Skip to content

Efficacy of Interferential Laser Therapy in Shoulder Pain

Efficacy of Interferential Laser Therapy in Pain Reduction in Shoulder Musculoskeletal Pathologies.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00694538
Acronym
PI070046
Enrollment
200
Registered
2008-06-10
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2009-11-30
Last updated
2009-11-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Shoulder Musculoskeletal Disorders

Keywords

Interferential laser therapy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the advantages of the interferential laser therapy in shoulder pain reduction compared with the conventional low level laser therapy modality.

Detailed description

The spatiotemporal superposition of two independent and opposite beams of laser generates a constructive interference pattern that increases the therapeutic effects in the irradiated tissue. Patients diagnosed of shoulder pain from different musculoskeletal disorders will received conventional or interferential laser therapy. This is a comparative, randomized and double - blind clinical study. Two identical equipments of near infrared laser therapy will be used. Number of sessions: 15. Frequency of the sessions: daily. Irradiation technique: manual, contact and punctual.Pain will be evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS) at rest and during analytical shoulder movements (abduction, adduction, internal rotation, external rotation, flexion, extension) and by means of a pain and disability index (SPADI). Evaluations will take place at pre and post treatment.

Interventions

Two GaAlAs laser (810 nm, 100mW)were used. In the interferential laser treatment, two probes were simultaneously applied. In the conventional laser group, only one probe was switched on. Laser was applied at five points over the pain area. The laser emission mode was continuous with an energy dose of 6 joules per point and session, a power density of 1.09 w/cm2 and an irradiation time per point of 60 s. The average output power was 100 mW and the total energy dose delivered in a patient session was 30 J. Every treatment was along 15 sessions. Hence, the accumulated energy delivered on the whole was 450 Joules for the conventional group of patients (using one beam) and 900 Joules for the interferential one (using two beams).

Sponsors

Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Acute or chronic pain from musculoskeletal origin * Age between 18 and 70 years

Exclusion criteria

* Brachial plexus palsy * Neurological diseases * Pacemakers * Shoulder pain from cervical pathology * Osteosynthesis material * Fibromyalgia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain will be evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS) at rest and during analytical shoulder movements.Five minutes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Shoulder Pain Disability Index (SPADI)ten minutes

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026