Skip to content

Capsule Endoscopy vs Standard of Care for Obscure Intestinal Bleeding

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Capsule Endoscopy vs Standard Care in Patients With Iron Deficiency Anemia With Suspected Obscure / Occult Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00694954
Enrollment
160
Registered
2008-06-11
Start date
2007-02-28
Completion date
2016-07-31
Last updated
2017-12-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Iron Deficiency Anemia

Keywords

Iron deficiency anemia, Wireless capsule endoscopy, Obscure-occult gastrointestinal bleeding

Brief summary

The role of capsule endoscopy (CE) in patients with obscure / occult gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding remains unclear. This pragmatic randomized controlled trial is designed to determine the diagnostic yield and clinical outcomes of patients with obscure GI bleeding who receive CE compared to those who receive usual standard care.

Detailed description

Patients with iron deficiency anemia from suspected occult GI bleeding will be randomized to receive CE or usual standard care following a negative gastroscopy and colonoscopy. Our primary outcome measure (diagnostic yield) and secondary outcome measures (noted below) will be determined after one year of followup. Patients with have a minimum of one year of clinical followup. Direct health care costs in each arm of the study will be determined after a minimum of two years of followup. An economic evaluation based on the results of the clinical trial is also planned.

Interventions

DEVICEDiagnostic Test - Given Imaging Pillcam

Procedure performed once only after randomization. If procedure is incomplete due to a number of variables, procedure may possibly need to be repeated. Diagnostic possibilities: normal exam, active bleeding, potential source of bleeding (angiodysplasia, ulcer, tumor)

Any other diagnostic tests (if not already performed) that the referring or attending physician deems necessary aside from Wireless Capsule Endoscopy.

Sponsors

Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research
CollaboratorOTHER
Calgary Health Region
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Calgary
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adult patients age over 18years with iron deficiency anemia (IDA). IDA is defined as hemoglobin \<137g/L in men or \<120g/L in women with serum ferritin level \<22ug/L in men and \<10ug/L in women. 2. Eligible patients should have a negative gastroscopy and negative colonoscopy within 1 year prior to entry into study. 3. Negative celiac screen and /or negative small bowel biopsies

Exclusion criteria

1. Overt gastrointestinal bleeding 2. Premenopausal women with menorrhagia 3. Known or suspected small bowel obstruction 4. Serious medical co-morbidities precluding surgery given the risk of capsule impaction 5. Pregnancy 6. Inability to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
diagnostic yield48 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
number of hospitalizations for GI bleeding/anemia48 weeks
number of GI-related procedures and investigations48
number of blood transfusions48 weeks
quality of life48measured by 1) SF36 - 8 domains + PCS/MCS, 2) GI Quality of Life Index (GIQLI), 3) EQ-5D - index + visual analogue scale
health care costs2 years
procedure-related complications48

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026