Skip to content

A Study for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Methotrexate (MTX) With an Inadequate Response to TNFα Inhibitor Therapy

A Phase 2 Study of Multiple Intravenous Doses of LY2127399 in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Concomitant Methotrexate and an Inadequate Response to TNFα Inhibitor Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00689728
Enrollment
100
Registered
2008-06-04
Start date
2008-06-30
Completion date
2010-05-31
Last updated
2018-12-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to explore whether LY2127399 is effective in relieving signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients with a history of inadequate response or intolerance to at least 1 Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha (TNFα) inhibitor therapy. Examples of these TNFα inhibitor therapies that are currently on the market include Enbrel® (etanercept), Remicade® (infliximab), and Humira® (adalimumab).

Interventions

BIOLOGICALLY2127399

LY2127399 will be administered as a single IV infusion over 30 minutes.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo will be administered as a single IV infusion over 30 minutes.

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have given written informed consent approval * Women must not be at risk to become pregnant during study participation * Diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis * Active Rheumatoid Arthritis * Current, regular use of Methotrexate, at a stable dose * Have been on at least 1 biologic tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) inhibitor therapy and either failed or were intolerant to treatment * Other criteria to be reviewed by study doctor

Exclusion criteria

* Use of excluded medications (reviewed by study doctor) * Have medical findings which, in the opinion of the study doctor, put patient at an unacceptable risk for participation in the study * Have had recent or ongoing infection which, in the opinion of the study doctor put patient at an unacceptable risk for participation * Evidence of tuberculosis * Have systemic inflammatory condition other than rheumatoid arthritis (RA), such as juvenile RA, seronegative spondyloarthropathy, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, or psoriatic arthritis. * Other criteria to be reviewed by study doctor

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR)50 Response at Week 1616 weeksACR50 Responder Index is a composite of clinical, laboratory, and functional measures in rheumatoid arthritis. ACR50 Responder is defined as a participant with greater than 50% improvement from baseline in both tender and swollen joint counts and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: physician global assessment, patient global assessment, functional ability measure (Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index which measures participants' perceived degree of difficulty when performing various daily activities), visual analog pain scale, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcome Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 16Baseline, 16 weeksSelf-reported questionnaire of 36 questions in 8 domains (physical functioning, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, mental health, role-physical, role-emotional, general health). Each domain is scored by summing individual items and transforming scores into a 0-100 scale (higher scores=better health status/function). The mental and physical component summaries are based on the 8 domains. Component scores are transformed scores representing a mean (50) and standard deviation (10) in the general United States (US) population. Scores \> or \<50 are above or below the average US population.
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 1616 weeksACR20 Responder Index is a composite of clinical, laboratory, and functional measures in rheumatoid arthritis. An ACR20 Responder is defined as a participant with at least 20% improvement from baseline in both tender and swollen joint counts and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: physician global assessment, patient global assessment, functional ability measure (Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index which measures participants' perceived degree of difficulty when performing various daily activities), visual analog pain scale, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein.
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR)70 Response at Week 1616 weeksACR70 Responder Index is a composite of clinical, laboratory, and functional measures in rheumatoid arthritis. An ACR70 Responder is defined as a participant with at least 70% improvement from baseline in both tender and swollen joint counts and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: physician global assessment, patient global assessment, functional ability measure (Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index which measures participants' perceived degree of difficulty when performing various daily activities), visual analog pain scale, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein.
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count at Week 16Baseline, 16 weeksThe number of tender and painful joints is determined by examination of 28 joints (14 on each side) which include: the 2 shoulders, the 2 elbows, the 2 wrists, the 10 metacarpophalangeal joints, the 2 interphalangeal joints of the thumb, the 8 proximal interphalangeal joints, and the 2 knees. The joints are assessed and classified as tender or not tender.
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Week 16Baseline, 16 weeksThe number of swollen joints is determined by examination of 28 joints (14 on each side) which include: the 2 shoulders, the 2 elbows, the 2 wrists, the 10 metacarpophalangeal joints, the 2 interphalangeal joints of the thumb, the 8 proximal interphalangeal joints, and the 2 knees. The joints are assessed and classified as swollen or not swollen.
Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Joint Pain at Week 16Baseline, 16 weeksParticipant's assessment of joint pain using a visual analog scale (VAS), which ranged from 0 to 100 millimeters, where 0 indicated no pain and 100 indicated worst possible pain.
Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 16Baseline, 16 weeksParticipant's assessment of their current arthritis disease activity using a visual analog scale (VAS), which ranged from 0 to 100 millimeters, where 0 indicated no arthritis activity and 100 indicated extremely active arthritis.
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 16Baseline, 16 weeksPhysician's global assessment of arthritis disease activity using a visual analog scale (VAS) which ranged from 0 to 100 millimeters, where 0 indicates no arthritis activity and 100 indicates extremely active arthritis.
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 16Baseline, 16 weeksThe HAQ-DI questionnaire scores the participant's self-perception on the degree of difficulty when dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and performing other daily activities (0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, and 3=unable to do). The scores for each of the functional areas, which have a range from 0 to 3, are averaged to calculate the functional disability index. Higher scores are associated with greater disability.
Number of Participants Experiencing An Adverse EventBaseline up to 68 weeksSerious adverse events and other non-serious adverse events are located in the Reported Adverse Event section.
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at Week 16Baseline, 16 weeksDisease Activity Score (modified to include the 28 joint count \[DAS28\]) consists of a composite score of the following variables: tender joint count (TJC28), swollen joint count (SJC28), C-reactive protein (CRP), and participant global assessment of their disease activity (patient global VAS). It is calculated by using the following formula:DAS28-CRP=0.56 times the square root of(28TJC)+0.28 times the square root of(28SJC)+0.36\*natural log (ln)(CRP+1)+0.014\*patient global VAS+0.96. Scores ranged from 1.0-9.4, where lower scores indicated less disease activity, and remission was DAS28-CRP \<2.6. A decrease in DAS28-CRP indicated an improvement in participant's condition.
Number of Participants With Response (Response Rate) Based Upon European League Against Rheumatism Responder Index, 28 Joint Count (EULAR28) at Week 1616 weeksEULAR28 categorizes clinical response based upon improvement since baseline in Disease Activity Score modified to include the 28 joint count (DAS28) and post-baseline DAS28. DAS28 consists of a composite score of the following variables: tender joint count (TJC28), swollen joint count (SJC28), C-reactive protein (CRP), and participant global assessment of their disease activity (patient global VAS). EULAR28 categories include: No Response (improvement in DAS28 of less than or equal to 0.6 units or post-baseline DAS28 score greater than 5.1 with improvement by less than or equal to 1.2 units), Moderate Response (post-baseline DAS28 score less than or equal to 5.1 with improvement by more than 0.6 units but no greater than 1.2 units or post-baseline DAS28 score greater than 3.2 with improvement by more than 1.2 units), and Good Response (post-baseline DAS28 score less than or equal to 3.2 with improvement by more than 1.2 units).
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Score at Week 16Baseline, 16 weeksThe FACIT Fatigue Score is a brief patient-reported measure of fatigue and consists of 13 items. Scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating less fatigue.
Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Absolute CD20 + B Cell Count at Week 16Baseline, 16 weeksB-lymphocyte antigen CD20 or CD20 is an activated-glycosylated phosphoprotein expressed on the surface of all mature B-cells. For this endpoint, total B cell counts (CD20+CD3- cells) are represented by number of cells per microliter. The reference range for the absolute counts is 43-602 cells per microliter.
Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Total B Cells (CD20 + CD3-) as a Percentage of Total LymphocytesBaseline, 16 weeksB-lymphocyte antigen CD20 or CD20 is an activated-glycosylated phosphoprotein expressed on the surface of all mature B-cells. For this outcome, total B cells (CD20+CD3- cells) are expressed as the relative percent of lymphocytes. There is no reference range provided for this parameter by the performing laboratory.
Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulins at Week 16Baseline, 16 weeksSerum immunoglobulin measured by Immunoglobulin A (IgA), Immunoglobulin G (IgG), and Immunoglobulin M (IgM) levels.
Pharmacokinetics: Predicted Population Mean Parameter: C-trough Steady-statePre-dose, Day 1 through Week 24C-trough is defined as the concentration of LY at the end of the dosing interval at steady state. Mean C-trough value was obtained by conducting a simulation consisting of 1000 participants. The simulated data were then used to determine the noncompartmental PK parameters for each regimen. Mean and standard deviation of the Ctrough values were calculated for each dose group based on simulated data.
Pharmacokinetics: Predicted Population Mean Parameter: T-half Life (t1/2, Tau)Pre-dose, Day 1 through Week 24T-half life (t1/2, tau) is defined as the apparent steady state elimination within the dosing interval. T-half life was obtained by conducting a simulation consisting of 1000 participants using the study drug regimens (30 and 80 mg, intravenous infusion over 30 minutes, once every 3 weeks). The simulated data were then used to determine the noncompartmental PK parameters for each regimen. Mean and standard deviation of the t-half life values were calculated for each dose group based on simulated data.
Percent Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 16Baseline, 16 weeks

Countries

Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Germany, Mexico, Poland, Puerto Rico, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Double-blind treatment was administered at Weeks 0, 3, and 6. At Week 16, participants not having at least a 20% decrease in tender or swollen joint counts could receive rescue therapy. Post-study B-cell follow-up (safety only) occurred beyond Week 24.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
30 mg LY2127399
30 mg LY2127399 administered as a single intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes at 0, 3, and 6 weeks.
35
80 mg LY2127399
80 mg LY2127399 administered as a single intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes at 0, 3, and 6 weeks.
30
Placebo
Placebo comparator administered as a single intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes at 0, 3, and 6 weeks.
35
Total100

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Double-Blind TreatmentAdverse Event100
Double-Blind TreatmentLack of Efficacy012
Double-Blind TreatmentProtocol Violation001
Double-Blind TreatmentWithdrawal by Subject332
Optional Follow-UpAdverse Event100
Optional Follow-UpLack of Efficacy011
Optional Follow-UpLost to Follow-up011
Optional Follow-UpProtocol Violation001
Optional Follow-UpWithdrawal by Subject243
RescueAdverse Event010
RescueWithdrawal by Subject111

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic30 mg LY212739980 mg LY2127399PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous52.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.03
52.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.05
52.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.46
52.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African
3 Participants3 Participants8 Participants14 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
26 Participants20 Participants21 Participants67 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
6 Participants7 Participants6 Participants19 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
4 Participants4 Participants4 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
2 Participants2 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
6 Participants3 Participants6 Participants15 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
1 Participants1 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Puerto Rico
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
18 Participants18 Participants14 Participants50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants26 Participants32 Participants86 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants4 Participants3 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
EG010
affected / at risk
EG011
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
22 / 3521 / 3022 / 352 / 195 / 126 / 153 / 113 / 1011 / 201 / 94 / 111 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 352 / 303 / 350 / 191 / 120 / 150 / 110 / 100 / 200 / 90 / 110 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR)50 Response at Week 16

ACR50 Responder Index is a composite of clinical, laboratory, and functional measures in rheumatoid arthritis. ACR50 Responder is defined as a participant with greater than 50% improvement from baseline in both tender and swollen joint counts and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: physician global assessment, patient global assessment, functional ability measure (Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index which measures participants' perceived degree of difficulty when performing various daily activities), visual analog pain scale, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Non-responder imputation/last observation carried forward (NRI/LOCF); intention to treat (ITT) population defined as participants who were randomized, received at least one dose of study drug, and had at least one post-baseline ACR50 assessment. Two participants from sites with good clinical practice \[GCP\] violations are excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
30 mg LY2127399Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR)50 Response at Week 1611.4 Percentage of Participants
80 mg LY2127399Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR)50 Response at Week 1614.3 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR)50 Response at Week 162.9 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.178Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.116Fisher Exact
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at Week 16

Disease Activity Score (modified to include the 28 joint count \[DAS28\]) consists of a composite score of the following variables: tender joint count (TJC28), swollen joint count (SJC28), C-reactive protein (CRP), and participant global assessment of their disease activity (patient global VAS). It is calculated by using the following formula:DAS28-CRP=0.56 times the square root of(28TJC)+0.28 times the square root of(28SJC)+0.36\*natural log (ln)(CRP+1)+0.014\*patient global VAS+0.96. Scores ranged from 1.0-9.4, where lower scores indicated less disease activity, and remission was DAS28-CRP \<2.6. A decrease in DAS28-CRP indicated an improvement in participant's condition.

Time frame: Baseline, 16 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population defined as participants who were randomized, received at least one dose of study drug, and had at least one post-baseline DAS28 assessment; last observation carried forward (LOCF). Two participants from sites with good clinical practice \[GCP\] violations are excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
30 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at Week 16-0.911 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.137
80 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at Week 16-1.288 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.934
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at Week 16-0.613 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.041
p-value: 0.1ANCOVA
p-value: 0.005ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Score at Week 16

The FACIT Fatigue Score is a brief patient-reported measure of fatigue and consists of 13 items. Scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating less fatigue.

Time frame: Baseline, 16 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population defined as participants who were randomized, received at least one dose of study drug, and had at least one post-baseline FACIT assessment; last observation carried forward (LOCF). Two participants from sites with good clinical practice \[GCP\] violations are excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
30 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Score at Week 162.5 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 11.2
80 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Score at Week 167.9 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.44
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Score at Week 163.1 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 9.56
p-value: 0.818ANCOVA
p-value: 0.066ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 16

The HAQ-DI questionnaire scores the participant's self-perception on the degree of difficulty when dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and performing other daily activities (0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, and 3=unable to do). The scores for each of the functional areas, which have a range from 0 to 3, are averaged to calculate the functional disability index. Higher scores are associated with greater disability.

Time frame: Baseline, 16 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population defined as participants who were randomized, received at least one dose of study drug, and had at least one post-baseline HAQ-DI assessment; last observation carried forward (LOCF). Two participants from sites with good clinical practice \[GCP\] violations are excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
30 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 16-0.161 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.569
80 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 16-0.259 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.623
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 16-0.205 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.511
p-value: 0.969ANCOVA
p-value: 0.452ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Medical Outcome Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 16

Self-reported questionnaire of 36 questions in 8 domains (physical functioning, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, mental health, role-physical, role-emotional, general health). Each domain is scored by summing individual items and transforming scores into a 0-100 scale (higher scores=better health status/function). The mental and physical component summaries are based on the 8 domains. Component scores are transformed scores representing a mean (50) and standard deviation (10) in the general United States (US) population. Scores \> or \<50 are above or below the average US population.

Time frame: Baseline, 16 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population defined as participants who were randomized, received at least one dose of study drug, and had at least one post-baseline SF-36 assessment; last observation carried forward (LOCF). Two participants from sites with good clinical practice \[GCP\] violations are excluded.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
30 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline in Medical Outcome Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 16Physical Health5.064 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.73
30 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline in Medical Outcome Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 16Mental Health2.700 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 10.82
80 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline in Medical Outcome Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 16Physical Health5.197 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.36
80 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline in Medical Outcome Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 16Mental Health3.597 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 11.96
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Medical Outcome Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 16Physical Health1.229 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 6.18
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Medical Outcome Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 16Mental Health0.133 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 12.99
p-value: 0.062ANCOVA
p-value: 0.052ANCOVA
p-value: 0.655ANCOVA
p-value: 0.173ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 16

Participant's assessment of their current arthritis disease activity using a visual analog scale (VAS), which ranged from 0 to 100 millimeters, where 0 indicated no arthritis activity and 100 indicated extremely active arthritis.

Time frame: Baseline, 16 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population defined as participants who were randomized, received at least one dose of study drug, and had at least one post-baseline disease activity assessment; last observation carried forward (LOCF). Two participants from sites with good clinical practice \[GCP\] violations are excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
30 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 16-20.2 MillimetersStandard Deviation 25.87
80 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 16-23.6 MillimetersStandard Deviation 29.36
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 16-11.2 MillimetersStandard Deviation 29.05
p-value: 0.157ANCOVA
p-value: 0.025ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Joint Pain at Week 16

Participant's assessment of joint pain using a visual analog scale (VAS), which ranged from 0 to 100 millimeters, where 0 indicated no pain and 100 indicated worst possible pain.

Time frame: Baseline, 16 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population defined as participants who were randomized, received at least one dose of study drug, and had at least one post-baseline joint pain assessment; last observation carried forward (LOCF). Two participants from sites with good clinical practice \[GCP\] violations are excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
30 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Joint Pain at Week 16-16.1 MillimetersStandard Deviation 26.86
80 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Joint Pain at Week 16-17.8 MillimetersStandard Deviation 27.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Joint Pain at Week 16-9.1 MillimetersStandard Deviation 29.2
p-value: 0.168ANCOVA
p-value: 0.075ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 16

Physician's global assessment of arthritis disease activity using a visual analog scale (VAS) which ranged from 0 to 100 millimeters, where 0 indicates no arthritis activity and 100 indicates extremely active arthritis.

Time frame: Baseline, 16 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population defined as participants who were randomized, received at least one dose of study drug, and had at least one post-baseline physician's disease activity assessment; last observation carried forward (LOCF). Two participants from sites with good clinical practice \[GCP\] violations are excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
30 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 16-17.7 MillimetersStandard Deviation 22.55
80 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 16-17.3 MillimetersStandard Deviation 29.67
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 16-13.1 MillimetersStandard Deviation 26.4
p-value: 0.11ANCOVA
p-value: 0.147ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Week 16

The number of swollen joints is determined by examination of 28 joints (14 on each side) which include: the 2 shoulders, the 2 elbows, the 2 wrists, the 10 metacarpophalangeal joints, the 2 interphalangeal joints of the thumb, the 8 proximal interphalangeal joints, and the 2 knees. The joints are assessed and classified as swollen or not swollen.

Time frame: Baseline, 16 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population defined as participants who were randomized, received at least one dose of study drug, and had at least one post-baseline swollen joint assessment; last observation carried forward (LOCF). Two participants from sites with good clinical practice \[GCP\] violations are excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
30 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Week 16-2.6 Swollen JointsStandard Deviation 5.23
80 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Week 16-4.7 Swollen JointsStandard Deviation 4.44
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Week 16-2.3 Swollen JointsStandard Deviation 5.54
p-value: 0.403ANCOVA
p-value: 0.006ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count at Week 16

The number of tender and painful joints is determined by examination of 28 joints (14 on each side) which include: the 2 shoulders, the 2 elbows, the 2 wrists, the 10 metacarpophalangeal joints, the 2 interphalangeal joints of the thumb, the 8 proximal interphalangeal joints, and the 2 knees. The joints are assessed and classified as tender or not tender.

Time frame: Baseline, 16 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population defined as participants who were randomized, received at least one dose of study drug, and had at least one post-baseline tender joint assessment; last observation carried forward (LOCF). Two participants from sites with good clinical practice \[GCP\] violations are excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
30 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count at Week 16-4.5 Tender JointsStandard Deviation 6.74
80 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count at Week 16-6.3 Tender JointsStandard Deviation 4.96
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Tender Joint Count at Week 16-3.3 Tender JointsStandard Deviation 8.2
p-value: 0.337ANCOVA
p-value: 0.038ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants Experiencing An Adverse Event

Serious adverse events and other non-serious adverse events are located in the Reported Adverse Event section.

Time frame: Baseline up to 68 weeks

Population: Safety population defined as all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
30 mg LY2127399Number of Participants Experiencing An Adverse EventOther22 Participants
30 mg LY2127399Number of Participants Experiencing An Adverse EventSerious1 Participants
80 mg LY2127399Number of Participants Experiencing An Adverse EventOther21 Participants
80 mg LY2127399Number of Participants Experiencing An Adverse EventSerious2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Experiencing An Adverse EventOther22 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Experiencing An Adverse EventSerious3 Participants
30 mg LY2127399 - Without Rescue TreatmentNumber of Participants Experiencing An Adverse EventOther2 Participants
30 mg LY2127399 - Without Rescue TreatmentNumber of Participants Experiencing An Adverse EventSerious0 Participants
30 mg LY2127399 - With Rescue TreatmentNumber of Participants Experiencing An Adverse EventSerious1 Participants
30 mg LY2127399 - With Rescue TreatmentNumber of Participants Experiencing An Adverse EventOther5 Participants
80 mg LY2127399 - Without Rescue TreatmentNumber of Participants Experiencing An Adverse EventSerious0 Participants
80 mg LY2127399 - Without Rescue TreatmentNumber of Participants Experiencing An Adverse EventOther6 Participants
80 mg LY2127399 - With Rescue TreatmentNumber of Participants Experiencing An Adverse EventOther3 Participants
80 mg LY2127399 - With Rescue TreatmentNumber of Participants Experiencing An Adverse EventSerious0 Participants
Placebo - Without Rescue TreatmentNumber of Participants Experiencing An Adverse EventSerious0 Participants
Placebo - Without Rescue TreatmentNumber of Participants Experiencing An Adverse EventOther3 Participants
Placebo - With Rescue TreatmentNumber of Participants Experiencing An Adverse EventOther11 Participants
Placebo - With Rescue TreatmentNumber of Participants Experiencing An Adverse EventSerious0 Participants
30 mg LY2127399 - Follow UpNumber of Participants Experiencing An Adverse EventOther1 Participants
30 mg LY2127399 - Follow UpNumber of Participants Experiencing An Adverse EventSerious0 Participants
80 mg LY2127399 - Follow UpNumber of Participants Experiencing An Adverse EventSerious0 Participants
80 mg LY2127399 - Follow UpNumber of Participants Experiencing An Adverse EventOther4 Participants
Placebo - Follow UpNumber of Participants Experiencing An Adverse EventSerious0 Participants
Placebo - Follow UpNumber of Participants Experiencing An Adverse EventOther1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Response (Response Rate) Based Upon European League Against Rheumatism Responder Index, 28 Joint Count (EULAR28) at Week 16

EULAR28 categorizes clinical response based upon improvement since baseline in Disease Activity Score modified to include the 28 joint count (DAS28) and post-baseline DAS28. DAS28 consists of a composite score of the following variables: tender joint count (TJC28), swollen joint count (SJC28), C-reactive protein (CRP), and participant global assessment of their disease activity (patient global VAS). EULAR28 categories include: No Response (improvement in DAS28 of less than or equal to 0.6 units or post-baseline DAS28 score greater than 5.1 with improvement by less than or equal to 1.2 units), Moderate Response (post-baseline DAS28 score less than or equal to 5.1 with improvement by more than 0.6 units but no greater than 1.2 units or post-baseline DAS28 score greater than 3.2 with improvement by more than 1.2 units), and Good Response (post-baseline DAS28 score less than or equal to 3.2 with improvement by more than 1.2 units).

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population defined as participants who were randomized, received at least one dose of study drug, and had at least one post-baseline EULAR28 assessment; last observation carried forward (LOCF). Two participants from sites with good clinical practice \[GCP\] violations are excluded.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
30 mg LY2127399Number of Participants With Response (Response Rate) Based Upon European League Against Rheumatism Responder Index, 28 Joint Count (EULAR28) at Week 16Moderate response8 Participants
30 mg LY2127399Number of Participants With Response (Response Rate) Based Upon European League Against Rheumatism Responder Index, 28 Joint Count (EULAR28) at Week 16Good response5 Participants
30 mg LY2127399Number of Participants With Response (Response Rate) Based Upon European League Against Rheumatism Responder Index, 28 Joint Count (EULAR28) at Week 16No response22 Participants
80 mg LY2127399Number of Participants With Response (Response Rate) Based Upon European League Against Rheumatism Responder Index, 28 Joint Count (EULAR28) at Week 16Moderate response12 Participants
80 mg LY2127399Number of Participants With Response (Response Rate) Based Upon European League Against Rheumatism Responder Index, 28 Joint Count (EULAR28) at Week 16Good response5 Participants
80 mg LY2127399Number of Participants With Response (Response Rate) Based Upon European League Against Rheumatism Responder Index, 28 Joint Count (EULAR28) at Week 16No response9 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response (Response Rate) Based Upon European League Against Rheumatism Responder Index, 28 Joint Count (EULAR28) at Week 16Good response0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response (Response Rate) Based Upon European League Against Rheumatism Responder Index, 28 Joint Count (EULAR28) at Week 16No response19 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response (Response Rate) Based Upon European League Against Rheumatism Responder Index, 28 Joint Count (EULAR28) at Week 16Moderate response15 Participants
p-value: 0.022Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.016Fisher Exact
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 16

ACR20 Responder Index is a composite of clinical, laboratory, and functional measures in rheumatoid arthritis. An ACR20 Responder is defined as a participant with at least 20% improvement from baseline in both tender and swollen joint counts and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: physician global assessment, patient global assessment, functional ability measure (Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index which measures participants' perceived degree of difficulty when performing various daily activities), visual analog pain scale, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Non-responder imputation (NRI)/last observation carried forward; intention to treat (ITT) population defined as participants who were randomized, received at least one dose of study drug, and had at least one post-baseline ACR20 assessment. Two participants from sites with good clinical practice \[GCP\] violations are excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
30 mg LY2127399Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 1625.7 Percentage of Participants
80 mg LY2127399Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 1628.6 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 1617.1 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.281Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.218Fisher Exact
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR)70 Response at Week 16

ACR70 Responder Index is a composite of clinical, laboratory, and functional measures in rheumatoid arthritis. An ACR70 Responder is defined as a participant with at least 70% improvement from baseline in both tender and swollen joint counts and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: physician global assessment, patient global assessment, functional ability measure (Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index which measures participants' perceived degree of difficulty when performing various daily activities), visual analog pain scale, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Non-responder imputation (NRI)/last observation carried forward; intention to treat (ITT) population defined as participants who were randomized, received at least one dose of study drug, and had at least one post-baseline ACR70 assessment. Two participants from sites with good clinical practice \[GCP\] violations are excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
30 mg LY2127399Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR)70 Response at Week 162.9 Percentage of Participants
80 mg LY2127399Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR)70 Response at Week 163.6 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR)70 Response at Week 160 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.5Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.444Fisher Exact
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 16

Time frame: Baseline, 16 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population defined as participants who were randomized, received at least one dose of study drug, and had at least one post-baseline CRP assessment; last observation carried forward (LOCF). Two participants from sites with good clinical practice \[GCP\] violations are excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
30 mg LY2127399Percent Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 1658.88 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 216.005
80 mg LY2127399Percent Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 1615.14 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 123.625
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 1671.64 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 410.942
p-value: 0.554ANCOVA
p-value: 0.92ANCOVA
Secondary

Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Absolute CD20 + B Cell Count at Week 16

B-lymphocyte antigen CD20 or CD20 is an activated-glycosylated phosphoprotein expressed on the surface of all mature B-cells. For this endpoint, total B cell counts (CD20+CD3- cells) are represented by number of cells per microliter. The reference range for the absolute counts is 43-602 cells per microliter.

Time frame: Baseline, 16 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population defined as participants who were randomized, received at least one dose of study drug, and had at least one post-baseline CD20 assessment; last observation carried forward (LOCF). Two participants from sites with good clinical practice \[GCP\] violations are excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
30 mg LY2127399Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Absolute CD20 + B Cell Count at Week 16-30.94 Cells per MicroliterStandard Deviation 152.813
80 mg LY2127399Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Absolute CD20 + B Cell Count at Week 16-34.92 Cells per MicroliterStandard Deviation 82.09
PlaceboPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Absolute CD20 + B Cell Count at Week 160.79 Cells per MicroliterStandard Deviation 144.251
p-value: 0.01ANCOVA
p-value: 0.056ANCOVA
Secondary

Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulins at Week 16

Serum immunoglobulin measured by Immunoglobulin A (IgA), Immunoglobulin G (IgG), and Immunoglobulin M (IgM) levels.

Time frame: Baseline, 16 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population defined as participants who were randomized, received at least one dose of study drug, and had at least one post-baseline serum immunoglobulin assessment; last observation carried forward (LOCF). Two participants from sites with good clinical practice \[GCP\] violations are excluded.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
30 mg LY2127399Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulins at Week 16Immunoglobulin M-0.27 gram/LiterStandard Deviation 0.325
30 mg LY2127399Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulins at Week 16Immunoglobulin G-0.83 gram/LiterStandard Deviation 1.233
30 mg LY2127399Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulins at Week 16Immunoglobulin A-0.24 gram/LiterStandard Deviation 0.429
80 mg LY2127399Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulins at Week 16Immunoglobulin M-0.24 gram/LiterStandard Deviation 0.371
80 mg LY2127399Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulins at Week 16Immunoglobulin G-1.33 gram/LiterStandard Deviation 2.055
80 mg LY2127399Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulins at Week 16Immunoglobulin A-0.26 gram/LiterStandard Deviation 0.405
PlaceboPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulins at Week 16Immunoglobulin G-0.62 gram/LiterStandard Deviation 1.783
PlaceboPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulins at Week 16Immunoglobulin A-0.23 gram/LiterStandard Deviation 0.729
PlaceboPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulins at Week 16Immunoglobulin M-0.05 gram/LiterStandard Deviation 0.388
p-value: 0.146ANCOVA
p-value: 0.125ANCOVA
p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
p-value: 0.005ANCOVA
p-value: 0.115ANCOVA
p-value: 0.019ANCOVA
Secondary

Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Total B Cells (CD20 + CD3-) as a Percentage of Total Lymphocytes

B-lymphocyte antigen CD20 or CD20 is an activated-glycosylated phosphoprotein expressed on the surface of all mature B-cells. For this outcome, total B cells (CD20+CD3- cells) are expressed as the relative percent of lymphocytes. There is no reference range provided for this parameter by the performing laboratory.

Time frame: Baseline, 16 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population defined as participants who were randomized, received at least one dose of study drug, and had at least one post-baseline CD20 assessment; last observation carried forward (LOCF). Two participants from sites with good clinical practice \[GCP\] violations are excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
30 mg LY2127399Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Total B Cells (CD20 + CD3-) as a Percentage of Total Lymphocytes-2.26 Percentage of LymphocytesStandard Deviation 4.651
80 mg LY2127399Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Total B Cells (CD20 + CD3-) as a Percentage of Total Lymphocytes-2.20 Percentage of LymphocytesStandard Deviation 4.517
PlaceboPharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Total B Cells (CD20 + CD3-) as a Percentage of Total Lymphocytes-0.59 Percentage of LymphocytesStandard Deviation 4.856
p-value: 0.001ANCOVA
p-value: 0.015ANCOVA
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics: Predicted Population Mean Parameter: C-trough Steady-state

C-trough is defined as the concentration of LY at the end of the dosing interval at steady state. Mean C-trough value was obtained by conducting a simulation consisting of 1000 participants. The simulated data were then used to determine the noncompartmental PK parameters for each regimen. Mean and standard deviation of the Ctrough values were calculated for each dose group based on simulated data.

Time frame: Pre-dose, Day 1 through Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with evaluable PK C-trough data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
30 mg LY2127399Pharmacokinetics: Predicted Population Mean Parameter: C-trough Steady-state5.84 Micrograms per MilliliterStandard Deviation 2.87
80 mg LY2127399Pharmacokinetics: Predicted Population Mean Parameter: C-trough Steady-state18.9 Micrograms per MilliliterStandard Deviation 7.86
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics: Predicted Population Mean Parameter: T-half Life (t1/2, Tau)

T-half life (t1/2, tau) is defined as the apparent steady state elimination within the dosing interval. T-half life was obtained by conducting a simulation consisting of 1000 participants using the study drug regimens (30 and 80 mg, intravenous infusion over 30 minutes, once every 3 weeks). The simulated data were then used to determine the noncompartmental PK parameters for each regimen. Mean and standard deviation of the t-half life values were calculated for each dose group based on simulated data.

Time frame: Pre-dose, Day 1 through Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with evaluable PK t-half life data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
30 mg LY2127399Pharmacokinetics: Predicted Population Mean Parameter: T-half Life (t1/2, Tau)19 DaysStandard Deviation 8
80 mg LY2127399Pharmacokinetics: Predicted Population Mean Parameter: T-half Life (t1/2, Tau)22 DaysStandard Deviation 8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 24, 2026