Skip to content

Post-Approval Study for the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft

A Prospective, Randomized, Concurrently-Controlled Post-Approval Study of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00677235
Acronym
RENOVA
Enrollment
270
Registered
2008-05-14
Start date
2008-12-31
Completion date
2013-03-31
Last updated
2017-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stenosis of Vascular Prosthetic Devices, Implants and Grafts

Keywords

Hemodialysis, Vascular Prosthesis, Stenosis, End-stage Renal Disease (ESRD)

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to confirm the long-term safety and effectiveness of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft for treatment of stenoses at the venous anastomosis of ePTFE or other synthetic arteriovenous (AV) access grafts.

Detailed description

The purpose of the study is to compare efficacy data on subjects randomized to treatment with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and the FLAIR™ Endovascular Stent Graft versus subjects randomized to treatment with PTA only.

Interventions

Treatment of stenoses with primary PTA and placement of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft

PROCEDUREPTA

Treatment of stenoses with PTA only

Sponsors

C. R. Bard
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject must be either a male or non-pregnant female greater than or equal to 21 years of age * Subject is willing to comply with the protocol requirements and can be contacted by telephone * Subject has a synthetic AV access graft located in an arm that has been implanted for greater than or equal to 30 days and has undergone at least one successful dialysis session prior to the index procedure * Angiographic evidence (per the institution's standard) is available to indicate that the subject has a stenosis greater than or equal to 50% located at the graft-vein anastomosis of subject's synthetic AV access graft * The target lesion is estimated to be less than or equal to 7 cm in length (by angiography) * The entire target lesion is located within 7 cm of the graft-vein anastomosis, as verified by angiography, such that approximately 1 cm of the FLAIR™ Endovascular Stent Graft will extend into non-diseased vein and approximately 1 cm but no more than 2 cm of the FLAIR™ Endovascular Stent Graft will extend into the non-diseased AV graft * Full expansion of an appropriately sized angioplasty balloon, in the operator's judgment, can be achieved during primary angioplasty * Graft diameter at the deployment site is between 5 mm and 8 mm as verified by angiography

Exclusion criteria

* The subject has a life expectancy of \< 25 months. * The target lesion has had a corresponding thrombosis treated less than or equal to 7 days prior to the index procedure. * A previously placed stent and/or stent graft located in the treatment area is present. Treatment area includes the entire target lesion and 1 cm of landing zone into both non-diseased AV graft and non-diseased vein. * The subject has an infected AV access graft or uncontrolled systemic infection. * The presence of additional lesion(s) in the access circuit less than or equal to 3 cm from the edges of the target lesion that was treated less than or equal to 30 days prior to index procedure. * The presence of additional lesion(s) in the access circuit \> 3 cm from the edges of the primary lesion that are greater than or equal to 30% stenosed. Note: Subjects may be included if the additional lesions(s) can be successfully treated with a final residual stenosis of \< 30% prior to the index procedure. * The location of the target lesion would require that the FLAIR™ Endovascular Stent Graft be deployed fully across the elbow joint (radiographically identified by a combination of the humeroulnar joint and the humeroradial joint). * The location of the target lesion would require that the FLAIR™ Endovascular Stent Graft cross an angle (between the inflow vein and synthetic AV access graft) that is \> 90 degrees. * The subject has an uncontrolled blood coagulation disorder. * The subject has a known allergy or sensitivity to contrast media which cannot be adequately pre-medicated. * The subject has a known hypersensitivity to nickel-titanium. * Subjects who are currently enrolled or who plan to enroll in other investigations that conflict with follow-up testing or confounds data in this trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ACPP Was Defined as the Interval Following the Index Procedure Until the Next Access Thrombosis or Reintervention.12 monthsTo demonstrate that the post intervention Access Circuit Primary Patency (ACPP) of FLAIR™ is superior to that of PTA at 12 months post study procedure.
The Index of Patency Function (IPF) [the Average Number of Months Between Interventions] of FLAIR™ is Not Inferior to That of PTA at 12 Months Post Study Procedure.12 monthsThe IPF is summarized was defined as the time from the index study procedure to complete graft abandonment divided by the number of visits for a reintervention performed on the arteriovenous (AV) access circuit in order to maintain vascular access for hemodialysis.
The Number of Participants With Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events at 12 Months Post Study Procedure.12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedural SuccessPatient Follow-UpProcedural success was a secondary endpoint without hypothesis testing and is therefore summarized descriptively. Procedural success is defined as anatomic success and at least one indicator of hemodynamic or clinical success.
Analysis of Proportion of Serious Adverse Events Classified as Device and/or Procedure-Related Through 30 Days Post-ProcedurePatient Follow-UpThe incidence of device-related and procedure-related serious adverse events (SAEs) from the index procedure through 30 days post procedure is summarized. The purpose of this analysis was to assess the effectiveness of the Bard Peripheral Vascular (BPV) clinician training program.
Demonstrate Non-inferiority of FLAIR Safety in Terms of Serious Adverse Events at 12 Months12 monthsSerious Adverse Events at 12 months are reported for all 270 subjects.
Access Circuit Primary Patency (ACCP) at 24 Months Procedure Until the Next Access Thrombosis or Reintervention.24 monthsAccess Circuit Primary Patency (ACPP) was defined as the interval following the index procedure until the next access thrombosis or reintervention at 24 months.
To Estimate Safety at 24 Months.24 monthsTo estimate the percentage of participants without safety issues through 24 months.
To Assess the Number of Re-interventions to the Access Circuit Until Graft Abandonment or Through 12 Months Post-index ProcedurePatient Follow-UpThe estimated number of re-interventions to the access circuit until graft abandonment or through 12 months post-index procedure was a secondary endpoint without hypothesis testing and is therefore summarized descriptively.
Post-intervention Secondary Patency at 24 Months24 monthsPostintervention secondary patency \[PSP; referred to as Access Circuit Cumulative Patency (ACCP) in the pivotal trial\] was the interval following the treatment procedure until the access circuit was surgically declotted, revised, or abandoned because of inability to treat the original stenosis.
Index of Patency Function (IPF) [the Average Number of Months Between Interventions] Rates of FLAIR™ and PTA at at 24 Months.24 monthsThe IPF is summarized was defined as the time from the index study procedure to complete graft abandonment divided by the number of visits for a reintervention performed on the AV access circuit in order to maintain vascular access for hemodialysis.
Post-Intervention Assisted Primary Patency at 6 Months6 month follow upPostintervention assisted primary patency (PAPP) was defined as the interval after the index/study procedure until access thrombosis or a surgical intervention that excluded the treated lesion from the access circuit.
Post-intervention Secondary Patency at 6 Months6 month follow-upPostintervention secondary patency \[PSP; referred to as Access Circuit Cumulative Patency (ACCP) in the pivotal trial\] was the interval following the treatment procedure until the access circuit was surgically declotted, revised, or abandoned because of inability to treat the original stenosis.
Post-Intervention Assisted Primary Patency at 24 Months24 month follow upPostintervention assisted primary patency (PAPP) was defined as the interval after the index/study procedure until access thrombosis or a surgical intervention that excluded the treated lesion from the access circuit.
Post-Intervention Assisted Primary Patency at 12 Months12 monthsPostintervention assisted primary patency (PAPP) was defined as the interval after the index/study procedure until access thrombosis or a surgical intervention that excluded the treated lesion from the access circuit.
Post-intervention Secondary Patency (PSP) at 12 Months12 monthsPostintervention secondary patency \[PSP; referred to as Access Circuit Cumulative Patency (ACCP) in the pivotal trial\] was the interval following the treatment procedure until the access circuit was surgically declotted, revised, or abandoned because of inability to treat the original stenosis.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
FLAIR
FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft: Treatment of stenoses with primary PTA and placement of the FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft
138
PTA Only
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty PTA: Treatment of stenoses with PTA only
132
Total270

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Experience10
Overall StudyDeath3736
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up21
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFLAIRPTA OnlyTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
73 Participants63 Participants136 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
65 Participants69 Participants134 Participants
Age, Continuous64 years63 years63.5 years
Region of Enrollment
United States
138 participants132 participants270 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
87 Participants86 Participants173 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
51 Participants46 Participants97 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
128 / 138127 / 132
serious
Total, serious adverse events
84 / 13887 / 132

Outcome results

Primary

ACPP Was Defined as the Interval Following the Index Procedure Until the Next Access Thrombosis or Reintervention.

To demonstrate that the post intervention Access Circuit Primary Patency (ACPP) of FLAIR™ is superior to that of PTA at 12 months post study procedure.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: All patients who were enrolled in the study were included in the analysis in the treatment group to which they were randomized, regardless of the intervention that they actually incurred (an intent-to-treat analysis).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FLAIRACPP Was Defined as the Interval Following the Index Procedure Until the Next Access Thrombosis or Reintervention.0.240 proportion of participants
PTA OnlyACPP Was Defined as the Interval Following the Index Procedure Until the Next Access Thrombosis or Reintervention.0.110 proportion of participants
Primary

The Index of Patency Function (IPF) [the Average Number of Months Between Interventions] of FLAIR™ is Not Inferior to That of PTA at 12 Months Post Study Procedure.

The IPF is summarized was defined as the time from the index study procedure to complete graft abandonment divided by the number of visits for a reintervention performed on the arteriovenous (AV) access circuit in order to maintain vascular access for hemodialysis.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: All patients who were enrolled in the study will participate in the analysis in the treatment group to which they were randomized, regardless of the intervention that they actually incurred (an intent-to-treat analysis).Blackwelder t-test testing non-inferiority of the FLAIR® group to that of PTA.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FLAIRThe Index of Patency Function (IPF) [the Average Number of Months Between Interventions] of FLAIR™ is Not Inferior to That of PTA at 12 Months Post Study Procedure.5.2 Months/interventionStandard Deviation 4.08
PTA OnlyThe Index of Patency Function (IPF) [the Average Number of Months Between Interventions] of FLAIR™ is Not Inferior to That of PTA at 12 Months Post Study Procedure.4.4 Months/interventionStandard Deviation 3.51
Primary

The Number of Participants With Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events at 12 Months Post Study Procedure.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FLAIRThe Number of Participants With Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events at 12 Months Post Study Procedure.128 Number of Participants with Device and/o
PTA OnlyThe Number of Participants With Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events at 12 Months Post Study Procedure.130 Number of Participants with Device and/o
Secondary

Access Circuit Primary Patency (ACCP) at 24 Months Procedure Until the Next Access Thrombosis or Reintervention.

Access Circuit Primary Patency (ACPP) was defined as the interval following the index procedure until the next access thrombosis or reintervention at 24 months.

Time frame: 24 months

Population: All patients who were enrolled in the study were included in the analysis in the treatment group to which they were randomized, regardless of the intervention that they actually incurred (an intent-to-treat analysis).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FLAIRAccess Circuit Primary Patency (ACCP) at 24 Months Procedure Until the Next Access Thrombosis or Reintervention.0.095 proportion of participants
PTA OnlyAccess Circuit Primary Patency (ACCP) at 24 Months Procedure Until the Next Access Thrombosis or Reintervention.0.055 proportion of participants
Secondary

Analysis of Proportion of Serious Adverse Events Classified as Device and/or Procedure-Related Through 30 Days Post-Procedure

The incidence of device-related and procedure-related serious adverse events (SAEs) from the index procedure through 30 days post procedure is summarized. The purpose of this analysis was to assess the effectiveness of the Bard Peripheral Vascular (BPV) clinician training program.

Time frame: Patient Follow-Up

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FLAIRAnalysis of Proportion of Serious Adverse Events Classified as Device and/or Procedure-Related Through 30 Days Post-Procedure2 events
PTA OnlyAnalysis of Proportion of Serious Adverse Events Classified as Device and/or Procedure-Related Through 30 Days Post-Procedure0 events
Secondary

Demonstrate Non-inferiority of FLAIR Safety in Terms of Serious Adverse Events at 12 Months

Serious Adverse Events at 12 months are reported for all 270 subjects.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FLAIRDemonstrate Non-inferiority of FLAIR Safety in Terms of Serious Adverse Events at 12 Months60.9 percentage of participants with serious
PTA OnlyDemonstrate Non-inferiority of FLAIR Safety in Terms of Serious Adverse Events at 12 Months65.9 percentage of participants with serious
p-value: 0.449Fisher Exact
Secondary

Index of Patency Function (IPF) [the Average Number of Months Between Interventions] Rates of FLAIR™ and PTA at at 24 Months.

The IPF is summarized was defined as the time from the index study procedure to complete graft abandonment divided by the number of visits for a reintervention performed on the AV access circuit in order to maintain vascular access for hemodialysis.

Time frame: 24 months

Population: All patients who were enrolled in the study will participate in the analysis in the treatment group to which they were randomized, regardless of the intervention that they actually incurred (an intent-to-treat analysis).Blackwelder t-test testing non-inferiority of the FLAIR® group to that of PTA.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FLAIRIndex of Patency Function (IPF) [the Average Number of Months Between Interventions] Rates of FLAIR™ and PTA at at 24 Months.7.1 Months/interventionStandard Deviation 7.04
PTA OnlyIndex of Patency Function (IPF) [the Average Number of Months Between Interventions] Rates of FLAIR™ and PTA at at 24 Months.5.3 Months/interventionStandard Deviation 5.22
Secondary

Post-Intervention Assisted Primary Patency at 12 Months

Postintervention assisted primary patency (PAPP) was defined as the interval after the index/study procedure until access thrombosis or a surgical intervention that excluded the treated lesion from the access circuit.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FLAIRPost-Intervention Assisted Primary Patency at 12 Months0.497 proportion of participants
PTA OnlyPost-Intervention Assisted Primary Patency at 12 Months0.563 proportion of participants
Secondary

Post-Intervention Assisted Primary Patency at 24 Months

Postintervention assisted primary patency (PAPP) was defined as the interval after the index/study procedure until access thrombosis or a surgical intervention that excluded the treated lesion from the access circuit.

Time frame: 24 month follow up

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FLAIRPost-Intervention Assisted Primary Patency at 24 Months0.384 proportion of participants
PTA OnlyPost-Intervention Assisted Primary Patency at 24 Months0.406 proportion of participants
Secondary

Post-Intervention Assisted Primary Patency at 6 Months

Postintervention assisted primary patency (PAPP) was defined as the interval after the index/study procedure until access thrombosis or a surgical intervention that excluded the treated lesion from the access circuit.

Time frame: 6 month follow up

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FLAIRPost-Intervention Assisted Primary Patency at 6 Months0.596 proportion of participants
PTA OnlyPost-Intervention Assisted Primary Patency at 6 Months0.656 proportion of participants
Secondary

Post-intervention Secondary Patency at 24 Months

Postintervention secondary patency \[PSP; referred to as Access Circuit Cumulative Patency (ACCP) in the pivotal trial\] was the interval following the treatment procedure until the access circuit was surgically declotted, revised, or abandoned because of inability to treat the original stenosis.

Time frame: 24 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FLAIRPost-intervention Secondary Patency at 24 Months0.518 proportion of participants
PTA OnlyPost-intervention Secondary Patency at 24 Months0.574 proportion of participants
Secondary

Post-intervention Secondary Patency at 6 Months

Postintervention secondary patency \[PSP; referred to as Access Circuit Cumulative Patency (ACCP) in the pivotal trial\] was the interval following the treatment procedure until the access circuit was surgically declotted, revised, or abandoned because of inability to treat the original stenosis.

Time frame: 6 month follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FLAIRPost-intervention Secondary Patency at 6 Months0.748 proportion of participants
PTA OnlyPost-intervention Secondary Patency at 6 Months0.793 proportion of participants
Secondary

Post-intervention Secondary Patency (PSP) at 12 Months

Postintervention secondary patency \[PSP; referred to as Access Circuit Cumulative Patency (ACCP) in the pivotal trial\] was the interval following the treatment procedure until the access circuit was surgically declotted, revised, or abandoned because of inability to treat the original stenosis.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FLAIRPost-intervention Secondary Patency (PSP) at 12 Months0.653 proportion of participants
PTA OnlyPost-intervention Secondary Patency (PSP) at 12 Months0.710 proportion of participants
Secondary

Procedural Success

Procedural success was a secondary endpoint without hypothesis testing and is therefore summarized descriptively. Procedural success is defined as anatomic success and at least one indicator of hemodynamic or clinical success.

Time frame: Patient Follow-Up

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FLAIRProcedural Success81.2 Percentage of Participants
PTA OnlyProcedural Success75.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

To Assess the Number of Re-interventions to the Access Circuit Until Graft Abandonment or Through 12 Months Post-index Procedure

The estimated number of re-interventions to the access circuit until graft abandonment or through 12 months post-index procedure was a secondary endpoint without hypothesis testing and is therefore summarized descriptively.

Time frame: Patient Follow-Up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FLAIRTo Assess the Number of Re-interventions to the Access Circuit Until Graft Abandonment or Through 12 Months Post-index Procedure1.9 reinterventionsStandard Deviation 2.18
PTA OnlyTo Assess the Number of Re-interventions to the Access Circuit Until Graft Abandonment or Through 12 Months Post-index Procedure2.4 reinterventionsStandard Deviation 2.31
Secondary

To Estimate Safety at 24 Months.

To estimate the percentage of participants without safety issues through 24 months.

Time frame: 24 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FLAIRTo Estimate Safety at 24 Months.10.9 percentage of participants
PTA OnlyTo Estimate Safety at 24 Months.3 percentage of participants
Post Hoc

Treatment Area Primary Patency (TAPP) at 12 Months.

TAPP is defined as patency (open to blood flow) after the study index procedure until reintervention in the treatment area (within 5mm proximal or 5mm distal to the study device or index balloon angioplasty treated area), or thrombotic occlusion that involved the treatment area.

Time frame: 12 months follow up

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FLAIRTreatment Area Primary Patency (TAPP) at 12 Months.0.476 proportion of participants
PTA OnlyTreatment Area Primary Patency (TAPP) at 12 Months.0.248 proportion of participants
Post Hoc

Treatment Area Primary Patency (TAPP) at 24 Months.

TAPP is defined as patency (open to blood flow) after the study index procedure until reintervention in the treatment area (within 5mm proximal or 5mm distal to the study device or index balloon angioplasty treated area), or thrombotic occlusion that involved the treatment area.

Time frame: 24 months follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FLAIRTreatment Area Primary Patency (TAPP) at 24 Months.0.269 proportion of participants
PTA OnlyTreatment Area Primary Patency (TAPP) at 24 Months.0.135 proportion of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026