLOCF Imputation37 percentage of subjects

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026