Skip to content

Safety and Effectiveness of Style 410 Silicone-Filled Breast Implant Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00690339
Enrollment
941
Registered
2008-06-04
Start date
2001-02-28
Completion date
2012-12-31
Last updated
2014-10-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Augmentation, Breast Reconstruction, Revision of Augmentation or Reconstruction

Brief summary

Safety and effectiveness of Style 410 Silicone-Filled Breast Implants in women undergoing primary augmentation, primary reconstruction, or revision of existing breast implants.

Interventions

DEVICEStyle 410 Silicone-Filled Breast Implants

Breast Implant Surgery

Sponsors

Allergan Medical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Female, age 18 years or older * Patients seeking primary breast augmentation (i.e., no previous breast implant surgery) indicated for the following: Patient dissatisfaction with size or shape of breast (e.g., mammary hypoplasia), asymmetry, ptosis, aplasia * Patients seeking breast reconstruction * Patients seeking breast revision-augmentation * Patients seeking breast revision-reconstruction * Adequate tissue available to cover implants * Patients must be willing to undergo MRI at their 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10-year follow-up visits (serial MRI). The patient must be eligible for MRI (for example, no implanted metal or metal devices and no history of severe claustrophobia that may make her ineligible for MRI).

Exclusion criteria

* Advanced fibrocystic disease considered to be premalignant without accompanying subcutaneous mastectomy * Existing carcinoma of the breast, without mastectomy * Abscess or infection in the body at the time of enrollment * Pregnant or nursing * Have any disease, including uncontrolled diabetes (e.g., Hb AIc \> 8%), that is clinically known to impact wound healing ability * Show tissue characteristics that are clinically incompatible with mammaplasty, such as tissue damage resulting from radiation, inadequate tissue, compromised vascularity or ulceration * Have, or under treatment for, any condition that may constitute an unwarranted surgical risk (e.g., unstable cardiac or pulmonary problems) * Show psychological characteristics that may be incompatible with the surgical procedure and the prosthesis, such as inappropriate attitude or motivation (e.g., body dysmorphic disorder) * Are not willing to undergo further surgery for revision, if medically required

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Local Complications10 yearsBy patient risk of complications occurring in at least 5% of patients in 1 or more cohorts

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Satisfaction With Breast Implants as Determined by Patients and Physicians on a 5-point Scale.10 yearsSatisfaction score on a 5-point scale, where 1 is definitely dissatisfied and 5 is definitely satisfied

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Augmentation
Augmentation Style 410 Silicone-Filled Breast Implants: Breast Implant Surgery
492
Reconstruction
Reconstruction Style 410 Silicone-Filled Breast Implants: Breast Implant Surgery
225
Revision-augmentation
Revision-augmentation Style 410 Silicone-Filled Breast Implants: Breast Implant Surgery
156
Revision-reconstruction
Revision-reconstruction Style 410 Silicone-Filled Breast Implants: Breast Implant Surgery
68
Total941

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAugmentationReconstructionRevision-augmentationRevision-reconstructionTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants7 Participants0 Participants3 Participants10 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
492 Participants218 Participants156 Participants65 Participants931 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
492 Participants225 Participants156 Participants68 Participants941 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 4920 / 2250 / 1560 / 68
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 4920 / 2250 / 1560 / 68

Outcome results

Primary

Local Complications

By patient risk of complications occurring in at least 5% of patients in 1 or more cohorts

Time frame: 10 years

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AugmentationLocal ComplicationsAsymmetry1.2 Percentage of Patients
AugmentationLocal ComplicationsImplant Malposition4.7 Percentage of Patients
AugmentationLocal ComplicationsSwelling4.0 Percentage of Patients
AugmentationLocal ComplicationsBreast Pain4.5 Percentage of Patients
AugmentationLocal ComplicationsWrinkling/Rippling0.9 Percentage of Patients
AugmentationLocal ComplicationsCapsular Contracture9.2 Percentage of Patients
AugmentationLocal ComplicationsSeroma/Fluid Accumulation1.6 Percentage of Patients
AugmentationLocal ComplicationsInfection1.7 Percentage of Patients
ReconstructionLocal ComplicationsWrinkling/Rippling6.2 Percentage of Patients
ReconstructionLocal ComplicationsSwelling5.3 Percentage of Patients
ReconstructionLocal ComplicationsSeroma/Fluid Accumulation2.8 Percentage of Patients
ReconstructionLocal ComplicationsImplant Malposition5.7 Percentage of Patients
ReconstructionLocal ComplicationsAsymmetry12.4 Percentage of Patients
ReconstructionLocal ComplicationsInfection6.1 Percentage of Patients
ReconstructionLocal ComplicationsCapsular Contracture14.5 Percentage of Patients
ReconstructionLocal ComplicationsBreast Pain8.2 Percentage of Patients
Revision-augmentationLocal ComplicationsBreast Pain5.2 Percentage of Patients
Revision-augmentationLocal ComplicationsCapsular Contracture11.9 Percentage of Patients
Revision-augmentationLocal ComplicationsAsymmetry6.9 Percentage of Patients
Revision-augmentationLocal ComplicationsWrinkling/Rippling3.7 Percentage of Patients
Revision-augmentationLocal ComplicationsInfection2.1 Percentage of Patients
Revision-augmentationLocal ComplicationsImplant Malposition9.1 Percentage of Patients
Revision-augmentationLocal ComplicationsSwelling2.7 Percentage of Patients
Revision-augmentationLocal ComplicationsSeroma/Fluid Accumulation3.2 Percentage of Patients
Revision-reconstructionLocal ComplicationsAsymmetry17.4 Percentage of Patients
Revision-reconstructionLocal ComplicationsSwelling3.2 Percentage of Patients
Revision-reconstructionLocal ComplicationsWrinkling/Rippling12.8 Percentage of Patients
Revision-reconstructionLocal ComplicationsBreast Pain7.8 Percentage of Patients
Revision-reconstructionLocal ComplicationsCapsular Contracture26.8 Percentage of Patients
Revision-reconstructionLocal ComplicationsSeroma/Fluid Accumulation6.2 Percentage of Patients
Revision-reconstructionLocal ComplicationsImplant Malposition8.0 Percentage of Patients
Revision-reconstructionLocal ComplicationsInfection8.5 Percentage of Patients
Secondary

Satisfaction With Breast Implants as Determined by Patients and Physicians on a 5-point Scale.

Satisfaction score on a 5-point scale, where 1 is definitely dissatisfied and 5 is definitely satisfied

Time frame: 10 years

Population: All patients who had a breast implant satisfaction rating

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AugmentationSatisfaction With Breast Implants as Determined by Patients and Physicians on a 5-point Scale.Physician Satisfaction4.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
AugmentationSatisfaction With Breast Implants as Determined by Patients and Physicians on a 5-point Scale.Patient Satisfaction4.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
ReconstructionSatisfaction With Breast Implants as Determined by Patients and Physicians on a 5-point Scale.Patient Satisfaction4.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
ReconstructionSatisfaction With Breast Implants as Determined by Patients and Physicians on a 5-point Scale.Physician Satisfaction4.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Revision-augmentationSatisfaction With Breast Implants as Determined by Patients and Physicians on a 5-point Scale.Physician Satisfaction4.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Revision-augmentationSatisfaction With Breast Implants as Determined by Patients and Physicians on a 5-point Scale.Patient Satisfaction4.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Revision-reconstructionSatisfaction With Breast Implants as Determined by Patients and Physicians on a 5-point Scale.Physician Satisfaction4.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Revision-reconstructionSatisfaction With Breast Implants as Determined by Patients and Physicians on a 5-point Scale.Patient Satisfaction4.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 23, 2026