Heart Failure, Ventricular Dyssynchrony
Conditions
Keywords
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, Heart Failure, Ventricular Dyssynchrony, Mechanical Dyssynchrony, Intraventricular Dyssynchrony, Echocardiography, Normal QRS, Heart Disease, EchoCRT
Brief summary
The EchoCRT trial evaluates the effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) on mortality and morbidity of subjects with heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction, already receiving optimized HF medication, with a narrow QRS width (\< 130 ms) and echocardiographic evidence of ventricular dyssynchrony.
Interventions
All patients will receive a commercially available BIOTRONIK Lumax HF-T CRT-D system with ICD back-up enabled. Patients will be randomized to CRT=ON or CRT=OFF.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Men and women 18 years of age or older. * Understand the nature of the procedure. * Give written informed consent. * Willing and able to complete all testing required by the clinical protocol. * Indication for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). * NYHA class III-IV within the last three months prior to enrollment and at baseline (at baseline only: also Stage C according to ACC/AHA guidelines). * Stable optimal pharmacologic therapy for HF. * An ejection fraction ≤ 35% within one year prior to enrollment and confirmed on the baseline echocardiogram. * Increased left ventricular dimension, defined as LVEDD ≥ 55 mm. * Resting QRS duration \< 130 ms evidenced by a historical 12-lead ECG prior to enrollment and at baseline. * Ventricular dyssynchrony assessed by echocardiography locally and confirmed by the echo core lab. One of the two following criteria has to be present to include the subject in the study: * Intra-left ventricular dyssynchrony measured by color Tissue Doppler Imaging (TDI) with an opposing wall delay of ≥ 80 ms in the 4-chamber or apical long-axis view. * Speckle-tracking radial strain septal-posterior wall delay ≥ 130 ms.
Exclusion criteria
* Implanted pacemaker or defibrillator with \>10% ventricular pacing, as demonstrated by device statistics averaged over at least the last three months prior to enrollment. * Women who are pregnant, lactating, or planning to become pregnant during the course of the trial. * Bradycardia pacing indication. * Surgically correctable primary valvular heart disease, i.e. aortic stenosis, torn cordae, or flail segment. * Coronary artery bypass graft surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention (balloon and/or stent angioplasty) within the past 3 months prior to enrollment. * Enzyme-positive myocardial infarction within the past 3 months prior to enrollment. * Angiographic evidence of coronary disease, candidates for coronary revascularization likely to undergo coronary artery bypass graft surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention in the next 3 months. * Irreversible brain damage from preexisting cerebral disease. * Reversible non-ischemic cardiomyopathy such as acute viral myocarditis. * Permanent second or third degree heart block. * Chagas disease. * Persistent or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation within one month prior to enrollment. * Expected to receive heart transplantation within six months. * Current inotropic therapy. * Acutely decompensated heart failure. * Contrast dye allergy and unable or unwilling to undergo pretreatment with steroids and/or diphenhydramine. * Life expectancy of less than six months. * Presence of any disease, other than the subject's cardiac disease associated with a reduced likelihood of survival for the duration of the trial, (e.g. cancer). * Significant renal insufficiency defined as a serum creatinine \> 2.5 mg/dL (\> 221 µmol/L) within the last four weeks prior to enrollment.. * Liver failure, defined as three times the upper limit of normal for aminotransferases. * Participation in any other clinical trial. * Unable to return for follow-up visits due to distance from the clinic. * Do not anticipate being a resident of the area for the scheduled duration of the trial.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Composite Primary Endpoint: Number of Subjects With First Hospitalization for Worsening Heart Failure or Death | From date of randomization until date of death from any cause or date of first hospitalization for worsening heart failure, whichever came first, assessed up to date of study exit, with a mean treatment duration of 1.6 years | The primary efficacy endpoint will evaluate the effect of CRT=ON versus CRT=OFF in time to event of a combined endpoint of all-cause mortality or first hospitalization for worsening heart failure. |
| Number of Subjects That Underwent Implant Attempt Without System- or Implant-Related Complications (Complication-Free) | 6 months | The primary safety endpoint will evaluate the complication-free rate of the Lumax HF-T CRT-D devices in the narrow QRS subject population. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Scores From Baseline to 6-Month Follow-up | Changes between baseline and 6 months | Quality of Life was evaluated using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLHF) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire.The questionnaire consists of 21 questions to measure the subjects' perception of how their HF and its treatment affected their ability to live as they wanted during the last month. The questions describe different ways in which some people are affected (i.e. physical, socioeconomic, and psychological impairments). If a question does not apply to a subject or is not related to their HF, then they can answer with a 0. If it does apply to them, then they can rate (from 1 to 5) how much it has affected them. From the 21 questions, the lowest possible total score is 0, and the highest possible total score is 105. A lower score is desirable. Therefore, a negative change in QOL score from baseline to 6 months represents an improvement in quality of life, while a positive change in QOL score from baseline to 6 months represents a worsening in quality of life. |
| Rate of Hospitalizations for Worsening Heart Failure (Hospitalizations Per Subject-year) | Study duration from randomization to study exit | Evaluate the effects of CRT=ON compared to CRT=OFF on the rate of hospitalization for worsening heart failure (WHF). |
| Number of Subjects With All-cause Mortality | From date of randomization up to date of study exit, with a mean treatment duration of 1.6 years | Evaluate the all-cause mortality rate between the CRT=ON compared to CRT=OFF group. |
| Composite Score of Death, Hospitalization for Worsening Heart Failure and Change in Quality of Life (QOL) | Composite of death, worsening heart failure hospitalization (up to 24 months), and change in QOL (at 6 months) | Evaluate the effects of CRT=ON compared to CRT=OFF in relation to a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, hospitalization for worsening heart failure and change in the MLHF Quality of Life Questionnaire. This composite endpoint used a weighted scoring scale based on the African-American Heart Failure Trial (A-HeFT) study Endpoint Score. (Taylor, AL, Ziesche, S, Yancy, C, et al. Combination of Isosorbide Dinitrate and Hydralazine in Blacks with Heart Failure. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:2049-57.) Composite Endpoint Scoring: Vital Status: Death (-3), Survival to end of trial (0), Hospitalization: 1st hospitalization for HF (-1), No hospitalization (0), QOL score:\* Improvement by ≥ 10 units (+2), Improvement by 5-9 units (+1), Change by \< 5 units (0), Worsening by 5-9 units (-1), Worsening by ≥ 10 (-2). Possible total score -6 to +2. \*QOL score details are provided in Secondary Outcome Measure 5. |
| New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification Change | 6 months | Evaluate the effects of CRT=ON compared to CRT=OFF in relation to the change in NYHA classification. NYHA classes: Class I - Subjects with cardiac disease, but without resulting limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation,dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class II - Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class III - Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class IV - Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased. |
Countries
Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
After enrollment, baseline eligibility criteria were assessed (e.g. ventricular dyssynchrony, NYHA, QRS width, etc.) to qualify for implant. 1680 subjects were enrolled. 825 subjects did not qualify for implant and were exited from the study. 855 subjects qualified for implant. 821 subjects were successfully implanted. 809 subjects were randomized.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| CRT=ON Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy activated. | 404 |
| CRT=OFF Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy deactivated. | 405 |
| Total | 809 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 46 | 30 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 5 | 6 |
| Overall Study | Vital status follow-up only | 3 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawn due to study closure | 337 | 338 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawn prior to study closure | 13 | 28 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | CRT=ON | Total | CRT=OFF |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 57.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9 | 58.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 | 58.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6 |
| Region of Enrollment Australia | 12 participants | 23 participants | 11 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Austria | 6 participants | 14 participants | 8 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Belgium | 6 participants | 12 participants | 6 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Canada | 13 participants | 27 participants | 14 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Czech Republic | 12 participants | 23 participants | 11 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Denmark | 24 participants | 47 participants | 23 participants |
| Region of Enrollment France | 10 participants | 21 participants | 11 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Germany | 41 participants | 82 participants | 41 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Israel | 18 participants | 34 participants | 16 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Italy | 4 participants | 8 participants | 4 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Netherlands | 10 participants | 20 participants | 10 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Poland | 0 participants | 2 participants | 2 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Portugal | 4 participants | 7 participants | 3 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Spain | 18 participants | 36 participants | 18 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Switzerland | 11 participants | 22 participants | 11 participants |
| Region of Enrollment United Kingdom | 19 participants | 37 participants | 18 participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 196 participants | 394 participants | 198 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 110 Participants | 224 Participants | 114 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 294 Participants | 585 Participants | 291 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 45 / 404 | 26 / 405 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 300 / 404 | 274 / 405 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 259 / 404 | 221 / 405 |
Outcome results
Composite Primary Endpoint: Number of Subjects With First Hospitalization for Worsening Heart Failure or Death
The primary efficacy endpoint will evaluate the effect of CRT=ON versus CRT=OFF in time to event of a combined endpoint of all-cause mortality or first hospitalization for worsening heart failure.
Time frame: From date of randomization until date of death from any cause or date of first hospitalization for worsening heart failure, whichever came first, assessed up to date of study exit, with a mean treatment duration of 1.6 years
Population: This analysis was carried out according to the intention-to-treat principle. Follow-up was censored at study closure, date of death, LVAD, heart transplant, withdrawal from the study, or loss to follow-up, whichever came first. 4 deaths in CRT OFF group and 1 death in CRT ON group were after LVAD/transplant and are not included in this analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| CRT=ON | Composite Primary Endpoint: Number of Subjects With First Hospitalization for Worsening Heart Failure or Death | 116 participants |
| CRT=OFF | Composite Primary Endpoint: Number of Subjects With First Hospitalization for Worsening Heart Failure or Death | 102 participants |
Number of Subjects That Underwent Implant Attempt Without System- or Implant-Related Complications (Complication-Free)
The primary safety endpoint will evaluate the complication-free rate of the Lumax HF-T CRT-D devices in the narrow QRS subject population.
Time frame: 6 months
Population: The primary safety endpoint included all subjects undergoing an implant procedure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| CRT=ON | Number of Subjects That Underwent Implant Attempt Without System- or Implant-Related Complications (Complication-Free) | 766 participants |
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Scores From Baseline to 6-Month Follow-up
Quality of Life was evaluated using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLHF) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire.The questionnaire consists of 21 questions to measure the subjects' perception of how their HF and its treatment affected their ability to live as they wanted during the last month. The questions describe different ways in which some people are affected (i.e. physical, socioeconomic, and psychological impairments). If a question does not apply to a subject or is not related to their HF, then they can answer with a 0. If it does apply to them, then they can rate (from 1 to 5) how much it has affected them. From the 21 questions, the lowest possible total score is 0, and the highest possible total score is 105. A lower score is desirable. Therefore, a negative change in QOL score from baseline to 6 months represents an improvement in quality of life, while a positive change in QOL score from baseline to 6 months represents a worsening in quality of life.
Time frame: Changes between baseline and 6 months
Population: Subjects with Baseline \& 6-month QOL scores. 25 subjects (15 CRT ON, 10 CRT OFF) that were in the study at least 6 months and that did not have 6-month QOL data, had 3-month data inputted using the LOCF principle.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRT=ON | Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Scores From Baseline to 6-Month Follow-up | -12.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.9 |
| CRT=OFF | Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Scores From Baseline to 6-Month Follow-up | -13.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.4 |
Composite Score of Death, Hospitalization for Worsening Heart Failure and Change in Quality of Life (QOL)
Evaluate the effects of CRT=ON compared to CRT=OFF in relation to a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, hospitalization for worsening heart failure and change in the MLHF Quality of Life Questionnaire. This composite endpoint used a weighted scoring scale based on the African-American Heart Failure Trial (A-HeFT) study Endpoint Score. (Taylor, AL, Ziesche, S, Yancy, C, et al. Combination of Isosorbide Dinitrate and Hydralazine in Blacks with Heart Failure. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:2049-57.) Composite Endpoint Scoring: Vital Status: Death (-3), Survival to end of trial (0), Hospitalization: 1st hospitalization for HF (-1), No hospitalization (0), QOL score:\* Improvement by ≥ 10 units (+2), Improvement by 5-9 units (+1), Change by \< 5 units (0), Worsening by 5-9 units (-1), Worsening by ≥ 10 (-2). Possible total score -6 to +2. \*QOL score details are provided in Secondary Outcome Measure 5.
Time frame: Composite of death, worsening heart failure hospitalization (up to 24 months), and change in QOL (at 6 months)
Population: Subjects with a potential of 24 months of follow-up.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRT=ON | Composite Score of Death, Hospitalization for Worsening Heart Failure and Change in Quality of Life (QOL) | -1.6 Composite score | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
| CRT=OFF | Composite Score of Death, Hospitalization for Worsening Heart Failure and Change in Quality of Life (QOL) | -1.5 Composite score | Standard Deviation 1.6 |
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification Change
Evaluate the effects of CRT=ON compared to CRT=OFF in relation to the change in NYHA classification. NYHA classes: Class I - Subjects with cardiac disease, but without resulting limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation,dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class II - Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class III - Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class IV - Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
Time frame: 6 months
Population: Subjects with Baseline \& 6-month NYHA classification. 18 subjects (9 CRT ON, 9 CRT OFF) that were in the study at least 6 months and that did not have 6-month NYHA data, had the most recent post-randomization NYHA inputted using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) principle.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRT=ON | New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification Change | Improved at least 1 Class | 213 Participants |
| CRT=ON | New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification Change | No Change | 116 Participants |
| CRT=ON | New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification Change | Deteriorated at least 1 Class | 18 Participants |
| CRT=OFF | New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification Change | Improved at least 1 Class | 185 Participants |
| CRT=OFF | New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification Change | No Change | 141 Participants |
| CRT=OFF | New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification Change | Deteriorated at least 1 Class | 12 Participants |
Number of Subjects With All-cause Mortality
Evaluate the all-cause mortality rate between the CRT=ON compared to CRT=OFF group.
Time frame: From date of randomization up to date of study exit, with a mean treatment duration of 1.6 years
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| CRT=ON | Number of Subjects With All-cause Mortality | 45 Participants |
| CRT=OFF | Number of Subjects With All-cause Mortality | 26 Participants |
Rate of Hospitalizations for Worsening Heart Failure (Hospitalizations Per Subject-year)
Evaluate the effects of CRT=ON compared to CRT=OFF on the rate of hospitalization for worsening heart failure (WHF).
Time frame: Study duration from randomization to study exit
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| CRT=ON | Rate of Hospitalizations for Worsening Heart Failure (Hospitalizations Per Subject-year) | 0.36 Hospitalizations per subj-yr |
| CRT=OFF | Rate of Hospitalizations for Worsening Heart Failure (Hospitalizations Per Subject-year) | 0.28 Hospitalizations per subj-yr |