Skip to content

Study In Patients With Overactive Bladder Treated With Toviaz® After Failure Of Previous Therapy

Observational Study In Patients With Overactive Bladder (OAB) Treated With Toviaz® After Failure Of Previous Antimuscarinic Therapy Due To Ineffectivity Or Intolerance.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00691093
Enrollment
823
Registered
2008-06-05
Start date
2008-07-31
Completion date
2009-06-30
Last updated
2018-11-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Overactive Bladder, Urinary Incontinence

Keywords

observational

Brief summary

This is a observational study in patients treated with fesoterodine (Toviaz), who have failed on previous treatment for overactive bladder. It will collect epidemiological data and investigate the efficacy and tolerability of fesoterodine.

Detailed description

patients older than 18 years with overactive bladder after failure of previous antimuscarinic therapy (due to lack of efficacy or intolerance)

Interventions

DRUGfesoterodine

4 mg per 24 hours, possibility to increase to 8 mg depending on efficacy chronic treatment

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients older than 18 years * Patients with OAB after failure of previous antimuscarinic therapy - due to lack of efficacy: persistence of storage symptoms. * Required symptoms: micturition frequency 8 and more / 24 hours and urgency episodes ≥2 per day subjectively perceived as bothersome * Due to intolerance: persistent and/or unacceptable adverse events

Exclusion criteria

* Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to peanut or soya or any of the excipients. * History of acute urinary retention (requiring catheterisation) * Gastric retention * Uncontrolled narrow angle glaucoma * Myasthenia gravis * Severe hepatic impairment (Child Pugh C) * Concomitant use of potent CYP3A4 inhibitors in subjects with moderate to severe hepatic or renal impairment * Severe ulcerative colitis * Toxic megacolon.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Each VisitBaseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3 or Early Termination (ET)Micturition frequency: mean number of 'day time' (i.e., the time the participant was awake) micturitions per 24 hours and calculated as the total number of 'day time' urinations, divided by the total diary days collected at that visit.
Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3 or ETNocturnal frequency: mean number of 'night time' (the time the participant was asleep and the urge to urinate woke him/her up) micturitions and calculated as the total number of 'night time' urinations, divided by the total diary days collected at that visit.
Change From Baseline in Urgency Episode Frequency (UEF) Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3 or ETUEF: mean number of micturition related urgency episodes per 24 hours and calculated as the total number of 'urgency' urinations (i.e., sudden urges to urinate and problems to delay micturition) divided by 3 (or if data for 3 days were not available, over the total number of diary days collected at that visit).
Change From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3 or ETThe mean number of UUI episodes: total number of UUI episodes, divided by the total diary days collected at that visit.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q): Symptom Severity/Bother ScaleBaseline, Month 3 or ETSymptom severity/bother score: sub-section of the OAB-q consists of 8 questions. Each item assessed on ordinal scale (0=Not at all to 5=a very great deal). Score=sum of scores for items 1 to 8 and a further 2 points were added if subject was male. Lowest possible score=0 and highest=42. Data were transformed onto a 0 to 100 scale and analyzed based on the transformed score: Transformed Symptom Bother Score=\[(Actual Total Raw Score minus Lowest possible value of raw score) divided by Range\] multiplied by 100. Higher scores=greater symptom severity or bother and lower=minimal symptom severity.
Change From Baseline in Total Scores of OAB-q at Visit 4Baseline, Month 3 or ETSymptom severity/bother score: sub-section of the OAB-q consists of 8 questions. Each item assessed on ordinal scale (0=Not at all to 5=a very great deal). Score=sum of scores for items 1 to 8 and a further 2 points were added if subject was male. Lowest possible score=0 and highest=42. Data were transformed onto a 0 to 100 scale and analyzed based on the transformed score: Transformed Symptom Bother Score=\[(Actual Total Raw Score minus Lowest possible value of raw score) divided by Range\] multiplied by 100. Higher scores=greater symptom severity or bother and lower=minimal symptom severity.
Change From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Urine Volume at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3 or ETThe PVR urine volume: measured by an ultrasound scan.
Study DosesMonth 3 or ETNumber of subjects that changed doses throughout the study period.
Reasons for Study Treatment Dose ChangesMonth 3 or ETPossible change in the dose and the reasons for the change were collected and documented.
Time To Onset Of Treatment ResponseMonth 1, Month 2, Month 3 or ETParticipant's perception of treatment response assessment since the previous visit was noted at each visit. Time to onset of response was calculated in weeks from start of treatment.
Patient's Global Evaluation of FesoterodineBaseline, Month 3 or ETThe patients global evaluation of study medication was assessed via the question 'how would you rate your overall response to the study medication?' and was assessed on the four point categorical scale, ranging from 'Poor' to 'Excellent'.
Clinical Global Evaluation of Fesoterodine12 weeksClinical global evaluation of study medication was assessed via the question 'how would you rate the study medication the patient received for overactive bladder?,' and was assessed on the four point categorical scale, ranging from 'Poor' to 'Excellent.'
Efficacy and Tolerability Compared to Previous Medication (Overall Treatment Effect Scale) at Visit 4Month 3 or ETOverall Treatment Effect Scale: 3 questions from which a numeric score was derived. If a subject answered '(2) About the same' to question 1 then a score of 0 was given. If a subject answered '(1) Worse' to question 1, then a score between -7=a very great deal worse to -1=Almost the same, hardly worse at all was given depending on severity of their symptoms (determined from answer to question 2). If a subject answered '(3) Better' to question 1, then a score ranging from 1=Almost the same, hardly better at all to 7=A very great deal better, depending on their answer to question 3, was given.

Countries

Slovakia

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Fesoterodine 4 mg
The recommended starting dose was 4 mg once daily. Based upon individual response, the dose was increased to 8 mg once daily.
823
Total823

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy1
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1
Overall StudyOngoing at Date of Cut-Off4

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFesoterodine 4 mg
Age, Customized
18-44 years
102 participants
Age, Customized
<18 years
11 participants
Age, Customized
44-64
497 participants
Age, Customized
>=65 years
213 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
574 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
249 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
78 / 823
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 823

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Each Visit

Micturition frequency: mean number of 'day time' (i.e., the time the participant was awake) micturitions per 24 hours and calculated as the total number of 'day time' urinations, divided by the total diary days collected at that visit.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3 or Early Termination (ET)

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all patients who received at least one dose of the study medication and who had at least one post baseline efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fesoterodine 4 mgChange From Baseline in Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Each VisitBaseline11.661 episodesStandard Deviation 2.8565
Fesoterodine 4 mgChange From Baseline in Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Each VisitVisit 2 (Month 1)-2.306 episodesStandard Deviation 1.5773
Fesoterodine 4 mgChange From Baseline in Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Each VisitVisit 3 (Month 2)-3.482 episodesStandard Deviation 1.9022
Fesoterodine 4 mgChange From Baseline in Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Each VisitVisit 4 (Month 3 or ET)-4.180 episodesStandard Deviation 2.1018
Fesoterodine 8 mgChange From Baseline in Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Each VisitVisit 4 (Month 3 or ET)-4.000 episodesStandard Deviation 1.2293
Fesoterodine 8 mgChange From Baseline in Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Each VisitBaseline10.636 episodesStandard Deviation 3.4269
Fesoterodine 8 mgChange From Baseline in Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Each VisitVisit 3 (Month 2)-2.848 episodesStandard Deviation 1.1772
Fesoterodine 8 mgChange From Baseline in Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Each VisitVisit 2 (Month 1)-2.303 episodesStandard Deviation 1.2863
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of EfficacyChange From Baseline in Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Each VisitVisit 4 (Month 3 or ET)-4.031 episodesStandard Deviation 1.8995
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of EfficacyChange From Baseline in Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Each VisitVisit 2 (Month 1)-1.566 episodesStandard Deviation 1.4241
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of EfficacyChange From Baseline in Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Each VisitVisit 3 (Month 2)-3.160 episodesStandard Deviation 1.7571
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of EfficacyChange From Baseline in Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Each VisitBaseline12.664 episodesStandard Deviation 2.7612
Primary

Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4

Nocturnal frequency: mean number of 'night time' (the time the participant was asleep and the urge to urinate woke him/her up) micturitions and calculated as the total number of 'night time' urinations, divided by the total diary days collected at that visit.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3 or ET

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fesoterodine 4 mgChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 3 (Month 2)-1.621 episodesStandard Deviation 0.9281
Fesoterodine 4 mgChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 4 (Month 3 or ET)-1.914 episodesStandard Deviation 1.082
Fesoterodine 4 mgChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 2 (Month 1)-1.104 episodesStandard Deviation 0.796
Fesoterodine 4 mgChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Baseline3.027 episodesStandard Deviation 1.2593
Fesoterodine 8 mgChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Baseline4.000 episodesStandard Deviation 1.422
Fesoterodine 8 mgChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 2 (Month 1)-1.212 episodesStandard Deviation 0.8065
Fesoterodine 8 mgChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 4 (Month 3 or ET)-2.030 episodesStandard Deviation 1.3035
Fesoterodine 8 mgChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 3 (Month 2)-1.848 episodesStandard Deviation 1.129
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of EfficacyChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 4 (Month 3 or ET)-2.072 episodesStandard Deviation 1.0907
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of EfficacyChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Baseline3.528 episodesStandard Deviation 1.3452
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of EfficacyChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 2 (Month 1)-0.915 episodesStandard Deviation 0.9115
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of EfficacyChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 3 (Month 2)-1.613 episodesStandard Deviation 1.0928
Primary

Change From Baseline in Urgency Episode Frequency (UEF) Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4

UEF: mean number of micturition related urgency episodes per 24 hours and calculated as the total number of 'urgency' urinations (i.e., sudden urges to urinate and problems to delay micturition) divided by 3 (or if data for 3 days were not available, over the total number of diary days collected at that visit).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3 or ET

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fesoterodine 4 mgChange From Baseline in Urgency Episode Frequency (UEF) Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Baseline4.412 episodesStandard Deviation 2.4355
Fesoterodine 4 mgChange From Baseline in Urgency Episode Frequency (UEF) Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 2 (Month 1)-1.890 episodesStandard Deviation 1.5967
Fesoterodine 4 mgChange From Baseline in Urgency Episode Frequency (UEF) Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 3 (Month 2)-2.736 episodesStandard Deviation 1.9249
Fesoterodine 4 mgChange From Baseline in Urgency Episode Frequency (UEF) Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 4 (Month 3 or ET)-3.127 episodesStandard Deviation 2.021
Fesoterodine 8 mgChange From Baseline in Urgency Episode Frequency (UEF) Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 4 (Month 3 or ET)-2.636 episodesStandard Deviation 1.7221
Fesoterodine 8 mgChange From Baseline in Urgency Episode Frequency (UEF) Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Baseline4.697 episodesStandard Deviation 1.9914
Fesoterodine 8 mgChange From Baseline in Urgency Episode Frequency (UEF) Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 3 (Month 2)-2.182 episodesStandard Deviation 1.4557
Fesoterodine 8 mgChange From Baseline in Urgency Episode Frequency (UEF) Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 2 (Month 1)-1.697 episodesStandard Deviation 0.9827
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of EfficacyChange From Baseline in Urgency Episode Frequency (UEF) Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 4 (Month 3 or ET)-3.814 episodesStandard Deviation 3.069
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of EfficacyChange From Baseline in Urgency Episode Frequency (UEF) Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 2 (Month 1)-1.650 episodesStandard Deviation 1.3065
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of EfficacyChange From Baseline in Urgency Episode Frequency (UEF) Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 3 (Month 2)-2.895 episodesStandard Deviation 2.6468
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of EfficacyChange From Baseline in Urgency Episode Frequency (UEF) Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Baseline5.587 episodesStandard Deviation 3.7759
Primary

Change From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4

The mean number of UUI episodes: total number of UUI episodes, divided by the total diary days collected at that visit.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3 or ET

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fesoterodine 4 mgChange From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Baseline2.601 episodesStandard Deviation 1.7127
Fesoterodine 4 mgChange From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 2 (Month 1)-1.209 episodesStandard Deviation 1.0891
Fesoterodine 4 mgChange From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 3 (Month 2)-1.806 episodesStandard Deviation 1.3107
Fesoterodine 4 mgChange From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 4 (Month 3 or ET)-2.065 episodesStandard Deviation 1.4582
Fesoterodine 8 mgChange From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 4 (Month 3 or ET)-1.733 episodesStandard Deviation 1.6836
Fesoterodine 8 mgChange From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Baseline2.933 episodesStandard Deviation 1.2551
Fesoterodine 8 mgChange From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 3 (Month 2)-1.583 episodesStandard Deviation 1.4974
Fesoterodine 8 mgChange From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 2 (Month 1)-1.067 episodesStandard Deviation 1.1738
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of EfficacyChange From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 4 (Month 3 or ET)-2.362 episodesStandard Deviation 1.6477
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of EfficacyChange From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 2 (Month 1)-1.190 episodesStandard Deviation 1.2532
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of EfficacyChange From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 3 (Month 2)-1.781 episodesStandard Deviation 1.4729
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of EfficacyChange From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Baseline3.467 episodesStandard Deviation 2.4484
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Urine Volume at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4

The PVR urine volume: measured by an ultrasound scan.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3 or ET

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fesoterodine 4 mgChange From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Urine Volume at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 2 (Month 1)-6.650 mlStandard Deviation 16.4784
Fesoterodine 4 mgChange From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Urine Volume at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 3 (Month 2)-9.864 mlStandard Deviation 20.2348
Fesoterodine 4 mgChange From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Urine Volume at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Baseline27.932 mlStandard Deviation 27.6079
Fesoterodine 4 mgChange From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Urine Volume at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 4 (Month 3 or ET)-12.800 mlStandard Deviation 23.9575
Fesoterodine 8 mgChange From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Urine Volume at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 2 (Month 1)-12.800 mlStandard Deviation 13.2313
Fesoterodine 8 mgChange From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Urine Volume at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Baseline42.000 mlStandard Deviation 35.6059
Fesoterodine 8 mgChange From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Urine Volume at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 3 (Month 2)-18.700 mlStandard Deviation 22.2663
Fesoterodine 8 mgChange From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Urine Volume at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 4 (Month 3 or ET)-21.000 mlStandard Deviation 24.3584
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of EfficacyChange From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Urine Volume at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 3 (Month 2)-5.791 mlStandard Deviation 17.8493
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of EfficacyChange From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Urine Volume at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Baseline24.867 mlStandard Deviation 27.7108
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of EfficacyChange From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Urine Volume at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 2 (Month 1)-2.364 mlStandard Deviation 11.25
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of EfficacyChange From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Urine Volume at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4Visit 4 (Month 3 or ET)-7.415 mlStandard Deviation 21.7658
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Scores of OAB-q at Visit 4

Symptom severity/bother score: sub-section of the OAB-q consists of 8 questions. Each item assessed on ordinal scale (0=Not at all to 5=a very great deal). Score=sum of scores for items 1 to 8 and a further 2 points were added if subject was male. Lowest possible score=0 and highest=42. Data were transformed onto a 0 to 100 scale and analyzed based on the transformed score: Transformed Symptom Bother Score=\[(Actual Total Raw Score minus Lowest possible value of raw score) divided by Range\] multiplied by 100. Higher scores=greater symptom severity or bother and lower=minimal symptom severity.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3 or ET

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fesoterodine 4 mgChange From Baseline in Total Scores of OAB-q at Visit 4-34.101 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.0799
Fesoterodine 8 mgChange From Baseline in Total Scores of OAB-q at Visit 4-34.318 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4928
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of EfficacyChange From Baseline in Total Scores of OAB-q at Visit 4-32.018 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.7183
Secondary

Clinical Global Evaluation of Fesoterodine

Clinical global evaluation of study medication was assessed via the question 'how would you rate the study medication the patient received for overactive bladder?,' and was assessed on the four point categorical scale, ranging from 'Poor' to 'Excellent.'

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: SAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Fesoterodine 4 mgClinical Global Evaluation of FesoterodineExcellent513 participants
Fesoterodine 4 mgClinical Global Evaluation of FesoterodineGood274 participants
Fesoterodine 4 mgClinical Global Evaluation of FesoterodineFair24 participants
Fesoterodine 4 mgClinical Global Evaluation of FesoterodinePoor9 participants
Fesoterodine 4 mgClinical Global Evaluation of FesoterodineMissing3 participants
Secondary

Efficacy and Tolerability Compared to Previous Medication (Overall Treatment Effect Scale) at Visit 4

Overall Treatment Effect Scale: 3 questions from which a numeric score was derived. If a subject answered '(2) About the same' to question 1 then a score of 0 was given. If a subject answered '(1) Worse' to question 1, then a score between -7=a very great deal worse to -1=Almost the same, hardly worse at all was given depending on severity of their symptoms (determined from answer to question 2). If a subject answered '(3) Better' to question 1, then a score ranging from 1=Almost the same, hardly better at all to 7=A very great deal better, depending on their answer to question 3, was given.

Time frame: Month 3 or ET

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fesoterodine 4 mgEfficacy and Tolerability Compared to Previous Medication (Overall Treatment Effect Scale) at Visit 45.661 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1663
Fesoterodine 8 mgEfficacy and Tolerability Compared to Previous Medication (Overall Treatment Effect Scale) at Visit 45.818 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9816
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of EfficacyEfficacy and Tolerability Compared to Previous Medication (Overall Treatment Effect Scale) at Visit 44.702 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7925
Secondary

Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q): Symptom Severity/Bother Scale

Symptom severity/bother score: sub-section of the OAB-q consists of 8 questions. Each item assessed on ordinal scale (0=Not at all to 5=a very great deal). Score=sum of scores for items 1 to 8 and a further 2 points were added if subject was male. Lowest possible score=0 and highest=42. Data were transformed onto a 0 to 100 scale and analyzed based on the transformed score: Transformed Symptom Bother Score=\[(Actual Total Raw Score minus Lowest possible value of raw score) divided by Range\] multiplied by 100. Higher scores=greater symptom severity or bother and lower=minimal symptom severity.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3 or ET

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fesoterodine 4 mgOveractive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q): Symptom Severity/Bother ScaleBaseline59.263 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.5239
Fesoterodine 4 mgOveractive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q): Symptom Severity/Bother ScaleVisit 4 (Month 3 or ET)25.147 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.369
Fesoterodine 8 mgOveractive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q): Symptom Severity/Bother ScaleVisit 4 (Month 3 or ET)35.682 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.752
Fesoterodine 8 mgOveractive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q): Symptom Severity/Bother ScaleBaseline70.000 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1242
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of EfficacyOveractive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q): Symptom Severity/Bother ScaleBaseline64.737 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.1696
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of EfficacyOveractive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q): Symptom Severity/Bother ScaleVisit 4 (Month 3 or ET)32.719 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.9115
Secondary

Patient's Global Evaluation of Fesoterodine

The patients global evaluation of study medication was assessed via the question 'how would you rate your overall response to the study medication?' and was assessed on the four point categorical scale, ranging from 'Poor' to 'Excellent'.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3 or ET

Population: The safety analysis set (SAS) included all subjects who enrolled in the study, signed informed consent and received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Fesoterodine 4 mgPatient's Global Evaluation of FesoterodineExcellent536 participants
Fesoterodine 4 mgPatient's Global Evaluation of FesoterodineGood252 participants
Fesoterodine 4 mgPatient's Global Evaluation of FesoterodineFair22 participants
Fesoterodine 4 mgPatient's Global Evaluation of FesoterodinePoor10 participants
Fesoterodine 4 mgPatient's Global Evaluation of FesoterodineMissing3 participants
Secondary

Reasons for Study Treatment Dose Changes

Possible change in the dose and the reasons for the change were collected and documented.

Time frame: Month 3 or ET

Population: SAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Fesoterodine 4 mgReasons for Study Treatment Dose ChangesInefectivity, Not Sufficient Effectivity22 participants
Fesoterodine 4 mgReasons for Study Treatment Dose ChangesInfectivity29 participants
Fesoterodine 4 mgReasons for Study Treatment Dose ChangesInsufficient (efficiency) effect1 participants
Fesoterodine 4 mgReasons for Study Treatment Dose ChangesInsufficient response1 participants
Fesoterodine 4 mgReasons for Study Treatment Dose ChangesPoor overall response1 participants
Fesoterodine 4 mgReasons for Study Treatment Dose ChangesMissing4 participants
Secondary

Study Doses

Number of subjects that changed doses throughout the study period.

Time frame: Month 3 or ET

Population: SAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Fesoterodine 4 mgStudy DosesIncreased57 participants
Fesoterodine 4 mgStudy DosesStayed the same766 participants
Fesoterodine 4 mgStudy DosesDecreased0 participants
Fesoterodine 4 mgStudy DosesFluctuated0 participants
Secondary

Time To Onset Of Treatment Response

Participant's perception of treatment response assessment since the previous visit was noted at each visit. Time to onset of response was calculated in weeks from start of treatment.

Time frame: Month 1, Month 2, Month 3 or ET

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Fesoterodine 4 mgTime To Onset Of Treatment Response3.0 weeksFull Range 1.27
Fesoterodine 8 mgTime To Onset Of Treatment Response3.0 weeksFull Range 1.1
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of EfficacyTime To Onset Of Treatment Response3.0 weeksFull Range 2.72

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026