Skip to content

Veterans Walk to Beat Back Pain

Veterans Walk to Beat Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00694018
Enrollment
229
Registered
2008-06-10
Start date
2009-05-31
Completion date
2012-03-31
Last updated
2015-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Back Pain

Keywords

randomized trial, walking

Brief summary

The objective of this study was to assess whether an Internet-mediated pedometer based intervention would increase walking and improve function among individuals with chronic back pain.

Detailed description

Project Background/Rationale: Chronic pain, and especially back pain, is common among VA patients, affecting approximately 60% of veterans using VA primary care services. Chronic pain is associated with increased disability, poorer health status, anxiety and depression, decreased quality of life, decreased employment and increased health services use and costs. Current evidence suggests that exercise is one of the most effective strategies for managing chronic pain. However, there are few clinical programs that use generally available tools and a relatively low cost approach to help patients with chronic back pain initiate and maintain an exercise program. Project Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of an Internet-mediated pedometer based intervention that was designed to increase walking and improve pain-related function among individuals with chronic back pain. The Specific Aims of this randomized, controlled trial were: 1) To determine whether an internet-mediated pedometer based intervention will reduce pain-related functional interference among patients with chronic back pain in the short term and over a 12-month timeframe; 2) To assess the effect of the intervention on walking (measured by step counts), quality of life, pain intensity, pain related fear and self-efficacy for exercise among patients with chronic back pain; and 3) To identify factors associated with a sustained increase in walking over a 12-month timeframe among patients randomized to the intervention. Project Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial of an Internet-mediated, pedometer based intervention to promote walking and improve pain-related function among patients with chronic back pain compared to enhanced usual care. Participants were followed for 12 months to investigate the efficacy of the intervention in assisting patients with initiating and maintaining a regular walking program and improving pain-related function. We recruited patients with chronic back pain (primarily low back pain) receiving care at one VA health care system. Study patients were randomized to one of two groups: 1) enhanced usual care or 2) the Internet-mediated, pedometer based intervention. All participants attended an educational program designed specifically for individuals with chronic back pain. Study participants randomized to the intervention were given an enhanced pedometer and access to a study website that provided step goals and feedback, tailored motivational messages and an e-community. Those in the control group received a pedometer but did not have access to the website. Both groups completed on-line survey assessments at baseline, 6, and 12 months and were asked to report adverse events on a regular basis. The primary outcome for this study was pain-related functional interference. Secondary outcomes included average daily steps at 12 months as measured using the study pedometer, health related quality of life, pain intensity, pain related fear and self-efficacy for exercise. The analysis was conducted based on intention to treat principles and used multivariable modeling procedures to determine the effect of the intervention on our outcomes.

Interventions

OTHEREducation and standard care

Educational program for individuals with chronic back pain.

BEHAVIORALInternet mediated enhanced pedometer intervention

Enhanced pedometer for uploading step information and website that provides step goals and feedback, tailored motivational messages and an online community.

Sponsors

US Department of Veterans Affairs
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Veterans receiving care at the VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System * Have back pain that has persisted for more than 3 months * Have a sedentary lifestyle (less than 150 minutes of physical activity per week) * Have access to a computer (with Windows XP or Vista) on at least a weekly basis with an available USB port and Internet access * Have a working e-mail address * Are competent to provide written informed consent * Are able to communicate in English * Are not institutionalized * Can identify a health care provider who can provide medical clearance.

Exclusion criteria

* Currently pregnant * Cannot walk at least one block * Cannot obtain written clearance to start a walking program from a treating healthcare provider

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) Score12 monthsThe Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire score ranges from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater disability

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Education and Standard Care
Education and standard care: Educational program for individuals with chronic back pain.
118
Internet Mediated Enhanced Pedometer
Education and standard care: Educational program for individuals with chronic back pain. Internet mediated enhanced pedometer intervention: Enhanced pedometer for uploading step information and website that provides step goals and feedback, tailored motivational messages and an online community.
111
Total229

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEducation and Standard CareInternet Mediated Enhanced PedometerTotal
Age, Continuous51.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
51.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
51.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
Daily step counts4321.9 steps
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2285.4
4492.9 steps
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2749.9
4404.8 steps
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2517
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
11 participants14 participants25 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other or prefer not to answer
6 participants15 participants21 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
101 participants82 participants183 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
118 participants111 participants229 participants
Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) Score9.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
9.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
9.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants12 Participants28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
102 Participants99 Participants201 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
76 / 11887 / 111
serious
Total, serious adverse events
26 / 11827 / 111

Outcome results

Primary

The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) Score

The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire score ranges from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater disability

Time frame: 12 months

Population: The number of participants analyzed is slightly lower than the number who completed the study at 12 months due to item non-response on the final study survey

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Education and Standard CareThe Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) Score8.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.6
Internet Mediated Enhanced PedometerThe Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) Score6.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 30, 2026