Skip to content

Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Conventional Dose Versus High Dose

Phase III Study for Prostate Cancer, Randomizing Between Two Radiation Dose Levels (68 Gy vs. 78 Gy) and Utilizing Three Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00692107
Enrollment
669
Registered
2008-06-06
Start date
1997-06-30
Completion date
2007-12-31
Last updated
2008-06-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Keywords

Radiotherapy, Dose

Brief summary

3-D conformal radiotherapy offers the opportunity to reach higher tumor doses with acceptable complication rates compared to conventional radiotherapy. There are retrospective and preliminary prospective reports of a better local control / disease free survival (including PSA control) using higher tumor doses. A prospective randomised phase III study is required to validate these reports. The purpose of this randomized phase III study is to investigate and compare the tumor control and toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated to 68 Gy and 78 Gy;

Detailed description

Patients were stratified by hospital, treatment group, age and (neo)adjuvant hormonal therapy. Four treatment groups with specific radiation volumes were defined depending on the estimated risk of tumour involvement of the seminal vesicles (based on T-stage, initial PSA and Gleason Score or Differentiation Grade).The dose was delivered with daily fractions of 2 Gy, five times a week. The total duration of the treatment was 7 weeks for patients treated to 68 Gy and 8 week for 78 Gy. Objectives: * To test in a phase III randomised study the hypothesis that higher radiation doses lead to a higher freedom from failure rate for localized prostate cancer. * To test the hypothesis that a higher freedom from failure rate leads to a longer disease-free survival and overall survival. * To limit acute and late toxicity with respect to gastro-intestinal and urological toxicity. * To evaluate different PSA related endpoints for local failure and distant metastasis. * To establish a database of patients treated to escalated doses with Dose Volume Histograms of the normal tissues at risk for each individual patient and common toxicity endpoints. * To validate a model to estimate normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) of rectum and bladder, based on the above-mentioned database, and to obtain reliable parameter values for NTCP estimations.

Interventions

RADIATIONGray

68 Gy vs. 78 Gy

Sponsors

Erasmus Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Dutch Cancer Society
CollaboratorOTHER
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* locally confined adenocarcinoma of the prostate * all T-stages with a PSA \< 60ng/ml, except any T1a tumor and well-differentiated (or Gleason score \< 5) T1b-c tumors with PSA-levels ≤ 4 ng/ml * Karnofsky Performance Status of 80 or more

Exclusion criteria

* distant metastases * positive regional lymph nodes proven by surgical or cytological sampling * on anticoagulants * previous prostatectomy * previous pelvic irradiation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Freedom from failure

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Toxicity
Overall survival
Freedom from clinical failure

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026