Skip to content

Prolotherapy Versus Steroids for Thumb Carpo-metacarpal Joint Arthritis

Randomized, Double Blind Comparison Trial of Prolotherapy (Dextrose) Compared to Corticosteroid Injection for the Treatment of Symptomatic Thumb Carpo-metacarpal Joint Arthritis

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00685880
Enrollment
2
Registered
2008-05-29
Start date
2008-05-31
Completion date
2010-07-31
Last updated
2012-08-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis

Keywords

thumb carpo metacarpal joint osteoarthritis, prolotherapy, intra articular steroid, hand therapy

Brief summary

Arthritis of the base of the thumb is a common debilitating problem. It is believed that laxity (loosening) of the joint leads to worsening arthritis in this joint. This can be treated by securing the joint surgically or symptoms can be treated with hand therapy and/or injection of corticosteroids. Recently prolotherapy (sugar water) has been shown to decrease looseness of joints and also be helpful for hand and knee arthritis. We hypothesize that prolotherapy injections for thumb arthritis will be equally or more beneficial to the patients than steroids.

Detailed description

Dextrose prolotherapy has been shown to decrease anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) laxity and decrease knee joint pain. Similar to ACL laxity leading to knee osteoarthritis, laxity of the beak ligament can lead to worsening thumb CMC osteoarthritis. We hypothesize that dextrose intra-articular prolotherapy will have similar results in treating the pain and instability related to symptomatic thumb CMC osteoarthritis. This will be a prospective randomized double blind comparison study comparing Celestone to Dextrose intra-articular injections as adjuncts to hand therapy for the treatment of symptomatic thumb CMC osteoarthritis. Twenty patients will be randomized to each treatment arm to provide enough power to show a 20% change in visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain to be significant. We will utilize the ultrasound guided injection protocol described by the co-investigators for both treatment arms to ensure proper placement of the respective solutions. We will measure various grip strengths, and VAS pain scales prior to the first injection, prior to the second injection at 6 weeks and at the final visit at 6 months. A telephone follow-up with pain scale will be administered at 3 months. A Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire measuring upper extremity functional impairment will be obtained at initial and final visits.

Interventions

DRUGProlotherapy (10% dextrose solution)

Dextrose diluted with sterile water.

DRUGBetamethasone

CELESTONE® SOLUSPAN® \* (betamethasone injectable suspension) Injectable Suspension is a sterile aqueous suspension containing 3 mg per milliliter betamethasone, as betamethasone sodium phosphate, and 3 mg per milliliter betamethasone acetate. Subjects will receive a 0.25 to 0.5 mL Celestone Soluspan injection.

Sponsors

Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age \>45 * Ability to make follow-up visits over the 6 month protocol * Ability to give informed consent * Eaton grade 2-3 thumb carpo-metacarpal joint osteoarthritis with pain over 3/10 on visual analogue scale with symptoms present greater then 6 months.

Exclusion criteria

* Recent trauma to the hand or wrist or fractures eeen on radiographs * Eaton grade 1, or 4 joints affected * Metabolic bone disease * Recent systemic or localized infection (within last 2 weeks) * History of rheumatologic disease * Allergies to injected solutions * Thumb carpo-metacarpal joint injections in the prior 6 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With a Decreased Pain Score >20%baseline, 6 month follow-upPain was measured on a 10 point visual analogue scale (VAS), with 0 meaning no pain, and 10 meaning extreme pain.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited from the pool of referrals to the Mayo Hand Clinic who are interested in receiving an injection for their pain, agree to comply with the standardized hand therapy program, meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria and are able to make the scheduled follow-up visits from Mayo 2008 to July 2010.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Prolotherapy Group
Subjects randomized to this arm will receive injection(s) of 10% dextrose solution in the affected thumb joint.
0
Corticosteroid Group
Subjects randomized to this arm will receive injection(s) of betamethasone solution in the affected thumb joint.
2
Total2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCorticosteroid GroupTotal
Age Categorical
<=18 years
0 participants0 participants
Age Categorical
>=65 years
2 participants2 participants
Age Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 participants0 participants
Gender
Female
2 participants2 participants
Gender
Male
0 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
2 participants2 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 2
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 2

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With a Decreased Pain Score >20%

Pain was measured on a 10 point visual analogue scale (VAS), with 0 meaning no pain, and 10 meaning extreme pain.

Time frame: baseline, 6 month follow-up

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026