Skip to content

Protein Nutrition During Weight Loss

Effect of Milk Proteins and Protein Feeding Pattern on Body Composition and Protein Metabolism in Energy Restricted Obese Subjects

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00690781
Acronym
SURPROL-CF-H
Enrollment
48
Registered
2008-06-05
Start date
2008-05-31
Completion date
2010-07-31
Last updated
2011-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity

Keywords

casein, milk soluble proteins, protein feeding pattern, overweight, obesity, energy restriction, protein metabolism, lean body mass, body composition, nitrogen balance, protein synthesis, proteolysis, spread, pulse

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to minimize the loss of lean body mass that occurs during a weight-loss program in obese people by changing the nature of ingested protein and the pattern of protein feeding

Detailed description

In most physiological situations, the adequate amount of protein necessary to promote health is more and more well known. However, for an adequate protein intake, it was shown that the kinetic of amino acid delivery to the organism has an influence on the efficiency of protein utilization. In particular, caseins, slowly digested milk proteins, promote a better protein balance than rapidly digested milk soluble proteins in young subjects (Boirie et al., 1997). In addition, changing protein feeding pattern (80% of daily protein consumed at noon vs 25%) significantly affect protein balance (Arnal et al., 2000). In young healthy individuals, the best protein efficiency is obtained by spreading protein absorption over time (casein, and/or 4 isoproteic meal per day). On the contrary, in older individuals, due to alteration in the sensitivity of protein metabolism to feeding, it is better to use rapidly digested proteins (Dangin et al., 2003), and / or to have a protein-rich meal once a day (Arnal et al., 1999). Another physiological situation that was not studied in this regard is obesity. Obesity incidence is rapidly increasing around the world. When body mass index (weight / height2) becomes too high (\>30), it is often suggested to restrict energy intake. However, severe energy restriction leads to fat mass loss, but also to lean body mass loss, which should be prevented. Our aim is to test whether for an adequate amount of total protein, it is possible to preserve lean body mass by using either casein, or milk soluble proteins, or by changing protein feeding pattern.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPulse casein feeding during energy restriction

Obese subjects are subjected to a 35% energy restriction during 6 weeks and during this period, 25% of energy is given as protein, these proteins being casein. In addition, a pulse protein feeding pattern is used (8% protein in the morning, 80% for lunch, 4% at 1600 h and 8% in the evening).

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTSpread casein feeding during energy restriction

Obese subjects are subjected to a 35% energy restriction during 6 weeks and during this period, 25% of energy is given as protein, these proteins being casein. In addition, a spread protein feeding pattern is used (25% of protein at each of the four meals of the day).

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPulse milk soluble protein feeding during energy restriction

Obese subjects are subjected to a 35% energy restriction during 6 weeks and during this period, 25% of energy is given as protein, these proteins being milk soluble proteins. In addition, a pulse protein feeding pattern is used (8% protein in the morning, 80% for lunch, 4% at 1600 h and 8% in the evening).

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTSpread milk soluble protein feeding during energy restriction

Obese subjects are subjected to a 35% energy restriction during 6 weeks and during this period, 25% of energy is given as protein, these proteins being milk soluble proteins. In addition, a spread protein feeding pattern is used (25% of protein at each of the four meals of the day).

Sponsors

Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine d'Auvergne
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
ANRS, Emerging Infectious Diseases
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Université d'Auvergne
CollaboratorOTHER
Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* BMI\>30 * sedentary * normal TSH

Exclusion criteria

* any serious health problem

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Lean body mass6 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Nitrogen balance6 weeks
whole body leucine turnover6 weeks

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026