Skip to content

Expression Analysis of Specific Markers in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer or Melanoma

Analysis of the Expression of a Specific Set of Genes and Tumor Antigens in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer or Melanoma

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00685750
Enrollment
88
Registered
2008-05-28
Start date
2008-04-28
Completion date
2013-12-17
Last updated
2019-06-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Cancer, Non-Small Cell

Keywords

tumor antigen, biomarkers

Brief summary

This study intends to analyze the expression of specific sets of markers in tumor samples and in serum from patients with Non-Small Cell lung Cancer (NSCLC) or Stage III or IV melanoma. The data obtained in this study will be used to guide future development of immunotherapies for melanoma or NSCLC patients. Moreover, the analyses will contribute to definition of markers potentially predictive of clinical response to specific anticancer therapies.

Detailed description

This protocol posting has been updated due to a protocol amendment.

Interventions

PROCEDURECollection of tumor and blood samples

Samples will be collected before and after standard treatment

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The patient (male or female) is at least 18 years of age. * The investigator believes that the patient can and will comply with the requirements of the protocol. * The patient has given his/her written informed consent to take part in the study. * The investigator believes that it will be possible to obtain a tumor tissue sample of at least 3 mm3 before treatment and all required tumor tissues several weeks after the initiation of the treatment. * The patient has cancer in one of the following histological types, fulfilling all of the characteristics listed for the respective cancer type: Cutaneous Melanoma, unresectable stage III or stage IV • The patient has histologically documented unresectable stage III or stage IV metastatic cutaneous melanoma. AND • The patient is a candidate for one of the following treatments: * First-line chemotherapy with DTIC or TMZ as monotherapy \[group ME1\], * First-line chemotherapy with an agent other than DTIC/TMZ as monotherapy or a combination (that may, but need not, include DTIC, TMZ, IL-2 or IFNγ) \[group ME2\], * Second- or higherline chemotherapy with any agent or combination of agents (that may, but need not, include DTIC, TMZ, IL-2 or IFNγ ; i.e., systemic chemotherapy after isolated limb perfusion should be considered as second-line) \[group ME3\], * Palliative irradiation of skin lesion(s)/region, irrespective of what line of treatment is planned \[group ME4\], * Topical palliative treatment by imiquimod of skin lesion(s), irrespective of what line of treatment is planned \[group ME5\]. * First or higher line treatment with ipilimumab \[group ME6\]. NSCLC, any stage if the patient is eligible for neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with subsequent resection • The patient has NSCLC at any stage (as defined by the International Staging System) if the patient is eligible for neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with subsequent resection. AND • The patient is a candidate for chemo(radio)-therapy induction doublet neoadjuvant chemotherapy with platinum plus a second chemotherapy drug. \[Note: Induction radiotherapy is permitted.\] The recruitment of patients to the NSCLC group has been ended prematurely.

Exclusion criteria

* The patient has any family history of congenital or hereditary immunodeficiency. * The patient has in the two weeks before baseline received any of the following: * Chemotherapeutic agents, * Immune-modulating agents such as (but not confined to) IFN-α, IL-2, BCG and anti-cancer therapeutic vaccines, * Immunosuppressive agents such as corticosteroids \[except for prednisone, or equivalent, \<0.5 mg/kg/day (absolute maximum 40 mg/day, maximum duration of treatment three weeks), and inhaled and topical steroids, which are allowed\]. * The patient is currently receiving an anti cancer treatment in another clinical trial. However, if the patient has finished the drug administration phase of that trial and has entered the follow-up phase, this patient can be included.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensBefore and after administration of standard of care treatment course, up to 3 monthsThe outcome presents the number of participants with expression of MAGE-A3 and NY-ESO-1 tumor antigens, after administration of standard of care treatment course compared to before administration
Number of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticBefore and after administration of standard of care treatment course, up to 3 monthsThe outcome presents the number of participants with a pre-identified gene signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 cancer immunotherapeutic from before and after standard cancer treatment, for comparison.
The Serum ProteomeAfter administration of standard of care treatment course
Correlation of Relevant Markers of the Pre-identified Gene-expression Signature as Measured by Immunohistochemical Methods and by Quantitative PCR.After administration of standard of care treatment course
Number of NSCLC Patients With Gene-expression Signature and Tumor Antigens in Distinct Concomitant Tumor Lesions Obtained at the Same Time From the Same Patient.After administration of standard of care treatment course
Number of Patients Responding to Treatment, by Best Clinical Response TypeAt 6 months after the initiation of the ipilimumab therapyThis outcome was assessed for metastatic melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab, in order to explore the predictive value to clinical activity of pre-identified immune-related gene-expression signature, by evaluating the patient's best clinical response to this treatment. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI and/or CT: Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for a Partial Response nor sufficient increase to qualify for Progression of Disease (POD); POD, 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions; Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions.

Countries

France, Germany, Italy, Sweden, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Melanoma 1 Group
Patients with cutaneous metastatic melanoma receiving nothing other than standard of care treatment consisting of dacarbazine or temozolomide as first line treatment
17
Melanoma 2 Group
Patients with cutaneous metastatic melanoma receiving nothing other than standard of care treatment consisting of first line treatment other than dacarbazine or temozolomide only
3
Melanoma 3 Group
Patients with cutaneous metastatic melanoma receiving nothing other than standard of care treatment consisting of any second-or higherline chemotherapy treatment
21
Melanoma 4 Group
Patients with cutaneous metastatic melanoma receiving nothing other than standard of care treatment consisting of local irradiation of cutaneous/subcutaneous tumor lesions
2
Melanoma 5 Group
Patients with cutaneous metastatic melanoma receiving nothing other than standard of care treatment consisting of local imiquimod
15
Melanoma 6 Group
Patients with cutaneous metastatic melanoma receiving nothing other than standard of care treatment consisting of ipilimumab
20
Non-Small Cell Group
Non-small cell lung cancer patients nothing other than any standard of care treatment.
10
Total88

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006
Overall StudyEligibility criteria not fulfilled0010000
Overall StudyPatient didn't receive the treatment0000001
Overall StudyTumor sampling failure0010000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMelanoma 1 GroupMelanoma 2 GroupMelanoma 3 GroupMelanoma 4 GroupMelanoma 5 GroupMelanoma 6 GroupNon-Small Cell GroupTotal
Age, Continuous67.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
50.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
64.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
77.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
65.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
61.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.7
59.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
63.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants3 Participants9 Participants0 Participants9 Participants11 Participants2 Participants45 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants0 Participants12 Participants2 Participants6 Participants9 Participants8 Participants43 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Correlation of Relevant Markers of the Pre-identified Gene-expression Signature as Measured by Immunohistochemical Methods and by Quantitative PCR.

Time frame: After administration of standard of care treatment course

Population: The testing was not be performed, because, as a consequence of the early study termination, no scientific value would have been brought and no patient would have benefited from it.

Primary

Number of NSCLC Patients With Gene-expression Signature and Tumor Antigens in Distinct Concomitant Tumor Lesions Obtained at the Same Time From the Same Patient.

Time frame: After administration of standard of care treatment course

Population: The testing was not be performed, because, as a consequence of the early study termination, no scientific value would have been brought and no patient would have benefited from it.

Primary

Number of Patients Responding to Treatment, by Best Clinical Response Type

This outcome was assessed for metastatic melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab, in order to explore the predictive value to clinical activity of pre-identified immune-related gene-expression signature, by evaluating the patient's best clinical response to this treatment. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI and/or CT: Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for a Partial Response nor sufficient increase to qualify for Progression of Disease (POD); POD, 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions; Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions.

Time frame: At 6 months after the initiation of the ipilimumab therapy

Population: The analysis was performed on all the 25 subjects in the ME6 group that were tested for GS expression at Visit 1.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Melanoma 1 GroupNumber of Patients Responding to Treatment, by Best Clinical Response TypeNot evaluable1 Participants
Melanoma 1 GroupNumber of Patients Responding to Treatment, by Best Clinical Response TypeStable Disease3 Participants
Melanoma 1 GroupNumber of Patients Responding to Treatment, by Best Clinical Response TypePartial response1 Participants
Melanoma 1 GroupNumber of Patients Responding to Treatment, by Best Clinical Response TypeProgressive Disease9 Participants
Melanoma 1 GroupNumber of Patients Responding to Treatment, by Best Clinical Response TypeComplete response0 Participants
Melanoma 2 GroupNumber of Patients Responding to Treatment, by Best Clinical Response TypeNot evaluable2 Participants
Melanoma 2 GroupNumber of Patients Responding to Treatment, by Best Clinical Response TypeComplete response0 Participants
Melanoma 2 GroupNumber of Patients Responding to Treatment, by Best Clinical Response TypePartial response0 Participants
Melanoma 2 GroupNumber of Patients Responding to Treatment, by Best Clinical Response TypeStable Disease4 Participants
Melanoma 2 GroupNumber of Patients Responding to Treatment, by Best Clinical Response TypeProgressive Disease4 Participants
Melanoma 3 GroupNumber of Patients Responding to Treatment, by Best Clinical Response TypeStable Disease1 Participants
Melanoma 3 GroupNumber of Patients Responding to Treatment, by Best Clinical Response TypeComplete response0 Participants
Melanoma 3 GroupNumber of Patients Responding to Treatment, by Best Clinical Response TypeProgressive Disease0 Participants
Melanoma 3 GroupNumber of Patients Responding to Treatment, by Best Clinical Response TypePartial response0 Participants
Melanoma 3 GroupNumber of Patients Responding to Treatment, by Best Clinical Response TypeNot evaluable0 Participants
Primary

Number of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer Immunotherapeutic

The outcome presents the number of participants with a pre-identified gene signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 cancer immunotherapeutic from before and after standard cancer treatment, for comparison.

Time frame: Before and after administration of standard of care treatment course, up to 3 months

Population: The analysis was performed on the Total Treated cohort. Data was not collected for the subjects in Non-Small Cell Group.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Melanoma 1 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticRemained positive4 Participants
Melanoma 1 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticRemained Negative9 Participants
Melanoma 1 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticTurned Positive0 Participants
Melanoma 1 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticTurned Negative1 Participants
Melanoma 1 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticNot tested2 Participants
Melanoma 1 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticInvalid testing1 Participants
Melanoma 2 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticRemained Negative0 Participants
Melanoma 2 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticTurned Negative1 Participants
Melanoma 2 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticInvalid testing1 Participants
Melanoma 2 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticRemained positive0 Participants
Melanoma 2 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticTurned Positive1 Participants
Melanoma 2 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticNot tested0 Participants
Melanoma 3 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticInvalid testing1 Participants
Melanoma 3 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticNot tested6 Participants
Melanoma 3 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticTurned Negative1 Participants
Melanoma 3 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticTurned Positive2 Participants
Melanoma 3 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticRemained positive4 Participants
Melanoma 3 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticRemained Negative7 Participants
Melanoma 4 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticTurned Negative1 Participants
Melanoma 4 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticRemained Negative0 Participants
Melanoma 4 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticTurned Positive0 Participants
Melanoma 4 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticInvalid testing0 Participants
Melanoma 4 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticNot tested1 Participants
Melanoma 4 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticRemained positive0 Participants
Melanoma 5 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticRemained positive4 Participants
Melanoma 5 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticNot tested3 Participants
Melanoma 5 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticRemained Negative3 Participants
Melanoma 5 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticTurned Positive4 Participants
Melanoma 5 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticTurned Negative1 Participants
Melanoma 5 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticInvalid testing0 Participants
Melanoma 6 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticTurned Negative4 Participants
Melanoma 6 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticTurned Positive2 Participants
Melanoma 6 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticNot tested0 Participants
Melanoma 6 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticInvalid testing3 Participants
Melanoma 6 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticRemained Negative5 Participants
Melanoma 6 GroupNumber of Subjects With a Pre-identified Gene Signature (GS) to the recMAGE-A3 Cancer ImmunotherapeuticRemained positive6 Participants
Primary

Number of Subjects With Expression of Tumor Antigens

The outcome presents the number of participants with expression of MAGE-A3 and NY-ESO-1 tumor antigens, after administration of standard of care treatment course compared to before administration

Time frame: Before and after administration of standard of care treatment course, up to 3 months

Population: The analysis was performed on the Total Treated cohort.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Melanoma 1 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Not tested2 Participants
Melanoma 1 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Turned Positive1 Participants
Melanoma 1 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Invalid testing1 Participants
Melanoma 1 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Remained Positive8 Participants
Melanoma 1 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Remained Positive4 Participants
Melanoma 1 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Turned Negative0 Participants
Melanoma 1 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Not tested1 Participants
Melanoma 1 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Invalid testing1 Participants
Melanoma 1 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Turned Negative0 Participants
Melanoma 1 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Turned Positive0 Participants
Melanoma 1 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Remained negative9 Participants
Melanoma 1 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Remained negative7 Participants
Melanoma 2 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Not tested0 Participants
Melanoma 2 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Not tested0 Participants
Melanoma 2 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Invalid testing1 Participants
Melanoma 2 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Turned Positive0 Participants
Melanoma 2 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Remained Positive0 Participants
Melanoma 2 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Turned Negative2 Participants
Melanoma 2 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Remained negative1 Participants
Melanoma 2 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Remained negative0 Participants
Melanoma 2 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Remained Positive1 Participants
Melanoma 2 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Turned Positive0 Participants
Melanoma 2 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Turned Negative0 Participants
Melanoma 2 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Invalid testing1 Participants
Melanoma 3 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Remained negative0 Participants
Melanoma 3 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Turned Negative1 Participants
Melanoma 3 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Invalid testing1 Participants
Melanoma 3 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Remained Positive2 Participants
Melanoma 3 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Not tested0 Participants
Melanoma 3 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Remained Positive11 Participants
Melanoma 3 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Invalid testing1 Participants
Melanoma 3 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Turned Positive1 Participants
Melanoma 3 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Remained negative14 Participants
Melanoma 3 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Turned Positive0 Participants
Melanoma 3 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Not tested2 Participants
Melanoma 3 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Turned Negative9 Participants
Melanoma 4 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Turned Positive0 Participants
Melanoma 4 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Not tested1 Participants
Melanoma 4 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Invalid testing0 Participants
Melanoma 4 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Remained Positive1 Participants
Melanoma 4 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Remained negative0 Participants
Melanoma 4 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Turned Positive0 Participants
Melanoma 4 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Turned Negative0 Participants
Melanoma 4 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Not tested1 Participants
Melanoma 4 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Invalid testing0 Participants
Melanoma 4 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Remained Positive1 Participants
Melanoma 4 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Remained negative0 Participants
Melanoma 4 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Turned Negative0 Participants
Melanoma 5 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Remained Positive4 Participants
Melanoma 5 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Not tested2 Participants
Melanoma 5 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Remained Positive5 Participants
Melanoma 5 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Remained negative5 Participants
Melanoma 5 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Remained negative6 Participants
Melanoma 5 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Invalid testing0 Participants
Melanoma 5 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Not tested2 Participants
Melanoma 5 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Turned Positive1 Participants
Melanoma 5 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Turned Positive1 Participants
Melanoma 5 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Invalid testing0 Participants
Melanoma 5 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Turned Negative2 Participants
Melanoma 5 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Turned Negative2 Participants
Melanoma 6 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Not tested1 Participants
Melanoma 6 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Turned Positive1 Participants
Melanoma 6 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Invalid testing3 Participants
Melanoma 6 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Remained negative6 Participants
Melanoma 6 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Remained Positive4 Participants
Melanoma 6 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Remained Positive6 Participants
Melanoma 6 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Turned Negative0 Participants
Melanoma 6 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Remained negative11 Participants
Melanoma 6 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Invalid testing3 Participants
Melanoma 6 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Turned Positive1 Participants
Melanoma 6 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Not tested1 Participants
Melanoma 6 GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Turned Negative3 Participants
Non-Small Cell GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Not tested0 Participants
Non-Small Cell GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Remained negative5 Participants
Non-Small Cell GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Invalid testing2 Participants
Non-Small Cell GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Turned NegativeNA Participants
Non-Small Cell GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Turned PositiveNA Participants
Non-Small Cell GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Not testedNA Participants
Non-Small Cell GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Turned Positive0 Participants
Non-Small Cell GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Remained Positive1 Participants
Non-Small Cell GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensMAGE-A3Turned Negative2 Participants
Non-Small Cell GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Remained negativeNA Participants
Non-Small Cell GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Remained PositiveNA Participants
Non-Small Cell GroupNumber of Subjects With Expression of Tumor AntigensNY-ESO-01Invalid testingNA Participants
Primary

The Serum Proteome

Time frame: After administration of standard of care treatment course

Population: Proteome analysis on serum samples was not performed, because they, as a consequence of the early study termination, would not have added any scientific value and would not have benefited any individual patient.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026