Skip to content

Comparison of Airway Clearance Therapy in Cystic Fibrosis Using the Same VEST Therapy Device But With Different Settings

Comparison of Sine Waveform High Frequency Chest Wall Oscillation Using Different Settings in Cystic Fibrosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00685035
Enrollment
17
Registered
2008-05-28
Start date
2008-05-31
Completion date
2008-10-31
Last updated
2016-07-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cystic Fibrosis

Keywords

high frequency chest wall oscillation, cystic fibrosis

Brief summary

Our primary hypothesis is that airway clearance therapy with sine waveform HFCWO using higher inflation pressures combined with both low and high oscillator frequencies will result in greater sputum production compared to sine waveform HFCWO with lower inflation pressures and mid-frequency oscillations.

Detailed description

Patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) perform daily airway clearance therapy to facilitate removal of secretions from their airways. Many different techniques are available to achieve this and there is currently no consensus as to which form of therapy is most effective. High frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) is used by CF patients throughout the United States and abroad. To perform this therapy, the patient wears a vest which fits over the entire torso and is connected to an air compressor. The compressor generates oscillating air pulses that are transmitted to the lungs, thereby mobilizing secretions. The most commonly used device is The Vest™ Airway Clearance System, (Hill-Rom Inc, St Paul, MN). Adjustment of the inflation pressure and frequency of oscillations affects the volume of displaced air and flow of air measured at the mouth of the patient. Previous studies indicate this form of therapy is as effective as more traditional and cumbersome forms of therapy. However, it is unclear which inflation pressures and oscillator frequencies provide optimal airway clearance. Some studies of sine waveform HFCWO reported the largest volume of air displacement and highest air flow measured at the mouth when using a combination of high inflation pressures with either low (7 - 10 Hz) or high frequencies (18 - 20 Hz), but most CF centers in the United States use HFCWO with lower pressures combined with mid-range frequencies (10 - 14 Hz). Furthermore, there are no previous studies assessing the affect of sine waveform HFCWO settings on sputum production. As a result, there is no consensus on which pressure and frequency settings are most efficacious for CF patients.

Interventions

DEVICEHFCWC with higher pressure/variable-frequency settings

Randomized crossover trial of airway clearance therapy comparing sine wave HFCWO with high pressures and variable frequency (pressure 10, frequencies 8,9,10 and pressure 6, frequencies 18,19,20) to low pressure and mid frequency (pressure 5, frequency 12). Subjects will have 2-day washout between airway clearance sessions. All sputum collected during sessions.

DEVICEHFCWC with lower pressure/mid-frequency settings

Subjects will perform pulmonary function tests prior to and following each airway clearance therapy. All sputum produced during, and for 15 minutes following airway clearance therapy will be collected. Subjects will complete a questionnaire addressing the comfort of therapy upon completion of the session.

Sponsors

Hill-Rom
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Minnesota
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Diagnosis of CF established by sweat chloride \> 60 mmol/L. 2. Age older than 18 years. 3. History of chronic daily sputum production. 4. Currently on a home therapeutic regimen that includes some form of airway clearance performed with a HFCWO device at least once daily that also includes concomitant use of an inhaled mucolytic and inhaled bronchodilator. 5. FVC and FEV1 \> 40%-predicted, and with stable lung function (no greater than a 10% variation in lung function parameters over the preceding 3 months). 6. Evaluated at the University of Minnesota CF Center 3 or more times in the preceding 12 months.

Exclusion criteria

1. Hospitalization for CF pulmonary complications in the 2 months preceding enrollment. 2. Hemoptysis \> 60 cc in a single episode in the 4 weeks preceding enrollment. 3. Chest pain requiring use of narcotic for pain control. 4. Current participation in another clinical trial. 5. Use of intravenous antibiotics for CF respiratory complications in the 2 months preceding enrollment. 6. No prior experience using HFCWO devices for airway clearance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sputum Wet and Dry WeightProduced during each airway clearance therapy session on days 1 and 4All sputum expectorated during all HFCWC sessions was collected in a pre-weighed specimen container and immediately sealed. Half the subjects used higher pressure/mixed frequency on day 1 followed by lower pressure/mid-frequency on day 4. Half the patients performed lower pressure/mid-frequency on day 1 followed by higher pressure/mixed frequency on day 4. All specimens were immediately centrifuged at 21,150 g for 15 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was completely removed to eliminate saliva. The sputum wet weight was calculated after re-weighing the container with the sputum pellet. The container was then left open in an oven with the temperature set at 65°C for a minimum of 3 days to allow for complete desiccation. The sputum dry weight was calculated after re-weighing the container.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pre vs. Post Therapy SpirometryPrior to and following each airway clearance therapy session on days 1 and 4Spirometry was performed prior to, and immediately following, all HCWC sessions on Day 1. Spirometry was performed immediately prior to, and immediately following, all HFCWC sessions on Day 4. Spirometry was performed according to American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society standards.
Rheology and in Vitro Cough Transportability of Sputum Produced Immediately Following Airway Clearance Therapy SessionSputum produced during the 15 minutes immediately following airway clearance therapy sessions on day 1 and day 4Sputum was collected during the 15 minutes immediately following HFCWC sessions on day 1 and day 4. Half the subjects performed higher-pressure/mixed frequency HFCWC on Day 1 followed by lower pressure/mid-frequency HFCWC on Day 4. The other half of subjects performed lower pressure/mid-frequency on Day 1 followed by higer pressure/mixed-frequency on Day 4. Samples were studied with a rheometer (AR1000, TA Instruments, New Castle, Delaware) to assess the dynamic frequency range of stress-strain of a 20 microliter sputum sample over driving frequencies of 1-100 rad/s. Shear storage modulus (G') and shear loss modulus (G) were determined from these curves after nondestructive creep transformation. G' (or dynamic elasticity) measures stored energy and is a property of ideal solids. G is directly proportional to viscosity (viscosity x frequency) and is a property of ideal liquids.
Patients' Perceived Comfort Using the Different Settings for the Vest DeviceImmediately following each airway clearance therapy on day 1 and day 4Following each HFCWC session on day 1 and day 4, subjects completed a questionnaire that rated the comfort and efficacy of each HFCWC session using a 5-point scale. The questionnaire was entitled Post-Therapy Questionnaire. Scale range for comfort ranged from 1 (very uncomfortable) to 3 (neutral) to 5 (very comfortable). Scale range for how effective the HFCWC session was ranged from 1 (minimally effective) to 3 (neutral) to 5 (very effective).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Potentially eligible patients were identified by query of the Minnesota CF database based on age and FEV1. This list was then reviewed and patients who met additional eligibility requirements were contacted by phone or recruited during a clinic visit by one of the study investigators. Enrollment was completed between 6/1/08 and 10/31/08.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Participants
Half patients randomly assigned to HFCWC therapy first with a higher-pressure/variable frequency protocol. This entailed performing a 30 minute session with pressure of 10 and 5 minutes each at frequencies of 8,9, and 10 Hz followed by pressure of 6 and 5 minutes each at frequencies of 18, 19, and 20 Hz. This group subsequently crossed-over to the lower-pressure/mid-frequency HFCWC protocol after a washout period of 2 days. This entailed performing a HFCWC session using a pressure of 5 and frequency of 12 Hz for the entire 30 minute session. The other half of subjects were randomly assigned to perform the lower-pressure/mid-frequency protocol first followed by the higher pressure/mixed-frequency after the 2 day washout period VEST Airway Clearance System, Model 205 : Subjects will perform pulmonary function tests prior to and following each airway clearance therapy. All sputum produced during, and for 15 minutes following airway clearance therapy will be collected. Subjects
17
Total17

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Period 1: First Intervention: 30 MinutesPulmonary lab plethysmography malfunctio10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
17 Participants
Age, Continuous33.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3
Region of Enrollment
United States
17 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 170 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 170 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Sputum Wet and Dry Weight

All sputum expectorated during all HFCWC sessions was collected in a pre-weighed specimen container and immediately sealed. Half the subjects used higher pressure/mixed frequency on day 1 followed by lower pressure/mid-frequency on day 4. Half the patients performed lower pressure/mid-frequency on day 1 followed by higher pressure/mixed frequency on day 4. All specimens were immediately centrifuged at 21,150 g for 15 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was completely removed to eliminate saliva. The sputum wet weight was calculated after re-weighing the container with the sputum pellet. The container was then left open in an oven with the temperature set at 65°C for a minimum of 3 days to allow for complete desiccation. The sputum dry weight was calculated after re-weighing the container.

Time frame: Produced during each airway clearance therapy session on days 1 and 4

Population: In a previous study with similar design,21 the standard deviation for the difference in the mean sputum wet weight between treatment arms was 4.6 g. Assuming the same standard deviation for the current study, enrollment of 16 subjects provided an 80% chance of detecting a 3.5-g difference in the sputum wet weights at a significance level of .05.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Sputum Wet Weight Higher Pressure/Variable FrequencySputum Wet and Dry Weight6.4 grams
Sputum Wet Weight Lower Pressure/Mid-frequencySputum Wet and Dry Weight4.8 grams
Sputum Dry Weight Higher Pressure/Variable FrequencySputum Wet and Dry Weight0.20 grams
Sputum Dry Weight Lower Pressure/Mid-frequencySputum Wet and Dry Weight0.12 grams
p-value: 0.02ANCOVA
Secondary

Patients' Perceived Comfort Using the Different Settings for the Vest Device

Following each HFCWC session on day 1 and day 4, subjects completed a questionnaire that rated the comfort and efficacy of each HFCWC session using a 5-point scale. The questionnaire was entitled Post-Therapy Questionnaire. Scale range for comfort ranged from 1 (very uncomfortable) to 3 (neutral) to 5 (very comfortable). Scale range for how effective the HFCWC session was ranged from 1 (minimally effective) to 3 (neutral) to 5 (very effective).

Time frame: Immediately following each airway clearance therapy on day 1 and day 4

Population: power calculation not performed for secondary outcomes

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Sputum Wet Weight Higher Pressure/Variable FrequencyPatients' Perceived Comfort Using the Different Settings for the Vest Device4.5 units on a scale
Sputum Wet Weight Lower Pressure/Mid-frequencyPatients' Perceived Comfort Using the Different Settings for the Vest Device5 units on a scale
Sputum Dry Weight Higher Pressure/Variable FrequencyPatients' Perceived Comfort Using the Different Settings for the Vest Device4 units on a scale
Sputum Dry Weight Lower Pressure/Mid-frequencyPatients' Perceived Comfort Using the Different Settings for the Vest Device4 units on a scale
Secondary

Pre vs. Post Therapy Spirometry

Spirometry was performed prior to, and immediately following, all HCWC sessions on Day 1. Spirometry was performed immediately prior to, and immediately following, all HFCWC sessions on Day 4. Spirometry was performed according to American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society standards.

Time frame: Prior to and following each airway clearance therapy session on days 1 and 4

Population: Power calculation not performed for secondary outcomes.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sputum Wet Weight Higher Pressure/Variable FrequencyPre vs. Post Therapy Spirometry70 mlStandard Deviation 90
Sputum Wet Weight Lower Pressure/Mid-frequencyPre vs. Post Therapy Spirometry90 mlStandard Deviation 120
Sputum Dry Weight Higher Pressure/Variable FrequencyPre vs. Post Therapy Spirometry80 mlStandard Deviation 160
Sputum Dry Weight Lower Pressure/Mid-frequencyPre vs. Post Therapy Spirometry80 mlStandard Deviation 230
Secondary

Rheology and in Vitro Cough Transportability of Sputum Produced Immediately Following Airway Clearance Therapy Session

Sputum was collected during the 15 minutes immediately following HFCWC sessions on day 1 and day 4. Half the subjects performed higher-pressure/mixed frequency HFCWC on Day 1 followed by lower pressure/mid-frequency HFCWC on Day 4. The other half of subjects performed lower pressure/mid-frequency on Day 1 followed by higer pressure/mixed-frequency on Day 4. Samples were studied with a rheometer (AR1000, TA Instruments, New Castle, Delaware) to assess the dynamic frequency range of stress-strain of a 20 microliter sputum sample over driving frequencies of 1-100 rad/s. Shear storage modulus (G') and shear loss modulus (G) were determined from these curves after nondestructive creep transformation. G' (or dynamic elasticity) measures stored energy and is a property of ideal solids. G is directly proportional to viscosity (viscosity x frequency) and is a property of ideal liquids.

Time frame: Sputum produced during the 15 minutes immediately following airway clearance therapy sessions on day 1 and day 4

Population: power calculation not performed for secondary outcomes

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Sputum Wet Weight Higher Pressure/Variable FrequencyRheology and in Vitro Cough Transportability of Sputum Produced Immediately Following Airway Clearance Therapy Session4.43 dynes/cm^2
Sputum Wet Weight Lower Pressure/Mid-frequencyRheology and in Vitro Cough Transportability of Sputum Produced Immediately Following Airway Clearance Therapy Session4.61 dynes/cm^2
Sputum Dry Weight Higher Pressure/Variable FrequencyRheology and in Vitro Cough Transportability of Sputum Produced Immediately Following Airway Clearance Therapy Session107.3 dynes/cm^2
Sputum Dry Weight Lower Pressure/Mid-frequencyRheology and in Vitro Cough Transportability of Sputum Produced Immediately Following Airway Clearance Therapy Session130.7 dynes/cm^2
G Loss Modulus 1 Rad/Sec Higher Pressure/Variable FrequencyRheology and in Vitro Cough Transportability of Sputum Produced Immediately Following Airway Clearance Therapy Session10.7 dynes/cm^2
G Loss Modulus 1 Rad/Sec Lower Pressure/Mid-frequencyRheology and in Vitro Cough Transportability of Sputum Produced Immediately Following Airway Clearance Therapy Session7.4 dynes/cm^2
G Loss Modulus 100 Rad/Sec Higher Pressure/Variable FrequencyRheology and in Vitro Cough Transportability of Sputum Produced Immediately Following Airway Clearance Therapy Session1,224 dynes/cm^2
G Loss Modulus 100 Rad/Sec Lower Pressure/Mid-frequencyRheology and in Vitro Cough Transportability of Sputum Produced Immediately Following Airway Clearance Therapy Session862 dynes/cm^2

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026