Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy Study of TG-873870 (Nemonoxacin) in Diabetic Foot Infections

An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Multi-Center Study of TG-873870 for Treating Patients With Diabetic Foot Infections of Mild to Moderate Severity Associated With Gram-Positive Pathogens

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00685698
Enrollment
40
Registered
2008-05-28
Start date
2008-06-30
Completion date
2009-06-30
Last updated
2025-07-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Foot Infections

Keywords

Diabetic Foot Infections, DFI, Nemonoxacin

Brief summary

Safety and Efficacy Study of TG-873870 (Nemonoxacin) in Diabetic Foot Infections

Detailed description

This study will assess the safety and efficacy of TG-873870 (Nemonoxacin) in patients with Diabetic Foot Infections. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) assessment will be conducted in a subgroup of eight consenting patients.

Interventions

DRUGTG-873870 (Nemonoxacin)

750 mg

Sponsors

TaiGen Biotechnology Co., Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Body weight ≥ 40 kg * Previously known or newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus, including type 1 and type 2 (per the American Diabetes Association guidelines), which is controlled by proper lifestyle (diet, exercise) or treatment with either oral medications or insulin * Patients' HbA1c ≦ 12% at screening * Clinically defined diabetic foot infection of mild or moderate severity (PEDIS grade 2-3) as based on the guideline of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. It includes any inframalleolar infection of the soft-tissue, such as paronychia, cellulitis, myositis, abscesses, and tendonitis * Evidence of necrotic tissue, purulent collections or abscess that may require excision, incision or drainage (based on investigator's judgment, and a surgeon if needed) * Must be able to provide suitable tissue specimens (preferably obtained by biopsy or tissue curettage, or purulent fluid aspiration, rather than by swabbing) from the infected wound (after appropriate cleansing and debridement) for Gram-staining and bacterial cultures (aerobes and anaerobes) * A confirmed Gram-positive pathogen infection by Gram-stain. The criterion to determine patient's eligibility for study recruitment is a Gram-stained smear with at least 1 Gram-positive organism seen in at least two high power fields. A solely Gram-positive pathogen infection or a polymicrobial infection including Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens are acceptable within the framework of the study

Exclusion criteria

* A co-morbid disease condition that could compromise evaluation or participation in this study, such as severe hepatic disease (e.g., active hepatitis, decompensated liver cirrhosis), renal failure (estimated creatinine clearance \[CrCl\] \<30 ml/minute or need for hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis), or active systemic malignancy (advanced or metastatic), unless enrollment is deemed appropriate at the discretion of the Investigator with prior consultation with the study Medical Monitor * History of prolonged QTc interval or a medical condition requiring the use of a concomitant medication that is associated with an increased QTc interval (e.g., class I or class III anti-arrhythmic agents) * Contact dermatitis over the infected skin area, infected third-degree burn wounds, necrotizing fascitis, extensive gangrene, pyoderma gangrenosum, deep vein thrombosis, shock, or any medical disorder that could either interfere with the evaluation of treatment or the response of the patient to therapy * Radiological evidence of bone or joints infection within 7 days prior to or at screening, i.e. potential osteomyelitis or septic arthritis * Clinically defined uninfected or severe infection (PEDIS grade 1 or 4) as based on the Infectious Diseases Society of America classification system * Any known severe immunosuppressive condition, such as an active hematological malignancy, HIV infection or active treatment with any immunosuppressive drug (including corticosteroids at a dose of \>20 mg/day of prednisone, or its equivalent) * Has received or will be receiving chemotherapy or oncolytics within six months prior to entering or during the study * History of current or active alcohol abuse (\>3 drinks daily or binge drinking) or any illicit drug use * Known or suspected critical ischemia of the affected limb (based on investigators' clinical judgments and vascular assessment) * Wound that contains or is proximate to any prosthetic materials or devices that is/are not scheduled for removal * Patient with a foot infection that, in the investigator's judgment, is severe enough to require hospitalization or intravenous antibiotic therapy * Neutrophil count \<1000 cells/mm3

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Success (in ITT Population)Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early TerminationClinical Success * Resolution is defined as total resolution of all pretreatment clinically significant signs and symptoms of infection and no development of any systemic evidence of infection. * Improvement is defined as resolution of more than two, but not all, pretreatment clinical signs and symptoms, or partial resolution of all clinical signs and symptoms relative to the baseline assessment, with no further need for antibiotic therapy, and no need for infection-related surgical interventions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Success (in PP Population)Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early TerminationClinical Success * Resolution is defined as total resolution of all pretreatment clinically significant signs and symptoms of infection and no development of any systemic evidence of infection. * Improvement is defined as resolution of more than two, but not all, pretreatment clinical signs and symptoms, or partial resolution of all clinical signs and symptoms relative to the baseline assessment, with no further need for antibiotic therapy, and no need for infection-related surgical interventions.
Clinical Success (at End of Treatment/Early Termination)End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)Clinical Success * Resolution is defined as total resolution of all pretreatment clinically significant signs and symptoms of infection and no development of any systemic evidence of infection. * Improvement is defined as resolution of more than two, but not all, pretreatment clinical signs and symptoms, or partial resolution of all clinical signs and symptoms relative to the baseline assessment, with no further need for antibiotic therapy, and no need for infection-related surgical interventions.
Per-Pathogen Clinical Responses (at Test of Cure)Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early TerminationClinical responses were assessed on a per-pathogen basis for the most frequently isolated pathogens at baseline (i.e., present in four or more patients), including MRSA. Clinical Responses were assessed at Test of Cure visit within each of the ITT and PP populations. Insufficient numbers prevented reporting Clinical Success rates for Streptococcus pyogenes in the PP population.
Per-Pathogen Clinical Response (at End of Treatment/Early Termination)End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)Clinical responses were assessed on a per-pathogen basis for the most frequently isolated pathogens at baseline (i.e., present in four or more patients), including MRSA. Clinical Responses were assessed at at End of Treatment/Early Termination within each of the ITT and PP populations. Insufficient numbers prevented reporting Clinical Success rates for Streptococcus pyogenes in the PP population.
Per-Pathogen Microbiological ResponsesTest of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early TerminationMicrobiological responses were assessed on a per-pathogen basis for the most frequently isolated pathogens at baseline (i.e., present in four or more patients), including MRSA. Microbiological Responses were assessed at Test of Cure visit within each of the ITT and PP populations. Insufficient numbers prevented reporting Microbiological Success rates for Streptococcus pyogenes in the PP population.
Total Wound Score (at Test of Cure in ITT Population)Visit 1 (Baseline); Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early TerminationThe Diabetic Foot Infection (DFI) Wound Scores will be used to evaluate the wound assessment at baseline and Test of Cure visits. The wound composite score was based on combining the general wound parameters (signs and symptoms of infection), and wound measurements (length, width, depth). Each wound parameter was assigned a score based on severity, with higher scores defining greater severity. For wound measurements and undermining, larger measurements received higher scores. The minimum and maximum score are 3 and 49, respectively.
Total Wound Score (at Test of Cure in PP Population)Visit 1 (Baseline); Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early TerminationThe Diabetic Foot Infection (DFI) Wound Scores will be used to evaluate the wound assessment at baseline and Test of Cure visits. The wound composite score was based on combining the general wound parameters (signs and symptoms of infection), and wound measurements (length, width, depth). Each wound parameter was assigned a score based on severity, with higher scores defining greater severity. For wound measurements and undermining, larger measurements received higher scores. The minimum and maximum score are 3 and 49, respectively.
Microbiological Success RateTest of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early TerminationMicrobiological Success * Eradicated, defined as absence of the original pathogen(s) from a repeat culture of the original infection site performed at the TOC visit. * Presumed Eradicated, defined as meeting the definition for Clinical Success at the TOC visit, but tissue sample could be obtained for culture from the original infection site. * TOC=Test of Cure
Total Wound Score (at End of Treatment/ Early Termination in PP Population)Visit 1 (Baseline); End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)The Diabetic Foot Infection (DFI) Wound Scores will be used to evaluate the wound assessment at baseline and Test of Cure visits. The wound composite score was based on combining the general wound parameters (signs and symptoms of infection), and wound measurements (length, width, depth). Each wound parameter was assigned a score based on severity, with higher scores defining greater severity. For wound measurements and undermining, larger measurements received higher scores. The minimum and maximum score are 3 and 49, respectively.
Diabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in ITT PopulationEnd of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)The number of patients within each of the PEDIS grading categories (uninfected, mild, moderate and severe) at baseline and End of Treatment/Early Termination.
Diabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in ITT PopulationTest of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early TerminationThe number of patients within each of the PEDIS grading categories (uninfected, mild, moderate and severe) at baseline and Test of Cure.
Diabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in PP PopulationEnd of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)The number of patients within each of the PEDIS grading categories (uninfected, mild, moderate and severe) at baseline and End of Treatment/Early Termination.
Diabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in PP PopulationTest of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early TerminationThe number of patients within each of the PEDIS grading categories (uninfected, mild, moderate and severe) at baseline and Test of Cure.
Need for Surgery, Hospitalisation and Non-Study Antibiotic Therapy for Diabetic Foot Infection During Study (in ITT Population)End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)Results in relation to the need for surgery, hospitalization, new and/or additional non-study antibiotic therapy for failure of initial oral therapy at End of Treatment/Early Termination.
Need for Surgery, Hospitalisation and Non-Study Antibiotic Therapy for Diabetic Foot Infection During Study (in PP Population)End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)Results in relation to the need for surgery, hospitalization, new and/or additional non-study antibiotic therapy for failure of initial oral therapy at End of Treatment/Early Termination.
Total Wound Score (at End of Treatment/ Early Termination in ITT Population)Visit 1 (Baseline); End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)The Diabetic Foot Infection (DFI) Wound Scores will be used to evaluate the wound assessment at baseline and End of Treatment/ Early Termination visits. The wound composite score was based on combining the general wound parameters (signs and symptoms of infection), and wound measurements (length, width, depth). Each wound parameter was assigned a score based on severity, with higher scores defining greater severity. For wound measurements and undermining, larger measurements received higher scores. The minimum and maximum score are 3 and 49, respectively.

Countries

South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were assessed during the 1- to 2-day screening phase (Visit 1) to determine their eligibility. Eligible patients demonstrating the presence of at least one Gram-positive organism on the basis of Gram-stain could begin treatment with study medication the same day (Day 1, Visit 1).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Nemonoxacin
Nemonoxacin 750 mg,oral administration, single-arm, once daily 7±1 and 14±1 days. TG-873870 (Nemonoxacin): 750 mg
33
Total33

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event3
Overall StudyCULTURE GRAM NEG SPECIES1
Overall StudyCULTURE RESULTS: GRAM-VE1
Overall StudyNO GRAM POSITIVE CULTURE GROWN1
Overall StudyProtocol Violation6
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNemonoxacin
Age, Continuous57.0 years
Age, Customized
>= 20 and < 30 years
0 participants
Age, Customized
< 20 years
0 participants
Age, Customized
>= 30 and < 40 years
1 participants
Age, Customized
>= 40 and < 50 years
8 participants
Age, Customized
>= 50 and < 60 years
11 participants
Age, Customized
>= 60 and < 70 years
3 participants
Age, Customized
>= 70 and < 80 years
9 participants
Age, Customized
>= 80 years
1 participants
Current treatment for Diabetes
Diet and Exercise
20 participants
Current treatment for Diabetes
Insulin
16 participants
Current treatment for Diabetes
Oral Agent
25 participants
Distribution of Time Since Diabetes Diagnosis
>= 10 and < 20 years
9 participants
Distribution of Time Since Diabetes Diagnosis
>= 20 and < 30 years
2 participants
Distribution of Time Since Diabetes Diagnosis
>= 30 and < 40 years
0 participants
Distribution of Time Since Diabetes Diagnosis
>= 40 years
0 participants
Distribution of Time Since Diabetes Diagnosis
>= 5 and < 10 years
8 participants
Distribution of Time Since Diabetes Diagnosis
< 5 years
12 participants
Distribution of Time Since Diabetes Diagnosis
Missing
2 participants
HbA1c % Result at Visit 1
>= 10.0% and < 11.0%
1 participants
HbA1c % Result at Visit 1
>= 11.0% and < 12.0%
2 participants
HbA1c % Result at Visit 1
>= 12.0%
1 participants
HbA1c % Result at Visit 1
< 6.5%
6 participants
HbA1c % Result at Visit 1
>= 6.5% and < 7.0%
2 participants
HbA1c % Result at Visit 1
>= 7.0% and < 9.0%
18 participants
HbA1c % Result at Visit 1
>= 9.0% and < 10.0%
3 participants
Most Recent HbA1c % Result
>= 10.0% and < 11.0%
2 participants
Most Recent HbA1c % Result
>= 11.0% and < 12.0%
1 participants
Most Recent HbA1c % Result
>= 12.0%
0 participants
Most Recent HbA1c % Result
< 6.5%
2 participants
Most Recent HbA1c % Result
>= 6.5% and < 7.0%
3 participants
Most Recent HbA1c % Result
>= 7.0% and < 9.0%
10 participants
Most Recent HbA1c % Result
>= 9.0% and < 10.0%
3 participants
Most Recent HbA1c % Result
Missing
12 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
5 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
7 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
6 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
15 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
22 Participants
Time Since Diabetes Diagnosis8.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.49
Type of Diabetes
Type 1 (Juvenile Onset)
3 participants
Type of Diabetes
Type 2 (Adult Onset)
30 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
21 / 38
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 38

Outcome results

Primary

Clinical Success (in ITT Population)

Clinical Success * Resolution is defined as total resolution of all pretreatment clinically significant signs and symptoms of infection and no development of any systemic evidence of infection. * Improvement is defined as resolution of more than two, but not all, pretreatment clinical signs and symptoms, or partial resolution of all clinical signs and symptoms relative to the baseline assessment, with no further need for antibiotic therapy, and no need for infection-related surgical interventions.

Time frame: Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination

Population: All eligible patients who took at least one whole dose of study drug and had at least 1 gram-positive pathogen identified at the Baseline Visit (Visit 1).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
NemonoxacinClinical Success (in ITT Population)95.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Clinical Success (at End of Treatment/Early Termination)

Clinical Success * Resolution is defined as total resolution of all pretreatment clinically significant signs and symptoms of infection and no development of any systemic evidence of infection. * Improvement is defined as resolution of more than two, but not all, pretreatment clinical signs and symptoms, or partial resolution of all clinical signs and symptoms relative to the baseline assessment, with no further need for antibiotic therapy, and no need for infection-related surgical interventions.

Time frame: End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
NemonoxacinClinical Success (at End of Treatment/Early Termination)100.0 percentage of participants
Nemonoxacin (PP Population at Test of Cure Visit)Clinical Success (at End of Treatment/Early Termination)100.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Clinical Success (in PP Population)

Clinical Success * Resolution is defined as total resolution of all pretreatment clinically significant signs and symptoms of infection and no development of any systemic evidence of infection. * Improvement is defined as resolution of more than two, but not all, pretreatment clinical signs and symptoms, or partial resolution of all clinical signs and symptoms relative to the baseline assessment, with no further need for antibiotic therapy, and no need for infection-related surgical interventions.

Time frame: Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination

Population: All eligible patients who took at least one whole dose of study drug and had at least 1 gram-positive pathogen identified at the Baseline Visit (Visit 1), and adhered to the protocol without major protocol violations.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
NemonoxacinClinical Success (in PP Population)94.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Diabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in ITT Population

The number of patients within each of the PEDIS grading categories (uninfected, mild, moderate and severe) at baseline and End of Treatment/Early Termination.

Time frame: End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in ITT PopulationMild to Uninfected8 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in ITT PopulationMild to Mild4 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in ITT PopulationMild to Moderate0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in ITT PopulationMild to Severe0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in ITT PopulationSevere to Severe0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in ITT PopulationSevere to Moderate0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in ITT PopulationUninfected to Uninfected0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in ITT PopulationUninfected to Mild0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in ITT PopulationUninfected to Moderate0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in ITT PopulationUninfected to Severe0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in ITT PopulationModerate to Uninfected12 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in ITT PopulationModerate to Mild5 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in ITT PopulationModerate to Moderate3 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in ITT PopulationModerate to Severe0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in ITT PopulationSevere to Uninfected0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in ITT PopulationSevere to Mild0 participants
Secondary

Diabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in PP Population

The number of patients within each of the PEDIS grading categories (uninfected, mild, moderate and severe) at baseline and End of Treatment/Early Termination.

Time frame: End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in PP PopulationUninfected to Uninfected0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in PP PopulationUninfected to Mild0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in PP PopulationUninfected to Moderate0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in PP PopulationUninfected to Severe0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in PP PopulationMild to Uninfected6 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in PP PopulationModerate to Moderate2 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in PP PopulationModerate to Severe0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in PP PopulationSevere to Uninfected0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in PP PopulationSevere to Mild0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in PP PopulationSevere to Moderate0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in PP PopulationSevere to Severe0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in PP PopulationMild to Mild1 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in PP PopulationMild to Moderate0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in PP PopulationMild to Severe0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in PP PopulationModerate to Uninfected9 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in PP PopulationModerate to Mild2 participants
Secondary

Diabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in ITT Population

The number of patients within each of the PEDIS grading categories (uninfected, mild, moderate and severe) at baseline and Test of Cure.

Time frame: Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in ITT PopulationUninfected to Uninfected0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in ITT PopulationUninfected to Severe0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in ITT PopulationMild to Uninfected8 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in ITT PopulationMild to Mild2 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in ITT PopulationModerate to Severe0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in ITT PopulationSevere to Uninfected0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in ITT PopulationUninfected to Mild0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in ITT PopulationUninfected to Moderate0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in ITT PopulationMild to Moderate0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in ITT PopulationMild to Severe0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in ITT PopulationModerate to Uninfected15 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in ITT PopulationModerate to Mild3 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in ITT PopulationModerate to Moderate0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in ITT PopulationSevere to Mild0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in ITT PopulationSevere to Moderate0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in ITT PopulationSevere to Severe0 participants
Secondary

Diabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in PP Population

The number of patients within each of the PEDIS grading categories (uninfected, mild, moderate and severe) at baseline and Test of Cure.

Time frame: Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in PP PopulationUninfected to Uninfected0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in PP PopulationUninfected to Mild0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in PP PopulationUninfected to Moderate0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in PP PopulationSevere to Mild0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in PP PopulationSevere to Moderate0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in PP PopulationSevere to Severe0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in PP PopulationUninfected to Severe0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in PP PopulationMild to Uninfected6 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in PP PopulationMild to Mild1 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in PP PopulationMild to Moderate0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in PP PopulationMild to Severe0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in PP PopulationModerate to Uninfected11 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in PP PopulationModerate to Mild1 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in PP PopulationModerate to Moderate0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in PP PopulationModerate to Severe0 participants
NemonoxacinDiabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in PP PopulationSevere to Uninfected0 participants
Secondary

Microbiological Success Rate

Microbiological Success * Eradicated, defined as absence of the original pathogen(s) from a repeat culture of the original infection site performed at the TOC visit. * Presumed Eradicated, defined as meeting the definition for Clinical Success at the TOC visit, but tissue sample could be obtained for culture from the original infection site. * TOC=Test of Cure

Time frame: Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
NemonoxacinMicrobiological Success Rate82.6 percentage of participants
Nemonoxacin (PP Population at Test of Cure Visit)Microbiological Success Rate89.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Need for Surgery, Hospitalisation and Non-Study Antibiotic Therapy for Diabetic Foot Infection During Study (in ITT Population)

Results in relation to the need for surgery, hospitalization, new and/or additional non-study antibiotic therapy for failure of initial oral therapy at End of Treatment/Early Termination.

Time frame: End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)

Population: Number at the End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit, ITT population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NemonoxacinNeed for Surgery, Hospitalisation and Non-Study Antibiotic Therapy for Diabetic Foot Infection During Study (in ITT Population)New or Additional Antibiotic Therapy Required3 participants
NemonoxacinNeed for Surgery, Hospitalisation and Non-Study Antibiotic Therapy for Diabetic Foot Infection During Study (in ITT Population)Surgery Required for DFI During Study1 participants
NemonoxacinNeed for Surgery, Hospitalisation and Non-Study Antibiotic Therapy for Diabetic Foot Infection During Study (in ITT Population)Hospitalisation Required for DFI During Study1 participants
Secondary

Need for Surgery, Hospitalisation and Non-Study Antibiotic Therapy for Diabetic Foot Infection During Study (in ITT Population)

Results in relation to the need for surgery, hospitalization, new and/or additional non-study antibiotic therapy for failure of initial oral therapy at Test of Cure.

Time frame: Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination

Population: Number at Test of Cure Visit, ITT population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NemonoxacinNeed for Surgery, Hospitalisation and Non-Study Antibiotic Therapy for Diabetic Foot Infection During Study (in ITT Population)Surgery Required for DFI During Study1 participants
NemonoxacinNeed for Surgery, Hospitalisation and Non-Study Antibiotic Therapy for Diabetic Foot Infection During Study (in ITT Population)Hospitalisation Required for DFI During Study1 participants
NemonoxacinNeed for Surgery, Hospitalisation and Non-Study Antibiotic Therapy for Diabetic Foot Infection During Study (in ITT Population)New or Additional Antibiotic Therapy Required3 participants
Secondary

Need for Surgery, Hospitalisation and Non-Study Antibiotic Therapy for Diabetic Foot Infection During Study (in PP Population)

Results in relation to the need for surgery, hospitalization, new and/or additional non-study antibiotic therapy for failure of initial oral therapy at Test of Cure.

Time frame: Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NemonoxacinNeed for Surgery, Hospitalisation and Non-Study Antibiotic Therapy for Diabetic Foot Infection During Study (in PP Population)Surgery Required for DFI During Study0 participants
NemonoxacinNeed for Surgery, Hospitalisation and Non-Study Antibiotic Therapy for Diabetic Foot Infection During Study (in PP Population)Hospitalisation Required for DFI During Study0 participants
NemonoxacinNeed for Surgery, Hospitalisation and Non-Study Antibiotic Therapy for Diabetic Foot Infection During Study (in PP Population)New or Additional Antibiotic Therapy Required1 participants
Secondary

Need for Surgery, Hospitalisation and Non-Study Antibiotic Therapy for Diabetic Foot Infection During Study (in PP Population)

Results in relation to the need for surgery, hospitalization, new and/or additional non-study antibiotic therapy for failure of initial oral therapy at End of Treatment/Early Termination.

Time frame: End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NemonoxacinNeed for Surgery, Hospitalisation and Non-Study Antibiotic Therapy for Diabetic Foot Infection During Study (in PP Population)Surgery Required for DFI During Study0 participants
NemonoxacinNeed for Surgery, Hospitalisation and Non-Study Antibiotic Therapy for Diabetic Foot Infection During Study (in PP Population)Hospitalisation Required for DFI During Study0 participants
NemonoxacinNeed for Surgery, Hospitalisation and Non-Study Antibiotic Therapy for Diabetic Foot Infection During Study (in PP Population)New or Additional Antibiotic Therapy Required0 participants
Secondary

Per-Pathogen Clinical Response (at End of Treatment/Early Termination)

Clinical responses were assessed on a per-pathogen basis for the most frequently isolated pathogens at baseline (i.e., present in four or more patients), including MRSA. Clinical Responses were assessed at at End of Treatment/Early Termination within each of the ITT and PP populations. Insufficient numbers prevented reporting Clinical Success rates for Streptococcus pyogenes in the PP population.

Time frame: End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NemonoxacinPer-Pathogen Clinical Response (at End of Treatment/Early Termination)Staphylococcus aureus (in ITT population)100.0 percentage of participants
NemonoxacinPer-Pathogen Clinical Response (at End of Treatment/Early Termination)Escherichia coli (in ITT population)100.0 percentage of participants
NemonoxacinPer-Pathogen Clinical Response (at End of Treatment/Early Termination)Enterococcus faecalis (in ITT population)100.0 percentage of participants
NemonoxacinPer-Pathogen Clinical Response (at End of Treatment/Early Termination)Streptococcus pyogenes (in ITT population)100.0 percentage of participants
NemonoxacinPer-Pathogen Clinical Response (at End of Treatment/Early Termination)Streptococcus agalactiae (in ITT population)100.0 percentage of participants
Nemonoxacin (PP Population at Test of Cure Visit)Per-Pathogen Clinical Response (at End of Treatment/Early Termination)Streptococcus agalactiae (in ITT population)100.0 percentage of participants
Nemonoxacin (PP Population at Test of Cure Visit)Per-Pathogen Clinical Response (at End of Treatment/Early Termination)Staphylococcus aureus (in ITT population)100.0 percentage of participants
Nemonoxacin (PP Population at Test of Cure Visit)Per-Pathogen Clinical Response (at End of Treatment/Early Termination)Escherichia coli (in ITT population)100.0 percentage of participants
Nemonoxacin (PP Population at Test of Cure Visit)Per-Pathogen Clinical Response (at End of Treatment/Early Termination)Streptococcus pyogenes (in ITT population)NA percentage of participants
Nemonoxacin (PP Population at Test of Cure Visit)Per-Pathogen Clinical Response (at End of Treatment/Early Termination)Enterococcus faecalis (in ITT population)100.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Per-Pathogen Clinical Responses (at Test of Cure)

Clinical responses were assessed on a per-pathogen basis for the most frequently isolated pathogens at baseline (i.e., present in four or more patients), including MRSA. Clinical Responses were assessed at Test of Cure visit within each of the ITT and PP populations. Insufficient numbers prevented reporting Clinical Success rates for Streptococcus pyogenes in the PP population.

Time frame: Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NemonoxacinPer-Pathogen Clinical Responses (at Test of Cure)Escherichia coli (in ITT population)100.0 percentage of participants
NemonoxacinPer-Pathogen Clinical Responses (at Test of Cure)Streptococcus agalactiae (in ITT population)100.0 percentage of participants
NemonoxacinPer-Pathogen Clinical Responses (at Test of Cure)Enterococcus faecalis (in ITT population)100.0 percentage of participants
NemonoxacinPer-Pathogen Clinical Responses (at Test of Cure)Streptococcus pyogenes (in ITT population)100.0 percentage of participants
NemonoxacinPer-Pathogen Clinical Responses (at Test of Cure)Staphylococcus aureus100.0 percentage of participants
Nemonoxacin (PP Population at Test of Cure Visit)Per-Pathogen Clinical Responses (at Test of Cure)Streptococcus pyogenes (in ITT population)NA percentage of participants
Nemonoxacin (PP Population at Test of Cure Visit)Per-Pathogen Clinical Responses (at Test of Cure)Staphylococcus aureus100.0 percentage of participants
Nemonoxacin (PP Population at Test of Cure Visit)Per-Pathogen Clinical Responses (at Test of Cure)Escherichia coli (in ITT population)100.0 percentage of participants
Nemonoxacin (PP Population at Test of Cure Visit)Per-Pathogen Clinical Responses (at Test of Cure)Enterococcus faecalis (in ITT population)100.0 percentage of participants
Nemonoxacin (PP Population at Test of Cure Visit)Per-Pathogen Clinical Responses (at Test of Cure)Streptococcus agalactiae (in ITT population)100.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Per-Pathogen Microbiological Responses

Microbiological responses were assessed on a per-pathogen basis for the most frequently isolated pathogens at baseline (i.e., present in four or more patients), including MRSA. Microbiological Responses were assessed at Test of Cure visit within each of the ITT and PP populations. Insufficient numbers prevented reporting Microbiological Success rates for Streptococcus pyogenes in the PP population.

Time frame: Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NemonoxacinPer-Pathogen Microbiological ResponsesEscherichia coli (in ITT population)66.7 percentage of participants
NemonoxacinPer-Pathogen Microbiological ResponsesStreptococcus agalactiae (in ITT population)100.0 percentage of participants
NemonoxacinPer-Pathogen Microbiological ResponsesEnterococcus faecalis (in ITT population)75.0 percentage of participants
NemonoxacinPer-Pathogen Microbiological ResponsesStreptococcus pyogenes (in ITT population)100.0 percentage of participants
NemonoxacinPer-Pathogen Microbiological ResponsesStaphylococcus aureus (in ITT population)93.3 percentage of participants
Nemonoxacin (PP Population at Test of Cure Visit)Per-Pathogen Microbiological ResponsesStreptococcus pyogenes (in ITT population)NA percentage of participants
Nemonoxacin (PP Population at Test of Cure Visit)Per-Pathogen Microbiological ResponsesStaphylococcus aureus (in ITT population)100.0 percentage of participants
Nemonoxacin (PP Population at Test of Cure Visit)Per-Pathogen Microbiological ResponsesEscherichia coli (in ITT population)75.0 percentage of participants
Nemonoxacin (PP Population at Test of Cure Visit)Per-Pathogen Microbiological ResponsesEnterococcus faecalis (in ITT population)75.0 percentage of participants
Nemonoxacin (PP Population at Test of Cure Visit)Per-Pathogen Microbiological ResponsesStreptococcus agalactiae (in ITT population)100.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Total Wound Score (at End of Treatment/ Early Termination in ITT Population)

The Diabetic Foot Infection (DFI) Wound Scores will be used to evaluate the wound assessment at baseline and End of Treatment/ Early Termination visits. The wound composite score was based on combining the general wound parameters (signs and symptoms of infection), and wound measurements (length, width, depth). Each wound parameter was assigned a score based on severity, with higher scores defining greater severity. For wound measurements and undermining, larger measurements received higher scores. The minimum and maximum score are 3 and 49, respectively.

Time frame: Visit 1 (Baseline); End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemonoxacinTotal Wound Score (at End of Treatment/ Early Termination in ITT Population)16.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
Nemonoxacin (PP Population at Test of Cure Visit)Total Wound Score (at End of Treatment/ Early Termination in ITT Population)7.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.65
Nemonoxacin (Change From Baseline to Test of Cure Visit)Total Wound Score (at End of Treatment/ Early Termination in ITT Population)-9.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.35
Secondary

Total Wound Score (at End of Treatment/ Early Termination in PP Population)

The Diabetic Foot Infection (DFI) Wound Scores will be used to evaluate the wound assessment at baseline and Test of Cure visits. The wound composite score was based on combining the general wound parameters (signs and symptoms of infection), and wound measurements (length, width, depth). Each wound parameter was assigned a score based on severity, with higher scores defining greater severity. For wound measurements and undermining, larger measurements received higher scores. The minimum and maximum score are 3 and 49, respectively.

Time frame: Visit 1 (Baseline); End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemonoxacinTotal Wound Score (at End of Treatment/ Early Termination in PP Population)18.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.54
Nemonoxacin (PP Population at Test of Cure Visit)Total Wound Score (at End of Treatment/ Early Termination in PP Population)6.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.31
Nemonoxacin (Change From Baseline to Test of Cure Visit)Total Wound Score (at End of Treatment/ Early Termination in PP Population)-12.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.44
Secondary

Total Wound Score (at Test of Cure in ITT Population)

The Diabetic Foot Infection (DFI) Wound Scores will be used to evaluate the wound assessment at baseline and Test of Cure visits. The wound composite score was based on combining the general wound parameters (signs and symptoms of infection), and wound measurements (length, width, depth). Each wound parameter was assigned a score based on severity, with higher scores defining greater severity. For wound measurements and undermining, larger measurements received higher scores. The minimum and maximum score are 3 and 49, respectively.

Time frame: Visit 1 (Baseline); Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemonoxacinTotal Wound Score (at Test of Cure in ITT Population)16.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
Nemonoxacin (PP Population at Test of Cure Visit)Total Wound Score (at Test of Cure in ITT Population)6.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.67
Nemonoxacin (Change From Baseline to Test of Cure Visit)Total Wound Score (at Test of Cure in ITT Population)-11.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.91
Secondary

Total Wound Score (at Test of Cure in PP Population)

The Diabetic Foot Infection (DFI) Wound Scores will be used to evaluate the wound assessment at baseline and Test of Cure visits. The wound composite score was based on combining the general wound parameters (signs and symptoms of infection), and wound measurements (length, width, depth). Each wound parameter was assigned a score based on severity, with higher scores defining greater severity. For wound measurements and undermining, larger measurements received higher scores. The minimum and maximum score are 3 and 49, respectively.

Time frame: Visit 1 (Baseline); Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NemonoxacinTotal Wound Score (at Test of Cure in PP Population)18.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.54
Nemonoxacin (PP Population at Test of Cure Visit)Total Wound Score (at Test of Cure in PP Population)5.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.79
Nemonoxacin (Change From Baseline to Test of Cure Visit)Total Wound Score (at Test of Cure in PP Population)-12.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026