Skip to content

A Comparison of Hydrochlorothiazide and Metolazone in Combination With Furosemide in Congestive Heart Failure Patients

A Comparison of Hydrochlorothiazide and Metolazone in Combination With Furosemide in Congestive Heart Failure Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00690521
Enrollment
8
Registered
2008-06-04
Start date
2004-10-26
Completion date
2009-11-10
Last updated
2024-10-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Congestive Heart Failure

Keywords

congestive heart failure, diuretics, combination

Brief summary

Objective: To establish which combination of diuretics is the most effective in promoting diuresis in congestive heart failure patients. Secondary Objectives: To determine the duration of action of furosemide as monotherapy and in combination hydrochlorothiazide with metolazone. To determine the effect of diuretic combination therapy on neurohormonal activation. Background: Diuretic resistance occurs when a potent diuretic drug, such as furosemide, is given in therapeutic doses and fails to reduce extracellular fluid volume to the desired level in an edematous patient. Studies have shown that metolazone and hydrochlorothiazide have demonstrated a synergistic response when used in combination with furosemide in congestive heart failure patients. The current guidelines for treating diuretic resistance in congestive heart failure patients recommend the metolazone-furosemide combination. However, there is no evidence to conclude that this combination is superior to hydrochlorothiazide-furosemide in increasing diuresis. Methods: Study to compare the efficacy of hydrochlorothiazide with metolazone in combination with stable doses of furosemide in 13 patients with congestive heart failure. The primary endpoint will be change in urinary output. Secondary endpoints will be changes in weight, neurohormones (angiotensin II, catecholamines, brain natriuretic peptide, aldosterone), and electrocardiographic parameters of ventricular instability. Study procedures will be performed at the UNM General Clinical Research Center. Patients will be hospitalized for 2 separate 4-day admissions, separated by a 1-week washout period. At each admission each patient will receive furosemide in combination with either metolazone or hydrochlorothiazide (metolazone for one admission and hydrochlorothiazide for the other). Following administration of combination therapy, blood and urine samples will be collected throughout the day to chart the onset and magnitude of effect of each treatment regimen. Various hemodynamic, renal, endocrine, and neurohormonal parameters will be assesed as will the effect of each combination treatment on ventricular instability using 12-lead electrocardiography. Data will be analyzed using ANOVA to compare changes from baseline and the Student t-test to analyze intertreatment differences. All statistical analysis will be performed using SAS v6.12.d

Interventions

DRUGTreatment of Furosemide + Hydrochlorothiazide

A randomized, double-blind, crossover study designed to compare the efficacy of hydrochlorothiazide in combination with stable doses of furosemide in congestive heart failure patients.

DRUGTreatment of Furosemide + Metolazone

A randomized, double-blind, crossover study designed to compare the efficacy of metolazone in combination with stable doses of furosemide in congestive heart failure patients.

Sponsors

University of New Mexico
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 98 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \>18 years * Diagnosis of chronic congestive heart failure with an ejection fraction ≤45% * Currently on a stable regimen of furosemide consisting of a daily dose of at least 80 mg for at least two weeks. * Patients receiving ACE-inhibitors and/or beta-blockers must be taking these medications for at least two weeks in stable doses.

Exclusion criteria

* Renal dysfunction (serum creatinine \>2 mg/dl or creatinine clearance of \<30 ml/min as calculated by the Cockroft and Gault equation) * Hepatic dysfunction (AST and ALT \>3 times the upper limit of the normal) * Hypokalemia (\<4.0 mg/dl) * Concomitant treatment with any diuretic other than furosemide (with the exception of spironolactone).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Participants With Change in Urinary OutputFirst Intervention (4 days), Washout (7 days), and Second Intervention (4 days)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

8 patients enrolled and received drug treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm 1
A Randomized, double-blind, crossover study designed to compare the efficacy of furosemide in combination with hydrochlorothiazide or metolazone in congestive heart failure patients. First Intervention with Furosemide and Hydrochlorothiazide (4 days), Washout (7 days), and Second Intervention with Furosemide + Metolazone(4 days).
8
Total8

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm 1
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
5 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 40 / 40 / 40 / 4
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 40 / 40 / 40 / 4
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 40 / 40 / 40 / 4

Outcome results

Primary

Participants With Change in Urinary Output

Time frame: First Intervention (4 days), Washout (7 days), and Second Intervention (4 days)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm1- Furosemide and Hydrochlorothiazide Then Furosemide + MetolazoneParticipants With Change in Urinary OutputFirst Intervention (4 days)4 participants
Arm1- Furosemide and Hydrochlorothiazide Then Furosemide + MetolazoneParticipants With Change in Urinary OutputWashout (7 days)4 participants
Arm1- Furosemide and Hydrochlorothiazide Then Furosemide + MetolazoneParticipants With Change in Urinary OutputSecond Intervention (4 days)4 participants
Arm2-Furosemide and Metolazone Then Furosemide and HydrochlorothiazideParticipants With Change in Urinary OutputFirst Intervention (4 days)4 participants
Arm2-Furosemide and Metolazone Then Furosemide and HydrochlorothiazideParticipants With Change in Urinary OutputWashout (7 days)4 participants
Arm2-Furosemide and Metolazone Then Furosemide and HydrochlorothiazideParticipants With Change in Urinary OutputSecond Intervention (4 days)4 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026