Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial
Conditions
Keywords
Perennial Allergic Rhinitis, fluticasone furoate, ocular safety
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to assess long-term ocular safety of fluticasone furoate nasal spray in adult and adolescent subjects diagnosed with perennial allergic rhinitis.
Interventions
fluticasone furoate nasal spray
DRUGvehicle placebo nasal spray
placebo
Sponsors
GlaxoSmithKline
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
Subjects eligible for enrollment in the study must meet all of the following criteria: \- Informed consent * Subject has provided an appropriately signed and dated informed consent. An appropriately signed and dated assent must be obtained from the parents or guardian if the subject is a child under 18 years of age. * Outpatient * Subject is treatable on an outpatient basis. * Age * 12 years of age and older at Visit 2 * Male or eligible female Female subjects should not be enrolled if they plan to become pregnant during the time of study participation. To be eligible for entry into the study, females of childbearing potential must commit to the consistent and correct use of an acceptable method of birth control, as defined by the following: * Abstinence Females of childbearing potential who are not sexually active must commit to complete abstinence from intercourse for two weeks before exposure to the study drug, throughout the clinical trial, and for a period after the trial to account for elimination of the drug (minimum of six days). * Oral contraceptive (either combined estrogen/progestin or progestin only) * Injectable progestogen * Implants of levonorgestrel * Percutaneous contraceptive patches * Intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS) with a documented failure rate of less than 1% per year, * Male partner who is sterile (vasectomy with documentation of azoospermia) prior to the female subject's entry into the study and is the sole sexual partner for that female subject, or * Double barrier method-condom or occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical /vault caps) plus Spermicide, * Estrogenic vaginal ring. A urine pregnancy test will be done at the screening visit to confirm females of childbearing potential are not pregnant upon entry into the study. In addition, urine pregnancy tests will be done for all females of childbearing potential at each clinic visit. * Diagnosis of PAR to include: A positive skin test (by prick method) response to appropriate perennial allergen (house dust mites, animal dander, mold, or cockroach) within last 12 months prior to Visit 1 or at Visit 1. A positive skin test is defined as a wheal ³3mm larger than the diluent control for prick testing. •Two year medical history and past treatment of PAR (written or verbal confirmation) which includes perennial, i.e., year-round, symptoms. PAR symptoms could include nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, nasal itching and sneezing. In vitro tests for specific IgE (such as RAST, PRIST) will not be allowed for the diagnosis of PAR. NOTE: Subjects who meet the above criteria and who also may have seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) and/or perennial non-allergic rhinitis (PNAR) are eligible for randomization. * Environment •Subject must be symptomatic to appropriate perennial allergen (animal dander, house dust mites, cockroach, mold) and willing to maintain, as much as possible, the same environment throughout the study. * Ability to comply with study procedures Subject understands and is willing, able and likely to comply with study procedures and restrictions. * Literate Subject must be able to read, comprehend, and record information in English
Exclusion criteria
Subjects meeting any of the following criteria must not be enrolled in the study: * Significant concomitant medical conditions, defined as but not limited to: * A historical or current evidence of clinically significant uncontrolled disease of any body system (e.g., tuberculosis, psychological disorders, eczema). Significant is defined as any disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would put the safety of the subject at risk through study participation or which would confound the interpretation of the study results if the disease/condition exacerbated during the study. * History or current diagnosis of diabetes mellitus * Uncontrolled hypertension (i.e., systolic blood pressure ³ 140mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ³ 90mm Hg) * A severe physical obstruction of the nose (e.g., deviated septum or nasal polyp) or nasal septal perforation that could affect the deposition of double blind intranasal study drug * Nasal (e.g., nasal septum) or ocular injury/surgery in the last 6 months (including LASIK eye surgery) * Asthma, with the exception of mild intermittent asthma \[National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma - Expert Panel Report 3, National Institutes of Health, August 28, 2007. NOTE: Subjects will be allowed to use short-acting inhaled beta2 agonists ONLY on an as needed basis. * Rhinitis medicamentosa * Bacterial or viral infection (e.g., common cold) of the eyes or upper respiratory tract within two weeks of Visit 1 or during the screening period * Documented evidence of acute or significant chronic sinusitis, as determined by the individual investigator * Current or history of glaucoma and/or ocular herpes simplex * Current cataract and/or previous history of cataract surgery * Physical impairment that would affect subject's ability to participate safely and fully in the study * Clinical evidence of a Candida infection of the nose * History of psychiatric disease, intellectual deficiency, poor motivation, substance abuse (including drug and alcohol) or other conditions that will limit the validity of informed consent or that would confound the interpretation of the study results * History of adrenal insufficiency * History of Hepatitis B or C * Use of corticosteroids, defined as: * Intranasal corticosteroid within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 (e.g., VERAMYST, FLONASE™, Nasonex, Rhinocort). * Inhaled, oral, intramuscular, intravenous, ocular, and/or topical corticosteroids (with the exception of topical hydrocortisone, 1% or less, or equivalent) within 8 weeks prior to Visit 1. * Use of other allergy medications within the timeframe indicated relative to Visit 1 * Intranasal or ocular cromolyn within 14 days prior to Visit 1 (e.g., Nasalcrom, Crolom) * Short-acting prescription and non-prescription antihistamines, including ocular preparations and antihistamines contained in insomnia and night time pain formulations, within 3 days prior to Visit 1 (e.g., Benadryl, Chlortrimeton, Dimetane, Tavist) * Long-acting antihistamines within 10 days prior to Visit 1 (e.g., Allegra, Claritin, Clarinex, Zyrtec). * Intranasal antihistamines (e.g., Astelin) within 2 weeks prior to Visit 1 * Oral or intranasal decongestants within 3 days prior to Visit 1 (e.g., Sudafed) * Long-acting beta-agonists within 3 days prior to Visit 1 (e.g., SEREVENT™, Foradil) * Intranasal, oral, or inhaled anticholinergics within 3 days prior to Visit 1 (e.g., Atrovent) * Oral antileukotrienes within 3 days of Visit 1 (e.g., Singulair) * Subcutaneous omalizumab (Xolair) within 5 months of Visit 1 * Use of other medications that may affect allergic rhinitis or its symptoms * Chronic use of concomitant medications, such as tricyclic antidepressants, that would affect assessment of the effectiveness of the study drug * Use of other intranasally administered medications (e.g., Miacalcin) * Use of immunosuppressive medications 8 weeks prior to screening and during the study * Immunotherapy Immunotherapy patients may be enrolled in the study if the immunotherapy was not initiated within 30 days of Visit 1, if the dose has remained fixed over the 30 days prior to Visit 1, and the dose will remain fixed for the duration of the study. * Use of any medications that significantly alter the pharmacokinetics of fluticasone furoate (ritonavir and ketoconazole) * Use of chronic treatment with agents known to promote the development of cataracts (e.g., potassium-sparing diuretics and allopurinol) * Allergy/Intolerance * Known hypersensitivity to corticosteroids or any excipients * Clinical trial/experimental medication experience * Has recent exposure to an investigational study drug within 30 days of Visit 1 * Participation in a previous or current FFNS (GW685698X) clinical study * Positive urine pregnancy test or female who is breastfeeding * Has a positive or inconclusive pregnancy test at Visit 1 or Visit 2 * Affiliation with investigational site * Subject is a participating investigator, sub-investigator, study co-ordinator, or employee of a participating investigator, or is an immediate family member of the aforementioned. * Tobacco use * Subject currently uses smoking products including cigarettes, cigars, and pipe or chewing tobacco, or has used these products in the last 6 months * Chickenpox or measles A subject is not eligible if he/she currently has chickenpox or measles, or has been exposed to chickenpox or measles during the last three weeks and is non-immune. If a subject develops chickenpox or measles during the study, he/she will be withdrawn from the study. If a non-immune subject is exposed to chickenpox or measles during the study, his/her continuation in the study will be at the discretion of the investigator, taking into consideration the likelihood of developing active disease. * Findings of a clinically significant, abnormal ECG * Findings of a clinically significant laboratory abnormality
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Cumulative Proportion (CU) of Participants (Par.) With an Event, as Measured as a Percentage, for Posterior Subcapsular Opacity (P) | Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 52, 64, 76, 88, and 104 | An event for P (opacity in the lens positioned just anterior to the posterior lens capsule and characterized by the posterior migration of lens epithelial cells from the lens bow) is defined as an increase of \>=0.3 from baseline in Lens Opacities Classification System, Version III (LOCS III; system used for the grading and comparison of cataract severity and type based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for P (range=0.1 \[lens clear\] to 5.9 \[lens unclear\]), in either eye. Data represent the Kaplan-Meier estimate for the CU of par. with an event of P based on a lifetest table. |
| Cumulative Proportion of Participants, as Measured as a Percentage, With an Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Event | Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 52, 64, 76, 88, and 104 | An event for IOP is defined as an increase of 7 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) or greater from baseline in IOP, in either eye, using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry (GAT). GAT is a commonly used method of determining approximate intraocular pressure. The data below represent the Kaplan-Meier estimate for the cumulative proportion of participants with an IOP event based on a lifetest table. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in LOCS III Cortical Opacity (C) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104 | An event for C (an opacity starting at the outer edge of the lens and progressing toward the center) is defined as an increase of \>=0.3 from baseline in LOCS III (system used for the grading and comparison of cataract severity and type based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for C (range=0.1 \[lens clear\] to 5.9 \[lens unclear\]), in either eye. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 and Week 104 value. |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104 | An event for C (an opacity starting at the outer edge of the lens and progressing toward the center) is defined as an increase of \>=0.3 from baseline in LOCS III (system used for the grading and comparison of cataract severity and type based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for C (range=0.1 \[lens clear\] to 5.9 \[lens unclear\]), in either eye. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 and Week 104 value. |
| Change From Baseline in LOCS III Nuclear Opacity (NO) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104 | Nuclear opacity refers to the opacity in the central nucleus of the eye.The range for NO is 0.1 (no opacity) to 6.9 (maximum opacity). Change from baseline in NO was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 or Week 104 value. |
| Change From Baseline in Nuclear Color (NC) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104 | Nuclear color is associated with the force required to compress a lens to 75% of its original depth. The range for NC is 0.1 (no opacity) to 6.9 (maximum opacity). Change from baseline in NC was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 or Week 104 value. |
| Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Weeks 52 and 104 | Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104 | An event for IOP is defined as an increase of 7 mm Hg or greater from baseline in IOP, in either eye, using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. Participants without post-baseline ophthalmic exam data were censored at the randomization date. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 or Week 104 value. |
| Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity at Week 52 and Week 104 | Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104 | An event for P (opacity in the lens positioned just anterior to the posterior lens capsule and characterized by the posterior migration of lens epithelial cells from the lens bow) is defined as an increase of \>=0.3 from baseline in LOCS III (system used for the grading and comparison of cataract severity and type based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for P (range=0.1 \[lens clear\] to 5.9 \[lens unclear\]), in either eye. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 and Week 104 value. |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Baseline and Week 104 | An event for IOP is defined as an increase of 7 mm Hg or greater from baseline in IOP, in either eye, using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. Participants without post-baseline ophthalmic exam data were censored at the randomization date. Change from baseline in IOP was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 104 value. |
| Change From Baseline in Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) Visual Acuity (VA) Using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Charts at Week 52 and Week 104 | Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104 | ETDRS charts are used to measure VA (the ability to resolve fine image details). Participants must have had a best-corrected distance VA of =\< 0.18 on the LogMAR scale using ETDRS charts in both eyes measured separately. The LogMAR scale (expressed as the \[decadic\] logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution \[range from +1.00 to -0.30\]) converts the geometric sequence of a traditional chart to a linear scale. It measures VA loss; positive values indicate vision loss, whereas negative values denote normal or better VA. A lower LogMAR value indicates better VA. |
| Percent Change From Baseline in the Funduscopic Horizontal Cup-to-disc Ratio at Week 104 | Baseline and Week 104 | The funduscopic horizontal cup-to-risk ratio assesses the progression of glaucoma. Percent change from baseline in funduscopic horizontal cup-to-disc ratio at Week 104 was calculated by substracting the baseline value from the Week 104 value (both expressed as a percent). The cup-to-disc ratio compares the diameter of the cup portion of the optic disc with the total diameter of the optic disc. A large cup-to-disc ratio may imply glaucoma or other pathology. |
| Change From Baseline in the Daily Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) for the Indicated Study Periods | Baseline, Weeks 1 to 26, Weeks 27 to 52, Weeks 53 to 78, and Weeks 79 to 104 | rTNSS was evaluated on a 4-point categorical scale (sum of the scores for rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing; range=0-12). The data collected were used as a measure for treatment compliance. The scores on the scale were based on the severity of each nasal symptom: 0=none (symptom is not present); 1=mild (sign/symptom is clearly present but minimal awareness; easily tolerated); 2=moderate (definite awareness of sign/symptom that is bothersome but tolerable); 3=severe (sign/symptom is hard to tolerate; causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping). |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Baseline and Week 52 | An event for IOP is defined as an increase of 7 mm Hg or greater from baseline in IOP, in either eye, using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. Participants without post-baseline ophthalmic exam data were censored at the randomization date. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 value. |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104 | An event for P is defined as an increase of \>=0.3 from baseline in LOCS III (classification system based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for P (range=0.1 \[lens clear\] to 5.9 \[lens unclear\]), in either eye. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 and Week 104 value. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo The matching placebo nasal spray containing only fluticasone furoate (FF) vehicle was self-administered as two sprays per nostril each morning once daily (QD) for 104 weeks. | 181 |
| FF 110 mcg QD FF nasal spray aqueous suspension contained 0.05% micronized FF. Each spray contained approximately 27.5 micrograms (mcg) of FF; participants self-administered two sprays per nostril each morning QD for a total dose of 110 mcg for 104 weeks. | 367 |
| Total | 548 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 12 | 23 |
| Overall Study | Did Not Receive Study Drug | 1 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 2 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 6 |
| Overall Study | Met Protocol-defined Stopping Criteria | 3 | 4 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 2 | 6 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 38 | 76 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 19 | 53 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Placebo | FF 110 mcg QD | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 38.0 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.34 | 37.0 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.48 | 37.4 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.43 |
| Gender Female | 116 Participants | 255 Participants | 371 Participants |
| Gender Male | 65 Participants | 112 Participants | 177 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized African American/African Heritage | 29 participants | 50 participants | 79 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized African American/African Heritage & White | 1 participants | 0 participants | 1 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Indian or Alaska Native | 1 participants | 4 participants | 5 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Central/South Asian Heritage | 0 participants | 1 participants | 1 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Japanese/East Asian/South East Asian Heritage | 2 participants | 6 participants | 8 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Mixed Asian Heritage | 0 participants | 1 participants | 1 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander | 2 participants | 2 participants | 4 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 146 participants | 303 participants | 449 participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 97 / 181 | 232 / 367 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 7 / 181 | 12 / 367 |
Outcome results
Primary
Cumulative Proportion (CU) of Participants (Par.) With an Event, as Measured as a Percentage, for Posterior Subcapsular Opacity (P)
An event for P (opacity in the lens positioned just anterior to the posterior lens capsule and characterized by the posterior migration of lens epithelial cells from the lens bow) is defined as an increase of \>=0.3 from baseline in Lens Opacities Classification System, Version III (LOCS III; system used for the grading and comparison of cataract severity and type based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for P (range=0.1 \[lens clear\] to 5.9 \[lens unclear\]), in either eye. Data represent the Kaplan-Meier estimate for the CU of par. with an event of P based on a lifetest table.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 52, 64, 76, 88, and 104
Population: ITT Population. All participants (par.) with post-baseline ophthalmic examination data were included in the analysis for this endpoint. Par. without post-baseline ophthalmic exam data were censored at the randomization data. Par. who completed the study without an event for P or were discontinued for reasons other than an event for P were censored.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Cumulative Proportion (CU) of Participants (Par.) With an Event, as Measured as a Percentage, for Posterior Subcapsular Opacity (P) | Week 12 | 0.60 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Cumulative Proportion (CU) of Participants (Par.) With an Event, as Measured as a Percentage, for Posterior Subcapsular Opacity (P) | Week 36 | 1.93 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Cumulative Proportion (CU) of Participants (Par.) With an Event, as Measured as a Percentage, for Posterior Subcapsular Opacity (P) | Week 64 | 2.68 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Cumulative Proportion (CU) of Participants (Par.) With an Event, as Measured as a Percentage, for Posterior Subcapsular Opacity (P) | Week 88 | 2.68 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Cumulative Proportion (CU) of Participants (Par.) With an Event, as Measured as a Percentage, for Posterior Subcapsular Opacity (P) | Week 104 | 2.68 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Cumulative Proportion (CU) of Participants (Par.) With an Event, as Measured as a Percentage, for Posterior Subcapsular Opacity (P) | Week 24 | 1.24 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Cumulative Proportion (CU) of Participants (Par.) With an Event, as Measured as a Percentage, for Posterior Subcapsular Opacity (P) | Week 52 | 2.68 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Cumulative Proportion (CU) of Participants (Par.) With an Event, as Measured as a Percentage, for Posterior Subcapsular Opacity (P) | Week 76 | 2.68 Percentage of participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Cumulative Proportion (CU) of Participants (Par.) With an Event, as Measured as a Percentage, for Posterior Subcapsular Opacity (P) | Week 104 | 5.09 Percentage of participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Cumulative Proportion (CU) of Participants (Par.) With an Event, as Measured as a Percentage, for Posterior Subcapsular Opacity (P) | Week 24 | 1.84 Percentage of participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Cumulative Proportion (CU) of Participants (Par.) With an Event, as Measured as a Percentage, for Posterior Subcapsular Opacity (P) | Week 52 | 3.72 Percentage of participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Cumulative Proportion (CU) of Participants (Par.) With an Event, as Measured as a Percentage, for Posterior Subcapsular Opacity (P) | Week 36 | 2.56 Percentage of participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Cumulative Proportion (CU) of Participants (Par.) With an Event, as Measured as a Percentage, for Posterior Subcapsular Opacity (P) | Week 76 | 3.72 Percentage of participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Cumulative Proportion (CU) of Participants (Par.) With an Event, as Measured as a Percentage, for Posterior Subcapsular Opacity (P) | Week 88 | 4.59 Percentage of participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Cumulative Proportion (CU) of Participants (Par.) With an Event, as Measured as a Percentage, for Posterior Subcapsular Opacity (P) | Week 64 | 3.72 Percentage of participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Cumulative Proportion (CU) of Participants (Par.) With an Event, as Measured as a Percentage, for Posterior Subcapsular Opacity (P) | Week 12 | 0.88 Percentage of participants |
p-value: 0.395Wald Chi-square
Primary
Cumulative Proportion of Participants, as Measured as a Percentage, With an Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Event
An event for IOP is defined as an increase of 7 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) or greater from baseline in IOP, in either eye, using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry (GAT). GAT is a commonly used method of determining approximate intraocular pressure. The data below represent the Kaplan-Meier estimate for the cumulative proportion of participants with an IOP event based on a lifetest table.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 12, 24, 36, 52, 64, 76, 88, and 104
Population: ITT Population. All participants with post-baseline ophthalmic examination data were included in the analysis for this endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Cumulative Proportion of Participants, as Measured as a Percentage, With an Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Event | Week 36 | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Cumulative Proportion of Participants, as Measured as a Percentage, With an Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Event | Week 52 | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Cumulative Proportion of Participants, as Measured as a Percentage, With an Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Event | Week 88 | 0.84 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Cumulative Proportion of Participants, as Measured as a Percentage, With an Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Event | Week 64 | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Cumulative Proportion of Participants, as Measured as a Percentage, With an Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Event | Week 76 | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Cumulative Proportion of Participants, as Measured as a Percentage, With an Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Event | Week 24 | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Cumulative Proportion of Participants, as Measured as a Percentage, With an Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Event | Week 104 | 0.84 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Cumulative Proportion of Participants, as Measured as a Percentage, With an Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Event | Week 12 | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Cumulative Proportion of Participants, as Measured as a Percentage, With an Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Event | Week 104 | 2.96 percentage of participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Cumulative Proportion of Participants, as Measured as a Percentage, With an Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Event | Week 64 | 1.12 percentage of participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Cumulative Proportion of Participants, as Measured as a Percentage, With an Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Event | Week 88 | 1.98 percentage of participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Cumulative Proportion of Participants, as Measured as a Percentage, With an Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Event | Week 12 | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Cumulative Proportion of Participants, as Measured as a Percentage, With an Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Event | Week 24 | 0.32 percentage of participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Cumulative Proportion of Participants, as Measured as a Percentage, With an Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Event | Week 52 | 0.71 percentage of participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Cumulative Proportion of Participants, as Measured as a Percentage, With an Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Event | Week 76 | 1.98 percentage of participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Cumulative Proportion of Participants, as Measured as a Percentage, With an Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Event | Week 36 | 0.32 percentage of participants |
p-value: 0.342Wald Chi-square
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Weeks 52 and 104
An event for IOP is defined as an increase of 7 mm Hg or greater from baseline in IOP, in either eye, using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. Participants without post-baseline ophthalmic exam data were censored at the randomization date. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 or Week 104 value.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104
Population: ITT Population. The number analyzed reflects those participants remaining in the study and contributing data at the indicated time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52; n=130, 251 | -0.5 mm Hg | Standard Deviation 2.04 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52; n=130, 251 | -0.7 mm Hg | Standard Deviation 2.08 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104; n=104, 198 | -1.0 mm Hg | Standard Deviation 2.17 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104; n=104, 198 | -0.8 mm Hg | Standard Deviation 1.98 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104; n=104, 198 | -0.7 mm Hg | Standard Deviation 2.55 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52; n=130, 251 | -0.3 mm Hg | Standard Deviation 2.26 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104; n=104, 198 | -0.6 mm Hg | Standard Deviation 2.41 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52; n=130, 251 | -0.4 mm Hg | Standard Deviation 2.33 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in LOCS III Cortical Opacity (C) at Week 52 and Week 104
An event for C (an opacity starting at the outer edge of the lens and progressing toward the center) is defined as an increase of \>=0.3 from baseline in LOCS III (system used for the grading and comparison of cataract severity and type based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for C (range=0.1 \[lens clear\] to 5.9 \[lens unclear\]), in either eye. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 and Week 104 value.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104
Population: ITT Population. The number analyzed reflects those participants remaining in the study and contributing data at the indicated time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in LOCS III Cortical Opacity (C) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Left eye, Week 104; n=104, 198 | 0.02 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.21 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in LOCS III Cortical Opacity (C) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Right eye, Week 104; n=104, 198 | 0.02 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.187 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in LOCS III Cortical Opacity (C) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Left eye, Week 52; n=130, 251 | 0.01 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.21 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in LOCS III Cortical Opacity (C) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Right eye, Week 52; n=130, 251 | -0.01 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.229 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Change From Baseline in LOCS III Cortical Opacity (C) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Right eye, Week 104; n=104, 198 | 0.01 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.186 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Change From Baseline in LOCS III Cortical Opacity (C) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Left eye, Week 104; n=104, 198 | 0.01 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.186 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Change From Baseline in LOCS III Cortical Opacity (C) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Right eye, Week 52; n=130, 251 | 0.00 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.154 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Change From Baseline in LOCS III Cortical Opacity (C) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Left eye, Week 52; n=130, 251 | 0.00 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.113 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in LOCS III Nuclear Opacity (NO) at Week 52 and Week 104
Nuclear opacity refers to the opacity in the central nucleus of the eye.The range for NO is 0.1 (no opacity) to 6.9 (maximum opacity). Change from baseline in NO was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 or Week 104 value.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104
Population: ITT Population. The number analyzed reflects those participants remaining in the study and contributing data at the indicated time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in LOCS III Nuclear Opacity (NO) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Left eye, Week 52; n=130, 251 | 0.12 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.498 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in LOCS III Nuclear Opacity (NO) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Right eye, Week 52; n=130, 251 | 0.12 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.511 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in LOCS III Nuclear Opacity (NO) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Left eye, Week 104; n=104, 198 | 0.21 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.538 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in LOCS III Nuclear Opacity (NO) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Right eye, Week 104; n=104, 198 | 0.21 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.55 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Change From Baseline in LOCS III Nuclear Opacity (NO) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Right eye, Week 104; n=104, 198 | 0.09 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.531 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Change From Baseline in LOCS III Nuclear Opacity (NO) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Left eye, Week 52; n=130, 251 | 0.06 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.495 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Change From Baseline in LOCS III Nuclear Opacity (NO) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Left eye, Week 104; n=104, 198 | 0.10 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.506 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Change From Baseline in LOCS III Nuclear Opacity (NO) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Right eye, Week 52; n=130, 251 | 0.06 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.492 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity at Week 52 and Week 104
An event for P (opacity in the lens positioned just anterior to the posterior lens capsule and characterized by the posterior migration of lens epithelial cells from the lens bow) is defined as an increase of \>=0.3 from baseline in LOCS III (system used for the grading and comparison of cataract severity and type based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for P (range=0.1 \[lens clear\] to 5.9 \[lens unclear\]), in either eye. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 and Week 104 value.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104
Population: ITT Population. The number analyzed reflects those participants remaining in the study and contributing data at the indicated time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity at Week 52 and Week 104 | Left eye, Week 52; n=130, 251 | 0.00 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.042 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity at Week 52 and Week 104 | Right eye, Week 52; n=130, 251 | 0.00 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.057 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity at Week 52 and Week 104 | Left eye, Week 104; n=104, 198 | 0.00 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.039 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity at Week 52 and Week 104 | Right eye, Week 104; n=104, 198 | 0.00 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.042 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity at Week 52 and Week 104 | Right eye, Week 104; n=104, 198 | -0.01 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.068 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity at Week 52 and Week 104 | Left eye, Week 52; n=130, 251 | 0.00 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.063 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity at Week 52 and Week 104 | Left eye, Week 104; n=104, 198 | 0.00 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.083 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity at Week 52 and Week 104 | Right eye, Week 52; n=130, 251 | 0.00 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.061 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) Visual Acuity (VA) Using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Charts at Week 52 and Week 104
ETDRS charts are used to measure VA (the ability to resolve fine image details). Participants must have had a best-corrected distance VA of =\< 0.18 on the LogMAR scale using ETDRS charts in both eyes measured separately. The LogMAR scale (expressed as the \[decadic\] logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution \[range from +1.00 to -0.30\]) converts the geometric sequence of a traditional chart to a linear scale. It measures VA loss; positive values indicate vision loss, whereas negative values denote normal or better VA. A lower LogMAR value indicates better VA.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104
Population: ITT Population. The number analyzed reflects those participants remaining in the study and contributing data at the indicated time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) Visual Acuity (VA) Using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Charts at Week 52 and Week 104 | Left eye, Week 52; n=130, 251 | -0.027 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.0729 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) Visual Acuity (VA) Using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Charts at Week 52 and Week 104 | Left eye, Week 104; n=104, 198 | -0.035 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.074 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) Visual Acuity (VA) Using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Charts at Week 52 and Week 104 | Right eye, Week 52; n=130, 251 | -0.023 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.081 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) Visual Acuity (VA) Using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Charts at Week 52 and Week 104 | Right eye, Week 104; n=104, 198 | -0.025 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.0992 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Change From Baseline in Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) Visual Acuity (VA) Using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Charts at Week 52 and Week 104 | Right eye, Week 104; n=104, 198 | -0.024 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.0899 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Change From Baseline in Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) Visual Acuity (VA) Using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Charts at Week 52 and Week 104 | Left eye, Week 52; n=130, 251 | -0.013 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.0778 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Change From Baseline in Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) Visual Acuity (VA) Using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Charts at Week 52 and Week 104 | Right eye, Week 52; n=130, 251 | -0.014 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.0852 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Change From Baseline in Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) Visual Acuity (VA) Using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Charts at Week 52 and Week 104 | Left eye, Week 104; n=104, 198 | -0.023 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.0858 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Nuclear Color (NC) at Week 52 and Week 104
Nuclear color is associated with the force required to compress a lens to 75% of its original depth. The range for NC is 0.1 (no opacity) to 6.9 (maximum opacity). Change from baseline in NC was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 or Week 104 value.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104
Population: ITT Population. The number analyzed reflects those participants remaining in the study and contributing data at the indicated time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Nuclear Color (NC) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Left eye, Week 104; n=104, 198 | 0.21 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.454 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Nuclear Color (NC) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Left eye, Week 52; n=130, 251 | 0.14 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.432 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Nuclear Color (NC) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Right eye, Week 52; n=130, 251 | 0.16 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.422 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Nuclear Color (NC) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Right eye, Week 104; n=104, 198 | 0.22 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.452 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Change From Baseline in Nuclear Color (NC) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Right eye, Week 104; n=104, 198 | 0.13 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.469 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Change From Baseline in Nuclear Color (NC) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Left eye, Week 52; n=130, 251 | 0.09 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.402 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Change From Baseline in Nuclear Color (NC) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Left eye, Week 104; n=104, 198 | 0.13 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.465 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Change From Baseline in Nuclear Color (NC) at Week 52 and Week 104 | Right eye, Week 52; n=130, 251 | 0.09 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in the Daily Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) for the Indicated Study Periods
rTNSS was evaluated on a 4-point categorical scale (sum of the scores for rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing; range=0-12). The data collected were used as a measure for treatment compliance. The scores on the scale were based on the severity of each nasal symptom: 0=none (symptom is not present); 1=mild (sign/symptom is clearly present but minimal awareness; easily tolerated); 2=moderate (definite awareness of sign/symptom that is bothersome but tolerable); 3=severe (sign/symptom is hard to tolerate; causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping).
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 to 26, Weeks 27 to 52, Weeks 53 to 78, and Weeks 79 to 104
Population: ITT Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Daily Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) for the Indicated Study Periods | Week 27 to 52 | -2.52 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.21 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Daily Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) for the Indicated Study Periods | Week 79 to 104 | -2.59 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.25 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Daily Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) for the Indicated Study Periods | Week 53 to 78 | -2.56 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.23 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Daily Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) for the Indicated Study Periods | Week 1 to 104 | -2.30 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.18 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Daily Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) for the Indicated Study Periods | Week 1 to 26 | -2.12 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.17 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Change From Baseline in the Daily Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) for the Indicated Study Periods | Week 1 to 104 | -3.45 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.13 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Change From Baseline in the Daily Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) for the Indicated Study Periods | Week 1 to 26 | -3.19 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Change From Baseline in the Daily Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) for the Indicated Study Periods | Week 27 to 52 | -3.86 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.15 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Change From Baseline in the Daily Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) for the Indicated Study Periods | Week 53 to 78 | -3.89 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.16 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Change From Baseline in the Daily Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) for the Indicated Study Periods | Week 79 to 104 | -4.10 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.18 |
Secondary
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104
An event for C (an opacity starting at the outer edge of the lens and progressing toward the center) is defined as an increase of \>=0.3 from baseline in LOCS III (system used for the grading and comparison of cataract severity and type based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for C (range=0.1 \[lens clear\] to 5.9 \[lens unclear\]), in either eye. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 and Week 104 value.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104
Population: ITT Population. The number analyzed reflects those participants remaining in the study and contributing data at the indicated time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, >=0.5; n=130, 251 | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, >=1.0; n=130, 251 | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, >=0.3; n=130, 251 | 4 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, >=0.3; n=130, 251 | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, >=0.5; n=130, 251 | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, >=1.0; n=130, 251 | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, >=0.3; n=104, 198 | 6 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, >=0.5; n=104, 198 | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, >=1.0; n=104, 198 | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, >=0.3; n=104, 198 | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, >=0.5; n=104, 198 | 2 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, >=1.0; n=104, 198 | 1 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, >=0.5; n=104, 198 | 4 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, >=0.5; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, >=0.3; n=104, 198 | 10 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, >=0.5; n=130, 251 | 2 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, >=0.3; n=104, 198 | 10 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, >=0.3; n=130, 251 | 4 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, >=1.0; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, >=0.5; n=104, 198 | 4 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, >=0.3; n=130, 251 | 8 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, >=1.0; n=104, 198 | 2 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, >=1.0; n=104, 198 | 1 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Cortical Opacity by Increment Categories of >=0.3, >=0.5, and >=1.0 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, >=1.0; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
Secondary
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104
An event for IOP is defined as an increase of 7 mm Hg or greater from baseline in IOP, in either eye, using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. Participants without post-baseline ophthalmic exam data were censored at the randomization date. Change from baseline in IOP was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 104 value.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 104
Population: ITT Population. The number analyzed reflects those participants remaining in the study and contributing data at the indicated time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = -1 | 15 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = -5 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = -3 | 15 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP >= 10 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP >= 7 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = <-10 to -9 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = -8 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = -7 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = -6 | 2 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = -4 | 6 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = -2 | 17 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = 0 | 21 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = 1 | 19 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = 2 | 5 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = 3 | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = 4 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = 5 | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = 6 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = 7 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = 8 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = 9 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP >= 7 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP >= 15 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = <-10 to -9 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = -8 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = -7 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = -6 | 2 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = -5 | 5 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = -4 | 4 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = -3 | 10 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = -2 | 24 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = -1 | 21 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = 0 | 12 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = 1 | 16 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = 2 | 6 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = 3 | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = 4 | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = 5 | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = 6 | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = 7 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = 8 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = 9 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP >= 10 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP >= 15 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = 0 | 46 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = 6 | 2 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = -4 | 10 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP >= 15 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = -3 | 19 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP >= 7 | 1 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = 1 | 23 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP >= 10 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = -2 | 32 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = <-10 to -9 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP >= 7 | 2 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = 9 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = <-10 to -9 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = -8 | 1 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = -8 | 1 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = 2 | 13 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = -7 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = -7 | 2 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = -5 | 7 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = 7 | 2 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = -6 | 1 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = -2 | 31 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = -6 | 3 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = -1 | 32 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = 3 | 8 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = 0 | 32 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = -5 | 7 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = 1 | 30 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP >= 15 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = 2 | 16 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = -4 | 15 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = 3 | 7 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = 4 | 5 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = 4 | 6 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = -3 | 17 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = 5 | 2 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = 8 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = 6 | 1 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = 5 | 2 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = 7 | 1 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP = -1 | 22 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = 8 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Right eye, IOP >= 10 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 104 | Left eye, IOP = 9 | 0 participants |
Secondary
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52
An event for IOP is defined as an increase of 7 mm Hg or greater from baseline in IOP, in either eye, using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. Participants without post-baseline ophthalmic exam data were censored at the randomization date. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 value.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Population: ITT Population. The number analyzed reflects those participants remaining in the study and contributing data at the indicated time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = 8 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = 6 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP >= 7 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = 7 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP >= 15 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = 9 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP >= 7 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = -7 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP >= 15 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = 1 | 20 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = <-10 to -9 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = -6 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = -8 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP >= 10 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = -7 | 2 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = -5 | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = -4 | 5 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = -3 | 9 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = -4 | 7 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = -2 | 18 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = -3 | 9 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = -6 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = -1 | 22 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = -1 | 22 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = 0 | 28 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = -5 | 2 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = 1 | 16 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = 0 | 36 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = 2 | 13 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = -2 | 25 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = 3 | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = 2 | 7 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = 4 | 2 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = -8 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = 5 | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = 3 | 5 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = 6 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = 7 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = 4 | 4 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = 8 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = 9 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = 5 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP >= 10 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = <-10 to -9 | 1 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP >= 10 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = <-10 to -9 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = -8 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = -5 | 3 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = -4 | 12 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = -3 | 19 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = 0 | 50 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = 7 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP >= 7 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = -2 | 43 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = 9 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP >= 15 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = -7 | 2 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = -6 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = -2 | 40 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = -1 | 40 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = 1 | 30 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = 2 | 24 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = 3 | 19 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = 4 | 7 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = 5 | 3 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = 6 | 2 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = 8 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP = 9 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP >= 10 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Left eye, IOP >= 15 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = <-10 to -9 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = -8 | 1 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = -7 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = -6 | 1 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = -5 | 4 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = -4 | 14 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = -3 | 23 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = -1 | 34 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = 0 | 46 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = 1 | 31 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = 2 | 27 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = 3 | 14 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = 4 | 8 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = 5 | 2 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = 6 | 3 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = 7 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP = 8 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Increments of 1 mm Hg at Week 52 | Right eye, IOP >= 7 | 0 participants |
Secondary
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104
An event for P is defined as an increase of \>=0.3 from baseline in LOCS III (classification system based on standard color photographic transparencies) grade for P (range=0.1 \[lens clear\] to 5.9 \[lens unclear\]), in either eye. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the Week 52 and Week 104 value.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52, and Week 104
Population: ITT Population. The number analyzed reflects those participants remaining in the study and contributing data at the indicated time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, -0.2; n=130, 251 | 2 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, -0.1; n=130, 251 | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, 0.5; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, 0.7; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, 0.8; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, >=0.9; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, >=0.3; n=130, 251 | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, 0.5; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, 0.8; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, <-0.3; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, -0.3; n=104, 198 | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, 0.2; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, 0.3; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, 0.4; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, <-0.3; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, -0.3; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, 0; n=130, 251 | 121 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, 0.1; n=130, 251 | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, 0.2; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, 0.3; n=130, 251 | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, 0.4; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, 0.6; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, >=0.5; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, >=1.0; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, <-0.3; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, -0.3; n=130, 251 | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, -0.2; n=130, 251 | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, -0.1; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, 0; n=130, 251 | 122 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, 0.1; n=130, 251 | 4 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, 0.2; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, 0.3; n=130, 251 | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, 0.4; n=130, 251 | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, 0.5; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, 0.6; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, 0.7; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, 0.8; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, >=0.9; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, >=0.3; n=130, 251 | 2 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, >=0.5; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, >=1.0; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, <-0.3; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, -0.3; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, -0.2; n=104, 198 | 2 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, -0.1; n=104, 198 | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, 0; n=104, 198 | 94 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, 0.1; n=104, 198 | 5 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, 0.2; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, 0.3; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, 0.4; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, 0.6; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, 0.7; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, >=0.9; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, >=0.3; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, >=0.5; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, >=1.0; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, -0.2; n=104, 198 | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, -0.1; n=104, 198 | 2 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, 0; n=104, 198 | 97 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, 0.1; n=104, 198 | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, 0.5; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, 0.6; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, 0.7; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, 0.8; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, >=0.9; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, >=0.3; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, >=0.5; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, >=1.0; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, >=0.3; n=104, 198 | 1 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, -0.2; n=130, 251 | 5 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, 0.4; n=130, 251 | 2 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, -0.1; n=130, 251 | 13 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, 0.4; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, 0.4; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, 0.6; n=130, 251 | 1 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, 0.5; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, 0.5; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, 0.8; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, 0.6; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, >=0.9; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, 0; n=104, 198 | 174 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, 0; n=130, 251 | 218 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, 0.2; n=130, 251 | 2 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, >=0.3; n=130, 251 | 3 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, 0.2; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, 0.7; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, 0.6; n=104, 198 | 1 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, 0.7; n=104, 198 | 1 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, 0.8; n=104, 198 | 1 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, >=0.3; n=104, 198 | 2 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, 0.8; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, <-0.3; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, 0.7; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, -0.3; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, >=0.9; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, 0.2; n=104, 198 | 2 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, 0.1; n=104, 198 | 2 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, 0.3; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, >=0.9; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, >=0.9; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, >=1.0; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, >=0.5; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, <-0.3; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, 0.4; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, -0.3; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, >=1.0; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, 0; n=130, 251 | 218 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, >=0.5; n=104, 198 | 1 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, 0.1; n=130, 251 | 12 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, <-0.3; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, 0.2; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, >=0.5; n=104, 198 | 2 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, 0.3; n=130, 251 | 2 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, -0.3; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, 0.5; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, 0.5; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, 0.7; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, >=0.3; n=130, 251 | 3 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, -0.2; n=104, 198 | 5 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, >=0.5; n=130, 251 | 1 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, >=1.0; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 52, >=1.0; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, -0.1; n=104, 198 | 11 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, <-0.3; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, 0.8; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, -0.3; n=130, 251 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, 0; n=104, 198 | 175 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, -0.2; n=130, 251 | 5 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, -0.2; n=104, 198 | 5 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, -0.1; n=130, 251 | 10 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, 0.1; n=104, 198 | 5 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, 0.6; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, 0.1; n=130, 251 | 13 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 104, -0.1; n=104, 198 | 14 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Left eye, Week 104, 0.3; n=104, 198 | 0 participants |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in LOCS III Posterior Subcapsular Opacity by Increments of 0.1 at Weeks 52 and 104 | Right eye, Week 52, 0.3; n=130, 251 | 1 participants |
Secondary
Percent Change From Baseline in the Funduscopic Horizontal Cup-to-disc Ratio at Week 104
The funduscopic horizontal cup-to-risk ratio assesses the progression of glaucoma. Percent change from baseline in funduscopic horizontal cup-to-disc ratio at Week 104 was calculated by substracting the baseline value from the Week 104 value (both expressed as a percent). The cup-to-disc ratio compares the diameter of the cup portion of the optic disc with the total diameter of the optic disc. A large cup-to-disc ratio may imply glaucoma or other pathology.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 104
Population: ITT Population. The number analyzed reflects those participants remaining in the study and contributing data at the indicated time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline in the Funduscopic Horizontal Cup-to-disc Ratio at Week 104 | Left eye | 0.0 percent change | Standard Deviation 7.23 |
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline in the Funduscopic Horizontal Cup-to-disc Ratio at Week 104 | Right eye | 0.0 percent change | Standard Deviation 7.31 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Percent Change From Baseline in the Funduscopic Horizontal Cup-to-disc Ratio at Week 104 | Left eye | 0.7 percent change | Standard Deviation 7.58 |
| FF 110 mcg QD | Percent Change From Baseline in the Funduscopic Horizontal Cup-to-disc Ratio at Week 104 | Right eye | 0.0 percent change | Standard Deviation 7.39 |