Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Donepezil Hydrochloride in Preadolescent and Adolescent Children With Attention Impairment Following Cancer Treatment

Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Efficacy and Safety of Donepezil Hydrochloride in Preadolescent and Adolescent Children With Attention Impairment Following Cancer Treatment

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00688376
Enrollment
72
Registered
2008-06-02
Start date
2008-07-02
Completion date
2009-05-26
Last updated
2022-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Attention Impairment

Keywords

Attention, cancer, chemotherapy, donepezil, acetylcholinesterase, inhibitor

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of donepezil in children with persistent attention impairment that is present at least 12 months after the completion of cancer treatment.

Detailed description

This is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study in pediatric subjects who have persistent attention impairment following treatment for cancer. This trial has three phases: (1) pre-randomization to establish eligibility, (2) a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase with dose escalation based on body weight, (3) a 12-week, blinded extension phase during which all subjects will receive active drug.

Interventions

DRUGDonepezil hydrochloride

During the 12-week Double-Blind Phase, subjects will receive oral donepezil hydrochloride tablets starting at a dose of 3 mg once daily. Doses will be increased incrementally at successive 3-week intervals on the basis of weight and tolerability. The final daily dose will be 3, 5, or 10 mg depending on body weight. During the Blinded Extension Phase, all subjects will receive active treatment (donepezil).

DRUGPlacebo

During the 12-week Double-Blind Phase, subjects will receive matching placebo tablets (3, 5, of 10 mg) once daily. During the 12-week Blinded Extension Phase, all subjects will receive active treatment (donepezil).

Sponsors

Eisai Limited
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Eisai Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. The subject must have received at least one cycle of chemotherapy and/or cranial radiation, and must have completed this treatment at least one year before screening takes place for entry into this study. 2. Subjects may be male or female; age range: 6 - 17.5 years; weight ≥ 20 kg. They must be physically healthy and able to move about, with or without aids, must be living in the community, and must have adequate motor skills as shown by tests that will be given at the time of screening. The subject's eyesight and hearing must be good enough to allow cooperation with tests and physical examinations. Additionally, they must be able to swallow tablets. 3. There must be subjective complaints by subject and/or parent of difficulties in school or other daily activities, possibly related to impairments in attention. These difficulties must have emerged after treatment for cancer and must still be present 12 months after cessation of treatment. There must also be objective evidence for this impairment, as shown by a test that will be given to the subject at the time of screening. 4. The IQ must be \>70 according to tests that will be given at the time of screening. 5. The first language in which the subject learned to read and write must be one that uses Roman lettering (a, b, c, etc.) and Arabic numerals (1, 2, 3, etc.). 6. The subject must not have previously taken any drugs in the class known as cholinesterase inhibitors. 7. A parent or legal guardian must be available who is willing and able to complete all of the outcome measures, to administer medications, and to accompany the subject to the required clinic visits. 8. Subjects with diabetes or thyroid disease may still be eligible if certain medical requirements are satisfied. 9. Female subjects who could become pregnant must undergo pregnancy testing and must agree to use contraception.

Exclusion criteria

Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study: 1. Inability to perform the required tests (for example, because of aphasia, motor deficits affecting the dominant hand, or mental retardation). 2. Motor coordination not sufficient, according to tests to be conducted at the time of screening. 3. Recurrence of cancer. If this happens, the subject will have to withdraw from the study. 4. Mental retardation/developmental disability. 5. Certain medications, such as methylphenidate, are not allowed during the study. 6. Major depression. 7. Problems with the digestive tract that could affect the subject's ability to absorb the study drug. 8. Hypersensitivity to a chemical class known as piperidine derivatives. 9. Certain other medical conditions as determined by clinical staff. 10. Alcoholism, drug abuse, or organic brain disease other than that caused by the cancer or its treatment. 11. Pregnancy, nursing, or unwillingness to undergo pregnancy testing if requested by clinical staff. 12. Pregnancy, lactation or plans to become pregnant, or unwilling to take a screening Beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (ßhCG) test if a female \>10 years of age. 13. If sexually active, unwillingness to use birth control (males and females). 14. Plans for certain types of elective surgery that would occur while the study is in progress. 15. Plans for travel or other events that would interfere with the study schedule. 16. Active treatment with another investigational drug within 3 months of the screening visit.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Test of Variables in Attention-Continuous Performance Test (TOVA-CPT) D-prime Standard Score (SS) at Week 12Baseline and Week 12TOVA-CPT test has a standardized computer game-like format that tests attention and simple impulse control. It precisely measures a person's reaction time to clicking on correct targets versus incorrect targets. Scores are based on the number of Hits (correct responses), omission errors (failure to respond), commission errors/False Alarms (incorrect responses), response time, and sensitivity (d-prime). D-prime a dimensionless statistics is a measure of distractibility and reflects how well a person reacts correctly versus incorrectly. A higher value of d-prime is reached by having more Hits (correct response) and fewer False Alarms (incorrect response). Analysis was based on three factors: the d-prime standard score, reaction time variability standard score, and response time standard score. Standard scores less than or equal to 80 were significant for an attention deficit disorder. Standard scores greater than 80 were not significant for an attention deficit disorder.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the TOVA-CPT D-prime Standard Score (SS) at Week 6Baseline and Week 6TOVA-CPT test has a standardized computer game-like format that tests attention and simple impulse control. It precisely measures a person's reaction time to clicking on correct targets versus incorrect targets. Scores are based on the number of Hits (correct responses), omission errors (failure to respond), commission errors/False Alarms (incorrect responses), response time, and sensitivity (d-prime). D-prime a dimensionless statistics is a measure of distractibility and reflects how well a person reacts correctly versus incorrectly. A higher value of d-prime is reached by having more Hits (correct response) and fewer False Alarms (incorrect response). Analysis was based on three factors: the d-prime standard score, reaction time variability standard score, and response time standard score. Standard scores less than or equal to 80 were significant for an attention deficit disorder. Standard scores greater than 80 were not significant for an attention deficit disorder.
Change From Baseline in the Reaction Time Variability Standard Score (RTVSS) and Response Time Standard Score (RTSS) at Weeks 6 and 12Baseline, Weeks 6 and 12The Reaction Time Variability is defined as the time measurement of how consistently the switch is pressed. The Response Time is the measurement of how fast or slow information is processed and responded to by the participant. The testing process was as described in a previous outcome measure. Standard scores less than or equal to 80 were significant for an attention deficit disorder. Standard scores greater than 80 were not significant for an attention deficit disorder.
Change From Baseline in the Global Executive Composite Score, Behavioral Regulation Index, Metacognition Index, and Working Memory SubscaleBaseline and Week 12Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning test evaluates impairment of executive function(planning and organization),memory,and sustained attention in children aged 5-18 years with wide range of developmental and acquired neurological conditions.Survey assess parent/guardian's perception of their child's executive functioning in home and school environments,which relate to daily function(as judged by parent).Each survey contains 86 items scored as;1(behavior is never a problem),2(behavior is sometimes a problem),or 3(behavior is often a problem).Data was presented as t-scores(raw scale scores are used to generate t-scores)for Global Executive Composite Score(t-score range 72-216),Behavioral Regulation Index(t-score range 28-84;inhibit,shift,and emotional control),Metacognition Inde (t-score range 44-132;initiate,working memory,plan/organize,organization of materials, and monitor),and Working Memory Subscale(t-score range 35-90).Higher scores indicate decline in performance.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Canada, Chile, France, Germany, Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 22 centers in the United States, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, the UK, Argentina, Chile, and Australia during the period of 02 July 2008 to 26 May 2009.

Pre-assignment details

This trial had three phases: (1)pre-randomization to establish eligibility; (2) a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase with dose escalation based on body weight; (3) a 12-week, blinded extension phase during which all participants received active drug. Eligible participants were randomized to receive placebo or donepezil.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Donepezil
Donepezil 3 mg, 5 mg, or 10 mg donepezil Immediate Release (IR) orally, once daily
40
Placebo
Placebo, matching 3 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg placebo tablets administered orally, once daily
31
Total71

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Blinded Extension PhaseAdverse Event34
Blinded Extension PhaseOther10
Blinded Extension PhasePhysician Decision10
Blinded Extension PhaseWithdrawal by Subject01
Double-Blind PhaseAdverse Event44
Double-Blind PhaseNot treated01
Double-Blind PhaseProtocol Violation12
Double-Blind PhaseWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDonepezilPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous12.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.06
11.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.83
11.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.95
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants21 Participants36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
25 Participants10 Participants35 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 400 / 310 / 340 / 25
other
Total, other adverse events
30 / 4020 / 3121 / 3415 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 401 / 310 / 340 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in the Test of Variables in Attention-Continuous Performance Test (TOVA-CPT) D-prime Standard Score (SS) at Week 12

TOVA-CPT test has a standardized computer game-like format that tests attention and simple impulse control. It precisely measures a person's reaction time to clicking on correct targets versus incorrect targets. Scores are based on the number of Hits (correct responses), omission errors (failure to respond), commission errors/False Alarms (incorrect responses), response time, and sensitivity (d-prime). D-prime a dimensionless statistics is a measure of distractibility and reflects how well a person reacts correctly versus incorrectly. A higher value of d-prime is reached by having more Hits (correct response) and fewer False Alarms (incorrect response). Analysis was based on three factors: the d-prime standard score, reaction time variability standard score, and response time standard score. Standard scores less than or equal to 80 were significant for an attention deficit disorder. Standard scores greater than 80 were not significant for an attention deficit disorder.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Last Observed Carried Forward (LOCF) population included all safety participants for whom the TOVA-CPT d-prime standard score was available at both Screening and at least one d-prime score from the treatment period, in addition to having a post-Baseline safety assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DonepezilChange From Baseline in the Test of Variables in Attention-Continuous Performance Test (TOVA-CPT) D-prime Standard Score (SS) at Week 125.2 d-primeStandard Deviation 8.77
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Test of Variables in Attention-Continuous Performance Test (TOVA-CPT) D-prime Standard Score (SS) at Week 124.5 d-primeStandard Deviation 7.39
Comparison: P-values, least squares (LS) mean, and 95% confidence interval (CI) were obtained from Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group as a factor and Baseline value as covariate.p-value: 0.69495% CI: [-3.22, 4.8]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Global Executive Composite Score, Behavioral Regulation Index, Metacognition Index, and Working Memory Subscale

Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning test evaluates impairment of executive function(planning and organization),memory,and sustained attention in children aged 5-18 years with wide range of developmental and acquired neurological conditions.Survey assess parent/guardian's perception of their child's executive functioning in home and school environments,which relate to daily function(as judged by parent).Each survey contains 86 items scored as;1(behavior is never a problem),2(behavior is sometimes a problem),or 3(behavior is often a problem).Data was presented as t-scores(raw scale scores are used to generate t-scores)for Global Executive Composite Score(t-score range 72-216),Behavioral Regulation Index(t-score range 28-84;inhibit,shift,and emotional control),Metacognition Inde (t-score range 44-132;initiate,working memory,plan/organize,organization of materials, and monitor),and Working Memory Subscale(t-score range 35-90).Higher scores indicate decline in performance.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: ITT population LOCF

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DonepezilChange From Baseline in the Global Executive Composite Score, Behavioral Regulation Index, Metacognition Index, and Working Memory SubscaleGlobal Executive Composite Score-1.3 t-scoresStandard Deviation 6.73
DonepezilChange From Baseline in the Global Executive Composite Score, Behavioral Regulation Index, Metacognition Index, and Working Memory SubscaleBehavioral Regulation Index0.8 t-scoresStandard Deviation 7.54
DonepezilChange From Baseline in the Global Executive Composite Score, Behavioral Regulation Index, Metacognition Index, and Working Memory SubscaleMetacognition Index-2.3 t-scoresStandard Deviation 7.29
DonepezilChange From Baseline in the Global Executive Composite Score, Behavioral Regulation Index, Metacognition Index, and Working Memory SubscaleWorking Memory Scale-3.6 t-scoresStandard Deviation 7.45
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Global Executive Composite Score, Behavioral Regulation Index, Metacognition Index, and Working Memory SubscaleWorking Memory Scale-3.3 t-scoresStandard Deviation 6.59
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Global Executive Composite Score, Behavioral Regulation Index, Metacognition Index, and Working Memory SubscaleGlobal Executive Composite Score-3.8 t-scoresStandard Deviation 6.78
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Global Executive Composite Score, Behavioral Regulation Index, Metacognition Index, and Working Memory SubscaleMetacognition Index-4.9 t-scoresStandard Deviation 6.99
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Global Executive Composite Score, Behavioral Regulation Index, Metacognition Index, and Working Memory SubscaleBehavioral Regulation Index-1.9 t-scoresStandard Deviation 6.91
Comparison: Global Executive Composite Score Analysis. P-values, LS mean, and 95% confidence intervals were obtained from ANCOVA model with treatment group as a factor and baseline value as covariate.p-value: 0.288695% CI: [-1.5, 4.96]ANCOVA
Comparison: Behavioral Regulation Index Analysis. P-values, LS mean, and 95% confidence intervals were obtained from ANCOVA model with treatment group as a factor and baseline value as covariate.p-value: 0.255595% CI: [-1.54, 5.69]ANCOVA
Comparison: Metacognition Index Analysis. P-values, LS mean, and 95% confidence intervals were obtained from ANCOVA model with treatment group as a factor and baseline value as covariate.p-value: 0.315595% CI: [-1.63, 4.99]ANCOVA
Comparison: Working Memory Scale Analysis. P-values, LS mean, and 95% confidence intervals were obtained from ANCOVA model with treatment group as a factor and baseline value as covariate.p-value: 0.907595% CI: [-3.55, 3.16]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Reaction Time Variability Standard Score (RTVSS) and Response Time Standard Score (RTSS) at Weeks 6 and 12

The Reaction Time Variability is defined as the time measurement of how consistently the switch is pressed. The Response Time is the measurement of how fast or slow information is processed and responded to by the participant. The testing process was as described in a previous outcome measure. Standard scores less than or equal to 80 were significant for an attention deficit disorder. Standard scores greater than 80 were not significant for an attention deficit disorder.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 6 and 12

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Last Observed Carried Forward (LOCF) population included all safety participants for whom the TOVA-CPT d-prime standard score was available at both Screening and at least one visit after the first dose of study drug during the Double-Blind Phase.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DonepezilChange From Baseline in the Reaction Time Variability Standard Score (RTVSS) and Response Time Standard Score (RTSS) at Weeks 6 and 12RTVSS (Week 6)-3.4 millisecondsStandard Deviation 18.44
DonepezilChange From Baseline in the Reaction Time Variability Standard Score (RTVSS) and Response Time Standard Score (RTSS) at Weeks 6 and 12RTVSS (Week 12)-3.9 millisecondsStandard Deviation 15.21
DonepezilChange From Baseline in the Reaction Time Variability Standard Score (RTVSS) and Response Time Standard Score (RTSS) at Weeks 6 and 12RTSS (Week 6)-6.9 millisecondsStandard Deviation 13.17
DonepezilChange From Baseline in the Reaction Time Variability Standard Score (RTVSS) and Response Time Standard Score (RTSS) at Weeks 6 and 12RTSS (Week 12)-9.0 millisecondsStandard Deviation 13.15
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Reaction Time Variability Standard Score (RTVSS) and Response Time Standard Score (RTSS) at Weeks 6 and 12RTVSS (Week 12)-5.0 millisecondsStandard Deviation 17
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Reaction Time Variability Standard Score (RTVSS) and Response Time Standard Score (RTSS) at Weeks 6 and 12RTSS (Week 12)-9.1 millisecondsStandard Deviation 12.79
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Reaction Time Variability Standard Score (RTVSS) and Response Time Standard Score (RTSS) at Weeks 6 and 12RTVSS (Week 6)-3.2 millisecondsStandard Deviation 15.75
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Reaction Time Variability Standard Score (RTVSS) and Response Time Standard Score (RTSS) at Weeks 6 and 12RTSS (Week 6)-9.6 millisecondsStandard Deviation 13.25
Comparison: RTVSS Change from Baseline to Week 6 (LOCF). P-values, LS mean, and 95% confidence intervals were obtained from ANCOVA model with treatment group as a factor and baseline value as covariate.p-value: 0.74395% CI: [-9.56, 6.85]ANCOVA
Comparison: RTVSS Change from Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF). P-values, LS mean, and 95% confidence intervals were obtained from ANCOVA model with treatment group as a factor and baseline value as covariate.p-value: 0.956195% CI: [-7.42, 7.84]ANCOVA
Comparison: RTSS Change from Baseline to Week 6 (LOCF). P-values, LS mean, and 95% confidence intervals were obtained from ANCOVA model with treatment group as a factor and baseline value as covariate.p-value: 0.438595% CI: [-3.97, 9.04]ANCOVA
Comparison: RTSS Change from Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF). P-values, LS mean, and 95% confidence intervals were obtained from ANCOVA model with treatment group as a factor and baseline value as covariate.p-value: 0.908895% CI: [-6.74, 6]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the TOVA-CPT D-prime Standard Score (SS) at Week 6

TOVA-CPT test has a standardized computer game-like format that tests attention and simple impulse control. It precisely measures a person's reaction time to clicking on correct targets versus incorrect targets. Scores are based on the number of Hits (correct responses), omission errors (failure to respond), commission errors/False Alarms (incorrect responses), response time, and sensitivity (d-prime). D-prime a dimensionless statistics is a measure of distractibility and reflects how well a person reacts correctly versus incorrectly. A higher value of d-prime is reached by having more Hits (correct response) and fewer False Alarms (incorrect response). Analysis was based on three factors: the d-prime standard score, reaction time variability standard score, and response time standard score. Standard scores less than or equal to 80 were significant for an attention deficit disorder. Standard scores greater than 80 were not significant for an attention deficit disorder.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Last Observed Carried Forward (LOCF) population included all safety participants for whom the TOVA-CPT d-prime standard score was available at both Screening and at least one visit after the first dose of study drug during the Double-Blind Phase.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DonepezilChange From Baseline in the TOVA-CPT D-prime Standard Score (SS) at Week 65.7 d-primeStandard Deviation 8.41
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the TOVA-CPT D-prime Standard Score (SS) at Week 66.2 d-primeStandard Deviation 9.49
Comparison: P-values, LS mean, and 95% confidence intervals were obtained from ANCOVA model with treatment group as a factor and baseline value as covariate.p-value: 0.945895% CI: [-4.38, 4.09]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026