Skip to content

Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of the Beta-3 Agonist Mirabegron (YM178) in Patients With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo and Active Controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron in Subjects With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00689104
Acronym
SCORPIO
Enrollment
2336
Registered
2008-06-03
Start date
2008-04-28
Completion date
2009-03-24
Last updated
2024-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urinary Bladder, Overactive

Keywords

Micturition, Urinary incontinence, Urinary urge incontinence, Overactive bladder (OAB), Urgency, YM178, Frequency

Brief summary

The study is intended to test efficacy, safety and tolerability of two doses of Mirabegron against placebo and compare the efficacy and safety with active comparator in patients with symptoms of overactive bladder.

Interventions

DRUGMirabegron

Tablets

DRUGTolterodine

Capsules

Matching mirabegron placebo tablets.

Matching tolterodine placebo capsules.

Sponsors

Astellas Pharma Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject is willing and able to complete the micturition diary and questionnaires correctly * Subject has symptoms of overactive bladder (urinary frequency and urgency with or without urge incontinence) for ≥ 3 months * Subject experiences frequency of micturition on average ≥ 8 times per 24-hour period during the 3-day micturition diary period * Subject must experience at least 3 episodes of urgency (grade 3 or 4) with or without incontinence, during the 3-day micturition diary period

Exclusion criteria

* Subject is breastfeeding, pregnant, intends to become pregnant during the study, or of childbearing potential, sexually active and not practicing a highly reliable method of birth control * Subject has significant stress incontinence or mixed stress/urge incontinence where stress is the predominant factor * Subject has an indwelling catheter or practices intermittent self-catheterization * Subject has diabetic neuropathy * Subject has evidence of a symptomatic urinary tract infection, chronic inflammation such as interstitial cystitis, bladder stones, previous pelvic radiation therapy or previous or current malignant disease of the pelvic organs * Subject receives non-drug treatment including electro-stimulation therapy * Subject has severe hypertension * Subject has a known or suspected hypersensitivity to tolterodine, other anticholinergics, YM178, other beta-adrenoreceptor (ß-AR) agonists, or lactose or any of the other inactive ingredients * Subject has been treated with any investigational drug or device within 30 days (90 days in the UK) * Subject had an average total daily urine volume \> 3000 mL as recorded in the 3-day micturition diary period * Subject has serum creatinine \>150 umol/L, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and/or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \> 2x upper limit of normal range (ULN), or gamma glutamyl transferase (γ-GT) \> 3x ULN * Subject has a clinically significant abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursBaseline and Week 12 (final visit)The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per day was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. Least Squares (LS) Means were generated from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursBaseline and Week 12The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was derived from the number of times a patient urinates (excluding incontinence only episodes) per day recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursBaseline and Week 4The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was calculated from the number of micturitions recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 4 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursBaseline and Weeks 8 and 12The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per 24 hours was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline, Week 8 and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursBaseline and Weeks 8 and 12The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was calculated from the number of micturitions recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline, Week 8 and 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionBaseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12The average volume voided per micturition was calculated from the volume of each micturition measured by the patient and recorded in a micturition diary for 3 days before the Baseline and Week 4, 8 and 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursBaseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12The involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately proceeded by urgency, derived from the number of incontinence episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0 = No urgency; 1 = Mild urgency; 2 = Moderate urgency, could postpone voiding a short while; 3 = Severe urgency, could not postpone voiding; 4 = Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursBaseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12The average number of urgency episodes (the sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer), derived from urgency episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as grade 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Level of UrgencyBaseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Average of patients' ratings on the degree of urgency associated with each micturition and/or incontinence episode recorded in a 3-day micturition diary according to the following 5-point categorical scale (Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale): 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursBaseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Nocturia is defined as waking at night one or more times to void. The average number of times a patient urinated (excluding incontinence only episodes) during sleeping time per day was derived from the 3-day patient micturition diary. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursBaseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12The average number of times a patient records a new pad used per day during the 3-day micturition diary period. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and the Final VisitWeeks 4, 8 and 12The percentage of participants with no incontinence episodes for the 3 days prior to each clinic visit derived from the micturition diary recorded by the patient.
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final VisitBaseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12The percentage of participants with at least 50% decrease from baseline in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours during the 3 days prior to each clinic visit derived from the patient micturition diary.
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother ScoreBaseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Overactive bladder symptoms were assessed using the symptom bother scale of the overactive bladder questionnaire. The symptom bother scale consists of 8 questions answered by the participant on a scale from 1-6. The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating worst severity. A negative change from Baseline in symptom bother score indicates improvements. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total ScoreBaseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Health-related quality of life was assessed by the HRQL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social interaction) of the overactive bladder questionnaire (OABq). The HRQL total score was calculated by adding the 4 HRQL subscale scores, and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline in HRQL score indicates improvements. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionBaseline and Week 12The average volume voided per micturition was calculated from the volume of each micturition measured by the patient and recorded in a micturition diary for 3 days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While WorkingBaseline and Week 12The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent impairment while working was derived from the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their productivity while working. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work ImpairmentBaseline and Week 12The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent overall work impairment takes into account both hours missed due to OAB symptoms and the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their productivity while working. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity ImpairmentBaseline and Week 12The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with daily activities over the last 7 days. Percent activity impairment is derived from the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their regular daily activities. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreBaseline and Week 12The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state: I have no problems in walking about; I have some problems in walking about; I am confined to bed. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreBaseline and Week 12The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state: I have no problems with self-care; I have some problems washing or dressing myself; I am unable to wash or dress myself. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreBaseline and Week 12The EQ-5D is a standardized, nondisease-specific instrument for describing health status. Participants were asked which statement best describes their health state with regard to usual activities (work, study or leisure): I have no problems performing my usual activities; I have some problems performing my usual activities; I am unable to perform my usual activities. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available at that Visit.
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreBaseline and Week 12The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state: I have no pain or discomfort; I have moderate pain or discomfort; I have extreme pain or discomfort. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreBaseline and Week 12The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state: I am not anxious or depressed; I am moderately anxious or depressed; I am extremely anxious or depressed. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, generic instrument for describing and evaluating health status. Health status is assessed by patients evaluating their health on a vertical, visual analog scale from 0 to 100 where the endpoints are labeled 'Worst imaginable health state' (=0) and 'Best imaginable health state' (=100). On the EQ-5D VAS, a positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)Baseline and Week 12The PPBC scale is a global assessment tool that asks patients to rate their impression of their current bladder condition on a 6-point scale from 1: 'Does not cause me any problems at all'; 2: 'Causes me some very minor problems'; 3: 'Causes me some minor problems'; 4: 'Causes me (some) moderate problems'; 5: 'Causes me severe problems' and 6: 'Causes me many severe problems'. LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS)Baseline and Week 12The TS-VAS is a visual analog scale (VAS) that asks patients to rate their satisfaction with treatment by placing a vertical mark on a 10 cm line where the endpoints are labeled 'No, not at all' on the left (=0) to 'Yes, completely satisfied' on the right (=10). LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to PhysicianBaseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12The number of times the patient visited a physician's office during the 4 weeks prior to each study visit (excluding study visits) because of the patient's bladder condition.
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final VisitBaseline and Week 12The PPBC scale is a global assessment tool that asks patients to rate their impression of their current bladder condition on a 6-point scale from 1: 'Does not cause me any problems at all'; 2: 'Causes me some very minor problems'; 3: 'Causes me some minor problems'; 4: 'Causes me (some) moderate problems'; 5: 'Causes me severe problems' and 6: 'Causes me many severe problems'. Improvement was defined as at least a 1 point improvement from Baseline to post-baseline and a major improvement was defined as at least a 2 point improvement from Baseline to post-baseline in PPBC score.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time MissedBaseline and Week 12The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent of work time missed is derived from the number of hours of work missed due to OAB symptoms as a percentage of total hours that should have been worked. A higher percentage indicates more hours missed. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursBaseline and Week 4The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per 24 hours was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 4 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Countries

Australia, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

After screening, 2336 patients took placebo run-in study drug in a 2-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period. On completion of the run-in period, 1987 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo, mirabegron 50 mg, mirabegron 100 mg or tolterodine 4 mg for 12 weeks.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets and matching tolterodine slow release (SR) placebo capsules orally once a day for 12 weeks.
494
Mirabegron 50 mg
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets and matching tolterodine SR placebo capsules orally once a day for 12 weeks.
493
Mirabegron 100 mg
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets and matching tolterodine SR placebo capsules orally once a day for 12 weeks.
496
Tolterodine SR 4 mg
Participants received Tolterodine SR 4 mg capsules and matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
495
Total1,978

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event13251624
Overall StudyEligibility criterion not met5804
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy5623
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up4325
Overall StudyNon-compliance with study procedures0010
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1000
Overall StudyProtocol Violation2353
Overall StudyRandomized but never received study drug2110
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject12111811

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboMirabegron 50 mgMirabegron 100 mgTolterodine SR 4 mgTotal
Age, Continuous59.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
59.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.36
59.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.71
59.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.89
59.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.56
Duration of OAB symptoms76.0 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 91.38
79.6 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 87.14
84.8 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 94.12
75.5 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 92.2
79.0 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 91.25
Mean level of urgency2.36 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.563
2.40 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.547
2.46 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.528
2.41 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.561
2.41 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.551
Mean number of micturitions per 24 Hours11.72 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.122
11.64 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.967
11.49 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.72
11.53 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.773
11.59 micturitions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.899
Mean number of nocturia episodes per 24 hours1.98 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.405
1.87 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.294
1.91 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.374
1.93 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.417
1.92 nocturia episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.373
Mean number of pads used per 24 hours1.12 pads
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.812
1.12 pads
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.941
1.25 pads
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.02
1.04 pads
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.752
1.13 pads
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.884
Mean number of urgency episodes (grade 3 or 4) per 24 hours5.72 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.972
5.68 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.679
5.95 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.699
5.79 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.494
5.79 urgency episodes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.713
Mean volume voided per micturition156.8 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 52.73
160.3 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 57.85
158.9 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 53.95
157.4 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 54.23
158.3 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 54.69
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 participants2 participants2 participants2 participants6 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
2 participants1 participants1 participants3 participants7 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 participants2 participants1 participants0 participants5 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
490 participants488 participants492 participants490 participants1960 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
356 Participants357 Participants355 Participants361 Participants1429 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
138 Participants136 Participants141 Participants134 Participants549 Participants
Type of overactive bladder (OAB)
Frequency
184 participants180 participants189 participants194 participants747 participants
Type of overactive bladder (OAB)
Mixed
106 participants113 participants119 participants111 participants449 participants
Type of overactive bladder (OAB)
Urge Incontinence
204 participants200 participants188 participants190 participants782 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
49 / 49442 / 49341 / 49686 / 495
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 49414 / 49312 / 49611 / 495

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per day was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. Least Squares (LS) Means were generated from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12 (final visit)

Population: The full analysis set-Incontinence included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and who had at least 1 incontinence episode at baseline. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was utilized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours-1.17 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.113
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours-1.57 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.113
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours-1.46 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.115
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours-1.27 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.112
Comparison: Since there were 2 coprimary efficacy endpoints and 3 key secondary efficacy endpoints, the multiplicity among the endpoints was controlled at a type I error rate at the alpha = 0.05 level using a stepwise parallel gatekeeping procedure (5 stages). In addition, since two mirabegron treatment groups were compared with placebo per endpoint, the Hochberg procedure was used to adjust for multiplicity. A stratified rank ANCOVA model was utilized for hypothesis testing.p-value: 0.00395% CI: [-0.72, -0.09]Stratified rank ANCOVA
Comparison: Since there were 2 coprimary efficacy endpoints and 3 key secondary efficacy endpoints, the multiplicity among the endpoints was controlled at a type I error rate at the alpha = 0.05 level using a stepwise parallel gatekeeping procedure (5 stages). In addition, since two mirabegron treatment groups were compared with placebo per endpoint, the Hochberg procedure was used to adjust for multiplicity. A stratified rank ANCOVA model was utilized for hypothesis testing.p-value: 0.0195% CI: [-0.61, 0.03]Stratified rank ANCOVA
Comparison: Since the comparison between tolterodine and placebo was a secondary analysis, no adjustment for multiplicity was necessary.p-value: 0.1195% CI: [-0.42, 0.21]Stratified rank ANCOVA
Primary

Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours

The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was derived from the number of times a patient urinates (excluding incontinence only episodes) per day recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: The full analysis set included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours-1.34 micturitionsStandard Error 0.11
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours-1.93 micturitionsStandard Error 0.111
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours-1.77 micturitionsStandard Error 0.11
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours-1.59 micturitionsStandard Error 0.111
Comparison: Since there were 2 coprimary efficacy endpoints and 3 key secondary efficacy endpoints, the multiplicity among the endpoints was controlled at a type I error rate at the alpha = 0.05 level using a stepwise parallel gatekeeping procedure (5 stages). In addition, since two mirabegron treatment groups were compared with placebo per endpoint, the Hochberg procedure was used to adjust for multiplicity. An ANCOVA model was used for hypothesis testing.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.9, -0.29]ANCOVA
Comparison: Since there were 2 coprimary efficacy endpoints and 3 key secondary efficacy endpoints, the multiplicity among the endpoints was controlled at a type I error rate at the alpha = 0.05 level using a stepwise parallel gatekeeping procedure (5 stages). In addition, since two mirabegron treatment groups were compared with placebo per endpoint, the Hochberg procedure was used to adjust for multiplicity. An ANCOVA model was used for hypothesis testing.p-value: 0.00595% CI: [-0.74, -0.13]ANCOVA
Comparison: Since the comparison between tolterodine and placebo was a secondary analysis, no adjustment for multiplicity was necessary.p-value: 0.1195% CI: [-0.55, 0.06]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression Score

The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state: I am not anxious or depressed; I am moderately anxious or depressed; I am extremely anxious or depressed. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreModerately anxious -> Not anxious76 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreNot anxious -> Moderately anxious37 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreNot anxious -> Extremely anxious2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreNot anxious -> Missing data1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreNot anxious -> Not anxious219 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreModerately anxious -> Moderately anxious108 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreModerately anxious -> Extremely anxious9 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreModerately anxious -> Missing data1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreExtremely anxious -> Not anxious3 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreExtremely anxious -> Moderately anxious12 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreExtremely anxious -> Extremely anxious9 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreExtremely anxious -> Missing data0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreMissing data -> Not anxious2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreMissing data -> Moderately anxious1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreMissing data -> Extremely anxious0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreMissing data -> Missing data0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreModerately anxious -> Moderately anxious111 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreExtremely anxious -> Not anxious4 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreMissing data -> Missing data0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreExtremely anxious -> Missing data1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreMissing data -> Extremely anxious0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreExtremely anxious -> Moderately anxious12 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreNot anxious -> Extremely anxious1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreExtremely anxious -> Extremely anxious9 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreModerately anxious -> Not anxious74 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreModerately anxious -> Extremely anxious5 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreNot anxious -> Missing data0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreNot anxious -> Moderately anxious30 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreMissing data -> Not anxious1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreModerately anxious -> Missing data1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreMissing data -> Moderately anxious0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreNot anxious -> Not anxious224 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreModerately anxious -> Moderately anxious105 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreModerately anxious -> Not anxious88 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreMissing data -> Moderately anxious0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreModerately anxious -> Extremely anxious10 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreModerately anxious -> Missing data0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreMissing data -> Missing data0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreExtremely anxious -> Not anxious1 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreExtremely anxious -> Moderately anxious11 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreMissing data -> Extremely anxious0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreExtremely anxious -> Extremely anxious8 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreExtremely anxious -> Missing data0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreNot anxious -> Not anxious232 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreNot anxious -> Moderately anxious19 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreMissing data -> Not anxious1 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreNot anxious -> Extremely anxious1 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreNot anxious -> Missing data2 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreMissing data -> Missing data0 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreModerately anxious -> Missing data1 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreNot anxious -> Extremely anxious3 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreNot anxious -> Not anxious217 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreMissing data -> Moderately anxious1 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreModerately anxious -> Extremely anxious12 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreMissing data -> Not anxious3 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreNot anxious -> Moderately anxious21 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreModerately anxious -> Not anxious71 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreExtremely anxious -> Moderately anxious18 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreModerately anxious -> Moderately anxious122 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreExtremely anxious -> Extremely anxious2 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreMissing data -> Extremely anxious0 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreExtremely anxious -> Not anxious4 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreNot anxious -> Missing data0 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Anxiety/Depression ScoreExtremely anxious -> Missing data0 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score

The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state: I have no problems in walking about; I have some problems in walking about; I am confined to bed. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreSome problems -> No problems37 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreNo problem -> Some problems27 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreNo problem -> Confined to bed0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreNo problem -> Missing data2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreNo problem -> No problem334 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreSome problems -> Some problems78 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreSome problems -> Confined to bed0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreSome problems -> Missing data0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreConfined -> No problems0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreConfined -> Some problems0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreConfined -> Confined to bed0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreConfined -> Missing data0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreMissing data -> No problem2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreMissing data -> Some problems0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreMissing data -> Confined to bed0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreMissing data -> Missing data0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreSome problems -> Some problems59 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreConfined -> No problems0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreMissing data -> Missing data0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreConfined -> Missing data0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreMissing data -> Confined to bed0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreConfined -> Some problems0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreNo problem -> Confined to bed1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreConfined -> Confined to bed0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreSome problems -> No problems44 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreSome problems -> Confined to bed0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreNo problem -> Missing data2 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreNo problem -> Some problems26 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreMissing data -> No problem1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreSome problems -> Missing data0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreMissing data -> Some problems0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreNo problem -> No problem340 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreSome problems -> Some problems82 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreSome problems -> No problems40 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreMissing data -> Some problems0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreSome problems -> Confined to bed0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreSome problems -> Missing data1 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreMissing data -> Missing data0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreConfined -> No problems0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreConfined -> Some problems0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreMissing data -> Confined to bed0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreConfined -> Confined to bed0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreConfined -> Missing data0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreNo problem -> No problem334 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreNo problem -> Some problems18 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreMissing data -> No problem2 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreNo problem -> Confined to bed0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreNo problem -> Missing data1 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreMissing data -> Missing data0 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreSome problems -> Missing data0 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreNo problem -> Confined to bed0 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreNo problem -> No problem330 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreMissing data -> Some problems1 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreSome problems -> Confined to bed1 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreMissing data -> No problem3 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreNo problem -> Some problems28 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreSome problems -> No problems38 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreConfined -> Some problems0 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreSome problems -> Some problems73 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreConfined -> Confined to bed0 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreMissing data -> Confined to bed0 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreConfined -> No problems0 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreNo problem -> Missing data1 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility ScoreConfined -> Missing data0 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score

The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state: I have no pain or discomfort; I have moderate pain or discomfort; I have extreme pain or discomfort. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreModerate pain -> No pain70 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreNo pain -> Moderate pain36 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreNo pain -> Extreme pain4 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreNo pain -> Missing data0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreNo pain -> No pain210 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreModerate pain -> Moderate pain129 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreModerate pain -> Extreme pain2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreModerate pain ->Missing data2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreExtreme pain -> No pain3 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreExtreme pain -> Moderate pain13 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreExtreme pain -> Extreme pain10 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreExtreme pain -> Missing data0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreMissing data -> No pain0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreMissing data -> Moderate pain1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreMissing data -> Extreme pain0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreMissing data -> Missing data0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreModerate pain -> Moderate pain128 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreExtreme pain -> No pain2 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreMissing data -> Missing data0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreExtreme pain -> Missing data0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreMissing data -> Extreme pain0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreExtreme pain -> Moderate pain12 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreNo pain -> Extreme pain2 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreExtreme pain -> Extreme pain4 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreModerate pain -> No pain71 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreModerate pain -> Extreme pain8 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreNo pain -> Missing data2 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreNo pain -> Moderate pain32 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreMissing data -> No pain1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreModerate pain ->Missing data0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreMissing data -> Moderate pain0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreNo pain -> No pain211 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreModerate pain -> Moderate pain114 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreModerate pain -> No pain76 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreMissing data -> Moderate pain1 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreModerate pain -> Extreme pain5 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreModerate pain ->Missing data1 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreMissing data -> Missing data0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreExtreme pain -> No pain1 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreExtreme pain -> Moderate pain12 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreMissing data -> Extreme pain0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreExtreme pain -> Extreme pain5 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreExtreme pain -> Missing data0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreNo pain -> No pain209 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreNo pain -> Moderate pain50 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreMissing data -> No pain1 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreNo pain -> Extreme pain2 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreNo pain -> Missing data1 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreMissing data -> Missing data0 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreModerate pain ->Missing data0 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreNo pain -> Extreme pain2 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreNo pain -> No pain197 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreMissing data -> Moderate pain1 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreModerate pain -> Extreme pain7 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreMissing data -> No pain3 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreNo pain -> Moderate pain37 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreModerate pain -> No pain69 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreExtreme pain -> Moderate pain12 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreModerate pain -> Moderate pain132 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreExtreme pain -> Extreme pain9 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreMissing data -> Extreme pain1 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreExtreme pain -> No pain4 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreNo pain -> Missing data1 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort ScoreExtreme pain -> Missing data0 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care Score

The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state: I have no problems with self-care; I have some problems washing or dressing myself; I am unable to wash or dress myself. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreUnable to wash or dress myself -> No problems1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreNo problem -> Unable to wash or dress myself0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreSome problems -> No problems18 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreMissing data -> Missing data0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreUnable to wash or dress -> Unable to wash or dress0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreMissing data -> Some problems0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreSome problems -> Some problems14 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreUnable to wash or dress myself -> Missing data0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreNo problem -> No problem437 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreMissing data -> Unable to wash or dress myself0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreSome problems -> Unable to wash or dress myself0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreNo problem -> Missing data2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreNo problem -> Some problems7 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreMissing data -> No problem1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreSome problems -> Missing data0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreUnable to wash or dress myself -> Some problems0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreSome problems -> Missing data0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreUnable to wash or dress myself -> Missing data0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreUnable to wash or dress myself -> No problems0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreUnable to wash or dress myself -> Some problems1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreUnable to wash or dress -> Unable to wash or dress0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreNo problem -> Unable to wash or dress myself0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreNo problem -> Missing data2 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreNo problem -> No problem445 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreMissing data -> Some problems0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreSome problems -> No problems9 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreMissing data -> Missing data0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreSome problems -> Some problems6 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreMissing data -> Unable to wash or dress myself0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreMissing data -> No problem1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreSome problems -> Unable to wash or dress myself0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreNo problem -> Some problems9 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreMissing data -> Some problems0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreNo problem -> No problem439 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreNo problem -> Some problems17 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreNo problem -> Unable to wash or dress myself0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreNo problem -> Missing data2 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreSome problems -> No problems8 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreSome problems -> Some problems10 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreSome problems -> Unable to wash or dress myself0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreSome problems -> Missing data0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreUnable to wash or dress myself -> No problems0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreUnable to wash or dress myself -> Some problems1 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreUnable to wash or dress -> Unable to wash or dress0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreUnable to wash or dress myself -> Missing data0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreMissing data -> No problem1 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreMissing data -> Unable to wash or dress myself0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreMissing data -> Missing data0 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreMissing data -> Some problems1 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreSome problems -> Unable to wash or dress myself0 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreSome problems -> Some problems15 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreUnable to wash or dress myself -> Missing data0 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreMissing data -> No problem4 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreSome problems -> No problems9 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreNo problem -> Missing data1 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreNo problem -> Some problems12 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreNo problem -> Unable to wash or dress myself1 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreNo problem -> No problem432 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreMissing data -> Missing data0 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreUnable to wash or dress myself -> Some problems0 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreMissing data -> Unable to wash or dress myself0 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreUnable to wash or dress -> Unable to wash or dress0 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreUnable to wash or dress myself -> No problems0 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-care ScoreSome problems -> Missing data0 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score

The EQ-5D is a standardized, nondisease-specific instrument for describing health status. Participants were asked which statement best describes their health state with regard to usual activities (work, study or leisure): I have no problems performing my usual activities; I have some problems performing my usual activities; I am unable to perform my usual activities. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available at that Visit.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreSome problems -> No problems73 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreNo problem -> Some problems25 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreNo problem -> Unable to perform usual activities0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreNo problem -> Missing data2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreNo problem -> No problem298 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreSome problems -> Some problems75 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreSome problems-> Unable to perform usual activities2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreSome problems -> Missing data0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreUnable to perform usual activities -> No problems0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreUnable to perform usual activities-> Some problems2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreUnable to perform -> Unable to perform0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreUnable to perform usual activities -> Missing data0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreMissing data -> No problem2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreMissing data -> Some problems1 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreMissing data -> Unable to perform usual activities0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreMissing data -> Missing data0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreSome problems -> Some problems48 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreUnable to perform usual activities -> No problems1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreMissing data -> Missing data0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreUnable to perform usual activities -> Missing data0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreMissing data -> Unable to perform usual activities0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreUnable to perform usual activities-> Some problems1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreNo problem -> Unable to perform usual activities2 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreUnable to perform -> Unable to perform1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreSome problems -> No problems82 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreSome problems-> Unable to perform usual activities0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreNo problem -> Missing data1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreNo problem -> Some problems18 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreMissing data -> No problem2 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreSome problems -> Missing data1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreMissing data -> Some problems0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreNo problem -> No problem316 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreSome problems -> Some problems63 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreSome problems -> No problems51 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreMissing data -> Some problems0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreSome problems-> Unable to perform usual activities0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreSome problems -> Missing data1 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreMissing data -> Missing data0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreUnable to perform usual activities -> No problems1 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreUnable to perform usual activities-> Some problems3 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreMissing data -> Unable to perform usual activities0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreUnable to perform -> Unable to perform2 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreUnable to perform usual activities -> Missing data0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreNo problem -> No problem327 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreNo problem -> Some problems25 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreMissing data -> No problem1 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreNo problem -> Unable to perform usual activities3 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreNo problem -> Missing data1 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreMissing data -> Missing data0 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreSome problems -> Missing data0 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreNo problem -> Unable to perform usual activities0 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreNo problem -> No problem283 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreMissing data -> Some problems1 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreSome problems-> Unable to perform usual activities0 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreMissing data -> No problem4 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreNo problem -> Some problems39 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreSome problems -> No problems68 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreUnable to perform usual activities-> Some problems3 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreSome problems -> Some problems73 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreUnable to perform -> Unable to perform1 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreMissing data -> Unable to perform usual activities0 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreUnable to perform usual activities -> No problems2 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreNo problem -> Missing data1 participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities ScoreUnable to perform usual activities -> Missing data0 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Final Visit in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition

The average volume voided per micturition was calculated from the volume of each micturition measured by the patient and recorded in a micturition diary for 3 days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: The Full analysis set included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Final Visit in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition12.3 mLStandard Error 1.99
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition24.2 mLStandard Error 2.01
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition25.6 mLStandard Error 2
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Final Visit in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition25.0 mLStandard Error 2
Comparison: Since there were 2 coprimary efficacy endpoints and 3 key secondary efficacy endpoints, the multiplicity among the endpoints was controlled at a type I error rate at the alpha = 0.05 level using a stepwise parallel gatekeeping procedure (5 stages). In addition, since two mirabegron treatment groups were compared with placebo per endpoint, the Hochberg procedure was used to adjust for multiplicity. An ANCOVA model was used for hypothesis testing.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [6.3, 17.4]ANCOVA
Comparison: Since there were 2 coprimary efficacy endpoints and 3 key secondary efficacy endpoints, the multiplicity among the endpoints was controlled at a type I error rate at the alpha = 0.05 level using a stepwise parallel gatekeeping procedure (5 stages). In addition, since two mirabegron treatment groups were compared with placebo per endpoint, the Hochberg procedure was used to adjust for multiplicity. An ANCOVA model was used for hypothesis testing.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [7.7, 18.7]ANCOVA
Comparison: Since the comparison between tolterodine and placebo was a secondary analysis, no adjustment for multiplicity was necessary.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [7.1, 18.2]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)

The PPBC scale is a global assessment tool that asks patients to rate their impression of their current bladder condition on a 6-point scale from 1: 'Does not cause me any problems at all'; 2: 'Causes me some very minor problems'; 3: 'Causes me some minor problems'; 4: 'Causes me (some) moderate problems'; 5: 'Causes me severe problems' and 6: 'Causes me many severe problems'. LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of participants included at each time point (N) only includes those with baseline and post-baseline values. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)Week 12 [N=425; 410; 421; 417]-0.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)Final Visit (LOCF) [N=433; 416; 429; 426]-0.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)Final Visit (LOCF) [N=433; 416; 429; 426]-1.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)Week 12 [N=425; 410; 421; 417]-1.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)Week 12 [N=425; 410; 421; 417]-0.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)Final Visit (LOCF) [N=433; 416; 429; 426]-1.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)Week 12 [N=425; 410; 421; 417]-1.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)Final Visit (LOCF) [N=433; 416; 429; 426]-1.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS)

The TS-VAS is a visual analog scale (VAS) that asks patients to rate their satisfaction with treatment by placing a vertical mark on a 10 cm line where the endpoints are labeled 'No, not at all' on the left (=0) to 'Yes, completely satisfied' on the right (=10). LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of participants included at each time point (N) only includes those with baseline and post-baseline values. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS)Week 12 [N=421; 410; 420; 416]1.92 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.147
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS)Final Visit (LOCF) [N=428; 414; 427; 425]1.89 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.146
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS)Final Visit (LOCF) [N=428; 414; 427; 425]2.55 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.149
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS)Week 12 [N=421; 410; 420; 416]2.57 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.149
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS)Week 12 [N=421; 410; 420; 416]2.67 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.147
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS)Final Visit (LOCF) [N=428; 414; 427; 425]2.66 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.146
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS)Week 12 [N=421; 410; 420; 416]2.44 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.148
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS)Final Visit (LOCF) [N=428; 414; 427; 425]2.44 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.147
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity Impairment

The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with daily activities over the last 7 days. Percent activity impairment is derived from the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their regular daily activities. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of participants at each time point (N) included patients with both baseline and post-baseline values. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity ImpairmentWeek 12 [N=409; 395; 409; 400]-11.2 percent activity impairmentStandard Deviation 27.73
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity ImpairmentFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=419; 400; 417; 409]-11.0 percent activity impairmentStandard Deviation 27.78
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity ImpairmentFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=419; 400; 417; 409]-14.9 percent activity impairmentStandard Deviation 27.84
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity ImpairmentWeek 12 [N=409; 395; 409; 400]-15.0 percent activity impairmentStandard Deviation 27.93
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity ImpairmentWeek 12 [N=409; 395; 409; 400]-14.5 percent activity impairmentStandard Deviation 28.67
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity ImpairmentFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=419; 400; 417; 409]-14.4 percent activity impairmentStandard Deviation 28.7
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity ImpairmentWeek 12 [N=409; 395; 409; 400]-14.7 percent activity impairmentStandard Deviation 29.5
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity ImpairmentFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=419; 400; 417; 409]-14.3 percent activity impairmentStandard Deviation 29.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While Working

The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent impairment while working was derived from the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their productivity while working. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of patients at each time point (N) includes those with both baseline and post-baseline values who were employed. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While WorkingFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=118; 130; 106; 115]-8.1 percent impairment while workingStandard Deviation 24.43
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While WorkingWeek 12 [N=116; 128; 104; 114]-8.3 percent impairment while workingStandard Deviation 24.5
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While WorkingFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=118; 130; 106; 115]-12.8 percent impairment while workingStandard Deviation 23.24
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While WorkingWeek 12 [N=116; 128; 104; 114]-12.5 percent impairment while workingStandard Deviation 23.24
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While WorkingWeek 12 [N=116; 128; 104; 114]-10.8 percent impairment while workingStandard Deviation 25.19
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While WorkingFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=118; 130; 106; 115]-10.8 percent impairment while workingStandard Deviation 25.04
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While WorkingWeek 12 [N=116; 128; 104; 114]-6.7 percent impairment while workingStandard Deviation 28.4
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While WorkingFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=118; 130; 106; 115]-6.6 percent impairment while workingStandard Deviation 28.28
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work Impairment

The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent overall work impairment takes into account both hours missed due to OAB symptoms and the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their productivity while working. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of patients at each time point (N) includes those with both baseline and post-baseline values who were employed. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work ImpairmentFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=106; 119; 99; 105]-7.7 percent overall work impairmentStandard Deviation 23.79
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work ImpairmentWeek 12 [N=104; 117; 98; 104]-7.9 percent overall work impairmentStandard Deviation 23.86
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work ImpairmentWeek 12 [N=104; 117; 98; 104]-13.2 percent overall work impairmentStandard Deviation 25.7
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work ImpairmentFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=106; 119; 99; 105]-13.6 percent overall work impairmentStandard Deviation 25.64
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work ImpairmentWeek 12 [N=104; 117; 98; 104]-11.6 percent overall work impairmentStandard Deviation 27.09
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work ImpairmentFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=106; 119; 99; 105]-11.5 percent overall work impairmentStandard Deviation 26.97
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work ImpairmentFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=106; 119; 99; 105]-5.8 percent overall work impairmentStandard Deviation 28.19
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work ImpairmentWeek 12 [N=104; 117; 98; 104]-5.8 percent overall work impairmentStandard Deviation 28.32
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time Missed

The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent of work time missed is derived from the number of hours of work missed due to OAB symptoms as a percentage of total hours that should have been worked. A higher percentage indicates more hours missed. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of patients at each time point (N) includes those with both baseline and post-baseline values who were employed. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time MissedWeek 12 [N=111; 120; 109; 113]-0.2 percent work time missedStandard Deviation 7.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time MissedFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=113; 122; 110; 114]-0.2 percent work time missedStandard Deviation 7.24
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time MissedWeek 12 [N=111; 120; 109; 113]-1.9 percent work time missedStandard Deviation 13.42
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time MissedFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=113; 122; 110; 114]-1.8 percent work time missedStandard Deviation 13.31
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time MissedFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=113; 122; 110; 114]-1.7 percent work time missedStandard Deviation 18.74
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time MissedWeek 12 [N=111; 120; 109; 113]-1.7 percent work time missedStandard Deviation 18.83
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time MissedWeek 12 [N=111; 120; 109; 113]-1.2 percent work time missedStandard Deviation 12.68
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time MissedFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=113; 122; 110; 114]-1.2 percent work time missedStandard Deviation 12.62
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per 24 hours was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 4 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Population: The full analysis set-Incontinence included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and who had at least 1 incontinence episode at baseline. Last observation carried forward was not utilized in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours-0.65 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.118
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours-1.04 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.118
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours-1.03 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.12
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours-1.00 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.117
Comparison: Since there were 2 coprimary efficacy endpoints and 3 key secondary efficacy endpoints, the multiplicity among the endpoints was controlled at a type I error rate at the alpha = 0.05 level using a stepwise parallel gatekeeping procedure (5 stages). In addition, since two mirabegron treatment groups were compared with placebo per endpoint, the Hochberg procedure was used to adjust for multiplicity. A stratified rank ANCOVA model was utilized for hypothesis testing.p-value: 0.00295% CI: [-0.71, -0.06]Stratified rank ANCOVA
Comparison: Since there were 2 coprimary efficacy endpoints and 3 key secondary efficacy endpoints, the multiplicity among the endpoints was controlled at a type I error rate at the alpha = 0.05 level using a stepwise parallel gatekeeping procedure (5 stages). In addition, since two mirabegron treatment groups were compared with placebo per endpoint, the Hochberg procedure was used to adjust for multiplicity. A stratified rank ANCOVA model was utilized for hypothesis testing.p-value: 0.00295% CI: [-0.71, -0.05]Stratified rank ANCOVA
Comparison: Since the comparison between tolterodine and placebo was a secondary analysis, no adjustment for multiplicity was necessary.p-value: 0.01995% CI: [-0.68, -0.03]Stratified rank ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours

The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was calculated from the number of micturitions recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 4 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Population: The full analysis set included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. Last observation carried forward was not utilized in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours-0.77 micturitionsStandard Error 0.096
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours-1.16 micturitionsStandard Error 0.097
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours-1.29 micturitionsStandard Error 0.096
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours-1.10 micturitionsStandard Error 0.096
Comparison: Since there were 2 coprimary efficacy endpoints and 3 key secondary efficacy endpoints, the multiplicity among the endpoints was controlled at a type I error rate at the alpha = 0.05 level using a stepwise parallel gatekeeping procedure (5 stages). In addition, since two mirabegron treatment groups were compared with placebo per endpoint, the Hochberg procedure was used to adjust for multiplicity. An ANCOVA model was used for hypothesis testing.p-value: 0.00495% CI: [-0.66, -0.13]ANCOVA
Comparison: Since there were 2 coprimary efficacy endpoints and 3 key secondary efficacy endpoints, the multiplicity among the endpoints was controlled at a type I error rate at the alpha = 0.05 level using a stepwise parallel gatekeeping procedure (5 stages). In addition, since two mirabegron treatment groups were compared with placebo per endpoint, the Hochberg procedure was used to adjust for multiplicity. An ANCOVA model was used for hypothesis testing.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.79, -0.26]ANCOVA
Comparison: Since the comparison between tolterodine and placebo was a secondary analysis, no adjustment for multiplicity was necessary.p-value: 0.01695% CI: [-0.6, -0.06]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition

The average volume voided per micturition was calculated from the volume of each micturition measured by the patient and recorded in a micturition diary for 3 days before the Baseline and Week 4, 8 and 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: The full analysis set included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was not utilized in this analysis. The number of participants included in the calculation for each time point is noted as N.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 12 [N=452; 437; 447; 438]11.9 mLStandard Error 2.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 4 [N=479; 470; 477; 474]9.8 mLStandard Error 1.73
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 8 [N=463; 449; 455; 461]11.7 mLStandard Error 1.97
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 8 [N=463; 449; 455; 461]20.7 mLStandard Error 2
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 4 [N=479; 470; 477; 474]20.1 mLStandard Error 1.75
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 12 [N=452; 437; 447; 438]25.3 mLStandard Error 2.11
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 12 [N=452; 437; 447; 438]25.7 mLStandard Error 2.08
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 4 [N=479; 470; 477; 474]20.3 mLStandard Error 1.74
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 8 [N=463; 449; 455; 461]25.3 mLStandard Error 1.99
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 8 [N=463; 449; 455; 461]25.9 mLStandard Error 1.97
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 4 [N=479; 470; 477; 474]21.4 mLStandard Error 1.74
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per MicturitionWeek 12 [N=452; 437; 447; 438]25.8 mLStandard Error 2.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score

Health-related quality of life was assessed by the HRQL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social interaction) of the overactive bladder questionnaire (OABq). The HRQL total score was calculated by adding the 4 HRQL subscale scores, and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline in HRQL score indicates improvements. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was utilized for the Final Visit analysis. The number of participants included in the calculation for each time point is noted as N.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 4 [N=471; 463; 469; 467]8.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.68
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 8 [N=454; 446; 450; 453]11.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.76
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 12 [N=445; 426; 435; 432]14.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.79
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total ScoreFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=473; 468; 472; 470]13.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.76
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 8 [N=454; 446; 450; 453]13.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.76
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 12 [N=445; 426; 435; 432]16.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total ScoreFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=473; 468; 472; 470]16.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.77
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 4 [N=471; 463; 469; 467]9.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.68
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 12 [N=445; 426; 435; 432]17.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 8 [N=454; 446; 450; 453]14.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.76
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total ScoreFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=473; 468; 472; 470]17.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.77
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 4 [N=471; 463; 469; 467]11.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.68
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total ScoreFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=473; 468; 472; 470]14.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.77
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 8 [N=454; 446; 450; 453]13.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.76
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 4 [N=471; 463; 469; 467]9.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.68
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total ScoreWeek 12 [N=445; 426; 435; 432]15.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Level of Urgency

Average of patients' ratings on the degree of urgency associated with each micturition and/or incontinence episode recorded in a 3-day micturition diary according to the following 5-point categorical scale (Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale): 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis. The number of participants included in the calculation for each time point is noted as N.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Level of UrgencyWeek 4 [N=476; 469; 472; 471]-0.08 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.023
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Level of UrgencyWeek 8 [N=460; 447; 451; 456]-0.16 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.027
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Level of UrgencyWeek 12 [N=450; 434; 442; 434]-0.22 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.029
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Level of UrgencyFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=480; 472; 475; 473]-0.22 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.028
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Level of UrgencyWeek 8 [N=460; 447; 451; 456]-0.26 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.027
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Level of UrgencyWeek 12 [N=450; 434; 442; 434]-0.33 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.029
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Level of UrgencyFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=480; 472; 475; 473]-0.31 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.028
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Level of UrgencyWeek 4 [N=476; 469; 472; 471]-0.19 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.023
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Level of UrgencyWeek 12 [N=450; 434; 442; 434]-0.31 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.029
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Level of UrgencyWeek 8 [N=460; 447; 451; 456]-0.27 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.027
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Level of UrgencyFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=480; 472; 475; 473]-0.30 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.028
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Level of UrgencyWeek 4 [N=476; 469; 472; 471]-0.21 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.023
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Level of UrgencyFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=480; 472; 475; 473]-0.29 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.028
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Level of UrgencyWeek 8 [N=460; 447; 451; 456]-0.25 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.027
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Level of UrgencyWeek 4 [N=476; 469; 472; 471]-0.21 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.023
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Level of UrgencyWeek 12 [N=450; 434; 442; 434]-0.30 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.029
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours

Nocturia is defined as waking at night one or more times to void. The average number of times a patient urinated (excluding incontinence only episodes) during sleeping time per day was derived from the 3-day patient micturition diary. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and who had at least one nocturia episode at baseline. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis. N is the number of participants included at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 4 [N=428; 422; 422; 432]-0.25 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.045
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8 [N=414; 404; 403; 419]-0.30 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.047
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12 [N=404; 393; 395; 399]-0.41 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.048
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=428; 423; 422; 433]-0.41 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.047
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8 [N=414; 404; 403; 419]-0.41 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.048
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12 [N=404; 393; 395; 399]-0.57 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.049
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=428; 423; 422; 433]-0.56 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.047
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 4 [N=428; 422; 422; 432]-0.27 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.045
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12 [N=404; 393; 395; 399]-0.47 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.049
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8 [N=414; 404; 403; 419]-0.48 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.048
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=428; 423; 422; 433]-0.50 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.047
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 4 [N=428; 422; 422; 432]-0.34 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.045
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=428; 423; 422; 433]-0.45 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.047
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8 [N=414; 404; 403; 419]-0.39 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.047
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 4 [N=428; 422; 422; 432]-0.29 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.045
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12 [N=404; 393; 395; 399]-0.44 nocturia episodesStandard Error 0.048
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours

The average number of times a patient records a new pad used per day during the 3-day micturition diary period. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and who had at least one use of a pad at baseline. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis. N is the number of participants included at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 4 [N=209; 183; 195; 181]-0.45 padsStandard Error 0.103
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 8 [N=204; 176; 183; 177]-0.72 padsStandard Error 0.116
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 12 [N=200; 172; 181; 165]-0.99 padsStandard Error 0.117
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=209; 183; 195; 181]-0.95 padsStandard Error 0.115
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 8 [N=204; 176; 183; 177]-1.02 padsStandard Error 0.125
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 12 [N=200; 172; 181; 165]-1.26 padsStandard Error 0.126
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=209; 183; 195; 181]-1.17 padsStandard Error 0.123
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 4 [N=209; 183; 195; 181]-0.73 padsStandard Error 0.11
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 12 [N=200; 172; 181; 165]-1.11 padsStandard Error 0.123
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 8 [N=204; 176; 183; 177]-1.03 padsStandard Error 0.122
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=209; 183; 195; 181]-1.12 padsStandard Error 0.119
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 4 [N=209; 183; 195; 181]-0.81 padsStandard Error 0.107
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=209; 183; 195; 181]-0.95 padsStandard Error 0.123
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 8 [N=204; 176; 183; 177]-0.77 padsStandard Error 0.124
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 4 [N=209; 183; 195; 181]-0.67 padsStandard Error 0.111
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 HoursWeek 12 [N=200; 172; 181; 165]-0.95 padsStandard Error 0.128
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours

The average number of urgency episodes (the sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer), derived from urgency episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as grade 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and at least 1 episode of urgency grade 3 or 4 at baseline. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis. N is the number of patients included at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 4 [N=475; 469; 471; 470]-0.89 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.138
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 8 [N=460; 446; 450; 456]-1.28 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.152
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 12 [N=450; 433; 441; 434]-1.65 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.154
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=479; 470; 474; 472]-1.65 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.151
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 8 [N=460; 446; 450; 456]-1.90 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.155
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 12 [N=450; 433; 441; 434]-2.35 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.157
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=479; 470; 474; 472]-2.25 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.152
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 4 [N=475; 469; 471; 470]-1.39 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.139
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 12 [N=450; 433; 441; 434]-2.00 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.155
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 8 [N=460; 446; 450; 456]-1.90 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.154
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=479; 470; 474; 472]-1.96 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.151
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 4 [N=475; 469; 471; 470]-1.54 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.138
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=479; 470; 474; 472]-2.07 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.152
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 8 [N=460; 446; 450; 456]-1.91 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.153
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 4 [N=475; 469; 471; 470]-1.63 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.139
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 HoursWeek 12 [N=450; 433; 441; 434]-2.16 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.156
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

The involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately proceeded by urgency, derived from the number of incontinence episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0 = No urgency; 1 = Mild urgency; 2 = Moderate urgency, could postpone voiding a short while; 3 = Severe urgency, could not postpone voiding; 4 = Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: The full analysis set-incontinence included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary \& at least 1 urgency incontinence episode at baseline. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis. N = the number of patients included at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=283; 286; 276; 289]-1.11 Urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12 [N=269; 267; 257; 265]-1.12 Urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.111
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 4 [N=283; 286; 276; 288]-0.63 Urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.108
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8 [N=273; 272; 263; 281]-0.94 Urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.118
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8 [N=273; 272; 263; 281]-1.27 Urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.118
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 4 [N=283; 286; 276; 288]-0.98 Urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.107
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12 [N=269; 267; 257; 265]-1.52 Urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.112
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=283; 286; 276; 289]-1.46 Urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.109
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12 [N=269; 267; 257; 265]-1.32 Urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.114
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=283; 286; 276; 289]-1.33 Urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.111
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8 [N=273; 272; 263; 281]-1.32 Urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.12
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 4 [N=283; 286; 276; 288]-1.00 Urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.109
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=283; 286; 276; 289]-1.18 Urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.109
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 4 [N=283; 286; 276; 288]-1.01 Urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.107
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8 [N=273; 272; 263; 281]-0.99 Urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.116
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12 [N=269; 267; 257; 265]-1.19 Urgency incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.122
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician

The number of times the patient visited a physician's office during the 4 weeks prior to each study visit (excluding study visits) because of the patient's bladder condition.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of participants at each time point (N) includes only patients with both baseline and post-baseline values. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to PhysicianWeek 4 [N=477; 467; 473; 474]-0.0 Physician visitsStandard Deviation 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to PhysicianWeek 8 [N=462; 448; 453; 460]-0.0 Physician visitsStandard Deviation 0.17
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to PhysicianWeek 12 [N=451; 435; 443; 439]-0.0 Physician visitsStandard Deviation 0.16
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to PhysicianFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=478; 469; 475; 474]-0.0 Physician visitsStandard Deviation 0.19
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to PhysicianWeek 8 [N=462; 448; 453; 460]0.0 Physician visitsStandard Deviation 0.18
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to PhysicianWeek 12 [N=451; 435; 443; 439]-0.0 Physician visitsStandard Deviation 0.16
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to PhysicianFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=478; 469; 475; 474]-0.0 Physician visitsStandard Deviation 0.17
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to PhysicianWeek 4 [N=477; 467; 473; 474]-0.0 Physician visitsStandard Deviation 0.14
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to PhysicianWeek 12 [N=451; 435; 443; 439]-0.0 Physician visitsStandard Deviation 0.18
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to PhysicianWeek 8 [N=462; 448; 453; 460]-0.0 Physician visitsStandard Deviation 0.21
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to PhysicianFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=478; 469; 475; 474]-0.0 Physician visitsStandard Deviation 0.18
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to PhysicianWeek 4 [N=477; 467; 473; 474]-0.0 Physician visitsStandard Deviation 0.19
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to PhysicianFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=478; 469; 475; 474]-0.0 Physician visitsStandard Deviation 0.19
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to PhysicianWeek 8 [N=462; 448; 453; 460]-0.0 Physician visitsStandard Deviation 0.15
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to PhysicianWeek 4 [N=477; 467; 473; 474]0.0 Physician visitsStandard Deviation 0.23
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to PhysicianWeek 12 [N=451; 435; 443; 439]-0.0 Physician visitsStandard Deviation 0.18
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score

Overactive bladder symptoms were assessed using the symptom bother scale of the overactive bladder questionnaire. The symptom bother scale consists of 8 questions answered by the participant on a scale from 1-6. The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating worst severity. A negative change from Baseline in symptom bother score indicates improvements. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis. The number of participants included in the calculation for each time point is noted as N.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 4 [N=472; 460; 470; 467]-9.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.75
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 8 [N=455; 441; 450; 451]-13.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.84
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 12 [N=445; 424; 435; 433]-15.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.87
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother ScoreFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=475; 465; 473; 469]-14.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.84
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 8 [N=455; 441; 450; 451]-17.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.85
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 12 [N=445; 424; 435; 433]-20.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.89
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother ScoreFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=475; 465; 473; 469]-19.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.85
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 4 [N=472; 460; 470; 467]-13.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.76
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 12 [N=445; 424; 435; 433]-20.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.88
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 8 [N=455; 441; 450; 451]-17.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.84
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother ScoreFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=475; 465; 473; 469]-19.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.84
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 4 [N=472; 460; 470; 467]-13.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.75
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother ScoreFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=475; 465; 473; 469]-18.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.85
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 8 [N=455; 441; 450; 451]-17.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.84
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 4 [N=472; 460; 470; 467]-13.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.76
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother ScoreWeek 12 [N=445; 424; 435; 433]-18.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.88
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, generic instrument for describing and evaluating health status. Health status is assessed by patients evaluating their health on a vertical, visual analog scale from 0 to 100 where the endpoints are labeled 'Worst imaginable health state' (=0) and 'Best imaginable health state' (=100). On the EQ-5D VAS, a positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of participants at each time point (N) includes only patients with both baseline and post-baseline values. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 4 [N=466; 459; 468; 461]3.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.64
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 8 [N=451; 443; 447; 447]4.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.81
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 12 [N=443; 423; 437; 429]6.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.01
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Final Visit (LOCF) [N=470; 466; 472; 467]6.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.03
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 8 [N=451; 443; 447; 447]5.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.79
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 12 [N=443; 423; 437; 429]7.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.89
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Final Visit (LOCF) [N=470; 466; 472; 467]6.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.67
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 4 [N=466; 459; 468; 461]3.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.74
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 12 [N=443; 423; 437; 429]8.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.56
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 8 [N=451; 443; 447; 447]6.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.42
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Final Visit (LOCF) [N=470; 466; 472; 467]8.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.74
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 4 [N=466; 459; 468; 461]4.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.75
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Final Visit (LOCF) [N=470; 466; 472; 467]6.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.23
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 8 [N=451; 443; 447; 447]6.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.31
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 4 [N=466; 459; 468; 461]3.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.68
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 12 [N=443; 423; 437; 429]6.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.62
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per 24 hours was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline, Week 8 and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8 and 12

Population: The full analysis set-incontinence included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary and at least 1 incontinence episode at baseline. The number of patients included at each time point is noted as N. LOCF was not utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8 [N=280; 277; 268; 292]-1.00 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.127
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12 [N=275; 272; 262; 276]-1.18 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.116
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12 [N=275; 272; 262; 276]-1.62 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.117
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8 [N=280; 277; 268; 292]-1.29 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.128
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8 [N=280; 277; 268; 292]-1.40 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.13
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12 [N=275; 272; 262; 276]-1.45 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.119
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 8 [N=280; 277; 268; 292]-1.02 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.125
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursWeek 12 [N=275; 272; 262; 276]-1.27 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.116
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours

The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was calculated from the number of micturitions recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline, Week 8 and 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8 and 12

Population: The full analysis set included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and who had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of patients included in the calculation for each time point is noted as N. LOCF was not used in this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursWeek 8 [N=463; 450; 455; 461]-1.15 micturitionsStandard Error 0.106
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursWeek 12 [N=452; 437; 447; 438]-1.33 micturitionsStandard Error 0.113
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursWeek 12 [N=452; 437; 447; 438]-2.02 micturitionsStandard Error 0.115
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursWeek 8 [N=463; 450; 455; 461]-1.64 micturitionsStandard Error 0.107
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursWeek 8 [N=463; 450; 455; 461]-1.66 micturitionsStandard Error 0.106
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursWeek 12 [N=452; 437; 447; 438]-1.78 micturitionsStandard Error 0.113
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursWeek 8 [N=463; 450; 455; 461]-1.43 micturitionsStandard Error 0.106
Tolterodine SR 4 mgChange From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursWeek 12 [N=452; 437; 447; 438]-1.60 micturitionsStandard Error 0.114
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit

The percentage of participants with at least 50% decrease from baseline in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours during the 3 days prior to each clinic visit derived from the patient micturition diary.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: The full analysis set-incontinence included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary \& who had at least 1 incontinence episode at baseline. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis. N is the number of patients included at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final VisitWeek 4 [N=291; 293; 281; 299]46.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final VisitWeek 8 [N=280; 277; 268; 292]53.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final VisitWeek 12 [N=275; 272; 262; 276]61.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final VisitFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=291; 293; 281; 300]60.1 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final VisitWeek 8 [N=280; 277; 268; 292]67.9 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final VisitWeek 12 [N=275; 272; 262; 276]73.5 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final VisitFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=291; 293; 281; 300]72.2 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final VisitWeek 4 [N=291; 293; 281; 299]57.3 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 100 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final VisitWeek 12 [N=275; 272; 262; 276]67.9 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 100 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final VisitWeek 8 [N=280; 277; 268; 292]68.3 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 100 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final VisitFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=291; 293; 281; 300]67.6 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 100 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final VisitWeek 4 [N=291; 293; 281; 299]54.4 percentage of participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final VisitFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=291; 293; 281; 300]68.3 percentage of participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final VisitWeek 8 [N=280; 277; 268; 292]64.4 percentage of participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final VisitWeek 4 [N=291; 293; 281; 299]56.5 percentage of participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgPercentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final VisitWeek 12 [N=275; 272; 262; 276]69.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit

The PPBC scale is a global assessment tool that asks patients to rate their impression of their current bladder condition on a 6-point scale from 1: 'Does not cause me any problems at all'; 2: 'Causes me some very minor problems'; 3: 'Causes me some minor problems'; 4: 'Causes me (some) moderate problems'; 5: 'Causes me severe problems' and 6: 'Causes me many severe problems'. Improvement was defined as at least a 1 point improvement from Baseline to post-baseline and a major improvement was defined as at least a 2 point improvement from Baseline to post-baseline in PPBC score.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: The full analysis set included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and had a baseline and at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary. The number of participants at each time point (N) only includes those with baseline and post-baseline values. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final VisitImprovement: Week 12 [N=425; 410;421; 417]56.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final VisitImprovement: Final Visit [N=433; 416; 429; 426]56.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final VisitMajor Improvement: Week 12 [N=425; 410; 421; 417]28.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final VisitMajor Improvement: Final Visit [N=433;416;429;426]28.2 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final VisitImprovement: Final Visit [N=433; 416; 429; 426]61.3 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final VisitMajor Improvement: Week 12 [N=425; 410; 421; 417]29.5 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final VisitMajor Improvement: Final Visit [N=433;416;429;426]29.1 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final VisitImprovement: Week 12 [N=425; 410;421; 417]61.5 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 100 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final VisitMajor Improvement: Week 12 [N=425; 410; 421; 417]34.0 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 100 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final VisitImprovement: Final Visit [N=433; 416; 429; 426]62.2 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 100 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final VisitMajor Improvement: Final Visit [N=433;416;429;426]33.6 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 100 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final VisitImprovement: Week 12 [N=425; 410;421; 417]62.7 percentage of participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final VisitMajor Improvement: Final Visit [N=433;416;429;426]31.5 percentage of participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final VisitImprovement: Final Visit [N=433; 416; 429; 426]65.0 percentage of participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final VisitImprovement: Week 12 [N=425; 410;421; 417]65.2 percentage of participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final VisitMajor Improvement: Week 12 [N=425; 410; 421; 417]31.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and the Final Visit

The percentage of participants with no incontinence episodes for the 3 days prior to each clinic visit derived from the micturition diary recorded by the patient.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: The full analysis set-incontinence included all patients who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had a baseline \& at least 1 postbaseline micturition measurement in the visit diary \& who had at least 1 incontinence episode at baseline. LOCF was used for the Final Visit analysis. N is the number of patients included at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and the Final VisitWeek 4 [N=291; 293; 281; 299]28.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and the Final VisitWeek 8 [N=280; 277; 268; 292]34.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and the Final VisitFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=291; 293; 281; 300]40.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and the Final VisitWeek 12 [N=275; 272; 262; 276]41.1 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and the Final VisitWeek 8 [N=280; 277; 268; 292]42.6 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and the Final VisitFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=291; 293; 281; 300]45.1 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and the Final VisitWeek 4 [N=291; 293; 281; 299]32.1 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 50 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and the Final VisitWeek 12 [N=275; 272; 262; 276]46.3 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 100 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and the Final VisitWeek 12 [N=275; 272; 262; 276]43.9 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 100 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and the Final VisitWeek 4 [N=291; 293; 281; 299]32.0 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 100 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and the Final VisitFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=291; 293; 281; 300]43.8 percentage of participants
Mirabegron 100 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and the Final VisitWeek 8 [N=280; 277; 268; 292]45.1 percentage of participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and the Final VisitFinal Visit (LOCF) [N=291; 293; 281; 300]47.3 percentage of participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and the Final VisitWeek 4 [N=291; 293; 281; 299]33.4 percentage of participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and the Final VisitWeek 8 [N=280; 277; 268; 292]41.8 percentage of participants
Tolterodine SR 4 mgPercentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and the Final VisitWeek 12 [N=275; 272; 262; 276]48.6 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 25, 2026