Skip to content

Cilengitide, Temozolomide, and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma and Methylated Gene Promoter Status

Cilengitide for Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma and Methylated MGMT Gene Promoter - A Multicenter, Open-label, Controlled Phase III Study, Testing Cilengitide in Combination With Standard Treatment (Temozolomide With Concomitant Radiation Therapy, Followed by Temozolomide Maintenance Therapy) Versus Standard Treatment Alone (CENTRIC)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00689221
Acronym
CENTRIC
Enrollment
545
Registered
2008-06-03
Start date
2008-09-30
Completion date
2013-08-31
Last updated
2014-11-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glioblastoma

Keywords

newly diagnosed Glioblastoma (WHO Grade IV), Cilengitide, Temozolomide, Radiotherapy

Brief summary

CENTRIC is a Phase 3 clinical trial assessing efficacy and safety of the investigational integrin inhibitor, cilengitide, in combination with standard treatment versus standard treatment alone in newly diagnosed glioblastoma subjects with a methylated O6-methylguanine-deoxyribonucleic acid methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter in the tumor tissue. The MGMT gene promoter is a section of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) that acts as a controlling element in the expression of MGMT. Methylation of the MGMT gene promoter has been found to be a predictive marker for benefit from temozolomide (TMZ) treatment.

Interventions

DRUGCilengitide

Cilengitide 2000 milligram (mg) will be administered intravenously twice weekly over 1 hour infusion from Weeks -1 to 77 or until occurrence of progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal for any other reason. If considered beneficial in the opinion of the Investigator, continuation of cilengitide treatment will be optional in subjects without disease progression and after Week 77 since start of treatment.

DRUGTemozolomide

Temozolomide (TMZ) 75 milligram per square meter \[mg/m\^2\] will be administered intravenously once daily from Weeks 1 to 6. From Week 11 onwards, TMZ will be given as maintenance treatment at a dose of 150-200 mg/m\^2 for consecutive 5 days every 4 weeks until Week 34 or until disease progression.

RADIATIONRadiotherapy

Radiotherapy (RTX) at a dose of 2 gray (Gy) per fraction will be given once daily, 5 days per week from Weeks 1 to 6, total dose 60 Gy.

Sponsors

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC
CollaboratorNETWORK
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
EMD Serono
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Tumor tissue specimens from the glioblastoma surgery or open biopsy (formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded block; stereotactic biopsy not allowed) must be available for MGMT status analysis and central pathology review 2. Newly diagnosed histologically proven supratentorial glioblastoma (World Health Organization \[WHO\] Grade IV) 3. Proven methylated MGMT gene promoter methylation status 4. Available post-operative gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-MRI) performed within less than (\<) 48 hours after surgery (in case it was not possible to obtain a Gd-MRI within \<48 hours post surgery, a Gd-MRI is to be performed prior to randomization) 5. Stable or decreasing dose of steroids for greater than or equal to (\>=) 5 days prior to randomization 6. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score (ECOG PS) of 0-1 7. Meets 1 of the following recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classifications: Class III (Age \< 50 years and ECOG PS 0). Class IV (meeting one of the following criteria: a) Age \< 50 years and ECOG PS 1 or b) Age \>= 50 years, underwent prior partial or total tumor resection, mini mental state examination \[MMSE\] \>= 27). Class V (meeting one of the following criteria: a) Age \>= 50 years and underwent prior partial or total tumor resection, MMSE \< 27 or b) Age \>= 50 years and underwent prior tumor biopsy only) 8. Other protocol defined inclusion criteria could apply

Exclusion criteria

1. Prior chemotherapy within the last 5 years 2. Prior RTX of the head 3. Receiving concurrent investigational agents or has received an investigational agent within the past 30 days prior to the first dose of cilengitide 4. Prior systemic antiangiogenic therapy 5. Placement of Gliadel® wafer at surgery 6. Inability to undergo Gd-MRI. 7. Planned surgery for other diseases 8. History of recent peptic ulcer disease (endoscopically proven gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, or esophageal ulcer) within 6 months of enrollment 9. History of malignancy. Subjects with curatively treated cervical carcinoma in situ or basal cell carcinoma of the skin, or subjects who have been free of other malignancies for \>= 5 years are eligible for this study 10. History of coagulation disorder associated with bleeding or recurrent thrombotic events 11. Clinically manifest myocardial insufficiency (New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] III, IV) or history of myocardial infarction during the past 6 months; uncontrolled arterial hypertension 12. Other protocol defined

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS) TimeTime from randomization to death or last day known to be alive, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, Sep 2008 until cut-off date, (19 Nov 2012)The OS time is defined as the time (in months) from randomization to death or last day known to be alive. Participants without event are censored at the last date known to be alive or at the clinical cut-off date, whatever is earlier.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)Day 1 of Week -1The Cmax for cilengitide was calculated by non-compartmental analysis using the computer program WinNonlin, Version 6.2.1.
Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax)Day 1 of Week -1The Tmax for cilengitide was calculated by non-compartmental analysis using the computer program WinNonlin, Version 6.2.1.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC [0-6]) After DoseDay 1 of Week -1The AUC (0-6) for cilengitide was calculated by non-compartmental analysis using the computer program WinNonlin, Version 6.2.1.
European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresUp to 50 monthsThe EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire including following sub-scales: global health status, functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social activity), symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain) and single items (dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhoea and financial difficulties). Scores are averaged for each scale and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score indicates better quality of life on global health status and functional scales and worse quality of life on symptom scales and financial difficulty scale.
European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Brain Module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) Sub-scale ScoresUp to 50 monthsThe QLQ-BN20 is a questionnaire specifically designed as the QLQ-C30 supplement for the evaluation of quality of life in brain tumor participants. It includes 4 multi-item sub-scales: future uncertainty, visual disorder, motor dysfunction, communication deficits, and 7 single-item scales: headaches, seizures, drowsiness, itchy skin, hair loss, weakness of legs, and bladder control. All items are rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale ('1=not at all', '2=a little', '3=quite a bit' and '4=very much'), and are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Time - Investigator and Independent ReadTime from randomization to disease progression, death or last tumor assessment, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, Sep 2008 until cut-off date, (19 Nov 2012)The PFS time is defined as the duration from randomization to either first observation of progressive disease (PD) or occurrence of death due to any cause. Investigator read is the assessment of all imaging by the treating physician at the local trial site and Independent Read is the assessment of all imaging centrally by an Independent Review Committee (IRC). Investigator's assessed progression according to MacDonald criteria and IRC by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working Group (RANO) criteria using Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Investigator and IRC read: Progression is defined as greater than 25 percent increase in the sum of the product of the largest perpendicular diameters of enhancing tumor compared to the smallest prior sum, or Worsening of an evaluable lesion(s),or Marked increase in T2/FLAIR non-enhancing lesions (IRC only) or Any new lesion
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline, End of study (up to cut-off date, [19 Nov 2012])Number of participants with change from baseline in work status (working full time \[FT\], part-time \[PT\], unemployed/retired \[U/R\]) at end of study (EOS) (up to cut-off date, \[19 Nov 2012\]) was reported. For the category 'part-time', the following sub-categories were defined: part-time due to basic disease (PT1); part-time not due to basic disease (PT2); part-time reason not known (PT3).
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, Treatment-Related AEs, Treatment-Related Serious AEs, AEs Leading to Death, Treatment Related AEs Leading to Death, AEs of Grade 3 or 4 and Treatment Related AEs of Grade 3 or 4Time from first dose up to 28 days after last dose of study treatment, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, Sep 2008 until cut-off date (19 Nov 2012)An AE is defined as any new untoward medical occurrences/worsening of pre-existing medical condition without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-emergent AEs are the events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose of study treatment. A Serious AE is an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treatment-related AEs are the AEs which are suspected to be reasonably related to the study treatment (cilengitide, or radiotherapy, or temozolomide) as per investigator assessment. The severity of AEs was assessed according to the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) (version 3.0): Grade 1=mild, Grade 2=moderate, Grade 3=severe, Grade 4=life threatening or disabling. Note: Death (Grade 5) was regarded as an outcome.
Number of Participants With AEs Belonging to Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Queries (SMQs) Thromboembolic Events and Hemorrhage With NCI-CTC Toxicity Grade 3 or 4Time from first dose up to 28 days after last dose of study treatment, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, Sep 2008 until cut-off date (19 Nov 2012)Thromboembolic events (standardized MedDRA query \[SMQ\]) Grade 3 or 4 AEs encompassed hemiparesis and cerebrovascular accident, pulmonary embolism, and deep vein thrombosis. Thromboembolic events (SMQ) of any grade and of Grade 3 or 4 were generally more frequent in the Cilengitide + Temozolomide/Radiotherapy group than in the Temozolomide/Radiotherapy group but were still in the expected range of this patient population The severity of AEs was assessed according to the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) (version 3.0): Grade 1=mild, Grade 2=moderate, Grade 3=severe, Grade 4=life threatening or disabling. Note: Death (Grade 5) was regarded as an outcome.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Lab ParametersUp to 50 months
EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire IndexUp to 50 monthsThe EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire is a measure of health status that provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value. The optional part of the questionnaire was not applied. The EQ-5D defines health in terms of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The 5 items are combined to generate health profiles. These profiles were converted to a continuous single index score using a one to one matching. The lowest possible score is -0.594 (death) and the highest is 1.00 (full health).

Countries

Germany, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

First/last participant (informed consent): Sep 2008/Aug 2011. Clinical data cut-off: 19 Nov 2012, Study completion date: Aug 2013.

Pre-assignment details

Enrolled: 3471 screened for eligibility; 2926 excluded (mainly due to unmethylated O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase status and non-fulfillment of inclusion or exclusion criteria), 545 participants randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + Radiotherapy
Cilengitide 2000 milligram (mg) twice weekly over 1 hour intravenous infusion from Weeks -1 to 77, Temozolomide (TMZ) 75 milligram per square meter \[mg/m\^2\] intravenously once daily from Weeks 1 to 6, from Week 11 onward, TMZ was given as maintenance treatment at a dose of 150-200 mg/m\^2 for consecutive 5 days every 4 weeks until Week 34 and radiotherapy (RTX) at a dose of 2 Gray (Gy) per fraction once daily, 5 days per week from Weeks 1 to 6 or until occurrence of progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal for any other reason. Continuation of cilengitide treatment after Week 77 was optional in participants without disease progression, If considered beneficial in the opinion of the Investigator.
272
Temozolomide + Radiotherapy
TMZ 75 mg/m\^2 administered intravenously once daily from Weeks 1 to 6, from Week 11 onward, TMZ was given as maintenance treatment at a dose of 150-200 mg/m\^2 for consecutive 5 days every 4 weeks until Week 34 and RTX at a dose of 2 Gy per fraction once daily, 5 days per week from Weeks 1 to 6 or until occurrence of progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal for any other reason.
273
Total545

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyOngoing at cut-off date3936

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyTemozolomide + RadiotherapyTotal
Age, Continuous56.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
56.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.97
56.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.98
Sex: Female, Male
Female
124 Participants130 Participants254 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
148 Participants143 Participants291 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
251 / 263240 / 258
serious
Total, serious adverse events
138 / 263115 / 258

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival (OS) Time

The OS time is defined as the time (in months) from randomization to death or last day known to be alive. Participants without event are censored at the last date known to be alive or at the clinical cut-off date, whatever is earlier.

Time frame: Time from randomization to death or last day known to be alive, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, Sep 2008 until cut-off date, (19 Nov 2012)

Population: ITT population included all the participants who were randomized to study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyOverall Survival (OS) Time26.3 Months
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyOverall Survival (OS) Time26.3 Months
p-value: 0.862395% CI: [0.808, 1.291]Log Rank
Secondary

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC [0-6]) After Dose

The AUC (0-6) for cilengitide was calculated by non-compartmental analysis using the computer program WinNonlin, Version 6.2.1.

Time frame: Day 1 of Week -1

Population: Analysis population included all participants of Cilengitide + Temozolomide + Radiotherapy group who received at least 1 cilengitide dose with plasma concentration data available on Day 1 of Week -1. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyArea Under the Plasma Concentration Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC [0-6]) After Dose295171.2 hour*ng/mLStandard Deviation 198050.62
Secondary

European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Brain Module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) Sub-scale Scores

The QLQ-BN20 is a questionnaire specifically designed as the QLQ-C30 supplement for the evaluation of quality of life in brain tumor participants. It includes 4 multi-item sub-scales: future uncertainty, visual disorder, motor dysfunction, communication deficits, and 7 single-item scales: headaches, seizures, drowsiness, itchy skin, hair loss, weakness of legs, and bladder control. All items are rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale ('1=not at all', '2=a little', '3=quite a bit' and '4=very much'), and are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.

Time frame: Up to 50 months

Population: ITT population included all the participants who were randomized to study treatment. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for the specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Brain Module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) Sub-scale ScoresCommunication Deficit (n=68, 86)26.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.59
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Brain Module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) Sub-scale ScoresDrowsiness (n=66, 87)38.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.71
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Brain Module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) Sub-scale ScoresMotor Dysfunction (n=68, 86)27.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.62
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Brain Module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) Sub-scale ScoresItchy Skin (n=68, 86)9.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Brain Module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) Sub-scale ScoresHeadaches (n=68, 86)25.98 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.5
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Brain Module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) Sub-scale ScoresHair Loss (n=66, 86)13.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.55
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Brain Module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) Sub-scale ScoresVisual Disorder (n=68, 85)12.99 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.24
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Brain Module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) Sub-scale ScoresWeakness of Legs (n=67, 85)24.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.12
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Brain Module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) Sub-scale ScoresSeizures (n=68, 87)9.31 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.93
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Brain Module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) Sub-scale ScoresBladder Control (n=67, 85)19.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.67
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Brain Module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) Sub-scale ScoresFuture Uncertainty (n=68, 86)44.49 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.7
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Brain Module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) Sub-scale ScoresBladder Control (n=67, 85)10.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.22
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Brain Module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) Sub-scale ScoresFuture Uncertainty (n=68, 86)39.31 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.24
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Brain Module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) Sub-scale ScoresVisual Disorder (n=68, 85)17.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.77
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Brain Module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) Sub-scale ScoresMotor Dysfunction (n=68, 86)23.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.95
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Brain Module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) Sub-scale ScoresCommunication Deficit (n=68, 86)19.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.89
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Brain Module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) Sub-scale ScoresHeadaches (n=68, 86)21.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.45
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Brain Module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) Sub-scale ScoresSeizures (n=68, 87)8.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.94
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Brain Module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) Sub-scale ScoresDrowsiness (n=66, 87)35.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.07
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Brain Module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) Sub-scale ScoresItchy Skin (n=68, 86)13.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.72
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Brain Module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) Sub-scale ScoresHair Loss (n=66, 86)15.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.4
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Brain Module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) Sub-scale ScoresWeakness of Legs (n=67, 85)20.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.68
Secondary

European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale Scores

The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire including following sub-scales: global health status, functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social activity), symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain) and single items (dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhoea and financial difficulties). Scores are averaged for each scale and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score indicates better quality of life on global health status and functional scales and worse quality of life on symptom scales and financial difficulty scale.

Time frame: Up to 50 months

Population: ITT population included all the participants who were randomized to study treatment. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for the specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresCognitive Functioning (n=70, 93)64.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.16
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresPain (n=71, 93)22.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.4
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresPhysical Functioning (n=71, 92)65.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.01
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresDyspnoea (n=71, 92)15.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.09
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresSocial Activity (n=71, 93)56.34 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.77
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresInsomnia (n=71, 91)20.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.01
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresEmotional Functioning (n=71, 93)67.49 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.58
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresAppetite Loss (n=71, 92)21.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.47
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresFatigue (n=71, 92)44.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.07
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresConstipation (n=71, 93)18.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.02
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresRole Functioning (n=71, 92)56.34 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.31
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresDiarrhoea (n=70, 92)6.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.48
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresNausea and Vomiting (n=71, 93)10.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.77
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresFinancial Difficulties (n=71, 93)27.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.53
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresGlobal Health Status (n=71, 92)54.34 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.58
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresFinancial Difficulties (n=71, 93)22.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.46
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresGlobal Health Status (n=71, 92)55.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.02
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresPhysical Functioning (n=71, 92)67.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.19
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresRole Functioning (n=71, 92)56.34 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.19
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresEmotional Functioning (n=71, 93)67.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.29
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresCognitive Functioning (n=70, 93)65.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.4
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresSocial Activity (n=71, 93)62.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.73
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresFatigue (n=71, 92)39.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.93
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresNausea and Vomiting (n=71, 93)7.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.03
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresPain (n=71, 93)24.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.93
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresDyspnoea (n=71, 92)13.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.62
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresInsomnia (n=71, 91)20.51 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.65
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresAppetite Loss (n=71, 92)15.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.59
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresConstipation (n=71, 93)13.98 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.69
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuropean Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Sub-scale ScoresDiarrhoea (n=70, 92)4.35 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.28
Secondary

EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Index

The EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire is a measure of health status that provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value. The optional part of the questionnaire was not applied. The EQ-5D defines health in terms of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The 5 items are combined to generate health profiles. These profiles were converted to a continuous single index score using a one to one matching. The lowest possible score is -0.594 (death) and the highest is 1.00 (full health).

Time frame: Up to 50 months

Population: ITT population included all the participants who were randomized to study treatment. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Index0.598 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.43
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyEuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Index0.623 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.36
Secondary

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

The Cmax for cilengitide was calculated by non-compartmental analysis using the computer program WinNonlin, Version 6.2.1.

Time frame: Day 1 of Week -1

Population: Analysis population included all participants of Cilengitide + Temozolomide + Radiotherapy group who received at least 1 cilengitide dose with plasma concentration data available on Day 1 of Week -1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)167363.2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 368301.11
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, Treatment-Related AEs, Treatment-Related Serious AEs, AEs Leading to Death, Treatment Related AEs Leading to Death, AEs of Grade 3 or 4 and Treatment Related AEs of Grade 3 or 4

An AE is defined as any new untoward medical occurrences/worsening of pre-existing medical condition without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-emergent AEs are the events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose of study treatment. A Serious AE is an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treatment-related AEs are the AEs which are suspected to be reasonably related to the study treatment (cilengitide, or radiotherapy, or temozolomide) as per investigator assessment. The severity of AEs was assessed according to the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) (version 3.0): Grade 1=mild, Grade 2=moderate, Grade 3=severe, Grade 4=life threatening or disabling. Note: Death (Grade 5) was regarded as an outcome.

Time frame: Time from first dose up to 28 days after last dose of study treatment, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, Sep 2008 until cut-off date (19 Nov 2012)

Population: Safety population included all the participants who received any dose of study treatment that is Cilengitide, Temozolomide or Radiotherapy. According to trial design safety data in trial arms (Cilengitide vs Control) were collected based on different visit frequency and different safety surveillance period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, Treatment-Related AEs, Treatment-Related Serious AEs, AEs Leading to Death, Treatment Related AEs Leading to Death, AEs of Grade 3 or 4 and Treatment Related AEs of Grade 3 or 4AEs261 Participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, Treatment-Related AEs, Treatment-Related Serious AEs, AEs Leading to Death, Treatment Related AEs Leading to Death, AEs of Grade 3 or 4 and Treatment Related AEs of Grade 3 or 4Serious AEs138 Participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, Treatment-Related AEs, Treatment-Related Serious AEs, AEs Leading to Death, Treatment Related AEs Leading to Death, AEs of Grade 3 or 4 and Treatment Related AEs of Grade 3 or 4Treatment-related AEs229 Participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, Treatment-Related AEs, Treatment-Related Serious AEs, AEs Leading to Death, Treatment Related AEs Leading to Death, AEs of Grade 3 or 4 and Treatment Related AEs of Grade 3 or 4Treatment-Related Serious AEs55 Participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, Treatment-Related AEs, Treatment-Related Serious AEs, AEs Leading to Death, Treatment Related AEs Leading to Death, AEs of Grade 3 or 4 and Treatment Related AEs of Grade 3 or 4AEs leading to death11 Participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, Treatment-Related AEs, Treatment-Related Serious AEs, AEs Leading to Death, Treatment Related AEs Leading to Death, AEs of Grade 3 or 4 and Treatment Related AEs of Grade 3 or 4Treatment-related AEs leading to death3 Participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, Treatment-Related AEs, Treatment-Related Serious AEs, AEs Leading to Death, Treatment Related AEs Leading to Death, AEs of Grade 3 or 4 and Treatment Related AEs of Grade 3 or 4AEs with NCI-CTC toxicity Grade 3 or 4169 Participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, Treatment-Related AEs, Treatment-Related Serious AEs, AEs Leading to Death, Treatment Related AEs Leading to Death, AEs of Grade 3 or 4 and Treatment Related AEs of Grade 3 or 4Treatment-related AEs of Grade 3 or 4100 Participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, Treatment-Related AEs, Treatment-Related Serious AEs, AEs Leading to Death, Treatment Related AEs Leading to Death, AEs of Grade 3 or 4 and Treatment Related AEs of Grade 3 or 4Treatment-related AEs of Grade 3 or 4101 Participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, Treatment-Related AEs, Treatment-Related Serious AEs, AEs Leading to Death, Treatment Related AEs Leading to Death, AEs of Grade 3 or 4 and Treatment Related AEs of Grade 3 or 4AEs253 Participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, Treatment-Related AEs, Treatment-Related Serious AEs, AEs Leading to Death, Treatment Related AEs Leading to Death, AEs of Grade 3 or 4 and Treatment Related AEs of Grade 3 or 4AEs leading to death9 Participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, Treatment-Related AEs, Treatment-Related Serious AEs, AEs Leading to Death, Treatment Related AEs Leading to Death, AEs of Grade 3 or 4 and Treatment Related AEs of Grade 3 or 4Serious AEs115 Participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, Treatment-Related AEs, Treatment-Related Serious AEs, AEs Leading to Death, Treatment Related AEs Leading to Death, AEs of Grade 3 or 4 and Treatment Related AEs of Grade 3 or 4AEs with NCI-CTC toxicity Grade 3 or 4158 Participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, Treatment-Related AEs, Treatment-Related Serious AEs, AEs Leading to Death, Treatment Related AEs Leading to Death, AEs of Grade 3 or 4 and Treatment Related AEs of Grade 3 or 4Treatment-related AEs222 Participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, Treatment-Related AEs, Treatment-Related Serious AEs, AEs Leading to Death, Treatment Related AEs Leading to Death, AEs of Grade 3 or 4 and Treatment Related AEs of Grade 3 or 4Treatment-related AEs leading to death3 Participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, Treatment-Related AEs, Treatment-Related Serious AEs, AEs Leading to Death, Treatment Related AEs Leading to Death, AEs of Grade 3 or 4 and Treatment Related AEs of Grade 3 or 4Treatment-Related Serious AEs47 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With AEs Belonging to Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Queries (SMQs) Thromboembolic Events and Hemorrhage With NCI-CTC Toxicity Grade 3 or 4

Thromboembolic events (standardized MedDRA query \[SMQ\]) Grade 3 or 4 AEs encompassed hemiparesis and cerebrovascular accident, pulmonary embolism, and deep vein thrombosis. Thromboembolic events (SMQ) of any grade and of Grade 3 or 4 were generally more frequent in the Cilengitide + Temozolomide/Radiotherapy group than in the Temozolomide/Radiotherapy group but were still in the expected range of this patient population The severity of AEs was assessed according to the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) (version 3.0): Grade 1=mild, Grade 2=moderate, Grade 3=severe, Grade 4=life threatening or disabling. Note: Death (Grade 5) was regarded as an outcome.

Time frame: Time from first dose up to 28 days after last dose of study treatment, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, Sep 2008 until cut-off date (19 Nov 2012)

Population: Safety population included all the participants who received any dose of study treatment that is Cilengitide, Temozolomide or Radiotherapy. According to trial design safety data in trial arms (Cilengitide vs Control) were collected based on different visit frequency and different safety surveillance period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With AEs Belonging to Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Queries (SMQs) Thromboembolic Events and Hemorrhage With NCI-CTC Toxicity Grade 3 or 4SMQ:Thromboembolic events35 Participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With AEs Belonging to Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Queries (SMQs) Thromboembolic Events and Hemorrhage With NCI-CTC Toxicity Grade 3 or 4SMQ: Hemorrhage4 Participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With AEs Belonging to Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Queries (SMQs) Thromboembolic Events and Hemorrhage With NCI-CTC Toxicity Grade 3 or 4SMQ:Thromboembolic events23 Participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With AEs Belonging to Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Queries (SMQs) Thromboembolic Events and Hemorrhage With NCI-CTC Toxicity Grade 3 or 4SMQ: Hemorrhage4 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of Study

Number of participants with change from baseline in work status (working full time \[FT\], part-time \[PT\], unemployed/retired \[U/R\]) at end of study (EOS) (up to cut-off date, \[19 Nov 2012\]) was reported. For the category 'part-time', the following sub-categories were defined: part-time due to basic disease (PT1); part-time not due to basic disease (PT2); part-time reason not known (PT3).

Time frame: Baseline, End of study (up to cut-off date, [19 Nov 2012])

Population: Safety population included all the participants who received any dose of study treatment that is Cilengitide, Temozolomide or Radiotherapy. According to trial design safety data in trial arms (Cilengitide vs Control) were collected based on different visit frequency and different safety surveillance period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: FT, EOS: FT3 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: FT, EOS: PT12 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: FT, EOS: PT21 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: FT, EOS: PT30 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: FT, EOS: U/R24 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT1, EOS: FT3 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT1, EOS: PT13 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT1, EOS: PT20 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT1, EOS: PT30 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT1, EOS: U/R9 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT2, EOS: FT0 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT2, EOS: PT10 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT2, EOS: PT20 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT2, EOS: PT31 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT2, EOS: U/R5 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT3, EOS: FT0 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT3, EOS: PT10 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT3, EOS: PT20 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT3, EOS: PT30 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT3, EOS: U/R0 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: U/R, EOS: FT5 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: U/R, EOS: PT15 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: U/R, EOS: PT21 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: U/R, EOS: PT30 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: U/R, EOS: U/R199 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: Missing, EOS: FT0 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: Missing, EOS: PT10 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: Missing, EOS: PT20 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: Missing, EOS: PT30 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: Missing, EOS: U/R1 participants
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: Missing, EOS: Missing1 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT3, EOS: FT0 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: FT, EOS: FT6 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: U/R, EOS: PT30 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: FT, EOS: PT11 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT3, EOS: PT10 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: FT, EOS: PT20 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: Missing, EOS: PT20 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: FT, EOS: PT30 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT3, EOS: PT20 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: FT, EOS: U/R22 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: U/R, EOS: U/R191 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT1, EOS: FT2 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT3, EOS: PT30 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT1, EOS: PT11 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: Missing, EOS: U/R1 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT1, EOS: PT20 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT3, EOS: U/R0 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT1, EOS: PT30 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: Missing, EOS: FT0 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT1, EOS: U/R12 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: U/R, EOS: FT8 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT2, EOS: FT1 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: Missing, EOS: PT30 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT2, EOS: PT10 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: U/R, EOS: PT17 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT2, EOS: PT20 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: Missing, EOS: PT10 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT2, EOS: PT30 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: U/R, EOS: PT21 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: PT2, EOS: U/R4 participants
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Work Status at End of StudyBaseline: Missing, EOS: Missing1 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Lab Parameters

Time frame: Up to 50 months

Population: Any clinically significant abnormal ECG and lab finding was planned to be reported as AE only so they have been captured in the below mentioned adverse event section.

Secondary

Progression Free Survival (PFS) Time - Investigator and Independent Read

The PFS time is defined as the duration from randomization to either first observation of progressive disease (PD) or occurrence of death due to any cause. Investigator read is the assessment of all imaging by the treating physician at the local trial site and Independent Read is the assessment of all imaging centrally by an Independent Review Committee (IRC). Investigator's assessed progression according to MacDonald criteria and IRC by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working Group (RANO) criteria using Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Investigator and IRC read: Progression is defined as greater than 25 percent increase in the sum of the product of the largest perpendicular diameters of enhancing tumor compared to the smallest prior sum, or Worsening of an evaluable lesion(s),or Marked increase in T2/FLAIR non-enhancing lesions (IRC only) or Any new lesion

Time frame: Time from randomization to disease progression, death or last tumor assessment, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, Sep 2008 until cut-off date, (19 Nov 2012)

Population: ITT population included all the participants who were randomized to study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyProgression Free Survival (PFS) Time - Investigator and Independent ReadPFS Time: Investigator read13.5 Months
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyProgression Free Survival (PFS) Time - Investigator and Independent ReadPFS Time: Independent read10.6 Months
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyProgression Free Survival (PFS) Time - Investigator and Independent ReadPFS Time: Investigator read10.7 Months
Temozolomide + RadiotherapyProgression Free Survival (PFS) Time - Investigator and Independent ReadPFS Time: Independent read7.9 Months
Secondary

Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax)

The Tmax for cilengitide was calculated by non-compartmental analysis using the computer program WinNonlin, Version 6.2.1.

Time frame: Day 1 of Week -1

Population: Analysis population included all participants of Cilengitide + Temozolomide + Radiotherapy group who received at least 1 cilengitide dose with plasma concentration data available on Day 1 of Week -1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cilengitide + Temozolomide + RadiotherapyTime to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax)1.029 hoursStandard Deviation 0.401

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026