Skip to content

Comparison of Olopatadine 0.6% and Fluticasone Proprionate 50mcg Nasal Sprays in a Two Week Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Trial

A Double-masked, Randomized, Parallel Group, Comparison of Olopatadine 0.6% and Fluticasone Proprionate 50mcg Nasal Sprays in a Two Week Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00691665
Enrollment
130
Registered
2008-06-05
Start date
2008-05-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2010-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Keywords

Rhinitis, Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis, allergies

Brief summary

Comparison of two nasal sprays for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis

Interventions

Olopatadine HCL Nasal Spray, 0.6% 2 sprays per nostril twice daily

DRUGFluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray, 50 mcg

Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray, 50 mcg 2 sprays per nostril once daily

Sponsors

Alcon Research
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion: * A history of spring/summer seasonal allergies. * Positive skin prick test for the currently prevalent allergen of the area. * Confirmed absence of significant anatomic abnormalities, infection, bleeding, and mucosal ulcerations on nasal examination prior to administration of test article. * For pre-menopausal females, a negative pregnancy test prior to entry into the study, and, if sexually active, agreement to use adequate birth control methods throughout the study. Exclusion: * History of chronic sinusitis. * Asthma, with the exception of intermittent asthma. * Smokers. * Known non-responders to antihistamines. * Chronic or intermittent use of inhaled, oral, intramuscular, intravenous or dermal potent or super-potent topical corticosteroids. * Chronic use of long acting antihistamines. * Upper or lower respiratory infection within 14 days of Visit 1. Diagnosis of acute sinusitis within 30 days of Visit 1. * Relatives of study site staff or other individuals who had access to the clinical study protocol. * Participation in any other investigational study within 30 days before entry into this study or concomitantly with this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Percent Change in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) From Baseline14 Days minus baselineResponses to patient-completed diaries for reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores (rTNSS). TNSS is composed of 4 individual assessments, which included runny nose, itchy nose, stuffy nose, and sneezing; each of the 4 assessments were rated using a 4 point scale that ranged in whole units from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). All 4 assessments are then added together for a composite score (TNSS score), the maximum of which could be 12. Reflective scores were assessed from the hour since the last dose of study medication.
Mean Percent Change in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) From Baseline14 days minus baselineResponses to patient-completed diaries for instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Scores (iTNSS). TNSS is composed of 4 individual assessments, which included runny nose, itchy nose, stuffy nose, and sneezing; each of the 4 assessments were rated using a 4 point scale that ranged in whole units from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). All 4 assessments are then added together for a composite score (TNSS score), the maximum of which could be 12. Instantaneous scores were assessed at the time of daily dosing.
Mean Percent Change in Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Scores (rTOSS) From Baseline14 Days minus baselineResponses to patient-completed diaries for reflective Total Ocular Symptom Scores (rTOSS). TOSS is composed of 3 individual assessments of ocular symptoms (itching/burning, tearing/watering, redness) each of the 3 assessments were rated using a 4 point scale that ranged in whole units from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). All 3 assessments are then added together for a composite score (TOSS score), the maximum of which could be 9. Reflective scores were assessed from the hour since the last dose of study medication.
Mean Percent Change in Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Scores (iTOSS) From Baseline14 Days minus baselineResponses to patient-completed diaries for instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Scores (iTOSS). TOSS is composed of 3 individual assessments of ocular symptoms (itching/burning, tearing/watering, redness) each of the 3 assessments were rated using a 4 point scale that ranged in whole units from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). All 3 assessments are then added together for a composite score (TOSS score), the maximum of which could be 9. Instantaneous scores were assessed at the time of daily dosing.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study recruitment occurred from May 14, 2008 - July 31, 2008.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Olopatadine HCL Nasal Spray, 0.6%
Olopatadine HCL Nasal Spray, 0.6% 2 sprays per nostril twice daily
65
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray, 50 Mcg
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray, 50 mcg 2 sprays per nostril once daily
65
Total130

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOlopatadine HCL Nasal Spray, 0.6%Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray, 50 McgTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
8 Participants2 Participants10 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
55 Participants63 Participants118 Participants
Gender
Female
34 participants30 participants64 participants
Gender
Male
30 participants33 participants63 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 650 / 65
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 650 / 65

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Percent Change in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) From Baseline

Responses to patient-completed diaries for instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Scores (iTNSS). TNSS is composed of 4 individual assessments, which included runny nose, itchy nose, stuffy nose, and sneezing; each of the 4 assessments were rated using a 4 point scale that ranged in whole units from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). All 4 assessments are then added together for a composite score (TNSS score), the maximum of which could be 12. Instantaneous scores were assessed at the time of daily dosing.

Time frame: 14 days minus baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Olopatadine HCL Nasal Spray, 0.6%Mean Percent Change in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) From Baseline-45.26 Percent changeStandard Deviation 27.93
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray, 50 McgMean Percent Change in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) From Baseline-48.8 Percent changeStandard Deviation 30.1
Primary

Mean Percent Change in Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Scores (iTOSS) From Baseline

Responses to patient-completed diaries for instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Scores (iTOSS). TOSS is composed of 3 individual assessments of ocular symptoms (itching/burning, tearing/watering, redness) each of the 3 assessments were rated using a 4 point scale that ranged in whole units from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). All 3 assessments are then added together for a composite score (TOSS score), the maximum of which could be 9. Instantaneous scores were assessed at the time of daily dosing.

Time frame: 14 Days minus baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Olopatadine HCL Nasal Spray, 0.6%Mean Percent Change in Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Scores (iTOSS) From Baseline-36.54 Percent changeStandard Deviation 60.26
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray, 50 McgMean Percent Change in Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Scores (iTOSS) From Baseline-41.63 Percent changeStandard Deviation 50.46
Primary

Mean Percent Change in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) From Baseline

Responses to patient-completed diaries for reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores (rTNSS). TNSS is composed of 4 individual assessments, which included runny nose, itchy nose, stuffy nose, and sneezing; each of the 4 assessments were rated using a 4 point scale that ranged in whole units from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). All 4 assessments are then added together for a composite score (TNSS score), the maximum of which could be 12. Reflective scores were assessed from the hour since the last dose of study medication.

Time frame: 14 Days minus baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Olopatadine HCL Nasal Spray, 0.6%Mean Percent Change in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) From Baseline-45.37 Percent changeStandard Deviation 31.77
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray, 50 McgMean Percent Change in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) From Baseline-47.35 Percent changeStandard Deviation 32.83
Primary

Mean Percent Change in Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Scores (rTOSS) From Baseline

Responses to patient-completed diaries for reflective Total Ocular Symptom Scores (rTOSS). TOSS is composed of 3 individual assessments of ocular symptoms (itching/burning, tearing/watering, redness) each of the 3 assessments were rated using a 4 point scale that ranged in whole units from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). All 3 assessments are then added together for a composite score (TOSS score), the maximum of which could be 9. Reflective scores were assessed from the hour since the last dose of study medication.

Time frame: 14 Days minus baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Olopatadine HCL Nasal Spray, 0.6%Mean Percent Change in Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Scores (rTOSS) From Baseline-38.52 Percent changeStandard Deviation 59.8
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray, 50 McgMean Percent Change in Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Scores (rTOSS) From Baseline-40.59 Percent changeStandard Deviation 55.66

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026