Skip to content

Wound Antiseptic Study With Hypochlorous Acid & Iodopovidone

Comparative Study of Two Antiseptics Solutions for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00692757
Acronym
WASH
Enrollment
432
Registered
2008-06-06
Start date
2008-07-31
Completion date
2009-03-31
Last updated
2008-10-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgical Site Infection

Keywords

Hypochlorous Acid, Colony forming units, surgical site infection, nosocomial infection, bacterial bioburden, wound healing

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether hypochlorous acid is an effective antiseptic agent to prevent surgical site infection.

Detailed description

A topical antimicrobial that decrease the bacterial bioburden of surgical wounds without impairing the wound's ability to heal is a need. A stabilized form of hypochlorous acid has been demonstrated in vitro and in animal studies to possess properties that could fulfill these criteria but it is imperative to assess its efficacy and safety in humans. To assess hypochlorous acid efficacy and safety, it was designed a clinical controlled randomized trial to compare hypochlorous acid to iodopovidone, the gold standard, in preoperative scrub of surgical area.

Interventions

Hypochlorous acid for preoperative scrubbing to prevent surgical site infection in spray

DRUGIodopovidone

Iodopovidone

Sponsors

Hospital Universitario San Jorge de Pereira (HUSJ)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients over 18 years old, who are going to be operated * Classification of surgical wounds according to the National Research Council as class I or II * Risk index classification of the American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) as ASA 1 or 2

Exclusion criteria

* Patients requiring mesh or prosthesis or orthesis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Surgical site infection ratesuntil one month (weekly)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Decreasing Colony Forming Unit count (CFU/mL) after using the skin topic antiseptic in surgical siteone week

Countries

Colombia

Contacts

Primary ContactJuliana Buitrago, Master
julianabuitrago@yahoo.com313-649-0439

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026