Skip to content

Zinc to Treat Tinnitus in the Elderly

Zinc to Treat Tinnitus in the Elderly: A Randomized Placebo Controlled Crossover Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00683644
Enrollment
116
Registered
2008-05-23
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2017-12-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tinnitus

Keywords

tinnitus, zinc

Brief summary

There is widespread belief and some evidence to indicate that zinc can successfully treat tinnitus. Zinc deficiency is more likely to occur in the elderly . The primary objective of this study is to establish the effectiveness of zinc for the treatment of tinnitus in individuals 60 years of age and older. Subjects will be randomly assigned to either receive zinc daily or a placebo. After 4 months and a 1-month wash-out, the subjects will be crossed over to the other group.

Detailed description

There is widespread belief and some evidence to indicate that zinc can successfully treat tinnitus. Zinc deficiency is more likely to occur in the elderly . The primary objective of this study is to establish the effectiveness of zinc for the treatment of tinnitus in individuals 60 years of age and older. Subjects will be randomly assigned to either receive zinc daily or a placebo. After 4 months and a 1-month wash-out, the subjects will be crossed over to the other group. 116 patients were tested. Tinnitus loudness and the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire are the outcome measures.

Interventions

DRUGZinc

Zinc taken once daily

DRUGPlacebo oral capsule

Placebo capsules taken once daily

Sponsors

Tinnitus Research Initiative
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Iowa
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

placebo pill

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 60 years of age or older * Tinnitus for 6 months or more * Normal copper levels * Be generally healthy

Exclusion criteria

* Have a treatable otological disorder * Involved in litigation * Have or are suspected of having a serious psychiatric problem * Involved in other treatments for tinnitus * Are taking drugs which might interact with zinc and result in tinnitus * Have copper deficiency * Have Zinc levels above normal * Are cognitively impaired.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Tinnitus Reaction on the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire Scores (0-100) at 4 Monthsbaseline - 4 monthsValidated questionnaire of tinnitus reactions. Scale 0 (no tinnitus reaction)- 100 (worst tinnitus reaction). Our primary outcome was the difference scores between Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (THQ) on baseline and end of treatment on zinc and placebo treatment. As stated by Newman et al., the test-retest variability was 20%, and difference scores greater than this should be considered a significant reduction. Therefore, changes on the difference scores of 20 or greater were considered as a statistically significant and therefore clinically meaningful improvement for THQ. The minimum score is zero and the maximum is 100. 0 is better and 100 is worse. This applies to all outcome measures.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes on Baseline Tinnitus Magnitude on Tinnitus Loudness Rating Scores (0-100) at 4 Months Treatmentbaseline and 4 monthsParticipants should rate their tinnitus loudness on a scale of 0 (no perception of tinnitus) to 100 (highest degree of tinnitus perception).
Changes on Baseline Tinnitus Reactions on Tinnitus Annoyance Rating Scores (0-100) at 4 Months Treatmentbaseline and 4 monthsTinnitus annoyance rate on a scale of 0 (no annoyance) to 100 (maximum degree of annoyance)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

recruited from audiology clinic in otolaryngology department

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group 1 Zinc First
Zinc sulfate 220 mg capsules, (corresponding to 50 mg of elemental zinc) administered once a day for 4 months. Washout period of 30 days. Placebo capsules administered once a day for 4 months.
58
Group 2 Placebo First
Placebo capsules administered once a day for 4 months. Washout period of 30 days. Zinc sulfate 220 mg capsules, (corresponding to 50 mg of elemental zinc) administered once a day for 4 months.
58
Total116

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event12
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up14
Overall StudyLow copper, other health problems,76
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject42

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup 1 Zinc FirstGroup 2 Placebo FirstTotal
Age, Continuous67.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5
67.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8
67.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
Region of Enrollment
United States
58 participants58 participants109 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
24 Participants20 Participants44 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
34 Participants38 Participants72 Participants
Tinnitus Annoyance Rating Scale60 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.7
65.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23
63 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.1
Tinnitus Handicap Questionaire28.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.3
27.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.2
27.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.8
Tinnitus Loudness Rating Scale66.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.2
67.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.1
67.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 990 / 101
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 992 / 101
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 990 / 101

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Tinnitus Reaction on the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire Scores (0-100) at 4 Months

Validated questionnaire of tinnitus reactions. Scale 0 (no tinnitus reaction)- 100 (worst tinnitus reaction). Our primary outcome was the difference scores between Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (THQ) on baseline and end of treatment on zinc and placebo treatment. As stated by Newman et al., the test-retest variability was 20%, and difference scores greater than this should be considered a significant reduction. Therefore, changes on the difference scores of 20 or greater were considered as a statistically significant and therefore clinically meaningful improvement for THQ. The minimum score is zero and the maximum is 100. 0 is better and 100 is worse. This applies to all outcome measures.

Time frame: baseline - 4 months

Population: For data analysis purposes subjects were recombined in 2 groups (Zinc and Placebo). Group ZINC: subjects who completed 4 months with Zinc 50 mg daily either from baseline to month 4, or after washout (from month 5 to 9). Group PLACEBO: subjects who completed 4 months with placebo either from baseline to month 4, or after washout (from month 5 to 9)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ZincChange From Baseline in Tinnitus Reaction on the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire Scores (0-100) at 4 MonthsTHQ scores at Baseline22.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22
ZincChange From Baseline in Tinnitus Reaction on the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire Scores (0-100) at 4 MonthsTHQ scores at 4 months23.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Tinnitus Reaction on the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire Scores (0-100) at 4 MonthsTHQ scores at Baseline24.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Tinnitus Reaction on the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire Scores (0-100) at 4 MonthsTHQ scores at 4 months25.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.3
p-value: >0.05Chi-squared
Secondary

Changes on Baseline Tinnitus Magnitude on Tinnitus Loudness Rating Scores (0-100) at 4 Months Treatment

Participants should rate their tinnitus loudness on a scale of 0 (no perception of tinnitus) to 100 (highest degree of tinnitus perception).

Time frame: baseline and 4 months

Population: Subjects that complete 4 months treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ZincChanges on Baseline Tinnitus Magnitude on Tinnitus Loudness Rating Scores (0-100) at 4 Months TreatmentBaseline tinnitus loudness rating scores (SD)67.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.7
ZincChanges on Baseline Tinnitus Magnitude on Tinnitus Loudness Rating Scores (0-100) at 4 Months Treatment4 months tinnitus loudness rating scores (SD)68.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.4
PlaceboChanges on Baseline Tinnitus Magnitude on Tinnitus Loudness Rating Scores (0-100) at 4 Months TreatmentBaseline tinnitus loudness rating scores (SD)66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.4
PlaceboChanges on Baseline Tinnitus Magnitude on Tinnitus Loudness Rating Scores (0-100) at 4 Months Treatment4 months tinnitus loudness rating scores (SD)67.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.2
p-value: 0.89paired t test
p-value: 0.36paired t test
Secondary

Changes on Baseline Tinnitus Reactions on Tinnitus Annoyance Rating Scores (0-100) at 4 Months Treatment

Tinnitus annoyance rate on a scale of 0 (no annoyance) to 100 (maximum degree of annoyance)

Time frame: baseline and 4 months

Population: Subjects that complete 4 months treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ZincChanges on Baseline Tinnitus Reactions on Tinnitus Annoyance Rating Scores (0-100) at 4 Months TreatmentBaseline tinnitus annoyance rating scores59.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.4
ZincChanges on Baseline Tinnitus Reactions on Tinnitus Annoyance Rating Scores (0-100) at 4 Months Treatment4 months tinnitus annoyance rating scores61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.5
PlaceboChanges on Baseline Tinnitus Reactions on Tinnitus Annoyance Rating Scores (0-100) at 4 Months TreatmentBaseline tinnitus annoyance rating scores57.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.85
PlaceboChanges on Baseline Tinnitus Reactions on Tinnitus Annoyance Rating Scores (0-100) at 4 Months Treatment4 months tinnitus annoyance rating scores57.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.7
p-value: 0.64paired t test
p-value: 0.93paired t test

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026