Skip to content

Echocardiography Guided Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (EchoCRT)

Echocardiography Guided Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (EchoCRT)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00683696
Acronym
EchoCRT
Enrollment
1680
Registered
2008-05-23
Start date
2008-08-31
Completion date
2013-03-31
Last updated
2018-01-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure, Ventricular Dyssynchrony

Keywords

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, Heart Failure, Ventricular Dyssynchrony, Mechanical Dyssynchrony, Intraventricular Dyssynchrony, Echocardiography, Normal QRS, Heart Disease, EchoCRT

Brief summary

The EchoCRT trial evaluates the effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) on mortality and morbidity of subjects with heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction, already receiving optimized HF medication, with a narrow QRS width (\< 130 ms) and echocardiographic evidence of ventricular dyssynchrony.

Interventions

DEVICEImplantable Cardioverter Defibrillator with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (BIOTRONIK Lumax HF-T CRT-D)

All patients will receive a commercially available BIOTRONIK Lumax HF-T CRT-D system with ICD back-up enabled. Patients will be randomized to CRT=ON or CRT=OFF.

Sponsors

University of Zurich
CollaboratorOTHER
Biotronik, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men and women 18 years of age or older. * Understand the nature of the procedure. * Give written informed consent. * Willing and able to complete all testing required by the clinical protocol. * Indication for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). * NYHA class III-IV within the last three months prior to enrollment and at baseline (at baseline only: also Stage C according to ACC/AHA guidelines). * Stable optimal pharmacologic therapy for HF. * An ejection fraction ≤ 35% within one year prior to enrollment and confirmed on the baseline echocardiogram. * Increased left ventricular dimension, defined as LVEDD ≥ 55 mm. * Resting QRS duration \< 130 ms evidenced by a historical 12-lead ECG prior to enrollment and at baseline. * Ventricular dyssynchrony assessed by echocardiography locally and confirmed by the echo core lab. One of the two following criteria has to be present to include the subject in the study: * Intra-left ventricular dyssynchrony measured by color Tissue Doppler Imaging (TDI) with an opposing wall delay of ≥ 80 ms in the 4-chamber or apical long-axis view. * Speckle-tracking radial strain septal-posterior wall delay ≥ 130 ms.

Exclusion criteria

* Implanted pacemaker or defibrillator with \>10% ventricular pacing, as demonstrated by device statistics averaged over at least the last three months prior to enrollment. * Women who are pregnant, lactating, or planning to become pregnant during the course of the trial. * Bradycardia pacing indication. * Surgically correctable primary valvular heart disease, i.e. aortic stenosis, torn cordae, or flail segment. * Coronary artery bypass graft surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention (balloon and/or stent angioplasty) within the past 3 months prior to enrollment. * Enzyme-positive myocardial infarction within the past 3 months prior to enrollment. * Angiographic evidence of coronary disease, candidates for coronary revascularization likely to undergo coronary artery bypass graft surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention in the next 3 months. * Irreversible brain damage from preexisting cerebral disease. * Reversible non-ischemic cardiomyopathy such as acute viral myocarditis. * Permanent second or third degree heart block. * Chagas disease. * Persistent or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation within one month prior to enrollment. * Expected to receive heart transplantation within six months. * Current inotropic therapy. * Acutely decompensated heart failure. * Contrast dye allergy and unable or unwilling to undergo pretreatment with steroids and/or diphenhydramine. * Life expectancy of less than six months. * Presence of any disease, other than the subject's cardiac disease associated with a reduced likelihood of survival for the duration of the trial, (e.g. cancer). * Significant renal insufficiency defined as a serum creatinine \> 2.5 mg/dL (\> 221 µmol/L) within the last four weeks prior to enrollment.. * Liver failure, defined as three times the upper limit of normal for aminotransferases. * Participation in any other clinical trial. * Unable to return for follow-up visits due to distance from the clinic. * Do not anticipate being a resident of the area for the scheduled duration of the trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite Primary Endpoint: Number of Subjects With First Hospitalization for Worsening Heart Failure or DeathFrom date of randomization until date of death from any cause or date of first hospitalization for worsening heart failure, whichever came first, assessed up to date of study exit, with a mean treatment duration of 1.6 yearsThe primary efficacy endpoint will evaluate the effect of CRT=ON versus CRT=OFF in time to event of a combined endpoint of all-cause mortality or first hospitalization for worsening heart failure.
Number of Subjects That Underwent Implant Attempt Without System- or Implant-Related Complications (Complication-Free)6 monthsThe primary safety endpoint will evaluate the complication-free rate of the Lumax HF-T CRT-D devices in the narrow QRS subject population.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Scores From Baseline to 6-Month Follow-upChanges between baseline and 6 monthsQuality of Life was evaluated using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLHF) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire.The questionnaire consists of 21 questions to measure the subjects' perception of how their HF and its treatment affected their ability to live as they wanted during the last month. The questions describe different ways in which some people are affected (i.e. physical, socioeconomic, and psychological impairments). If a question does not apply to a subject or is not related to their HF, then they can answer with a 0. If it does apply to them, then they can rate (from 1 to 5) how much it has affected them. From the 21 questions, the lowest possible total score is 0, and the highest possible total score is 105. A lower score is desirable. Therefore, a negative change in QOL score from baseline to 6 months represents an improvement in quality of life, while a positive change in QOL score from baseline to 6 months represents a worsening in quality of life.
Rate of Hospitalizations for Worsening Heart Failure (Hospitalizations Per Subject-year)Study duration from randomization to study exitEvaluate the effects of CRT=ON compared to CRT=OFF on the rate of hospitalization for worsening heart failure (WHF).
Number of Subjects With All-cause MortalityFrom date of randomization up to date of study exit, with a mean treatment duration of 1.6 yearsEvaluate the all-cause mortality rate between the CRT=ON compared to CRT=OFF group.
Composite Score of Death, Hospitalization for Worsening Heart Failure and Change in Quality of Life (QOL)Composite of death, worsening heart failure hospitalization (up to 24 months), and change in QOL (at 6 months)Evaluate the effects of CRT=ON compared to CRT=OFF in relation to a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, hospitalization for worsening heart failure and change in the MLHF Quality of Life Questionnaire. This composite endpoint used a weighted scoring scale based on the African-American Heart Failure Trial (A-HeFT) study Endpoint Score. (Taylor, AL, Ziesche, S, Yancy, C, et al. Combination of Isosorbide Dinitrate and Hydralazine in Blacks with Heart Failure. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:2049-57.) Composite Endpoint Scoring: Vital Status: Death (-3), Survival to end of trial (0), Hospitalization: 1st hospitalization for HF (-1), No hospitalization (0), QOL score:\* Improvement by ≥ 10 units (+2), Improvement by 5-9 units (+1), Change by \< 5 units (0), Worsening by 5-9 units (-1), Worsening by ≥ 10 (-2). Possible total score -6 to +2. \*QOL score details are provided in Secondary Outcome Measure 5.
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification Change6 monthsEvaluate the effects of CRT=ON compared to CRT=OFF in relation to the change in NYHA classification. NYHA classes: Class I - Subjects with cardiac disease, but without resulting limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation,dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class II - Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class III - Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class IV - Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.

Countries

Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

After enrollment, baseline eligibility criteria were assessed (e.g. ventricular dyssynchrony, NYHA, QRS width, etc.) to qualify for implant. 1680 subjects were enrolled. 825 subjects did not qualify for implant and were exited from the study. 855 subjects qualified for implant. 821 subjects were successfully implanted. 809 subjects were randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CRT=ON
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy activated.
404
CRT=OFF
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy deactivated.
405
Total809

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath4630
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up56
Overall StudyVital status follow-up only33
Overall StudyWithdrawn due to study closure337338
Overall StudyWithdrawn prior to study closure1328

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCRT=ONTotalCRT=OFF
Age, Continuous57.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
58.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7
58.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
Region of Enrollment
Australia
12 participants23 participants11 participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
6 participants14 participants8 participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
6 participants12 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
13 participants27 participants14 participants
Region of Enrollment
Czech Republic
12 participants23 participants11 participants
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
24 participants47 participants23 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
10 participants21 participants11 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
41 participants82 participants41 participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
18 participants34 participants16 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
4 participants8 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
10 participants20 participants10 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
0 participants2 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Portugal
4 participants7 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
18 participants36 participants18 participants
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
11 participants22 participants11 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
19 participants37 participants18 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
196 participants394 participants198 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
110 Participants224 Participants114 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
294 Participants585 Participants291 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
45 / 40426 / 405
other
Total, other adverse events
300 / 404274 / 405
serious
Total, serious adverse events
259 / 404221 / 405

Outcome results

Primary

Composite Primary Endpoint: Number of Subjects With First Hospitalization for Worsening Heart Failure or Death

The primary efficacy endpoint will evaluate the effect of CRT=ON versus CRT=OFF in time to event of a combined endpoint of all-cause mortality or first hospitalization for worsening heart failure.

Time frame: From date of randomization until date of death from any cause or date of first hospitalization for worsening heart failure, whichever came first, assessed up to date of study exit, with a mean treatment duration of 1.6 years

Population: This analysis was carried out according to the intention-to-treat principle. Follow-up was censored at study closure, date of death, LVAD, heart transplant, withdrawal from the study, or loss to follow-up, whichever came first. 4 deaths in CRT OFF group and 1 death in CRT ON group were after LVAD/transplant and are not included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CRT=ONComposite Primary Endpoint: Number of Subjects With First Hospitalization for Worsening Heart Failure or Death116 participants
CRT=OFFComposite Primary Endpoint: Number of Subjects With First Hospitalization for Worsening Heart Failure or Death102 participants
Primary

Number of Subjects That Underwent Implant Attempt Without System- or Implant-Related Complications (Complication-Free)

The primary safety endpoint will evaluate the complication-free rate of the Lumax HF-T CRT-D devices in the narrow QRS subject population.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: The primary safety endpoint included all subjects undergoing an implant procedure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CRT=ONNumber of Subjects That Underwent Implant Attempt Without System- or Implant-Related Complications (Complication-Free)766 participants
Secondary

Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Scores From Baseline to 6-Month Follow-up

Quality of Life was evaluated using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLHF) Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire.The questionnaire consists of 21 questions to measure the subjects' perception of how their HF and its treatment affected their ability to live as they wanted during the last month. The questions describe different ways in which some people are affected (i.e. physical, socioeconomic, and psychological impairments). If a question does not apply to a subject or is not related to their HF, then they can answer with a 0. If it does apply to them, then they can rate (from 1 to 5) how much it has affected them. From the 21 questions, the lowest possible total score is 0, and the highest possible total score is 105. A lower score is desirable. Therefore, a negative change in QOL score from baseline to 6 months represents an improvement in quality of life, while a positive change in QOL score from baseline to 6 months represents a worsening in quality of life.

Time frame: Changes between baseline and 6 months

Population: Subjects with Baseline \& 6-month QOL scores. 25 subjects (15 CRT ON, 10 CRT OFF) that were in the study at least 6 months and that did not have 6-month QOL data, had 3-month data inputted using the LOCF principle.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CRT=ONChange in Quality of Life (QOL) Scores From Baseline to 6-Month Follow-up-12.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.9
CRT=OFFChange in Quality of Life (QOL) Scores From Baseline to 6-Month Follow-up-13.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.4
Secondary

Composite Score of Death, Hospitalization for Worsening Heart Failure and Change in Quality of Life (QOL)

Evaluate the effects of CRT=ON compared to CRT=OFF in relation to a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, hospitalization for worsening heart failure and change in the MLHF Quality of Life Questionnaire. This composite endpoint used a weighted scoring scale based on the African-American Heart Failure Trial (A-HeFT) study Endpoint Score. (Taylor, AL, Ziesche, S, Yancy, C, et al. Combination of Isosorbide Dinitrate and Hydralazine in Blacks with Heart Failure. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:2049-57.) Composite Endpoint Scoring: Vital Status: Death (-3), Survival to end of trial (0), Hospitalization: 1st hospitalization for HF (-1), No hospitalization (0), QOL score:\* Improvement by ≥ 10 units (+2), Improvement by 5-9 units (+1), Change by \< 5 units (0), Worsening by 5-9 units (-1), Worsening by ≥ 10 (-2). Possible total score -6 to +2. \*QOL score details are provided in Secondary Outcome Measure 5.

Time frame: Composite of death, worsening heart failure hospitalization (up to 24 months), and change in QOL (at 6 months)

Population: Subjects with a potential of 24 months of follow-up.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CRT=ONComposite Score of Death, Hospitalization for Worsening Heart Failure and Change in Quality of Life (QOL)-1.6 Composite scoreStandard Deviation 1.9
CRT=OFFComposite Score of Death, Hospitalization for Worsening Heart Failure and Change in Quality of Life (QOL)-1.5 Composite scoreStandard Deviation 1.6
Secondary

New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification Change

Evaluate the effects of CRT=ON compared to CRT=OFF in relation to the change in NYHA classification. NYHA classes: Class I - Subjects with cardiac disease, but without resulting limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation,dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class II - Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class III - Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class IV - Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Subjects with Baseline \& 6-month NYHA classification. 18 subjects (9 CRT ON, 9 CRT OFF) that were in the study at least 6 months and that did not have 6-month NYHA data, had the most recent post-randomization NYHA inputted using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) principle.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CRT=ONNew York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification ChangeImproved at least 1 Class213 Participants
CRT=ONNew York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification ChangeNo Change116 Participants
CRT=ONNew York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification ChangeDeteriorated at least 1 Class18 Participants
CRT=OFFNew York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification ChangeImproved at least 1 Class185 Participants
CRT=OFFNew York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification ChangeNo Change141 Participants
CRT=OFFNew York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification ChangeDeteriorated at least 1 Class12 Participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects With All-cause Mortality

Evaluate the all-cause mortality rate between the CRT=ON compared to CRT=OFF group.

Time frame: From date of randomization up to date of study exit, with a mean treatment duration of 1.6 years

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CRT=ONNumber of Subjects With All-cause Mortality45 Participants
CRT=OFFNumber of Subjects With All-cause Mortality26 Participants
Secondary

Rate of Hospitalizations for Worsening Heart Failure (Hospitalizations Per Subject-year)

Evaluate the effects of CRT=ON compared to CRT=OFF on the rate of hospitalization for worsening heart failure (WHF).

Time frame: Study duration from randomization to study exit

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CRT=ONRate of Hospitalizations for Worsening Heart Failure (Hospitalizations Per Subject-year)0.36 Hospitalizations per subj-yr
CRT=OFFRate of Hospitalizations for Worsening Heart Failure (Hospitalizations Per Subject-year)0.28 Hospitalizations per subj-yr

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026