Skip to content

Optical Coherence Tomography for Drug Eluting Stent Safety

In-Vivo Vascular Response of Sirolimus-,Paclitaxel- and Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents in Long Lesions Requiring Overlapping. A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study Using Optical Coherence Tomography

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00693030
Acronym
ODESSA
Enrollment
77
Registered
2008-06-06
Start date
2006-08-31
Completion date
2008-12-31
Last updated
2008-06-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Coronary Artery Disease, Percutaneous Coronary Interventions, Drug-Eluting stents, Optical Coherence Tomography, Thrombosis, Long lesions in native vessel requiring stents in overlap

Brief summary

Increasing lesion complexity in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) has warranted the use of overlapping drug-eluting stents. Whether the substantial impairment of arterial healing observed at sites of overlap in preclinical pathologic studies persists in patients undergoing PCI is unknown. Consecutive patients with long lesions in native coronary vessels requiring stents in overlap are prospectively randomized to receive multiple sirolimus-,paclitaxel polymer-or zotarolimus eluting stents versus bare metal stents. The completeness of stent struts coverage and/or late malapposition are evaluated by Optical Coherence Tomography at 6 months follow-up

Detailed description

If overlapping drug-eluting stents provide increased vessel toxicity is not known. Given the association of delayed healing and incomplete endothelialization observed in animal and human autopsy studies at overlapping sites it is unclear why most patients do well with multiple DES implanted. OCT detecs smaller degrees of in-stent neointima more accurately than IVUS and might be a useful method for identify strut coverage and/or malapposition. Patients if eligible on the basis of clinical and angiographic criteria, are randomized (2:2:2:1) to receive multiple TAXUS Libertè™ vs Cypher Select™ vs Endeavor™ vs Libertè BM stents, in overlap. Stent implantation are done accordingly to the normal interventional practice. QCA and IVUS are performed at the end of optimal stents placement per visual judgement (residual stenosis \< 10%, TIMI 3 flow). Stent, lumen size and volume as well as complete stent strut apposal will be determined by IVUS analysis. Clinical follow-up will take place at 1 month (±1 week), 6 months (±2 weeks) and 1 year (±2 weeks). At 6-months follow-up all patients will undergo a quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), IVUS and Optical Coherence Tomography (LightLab OCT Imaging M2, automated pull back and flushing combination)assessments. OCT images will be acquired at 15-30 frames per second. Blind corelab quantitative strut by strut analysis will be performed using a novel dedicated software at each 0.5 mm section. The following OCT variables will be evaluated:number of visualized strut per section, mean-max neointimal thickness per section, % struts well apposed with neointima at overlapping vs non overlapping sites, % struts without neointima, % struts malapposed, rate of \> 30% uncovered struts/total number of struts per section.

Interventions

DEVICEsirolimus drug eluting coronary stent Cypher™ (Cordis Corp, Johnson & Johnson Co)

comparison of multiple drug eluting stents

DEVICEpaclitaxel polymer drug eluting stent Taxus Libertè™ (Boston Scientific, Natick MS)

comparison of multiple drug eluting coronary stents

DEVICEzotarolimus drug eluting coronary stent Endeavor™ (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA)

comparison of multiple drug eluting coronary stents

DEVICELibertè bare metal coronary stent Libertè™ BMS(Boston Scientific, Natick, MS)

comparison of DES in overlap vs BMS in overlap

Sponsors

Case Western Reserve University
CollaboratorOTHER
Medtronic Vascular
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Boston Scientific Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
A.O. Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Native coronary artery disease with ≥ 75% diameter stenosis 2. Lesion length ≥ 20 mm, 3. Vessel size in between 2.5 and 3.5 mm. 4. Multiple, overlapped DES vs BMS placement (intention to overlap ≥ 4 mm) 5. Signed patient informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. left main coronary artery disease, 2. lesions in coronary artery bypass grafts, 3. acute myocardial infarction, 4. poor cardiac function as defined by left ventricular global ejection fraction ≤ 30%. 5. allergy to aspirin and or clopidogrel/ticlo, 6. renal failure with creatinine value \> 2.5, 7. no suitable anatomy for OCT scan

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of uncovered and/or malapposed stent struts at overlapping versus non overlapping sites in drug eluting vs bare metal stents6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Failure12 months
Number of uncovered and/or malapposed stent struts at overlapping sites in sirolimus-, paclitaxel- or zotarolimus eluting stents6 months

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactMonia Lorini, MD
mlorini@ospedaliriuniti.bergamo.it39-03-526-9751

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 31, 2026