Skip to content

Investigating Superion™ In Spinal Stenosis

A Prospective, Multi-Center, Randomized Study Comparing the VertiFlex® Superion™ Interspinous Spacer (ISS) to the X-STOP® Interspinous Process Decompression (IPD®) System in Patients With Moderate Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00692276
Enrollment
391
Registered
2008-06-06
Start date
2008-06-30
Completion date
2017-02-28
Last updated
2020-11-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intermittent Claudication, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Brief summary

The proposed prospective, multi-center, randomized clinical trial is designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Superion™ ISS compared to the X-STOP® IPD® device in healthy adults suffering from at least 6 months of moderate spinal stenosis symptoms who have been unresponsive to conservative care.

Detailed description

The proposed prospective, multi-center, randomized clinical trial is designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Superion™ ISS compared to the X-STOP® IPD® device in healthy adults suffering from at least 6 months of moderate spinal stenosis symptoms who have been unresponsive to conservative care. The study endpoint is the rate of overall subject success at 24 months.

Interventions

DEVICEX-STOP® IPD® Device

Implantation of interspinous process spacer to treat lumbar spinal stenosis

DEVICESuperion™ Interspinous Spacer

Implantation of interspinous process spacer to treat lumbar spinal stenosis

Sponsors

VertiFlex, Incorporated
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Boston Scientific Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female subjects ≥ 45 years of age * Persistent leg/buttock/groin pain, with or without back pain, that is relieved by flexion activities (example: sitting or bending over a shopping cart) * Diagnosis of degenerative spinal stenosis of the lumbar spine, defined as the narrowing of the midline sagittal spinal canal (central) and/or narrowing between the facet superior articulating process (SAP), the posterior vertebral margin (lateral recess), and the nerve root canal (foraminal) * Must be able to sit for 50 minutes without pain and to walk 50 feet or more

Exclusion criteria

* Axial back pain only * Fixed motor deficit * Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis which requires any direct neural decompression or surgical intervention other than those required to implant the control or experimental device * Unremitting pain in any spinal position * Significant peripheral neuropathy or acute denervation secondary to radiculopathy * Lumbar spinal stenosis at more than two levels determined pre-operatively to require surgical intervention * Significant instability of the lumbar spine as defined by 3mm translation or 5 degrees angulation * Sustained pathologic fractures of the vertebrae or multiple fractures of the vertebrae and/or hips * Spondylolisthesis or degenerative spondylolisthesis greater than grade 1.0 (on a scale of 1 to 4) * Spondylolysis (pars fracture) * Morbid obesity, defined as Body Mass Index (BMI) greater than 40kg/m2 * Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus * Prior surgery of the lumbar spine * Cauda equina syndrome (defined as neural compression causing neurogenic bowel or bladder dysfunction) * Infection in the disc or spine, past or present * Paget's disease at involved segment or metastasis to the vertebra, osteomalacia, or other metabolic bone disease * Tumor in the spine or a malignant tumor except for basal cell carcinoma * Involved in pending litigation of the spine or worker's compensation related to the back

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Subjects With Clinically Significant Improvement in OutcomesBaseline and 24 monthsWhere clinically significant improvement in outcomes compared to baseline, as determined by meeting the following: * At least two of three domains of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) \[validated, condition-specific patient-reported questionnaire that captures data in three distinct domains\] * Improvement in physical function by ≥0.5 points * Improvement in symptom severity by ≥0.5 points * Satisfied or somewhat satisfied as defined by a score of ≤ 2.5 points on the patient satisfaction domain * No re-operations, revisions, removals or supplemental fixation at the index level(s) * No major implant- or procedure-related complications: * No dislodgement, migration, or deformation * No new or persistent worsened neurological deficit at the index level * No spinous process fractures * No deep infection, death, or other permanent device attributed disability * No clinically significant confounding treatments: * No epidural injections or nerve block proc

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
1 - Study Treatment
Superion™ Interspinous Spacer
190
2 - Active Control Treatment
X-STOP® IPD® Device
201
Total391

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic1 - Study Treatment2 - Active Control TreatmentTotal
Age, Customized66.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
66.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
66.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants11 Participants16 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
185 Participants190 Participants375 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
80 Participants72 Participants152 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
110 Participants129 Participants239 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
7 / 1906 / 201
other
Total, other adverse events
82 / 190100 / 201
serious
Total, serious adverse events
113 / 190117 / 201

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Subjects With Clinically Significant Improvement in Outcomes

Where clinically significant improvement in outcomes compared to baseline, as determined by meeting the following: * At least two of three domains of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) \[validated, condition-specific patient-reported questionnaire that captures data in three distinct domains\] * Improvement in physical function by ≥0.5 points * Improvement in symptom severity by ≥0.5 points * Satisfied or somewhat satisfied as defined by a score of ≤ 2.5 points on the patient satisfaction domain * No re-operations, revisions, removals or supplemental fixation at the index level(s) * No major implant- or procedure-related complications: * No dislodgement, migration, or deformation * No new or persistent worsened neurological deficit at the index level * No spinous process fractures * No deep infection, death, or other permanent device attributed disability * No clinically significant confounding treatments: * No epidural injections or nerve block proc

Time frame: Baseline and 24 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
1 - Study TreatmentPercentage of Subjects With Clinically Significant Improvement in Outcomes52.7 percentage of subjects
2 - Active Control TreatmentPercentage of Subjects With Clinically Significant Improvement in Outcomes50.2 percentage of subjects

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026