Autonomic Failure, Diabetes Mellitus, Hypoglycemia
Conditions
Keywords
Diabetes, Hypoglycemia, HAAF, Counterregulation
Brief summary
Intensive glucose control in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is associated with clear health benefits. However, despite development of insulin analogs, pump/multi-dose treatment and continuous glucose monitoring, maintaining near-normal glycemia remains an elusive goal for most patients, in large part owing to the risk of hypoglycemia. T1DM patients are susceptible to hypoglycemia due to defective counterregulatory responses (CR) characterized by: 1) deficient glucagon release during impending/early hypoglycemia; 2) additional hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure (HAAF) and exercise-associated autonomic failure (EAAF) that blunt the sympathoadrenal responses to hypoglycemia following repeated episodes of hypoglycemia or exercise as well as degrading other CR; and 3) hypoglycemia unawareness (HU), lowering the threshold for symptoms that trigger behavioral responses (e.g. eating). Thus, the risk of hypoglycemia in T1DM impedes ideal insulin treatment and leads to defaulting to suboptimal glycemic control. There are two approaches that could resolve this important clinical problem: 1) perfection of glucose sensing and insulin and glucagon delivery approaches (bioengineered or cell-based) that mimic normal islet function and precisely regulate glucose continuously, or 2) a drug to enhance or normalize the pattern of CR to hypoglycemia. Despite much research and important advances in the field, neither islet transplantation nor biosensor devices have emerged as viable long-term solutions for the majority of patients. Over the past several years, the Diabetes Research Center laboratory at Albert Einstein College of Medicine has explored the approach of enhancing CR by examining mechanisms responsible for HAAF/EAAF and searching for potential pharmacological methods to modulate the CR to hypoglycemia. The work by the laboratory has led to a paradigm shift in the field of hypoglycemia, exemplified by the novel hypothesis and published experimental data supporting a role for opioid signaling that resulted in the initiation of exploratory clinical trials by other research groups.
Detailed description
In the prior project period of R01DK079974, the study team elucidated the central role played by the opioid signaling system as a mechanism for the development of HAAF/EAAF. The study team has previously demonstrated that opioid receptor blockade by acute infusion of naloxone during antecedent hypoglycemia can prevent experimentally induced HAAF in nondiabetic and T1DM subjects (JCEM 94:3372-80, 2009; JCEM 96:3424-31, 2011). The study team has also shown that opioid receptor blockade also abolishes EAAF, and that both effects are regulated by the stress response (hypoglycemia and exercise, respectively). Furthermore, activation of μ-opioid receptors with IV infusion of morphine reproduces some of the key biochemical and clinical features of HAAF in nondiabetic humans. Taken together, these studies demonstrate that the opioid system plays a central role in hypoglycemia counterregulation and in HAAF. NOTE: This ClinicalTrials.gov registration does not include the proposed fructose and exercise interventions described within the Arms/Interventions section. These interventions predate the change in PI and official notice of transfer of the NIH-NIDDK grant on February 06, 2014 and were not conducted. Interventions conducted as part of this study include the independent assessments of Epinephrine and Morphine as part of Aim 1 and assessment of intranasal Naloxone as part of Aim 3: Aim 2 of this protocol was not conducted prior to early termination of the study. It should be noted that information, including summarized Results data for four of the participants associated with the intranasal naloxone intervention were reported as part of a separate study approved by the IRB under a different study number. For these results, please reference NCT03608163 (ID: 2018-9208).
Interventions
Administering naloxone on Day 1, and quantifying the counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia on Day 2.
Administering fructose on Day 1, and quantifying the counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia on Day 2.
Administering exercise on Day 1, and quantifying the counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia on Day 2.
Administering morphine on Day 1, and quantifying the counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia on Day 2.
Administering epinephrine on Day 1, and quantifying the counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia on Day 2.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Non-diabetic individuals
Exclusion criteria
* Hypertension * Hyperlipidemia * Heart disease * Cerebrovascular disease * Seizures * Bleeding disorders
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Endogenous Glucose Production (EGP) Response Rate - Morphine Sulfate Study | Obtained every 15 minutes during the 1st and 3rd 2-hour hypoglycemic episodes (on Day 1 and Day 2), crossover visits up to ~7 months apart. Data from the final hour of the 3rd clamp episode were averaged/reported. | EGP response after antecedent morphine administration was assessed in the Morphine Sulfate vs Matched Placebo study. EGP response is a measure of how the body produces glucose from substrates to maintain blood sugar levels, particularly during fasting. Morphine was administered on Day 1 followed by a stepped hypoglycemia clamp (i.e., euglycemia → 90 mg/dl → 80 mg/dl → 70 mg/dl → 60 mg/dl) on Day 2. EGP response rate is reported in milligrams/kilograms/minute (mg/kg/min) and results are summarized and reported by study arm using basic descriptive statistics. Data from the final hour of the 3rd clamp episode were averaged/reported. |
| Endogenous Glucose Production (EGP) Via Glucose Infusion Rate - Naloxone Study | Obtained every 15 minutes during the 1st and 3rd 2-hour hypoglycemic episodes (on Day 1 and Day 2), crossover visits up to ~5 months apart. Data from the five timepoints over the final hour of the 1st and 3rd clamp episodes were averaged/reported. | For the Naloxone vs Matched Placebo study, EGP, a measure of the body's production of sugar, was assessed by determining the Glucose Infusion Rate (GIR) an indirect measure of endogenous glucose production, during the first and third hypoglycemic clamp episodes. GIR is reported in cubic centimeters/minute (cc/min) and results are summarized and reported by study arm using basic descriptive statistics. |
| Endogenous Glucose Production (EGP) Response Rate - Epinephrine Study | Obtained every 15 minutes during the 1st and 3rd 2-hour hypoglycemic episodes (on Day 1 and Day 2), crossover visits up to ~19 months apart. Data from the final hour of the 3rd clamp episode were averaged/reported. | EGP response after antecedent epinephrine administration was assessed in the Epinephrine vs Matched Epinephrine study. EGP response, a measure of how the body produces glucose from substrates to maintain blood sugar levels, was assessed during the final hypoglycemic clamp episode. EGP at the major nadir at the 60 mg/dL, during the last 10 minutes of the 3rd clamp episode, is reported in milligrams per kilogram per minute (mg/kg/min) and results are summarized and reported by study arm using basic descriptive statistics. Data from the final hour of the 3rd clamp episode were averaged/reported |
| Counterregulatory Response to Hypoglycemia - Morphine Sulfate Study | Approximately 2 Days following intervention (Day 1 and Day 2), crossover visits up to ~7 months apart. | Counterregulatory response to hypoglycemia was assessed for the Morphine Sulfate study by quantifying peak plasma responses to three episodes of induced hypoglycemia over two days: two, 2-hour episodes of moderate hyper-insulinemic, hypoglycemic clamp studies (target glucose 54 mg/dL), separated by a 2-hour break with a small snack, on Day 1, followed by a third, comparable hypoglycemic episode on Day 2. Group mean results are summarized for the Morphine Sulfate arm and Matched Placebo arm. |
| Counterregulatory Response to Hypoglycemia - Naloxone Study | Approximately 2 Days following intervention (Day 1 and Day 2), crossover visits up to ~5 months apart. | Counterregulatory response to hypoglycemia was assessed for the Naloxone study by quantifying peak plasma responses to three episodes of induced hypoglycemia over two days: two, 2-hour episodes of moderate hyper-insulinemic, hypoglycemic clamp studies (target glucose 54 mg/dL), separated by a 2-hour break with a small snack, on Day 1, followed by a third, comparable hypoglycemic episode on Day 2. The second challenge on Day 1 was conducted to assess the impact of the third episode for informational purposes only but was not reported. Group mean results are summarized for the 1st and 3rd episodes in the Naloxone arm and Matched Placebo arm. |
| Counterregulatory Response to Hypoglycemia - Epinephrine Study | Approximately 2 Days following intervention (Day 1 and Day 2), crossover visits up to ~19 months apart. | Counterregulatory response to hypoglycemia was assessed for the Epinephrine study by quantifying peak plasma epinephrine level responses to three episodes of induced hypoglycemia over two days: two, 2-hour episodes of moderate hyper-insulinemic, hypoglycemic clamp studies (target glucose 60 mg/dL), separated by a 2-hour break with a small snack, on Day 1, followed by a third, comparable hypoglycemic episode on Day 2. Group mean results are summarized for the Epinephrine arm and Matched Placebo arm. |
| Hypoglycemic Symptom Scores - Morphine Sulfate Study | Obtained at the end of each hypoglycemic episode on Day 2, crossover visits up to ~19 months apart. Summarized mean values for each participant during the 3rd hypoglycemic episode on Day 2 are reported | Hypoglycemic Symptom Scores were evaluated using the Edinburgh Hypoglycemia Symptom Scale (EHSS). The EHSS is an instrument to evaluate patients' experiences of symptoms in a typical hypoglycemic episode. It is comprised of 11 symptoms within 3 domains: Neuroglycopenic (i.e., confusion, drowsiness, odd behavior, speech difficulty, and incoordination), Autonomic (i.e., sweating, palpitations, shaking, and hunger), and General Malaise (i.e., headaches, nausea); which are evaluated by a 8-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = "Not at all" to 7 = "Very severely." An overall global mean composite score for the 11 symptoms was summed and averaged for each participant during the 3rd hypoglycemic episode on Day 2. Higher scores are indicative of more EHSS symptoms. Group mean values will be reported using basic descriptive statistics. |
| Hypoglycemic Symptom Scores - Naloxone Study | Obtained at the end of each hypoglycemic episode on Day 2, crossover visits up to ~19 months apart. Summarized mean values for each participant during the 3rd hypoglycemic episode on Day 2 are reported | Hypoglycemic Symptom Scores were evaluated using the Edinburgh Hypoglycemia Symptom Scale (EHSS). The EHSS is an instrument to evaluate patients' experiences of symptoms in a typical hypoglycemic episode. It is comprised of 11 symptoms within 3 domains: Neuroglycopenic (i.e., confusion, drowsiness, odd behavior, speech difficulty, and incoordination), Autonomic (i.e., sweating, palpitations, shaking, and hunger), and General Malaise (i.e., headaches, nausea); which are evaluated by a 8-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = "Not at all", to 7 = "Very severely." An overall global mean composite score for the 11 symptoms was summed and averaged for each participant during the 3rd hypoglycemic episode on Day 2. Higher scores are indicative of more EHSS symptoms. Group mean values will be reported using basic descriptive statistics. |
| Hypoglycemic Symptom Scores - Epinephrine Study | Obtained at the end of each hypoglycemic episode on Day 2, crossover visits up to ~19 months apart. Summarized mean values for each participant during the 3rd hypoglycemic episode on Day 2 are reported | Hypoglycemic Symptom Scores were evaluated using the Edinburgh Hypoglycemia Symptom Scale (EHSS). The EHSS is an instrument to evaluate patients' experiences of symptoms in a typical hypoglycemic episode. It is comprised of 11 symptoms within 3 domains: Neuroglycopenic (i.e., confusion, drowsiness, odd behavior, speech difficulty, and incoordination), Autonomic (i.e., sweating, palpitations, shaking, and hunger), and General Malaise (i.e., headaches, nausea); which are evaluated by a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = "Not at all", to 7 = "Very severely." An overall global mean composite score for the 11 symptoms was summed and averaged for each participant during the 3rd hypoglycemic episode on Day 2. Higher scores are indicative of more EHSS symptoms. Group mean values will be reported using basic descriptive statistics. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Zero (0) Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) patients were enrolled into the study. All study participants were healthy individuals without diabetes who were not on medication and had no history of hypoglycemia or family history of diabetes. One participant in the Naloxone vs Placebo comparator crossover study consented but was not enrolled. As such, 17 participants were enrolled into that study.
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | — |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 34.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9 |
| Body Mass Index (BMI) | 23.8 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5 |
| Fasting Glucose | 93.4 mg/dL STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.83 |
| Hemoglobin-A1C (HbA1c) | 5.6 percentage |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 12 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 12 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 5 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 14 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk | EG005 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 12 | 0 / 12 | 0 / 10 | 0 / 10 | 0 / 17 | 0 / 17 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 12 | 0 / 12 | 0 / 10 | 0 / 10 | 0 / 17 | 0 / 17 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 12 | 0 / 12 | 0 / 10 | 0 / 10 | 0 / 17 | 0 / 17 |