Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Etanercept in Active RA Despite Methotrexate Therapy in Japan

Efficacy and Safety of Etanercept in Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Methotrexate Therapy in Japan

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00688103
Acronym
JESMR
Enrollment
151
Registered
2008-06-02
Start date
2005-06-30
Completion date
2010-10-31
Last updated
2015-10-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

Multi-center, parallel-group, randomized, open control study. All patients will be selected to two treatment groups. 1. Etanercept alone treatment group (25mg, twice/week, s.c.) 2. Etanercept combined with MTX group (25mg, twice/week, s.c.+MTX 6-8mg/week)

Interventions

DRUGETN Alone

etanercept (25 mg, twice/week, s.c.)

DRUGETN+MTX

etanercept (25 mg, twice/week, s.c.) combined with methotrexate (6-8 mg/week)

Sponsors

Japan Biological Agent Study Integrated Consortium
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients had to be at least 18 years of age * fulfilled the 1987 revised classification criteria for RA by in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) * met the guidelines for the proper use of ETN in Japan (having at least 6 tender joints and 6 swollen joints * either serum C-reactive protein more than 2 mg/dl or ESR no less than 28 mm at 1 hour, with adequate safety profiles) * be ACR functional class I-III * have been receiving MTX 6 mg/week for a minimum of 3 months at a stable dose for at least 4 weeks at the time of study enrollment

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who required concurrent use of prednisone (PSL) \>10 mg/day, or its equivalent, were excluded from study entry * the start of dose increment of PSL equivalents within 3 months of the study enrollment * experience of antirheumatic therapy except for MTX and PSL equivalents * previous treatment with ETN or any other biological treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
EULAR Good Responseat 24 weeksEULAR good response was defined as reaching, at least, low decease activity by the disease activity score of 28 joints (DAS28) and its improvement by \> 1.2. DAS28 is a quantitative composite measure of disease activity for rheumatoid arthritis, and DAS28 \< 3.2 is regarded as low disease activity.
ACR50 Response Rateat 24 weeksACR (American College of Rheumatology) 50 response is defined by the following definition of improvement: at least 50% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and at least 50% improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR-core set measures; patient and physician global assessments, pain, disability, and an acute phase reactant (erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein).
Radiographic Progression Defined by Change in Van Der Heijde-modified Total Sharp Scoreat 52 weeksThe van der Heijde-modifiedtotal Sharp score is the sum of scores for erosions and joint space narrowing. The minimum and maximum total scores are 0 and 448, respectively. The maximum number of erosions is 160 in the hands and 120 in the feet; and the maximum scores for joint space narrowing are 120 and 48, respectively. Erosions are scored 1 for a discrete interruption of the cortical surface, and scored 2-5 for a larger defect according to the surface area of the joint involved. Notably, the maximum erosion score in each joint in hands is 5, while it is 10 in the feet. For joint space narrowing, 0=normal; 1=focal or doubtful; 2=general, \<50% of the original joint space; 3=general, \>50% of the original joint space or subluxation; 4=ankylosis.

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ETN Alone
Etanercept alone treatment group (25mg, twice/week, s.c.)
74
ETN+MTX
Etanercept combined with MTX group (25mg, twice/week, s.c.+MTX 6-8mg/week)
77
Total151

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event41
Overall Studycomplex reasons119
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy111
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject42

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicETN+MTXETN AloneTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
19 Participants20 Participants39 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
58 Participants54 Participants112 Participants
Age, Continuous56.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
58.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
57.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
Region of Enrollment
Japan
77 participants74 participants151 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
62 Participants65 Participants127 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants9 Participants24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
34 / 7139 / 76
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 719 / 76

Outcome results

Primary

ACR50 Response Rate

ACR (American College of Rheumatology) 50 response is defined by the following definition of improvement: at least 50% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and at least 50% improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR-core set measures; patient and physician global assessments, pain, disability, and an acute phase reactant (erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein).

Time frame: at 24 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ETN AloneACR50 Response Rate47.8 percentage of responders
ETN+MTXACR50 Response Rate64.4 percentage of responders
Primary

EULAR Good Response

EULAR good response was defined as reaching, at least, low decease activity by the disease activity score of 28 joints (DAS28) and its improvement by \> 1.2. DAS28 is a quantitative composite measure of disease activity for rheumatoid arthritis, and DAS28 \< 3.2 is regarded as low disease activity.

Time frame: at 24 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ETN AloneEULAR Good Response33.3 percentage of responders
ETN+MTXEULAR Good Response52.1 percentage of responders
Primary

Radiographic Progression Defined by Change in Van Der Heijde-modified Total Sharp Score

The van der Heijde-modifiedtotal Sharp score is the sum of scores for erosions and joint space narrowing. The minimum and maximum total scores are 0 and 448, respectively. The maximum number of erosions is 160 in the hands and 120 in the feet; and the maximum scores for joint space narrowing are 120 and 48, respectively. Erosions are scored 1 for a discrete interruption of the cortical surface, and scored 2-5 for a larger defect according to the surface area of the joint involved. Notably, the maximum erosion score in each joint in hands is 5, while it is 10 in the feet. For joint space narrowing, 0=normal; 1=focal or doubtful; 2=general, \<50% of the original joint space; 3=general, \>50% of the original joint space or subluxation; 4=ankylosis.

Time frame: at 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ETN AloneRadiographic Progression Defined by Change in Van Der Heijde-modified Total Sharp Score3.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.4
ETN+MTXRadiographic Progression Defined by Change in Van Der Heijde-modified Total Sharp Score0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.4

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 29, 2026