Skip to content

Retapamulin Versus Placebo in Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions (SITL)

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Placebo-controlled, Phase III Superiority Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Placebo Ointment Applied Twice Daily for 5 Days in the Treatment of Adult and Pediatric Subjects With SITL

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00684177
Enrollment
508
Registered
2008-05-26
Start date
2008-05-31
Completion date
2009-10-31
Last updated
2016-11-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Skin Infections, Bacterial

Keywords

infection, retapamulin, secondarily-infected traumatic lesions, placebo

Brief summary

The purpose of Study TOC110977 is to demonstrate clinical superiority of Retapamulin ointment, 1%, over placebo in patients with secondarily-infected traumatic lesions, which includes secondarily-infected lacerations, abrasions and sutured wounds. Subjects 2 months of age and older will be treated with topical retapamulin or placebo ointment twice daily for 5 days. The primary endpoint of this study is the clinical response at follow-up (Day 12-14; 7-9 days after the end of therapy) in the intent-to-treat clinical population.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group study in subjects aged 2 months and older with SITL, including secondarily-infected lacerations, sutured wounds or abrasions. A laceration or sutured wound cannot exceed 10 cm in length with surrounding erythema not extending more than 2 cm from the edge of the lesion. Abrasions cannot exceed 100 cm2 in total area, or up to a maximum of 2% total body surface area for subjects \<18 years of age, with surrounding erythema not extending more than 2 cm from the edge of the abrasion. There are four study visits occurring over a 12-14 day period. At the Baseline visit (Visit 1, Day 1), subjects will be randomized to receive retapamulin or placebo ointment in a 2:1 (retapamulin:placebo) ratio. The 2:1 randomization is included to minimize the number of subjects exposed to treatment with placebo. Both active treatment and placebo will be dosed topically twice daily (BID) for 5 days. All subjects will receive a telephone call from the investigator or appropriate designee appointed by the investigator on Day 2. The subject will be interviewed to determine if there is any evidence of worsening infection. Subjects who are thought to be worsening will be instructed to come in to the clinic for an assessment. Subjects will be monitored and clinically evaluated at the On-therapy (Days 3-4), End of Therapy (Days 7-9), and Follow-up (Days 12-14) visits. Randomization will be center-based and performed using an appropriate Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS), an automated telephone system. The block size will remain confidential. Subjects are considered to have completed the study if they meet all inclusion/exclusion criteria, are considered compliant with study medication, and attend all study visits as defined by the protocol.

Interventions

Provided as approximately 10 grams of an off-white smooth ointment in collapsible aluminum tubes with reverse taper puncture tip caps.

Provided as approximately 10 grams of an off-white smooth ointment in collapsible aluminum tubes with reverse taper puncture tip caps.

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Months to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* subject is aged 2 months or older * subject has secondarily-infected traumatic lesion (laceration, sutured wound or abrasion) * negative urine pregnancy test * subject has total skin infection rating scale score of at least 8, including pus/exudate score of at least 3 * subject and/or parent/legal guardian is willing and able to comply with protocol * subject or parent/legal guardian has given written informed consent or assent as applicable

Exclusion criteria

* previous hypersensitivity to pleuromutilin * secondarily-infected animal/human bite or puncture wound * subject has an abscess * chronic ulcerative lesion * underlying skin disease * systemic signs and symptoms of infection * infection not appropriately treated with topical antibiotic * infection requires surgical intervention prior to or during study * subject received systemic antibacterial or steroid, or topical therapeutic agent within 24 hours of entry into study * serious underlying disease * subject pregnant, breast feeding or planning a pregnancy, or unacceptable method of contraception * other investigational drug within 30 days of study entry * subject previously enrolled in this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Clinical Success and Failure at Follow-up (7-9 Days Post Therapy) for the Primary Efficacy PopulationDays 12-14Clinical Success at follow-up was defined as Resolution of clinically meaningful signs and symptoms of infection recorded at baseline including a pus/exudate Skin Infection Rating Scale (SIRS) score of 0. Clinical response at follow-up was classified as Clinical Failure for all other cases. The SIRS consists of seven items (pus/exudates, crusting, erythema/inflammation, tissue warmth, tissue edema, itching and pain). Each item has a score ranging from 0 to 6 (0=absent, 6=severe). The SIRS total score was calculated as the sum of the scores of all 7 SIRS items.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Clinical Success and Failure at Follow-up (7-9 Days Post Therapy) for the Intent-to-Treat Bacteriology (ITTB) Subset of the Primary Efficacy PopulationDays 12-14Clinical Success at follow-up was defined as Resolution of clinically meaningful signs and symptoms of infection recorded at baseline including a pus/exudate Skin Infection Rating Scale (SIRS) score of 0. Clinical response at follow-up was classified as Clinical Failure for all other cases. The SIRS consists of seven items (pus/exudates, crusting, erythema/inflammation, tissue warmth, tissue edema, itching and pain). Each item has a score ranging from 0 to 6 (0=absent, 6=severe). The SIRS total score was calculated as the sum of the scores of all 7 SIRS items.
Number of Participants With Microbiological Success and Failure at Follow-up (7-9 Days Post Therapy)Days 12-14The by pathogen microbiological outcome was determined by comparing the baseline culture results to those at follow-up. The by subject microbiological response was Microbiological Success if the microbiological outcomes for all baseline pathogens (bps) belong to Eradication (elimination of bps), Presumed Eradication (clinical outcome was success; no culture was obtained due to lack of culturable material), or Colonization (previously unidentified pathogen is identified at end of therapy in participant who is resolved/improved); otherwise, response was Microbiological Failure.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Outcome at End of Therapy (2-4 Days Post Therapy)Days 7-9Clinical outcome is determined by the investigator based on signs and symptoms (S/S) at the end of therapy evaluation. The 4 clincal outcome categories are: clinical success, resolution of clinically meaningful S/S of infection recorded at baseline (BL), including a pus/exudates score of 0; clinical improvement, improvement of S/S of infection recorded at BL to such an extent that no further antimicrobial therapy is necessary; clinical failure, insufficient improvement of deterioration of S/S of infection recorded at BL such that additional antibiotic therapy is required; unable to determine.
Number of Baseline Pathogens With the Indicated Microbiological Outcome at End of Therapy (2-4 Days Post Therapy)Days 7-9The by pathogen microbiological outcome was determined by comparing the baseline culture results to those at follow-up. The results presented below pooled all baseline pathogens (bps). Eradication: elimination of bps. Presumed Eradication: clinical outcome was success; no culture was obtained due to lack of culturable material. Presumed Improvement: clinical outcome was improvement such that no culture was obtained due to lack of culturable material. Persistence: bps still present. Presumed persistence: clinical failure and no culture was obtained.
Number of Participants With Therapeutic Success and Failure at Follow-up (7-9 Days Post Therapy)Follow-up (Days 12-14)Therapeutic Success (Succ) was referred to as both Clinical Succ and Microbiological (Micro) Succ at Follow-up. Clinical Succ was the Resolution of baseline signs/symptoms of infection with a pus score of 0. A participant was Micro Succ if the micro outcome for all baseline pathogens (bps) belonged to Eradication (elimination of bps), Presumed Eradication (clinical outcome is success; no culturable material), or Colonization (new pathogen is identified at end of therapy in participants who are resolved/improved). All other combinations were deemed Therapeutic Failures.

Countries

Argentina, Brazil, India, South Africa, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 508 participants were randomized. One participant did not receive treatment; thus, no data were collected for this participant. Only 507 participants were included in the analysis.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Retapamulin
Topical retapamulin ointment, 1% twice daily for 5 days
343
Placebo
Matching placebo
164
Total507

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event43
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy1015
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up21
Overall StudyOther12
Overall StudyPhysician Decision20
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalRetapamulin
Age, Continuous28.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.32
31.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.7
32.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.77
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American/African Heritage
71 participants215 participants144 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaskan Native
3 participants12 participants9 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - Central / South Asian Heritage
1 participants1 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - East Asian Heritage
2 participants6 participants4 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - South East Asian Heritage
15 participants48 participants33 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mixed Race
9 participants28 participants19 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
2 participants3 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - Arabic/North African Heritage
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - White/Caucasian/European Heritage
61 participants193 participants132 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
63 Participants207 Participants144 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
101 Participants300 Participants199 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 3424 / 165
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 3421 / 165

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Clinical Success and Failure at Follow-up (7-9 Days Post Therapy) for the Primary Efficacy Population

Clinical Success at follow-up was defined as Resolution of clinically meaningful signs and symptoms of infection recorded at baseline including a pus/exudate Skin Infection Rating Scale (SIRS) score of 0. Clinical response at follow-up was classified as Clinical Failure for all other cases. The SIRS consists of seven items (pus/exudates, crusting, erythema/inflammation, tissue warmth, tissue edema, itching and pain). Each item has a score ranging from 0 to 6 (0=absent, 6=severe). The SIRS total score was calculated as the sum of the scores of all 7 SIRS items.

Time frame: Days 12-14

Population: Primary Efficacy Population: ITTC participants (par.) with baseline pus/exudate \>=3 who were enrolled under the original protocol with data captured under eCRF V1 and who were enrolled under protocol amendments with data captured under eCRF V2; ITTC (Intent-to-treat Clinical): all randomized par. who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RetapamulinNumber of Participants With Clinical Success and Failure at Follow-up (7-9 Days Post Therapy) for the Primary Efficacy PopulationClinical Success184 participants
RetapamulinNumber of Participants With Clinical Success and Failure at Follow-up (7-9 Days Post Therapy) for the Primary Efficacy PopulationClinical Failure62 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Success and Failure at Follow-up (7-9 Days Post Therapy) for the Primary Efficacy PopulationClinical Success75 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Success and Failure at Follow-up (7-9 Days Post Therapy) for the Primary Efficacy PopulationClinical Failure38 participants
p-value: 0.09895% CI: [-1.6, 18.4]Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Baseline Pathogens With the Indicated Microbiological Outcome at End of Therapy (2-4 Days Post Therapy)

The by pathogen microbiological outcome was determined by comparing the baseline culture results to those at follow-up. The results presented below pooled all baseline pathogens (bps). Eradication: elimination of bps. Presumed Eradication: clinical outcome was success; no culture was obtained due to lack of culturable material. Presumed Improvement: clinical outcome was improvement such that no culture was obtained due to lack of culturable material. Persistence: bps still present. Presumed persistence: clinical failure and no culture was obtained.

Time frame: Days 7-9

Population: ITTB subset of Primary Efficacy Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RetapamulinNumber of Baseline Pathogens With the Indicated Microbiological Outcome at End of Therapy (2-4 Days Post Therapy)Presumed Eradication137 baseline pathogens
RetapamulinNumber of Baseline Pathogens With the Indicated Microbiological Outcome at End of Therapy (2-4 Days Post Therapy)Persistence3 baseline pathogens
RetapamulinNumber of Baseline Pathogens With the Indicated Microbiological Outcome at End of Therapy (2-4 Days Post Therapy)Presumed Improvement94 baseline pathogens
RetapamulinNumber of Baseline Pathogens With the Indicated Microbiological Outcome at End of Therapy (2-4 Days Post Therapy)Presumed Persistence5 baseline pathogens
RetapamulinNumber of Baseline Pathogens With the Indicated Microbiological Outcome at End of Therapy (2-4 Days Post Therapy)Eradication4 baseline pathogens
PlaceboNumber of Baseline Pathogens With the Indicated Microbiological Outcome at End of Therapy (2-4 Days Post Therapy)Presumed Persistence8 baseline pathogens
PlaceboNumber of Baseline Pathogens With the Indicated Microbiological Outcome at End of Therapy (2-4 Days Post Therapy)Eradication5 baseline pathogens
PlaceboNumber of Baseline Pathogens With the Indicated Microbiological Outcome at End of Therapy (2-4 Days Post Therapy)Presumed Eradication49 baseline pathogens
PlaceboNumber of Baseline Pathogens With the Indicated Microbiological Outcome at End of Therapy (2-4 Days Post Therapy)Presumed Improvement35 baseline pathogens
PlaceboNumber of Baseline Pathogens With the Indicated Microbiological Outcome at End of Therapy (2-4 Days Post Therapy)Persistence13 baseline pathogens
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinical Success and Failure at Follow-up (7-9 Days Post Therapy) for the Intent-to-Treat Bacteriology (ITTB) Subset of the Primary Efficacy Population

Clinical Success at follow-up was defined as Resolution of clinically meaningful signs and symptoms of infection recorded at baseline including a pus/exudate Skin Infection Rating Scale (SIRS) score of 0. Clinical response at follow-up was classified as Clinical Failure for all other cases. The SIRS consists of seven items (pus/exudates, crusting, erythema/inflammation, tissue warmth, tissue edema, itching and pain). Each item has a score ranging from 0 to 6 (0=absent, 6=severe). The SIRS total score was calculated as the sum of the scores of all 7 SIRS items.

Time frame: Days 12-14

Population: ITTB subset of Primary Efficacy Population: participants in the Primary Efficacy Population (see analysis population description in the Primary Outcome section) who had at least one pathogen isolated at the baseline visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RetapamulinNumber of Participants With Clinical Success and Failure at Follow-up (7-9 Days Post Therapy) for the Intent-to-Treat Bacteriology (ITTB) Subset of the Primary Efficacy PopulationClinical Success139 participants
RetapamulinNumber of Participants With Clinical Success and Failure at Follow-up (7-9 Days Post Therapy) for the Intent-to-Treat Bacteriology (ITTB) Subset of the Primary Efficacy PopulationClinical Failure43 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Success and Failure at Follow-up (7-9 Days Post Therapy) for the Intent-to-Treat Bacteriology (ITTB) Subset of the Primary Efficacy PopulationClinical Success54 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Success and Failure at Follow-up (7-9 Days Post Therapy) for the Intent-to-Treat Bacteriology (ITTB) Subset of the Primary Efficacy PopulationClinical Failure30 participants
p-value: 0.0495% CI: [0.6, 23.6]Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants With Microbiological Success and Failure at Follow-up (7-9 Days Post Therapy)

The by pathogen microbiological outcome was determined by comparing the baseline culture results to those at follow-up. The by subject microbiological response was Microbiological Success if the microbiological outcomes for all baseline pathogens (bps) belong to Eradication (elimination of bps), Presumed Eradication (clinical outcome was success; no culture was obtained due to lack of culturable material), or Colonization (previously unidentified pathogen is identified at end of therapy in participant who is resolved/improved); otherwise, response was Microbiological Failure.

Time frame: Days 12-14

Population: ITTB subset of Primary Efficacy Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RetapamulinNumber of Participants With Microbiological Success and Failure at Follow-up (7-9 Days Post Therapy)Microbiological Success139 participants
RetapamulinNumber of Participants With Microbiological Success and Failure at Follow-up (7-9 Days Post Therapy)Microbiological Failure43 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Microbiological Success and Failure at Follow-up (7-9 Days Post Therapy)Microbiological Success54 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Microbiological Success and Failure at Follow-up (7-9 Days Post Therapy)Microbiological Failure30 participants
p-value: 0.0495% CI: [0.6, 23.6]Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Outcome at End of Therapy (2-4 Days Post Therapy)

Clinical outcome is determined by the investigator based on signs and symptoms (S/S) at the end of therapy evaluation. The 4 clincal outcome categories are: clinical success, resolution of clinically meaningful S/S of infection recorded at baseline (BL), including a pus/exudates score of 0; clinical improvement, improvement of S/S of infection recorded at BL to such an extent that no further antimicrobial therapy is necessary; clinical failure, insufficient improvement of deterioration of S/S of infection recorded at BL such that additional antibiotic therapy is required; unable to determine.

Time frame: Days 7-9

Population: Primary Efficacy Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RetapamulinNumber of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Outcome at End of Therapy (2-4 Days Post Therapy)Clinical Success130 participants
RetapamulinNumber of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Outcome at End of Therapy (2-4 Days Post Therapy)Clinical Improvement102 participants
RetapamulinNumber of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Outcome at End of Therapy (2-4 Days Post Therapy)Clinical Failure11 participants
RetapamulinNumber of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Outcome at End of Therapy (2-4 Days Post Therapy)Unable to Determine3 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Outcome at End of Therapy (2-4 Days Post Therapy)Unable to Determine2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Outcome at End of Therapy (2-4 Days Post Therapy)Clinical Success52 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Outcome at End of Therapy (2-4 Days Post Therapy)Clinical Failure14 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Outcome at End of Therapy (2-4 Days Post Therapy)Clinical Improvement45 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Therapeutic Success and Failure at Follow-up (7-9 Days Post Therapy)

Therapeutic Success (Succ) was referred to as both Clinical Succ and Microbiological (Micro) Succ at Follow-up. Clinical Succ was the Resolution of baseline signs/symptoms of infection with a pus score of 0. A participant was Micro Succ if the micro outcome for all baseline pathogens (bps) belonged to Eradication (elimination of bps), Presumed Eradication (clinical outcome is success; no culturable material), or Colonization (new pathogen is identified at end of therapy in participants who are resolved/improved). All other combinations were deemed Therapeutic Failures.

Time frame: Follow-up (Days 12-14)

Population: ITTB subset of Primary Efficacy Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RetapamulinNumber of Participants With Therapeutic Success and Failure at Follow-up (7-9 Days Post Therapy)Success139 participants
RetapamulinNumber of Participants With Therapeutic Success and Failure at Follow-up (7-9 Days Post Therapy)Failure43 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Therapeutic Success and Failure at Follow-up (7-9 Days Post Therapy)Success54 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Therapeutic Success and Failure at Follow-up (7-9 Days Post Therapy)Failure30 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026