Skip to content

Adapalene-Benzoy Peroxide (BPO) Gel in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris as a 6-month Maintenance

Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Adapalene 0.1% / Benzoyl Peroxide 2.5% Gel Versus Adapalene 0.1% / Benzoyl Peroxide 2.5% Gel Vehicle Gel as a 6-month Acne Maintenance Treatment

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00687908
Acronym
ACCESS II
Enrollment
243
Registered
2008-06-02
Start date
2008-11-30
Completion date
2009-07-31
Last updated
2021-02-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acne

Keywords

Acne

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy of Adapalene 0.1% /Benzoyl Peroxide 2.5% Gel compared to its Vehicle Gel as an acne maintenance treatment in Subjects previously treated with Adapalene-BPO Gel or Adapalene-BPO Vehicle Gel both associated with Doxycycline Hyclate 100 mg. The safety of the two investigational treatments will also be assessed.

Detailed description

This study is a follow-up to RD.03.SPR.29074 - ACCESS I / NCT00688064 - Adapalene-BPO Gel Associated With Doxycycline 100 mg in the Treatment of Severe Acne Vulgaris

Interventions

DRUGAdapalene 0.1% / Benzoyl Peroxide 2.5% Gel

Topical Gel to the face, once daily in the evening for 24 weeks.

DRUGVehicle Gel

Topical Gel to the face, once daily in the evening for 24 weeks.

Sponsors

Galderma R&D
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects who completed the previous study (RD.03.SPR29074 - NCT00688064)and had obtained at least a good Improvement (Grade, 0, 1, 2 or 3)

Exclusion criteria

* Female Subjects who are pregnant, nursing or planning a pregnancy during the study * Subjects who foresee intensive UV exposure during the study (mountain sports, UV radiation, sunbathing, etc).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maintenance Success for Total Lesions at Week 24Week 24Maintenance success for total lesions at Week 24 is defined as the percentage of subjects maintaining at least 50 percent of the improvement obtained with prior combination therapy, in terms of total lesion counts.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maintenance Success for Inflamatory Lesions at Week 24Week 24Maintenance success for inflamatory lesions at Week 24 is defined as the percentage of subjects maintaining at least 50 percent of the improvement obtained with prior combination therapy, in terms of inflamatory lesion counts.
Maintenance Success for Non-inflammatory Lesions at Week 24Week 24Maintenance success for non-inflamatory lesions at Week 24 is defined as the percentage of subjects maintaining at least 50 percent of the improvement obtained with prior combination therapy, in terms of non-inflamatory lesion counts.
Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Maintenance Success at Week 24Baseline, Week 24IGA maintenance success is defined as the percentage of subjects with IGA grade inferior or equal to Baseline IGA grade. IGA grade: 0 Clear:Residual hyperpigmentation & erythema may be present 1. Almost Clear:A few scattered comedones & a few small papules. 2. Mild:Some comedones & some papules and pustules. No nodules present 3. Moderate:Many comedones, papules & pustules. One nodule may be present 4. Severe:Covered with comedones, numerous papules & pustules & few nodules & cysts may be present 5. Very severe:Highly inflammatory acne covering the face; with nodules & cysts present
Percent of Subjects With Adverse EventsUp to 24 weeksAll participants with events were measured for that particular Outcome Measure and not only the events with a frequency threshold above 2 percent

Countries

Canada, Puerto Rico, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment period: 12 NOV 2008 to 09 FEB 2009 in thirty-four centers (29 in the USA and 5 in Canada) public or private practices. Twenty-four USA centers and four Candadian centers used a central IRB, and the others used a local IRB.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Adapalene-BPO
Adapalene 0.1% / Benzoyl Peroxide 2.5% Gel
123
Vehicle
Vehicle Gel
120
Total243

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAdapalene-BPOVehicleTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
76 Participants84 Participants160 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
47 Participants36 Participants83 Participants
Age, Continuous19.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.89
18.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.23
18.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.58
Region of Enrollment
Canada
26 participants28 participants54 participants
Region of Enrollment
Puerto Rico
13 participants13 participants26 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
84 participants79 participants163 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
58 Participants53 Participants111 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
65 Participants67 Participants132 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
43 / 12327 / 120
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 1231 / 120

Outcome results

Primary

Maintenance Success for Total Lesions at Week 24

Maintenance success for total lesions at Week 24 is defined as the percentage of subjects maintaining at least 50 percent of the improvement obtained with prior combination therapy, in terms of total lesion counts.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT - Worst-case (Any missing data at Week 24 is considered as a failure)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Adapalene-BPOMaintenance Success for Total Lesions at Week 2478.9 percent of subjects
VehicleMaintenance Success for Total Lesions at Week 2445.8 percent of subjects
Secondary

Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Maintenance Success at Week 24

IGA maintenance success is defined as the percentage of subjects with IGA grade inferior or equal to Baseline IGA grade. IGA grade: 0 Clear:Residual hyperpigmentation & erythema may be present 1. Almost Clear:A few scattered comedones & a few small papules. 2. Mild:Some comedones & some papules and pustules. No nodules present 3. Moderate:Many comedones, papules & pustules. One nodule may be present 4. Severe:Covered with comedones, numerous papules & pustules & few nodules & cysts may be present 5. Very severe:Highly inflammatory acne covering the face; with nodules & cysts present

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: ITT - Worst-case (Any missing data at each visit is considered as a failure, except where maintenance rate of both previous and following visits are success)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Adapalene-BPOInvestigator Global Assessment (IGA) Maintenance Success at Week 2470.7 percent of subjects
VehicleInvestigator Global Assessment (IGA) Maintenance Success at Week 2434.2 percent of subjects
Secondary

Maintenance Success for Inflamatory Lesions at Week 24

Maintenance success for inflamatory lesions at Week 24 is defined as the percentage of subjects maintaining at least 50 percent of the improvement obtained with prior combination therapy, in terms of inflamatory lesion counts.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT - Worst-case (Any missing data at each visit is considered as a failure, except where maintenance rate of both previous and following visits are success)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Adapalene-BPOMaintenance Success for Inflamatory Lesions at Week 2478 percent of subjects
VehicleMaintenance Success for Inflamatory Lesions at Week 2448.3 percent of subjects
Secondary

Maintenance Success for Non-inflammatory Lesions at Week 24

Maintenance success for non-inflamatory lesions at Week 24 is defined as the percentage of subjects maintaining at least 50 percent of the improvement obtained with prior combination therapy, in terms of non-inflamatory lesion counts.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT - Worst-case (Any missing data at each visit is considered as a failure, except where maintenance rate of both previous and following visits are success)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Adapalene-BPOMaintenance Success for Non-inflammatory Lesions at Week 2478 percent of subjects
VehicleMaintenance Success for Non-inflammatory Lesions at Week 2443.3 percent of subjects
Secondary

Percent of Subjects With Adverse Events

All participants with events were measured for that particular Outcome Measure and not only the events with a frequency threshold above 2 percent

Time frame: Up to 24 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Adapalene-BPOPercent of Subjects With Adverse Events41.5 percent of subjects
VehiclePercent of Subjects With Adverse Events29.2 percent of subjects

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026