Skip to content

Longitudinal Cohort Study Comparing 2 Surgical Techniques in Patients With Class 3 Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes

Longitudinal Cohort Study Comparing 2 Surgical Techniques (Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Adjustable Gastric Banding) in Patients With Class 3 Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00688974
Acronym
OBEDIAB
Enrollment
56
Registered
2008-06-03
Start date
2004-05-31
Completion date
2012-09-30
Last updated
2016-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes

Keywords

type 2 diabetes, obesity, gastric bypass, adjustable gastric banding, BMI > 35., obesity for more than 5 years

Brief summary

Wight loss surgery provides good glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. The technique of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is more effective than the Adjustable Gastric Band on weight loss. This longitudinal cohort study will compare the effectiveness of the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and Adjustable Gastric Banding on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes and explore the responsible mechanisms. The evaluation will be made preoperatively and 1 year later as assessed by the decline in HbA1c. An evaluation will also be carried out after a weight loss of 10% to indicate whether the observed difference is independent of weight loss.

Detailed description

Type 2 diabetes is a condition often associated with obesity and often difficult to control. In patients with severe obesity, surgical treatment allows a sustainable weight loss and higher than that obtained with other treatments available. In most cases, surgery also reduces significantly the comorbidities of obesity and diabetes in particular. Among the various technical options, adjustable gastric band (AGB) is the simplest and by far the most used in France. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a more complicated intervention combining gastrointestinal malabsorption- duodeno-jejunal and gastric reduction and allows a higher weight loss. Several studies also suggest that the technique has a remarkable efficiency on glycemic control, justifying the extension of its readings/indications. No study controlled, however, has compared these two techniques. The objective of this study is to compare the efficiency of RYGB vs AGB on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. Although some studies have compared AGB and RYGB, none have compared their effectiveness on post prandial glucose control in patients with diabetes. It is generally recognized that the effectiveness of RYGB on diabetes is independent of the weight loss, but this has never been demonstrated. By demonstrating the superiority of RYGB vs AGB, and identifying the responsible mechanisms, the study will expand the indications of RYGB in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Weight loss surgery offers a unique model for the clinical study of the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes. Main objective: * To compare the effectiveness of RYGB vs AGB on glucose control in obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Secondary Objectives: * demonstrate that the better outcome achieved with RYGB is independent of weight loss. * Identify the mechanisms underlying the better outcome of RYGB

Interventions

PROCEDURERoux-en-Y gastric bypass

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band

Sponsors

University Hospital, Lille
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 18 and 70 years AND * BMI \> 35 * Type 2 diabetes * Obesity for more than 5 years OR * normoglycemia * BMI\< 30

Exclusion criteria

* Secondary obesity due to an endocrinopathy * Chronic pathology (neoplasia, cirrhosis, disease of system) * Psychosis, alcoholic addiction or narcotics. * Contre-indications to the anaesthesia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Glucose control12 monthsHbA1c and fasting blood glucose

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Glycaemia, Insulinemia, Incretins during a standardized meal test at 10% of weight loss3 monthsConcentration curves of glycaemia, insulinemia, incretins, and D-xylose during a standardized mixed meal test
Weight loss60 monthsBody mass index
Glycaemia, Insulinemia, Incretins, and D-xylose during a normalized(standardized) meal12 monthsConcentration curves of glycaemia, insulinemia, incretins, and D-xylose during a standardized mixed meal test
Glycaemia, insulinemia, incretins, and D-xylose during a normalized(standardized) meal60 monthsConcentration curves of glycaemia, insulinemia, incretins, and D-xylose during a standardized mixed meal test
Diabetes remission60 monthsHbA1c \< 6.5% AND fasting blood glucose \< 7.0 mmol/L in absence of antidiabetic drug

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026