Skip to content

Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Bapineuzumab in Alzheimer Disease Patients

A Phase Iii, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, Efficacy And Safety Trial Of Bapineuzumab (Aab 001, Eln115727) In Subjects With Mild To Moderate Alzheimer Disease Who Are Apolipoprotein E 4 Carriers

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00676143
Enrollment
1100
Registered
2008-05-12
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2012-11-30
Last updated
2016-06-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer Disease

Keywords

antibody, immunotherapy

Brief summary

This is a study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of multiple doses of bapineuzumab in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer Disease. Patients will receive either bapineuzumab or placebo. Each patient's participation will last approximately 1.5 years.

Interventions

Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg administered by IV infusion approximately every 13 weeks through week 65.

DRUGplacebo

Placebo will be administered by IV infusion approximately every 13 weeks through week 65.

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 88 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of probable AD, with MMSE score of 16-26, and brain MRI consistent with the diagnosis of AD * Concurrent use of cholinesterase inhibitor or memantine allowed, if stable. * Caregiver will participate and be able to attend clinic visits with patient.

Exclusion criteria

* Significant neurological disease other than AD, or a major psychiatric disorder * Contraindication to undergo brain MRI (e.g., pacemaker, CSF shunt, or foreign metal objects in the body) * Woman of childbearing potential

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog)/11 Subscale Total Score at Week 78Baseline and 78 weeksThe ADAS-Cog is a multi-item, objective measure of cognitive function. The scale evaluates memory, language, and praxis with items such as orientation, word recall, word recognition, object identification, comprehension, and the completion of simple tasks. Analysis of the ADAS-Cog for this study was based upon an 11 item score from the following items 1) word recall task, 2) naming objects and fingers, 3) following commands, 4) constructional praxis, 5) ideational praxis, 6) orientation, 7) word recognition, 8) remembering test instructions, 9) spoken language ability, 10) word finding difficulty in spontaneous speech, and 11) comprehension. This scale had to be administered by a trained and certified psychometric rater who did not have access to any information regarding adverse events experienced. The ADAS-Cog/11 ranged from 0 to 70 points, with higher scores indicating a greater degree of impairment. A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in cognitive impairment.
Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) Total Score at Week 78Baseline and 78 weeksThe DAD measures instrumental and basic activities of daily living in participants with Alzheimer's Disease (AD). The DAD is administered to the participants'caregiver in the form of an interview. This scale had to be administered by a trained and certified psychometric rater who did not have access to any information regarding adverse events experienced by the participant. This scale assesses a participants' ability to initiate, plan, and perform activities related to hygiene, dressing, continence, eating, meal preparation, telephoning, going on an outing, finance and correspondence, medications, leisure, and housework. Each item can be scored as 1 = yes, 0 = no, non applicable = NA. A total score is obtained by adding the rating for each question and converting this total score out of 100. Higher scores indicate better function; a positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Brain Volume, as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Boundary Shift Integral (MRI BBSI), at Week 71Baseline and 71 WeeksCerebral atrophy correlates closely with the gradual cognitive decline in AD and can be visualized by MRI. The BBSI technique involves positional matching of serial 3-dimensional MRI brain images, such that brain MRI-image volumes were first registered and then subtracted from each other. Atrophy rates would generally be expected to be lower if the underlying disease was attenuated by effective treatment.
Divergence of Effect on the ADAS-Cog/11 Total Scores From Week 39 to Week 78Week 39 to Week 78Treatment differences are estimated using least-squares (LS) means with factor levels weighted according to overall analysis population proportions. ADAS-Cog/11 total score range is 0 (least impairment) to 70 (most impairment); a negative treatment difference (bapineuzumab minus placebo) favors bapineuzumab. Within the MMRMs for ADAS-Cog/11 described for the primary analyses, linear contrasts were formed to test increasing trend of the differences between bapineuzumab and placebo from Week 39 (the 9-month visit) through Week 78 (the 18 -month visit) for each variable, which is equivalent to testing a positive slope of the differences between each bapineuzumab dose group and placebo from Week 39 through Week 78. Results are from a restricted maximum likelihood (REML)-based mixed model for MMRM.
Divergence of Effect on the DAD Total Scores From Week 39 to Week 78Week 39 to Week 78Treatment differences are estimated using least-squares (LS) means with factor levels weighted according to overall analysis population proportions. DAD total score range is 0 to 100; a positive treatment difference (bapineuzumab minus placebo) favors bapineuzumab. Within the MMRMs for ADAS-Cog/11 described for the primary analyses, linear contrasts were formed to test increasing trend of the differences between bapineuzumab and placebo from Week 39 (the 9-month visit) through Week 78 (the 18 -month visit) for each variable, which is equivalent to testing a positive slope of the differences between each bapineuzumab dose group and placebo from Week 39 through Week 78. Results are from a restricted maximum likelihood (REML)-based mixed model for MMRM.
Time to First Median Placebo Deterioration on ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score (European Union [EU] Analysis Plan)Baseline and 78 WeeksThe time to first median placebo deterioration, defined as the first time a participant experienced an increase (worsening) from baseline in ADAS-Cog/11 total score greater than or equal to the median worsening observed at Week 78 in the placebo group. The Kaplan Meier estimate of median time to first median placebo deterioration was presented.
Time to First Clinically Meaningful Deterioration on ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score (United States [US] Analysis Plan)Baseline and 78 WeeksThe time to first clinically meaningful deterioration was defined as the first time a participant experienced an increase (worsening) from baseline in ADAS-Cog/11 total score of \>=7.
Time to First Median Placebo Deterioration on DAD Total Score (EU Analysis Plan)Baseline and 78 WeeksThe time to first median placebo deterioration was defined as the first time a participant experienced a decrease (worsening) in DAD total score greater than or equal to the median worsening at Week 78 in the placebo group.
Change From Baseline in Brain Amyloid Burden at Week 71Baseline and 71 weeksBrain amyloid burden as imaged by 11C-Pittsburgh compound B (PIB) positron emission tomography (PET). The latter is a semi-quantitative measure of the extent of fibrillar amyloid in the brain. PIB PET measurements were made in cortical regions found to have the highest burden of fibrillar amyloid at autopsy in participants diagnosed as having Alzheimer's pathology, and also regions reported to have the highest average retention of PIB signal in previous PET studies enrolling participants with probable AD. This parameter reflects overall brain amyloid deposition as indexed by imaging. The change from baseline was measured as average standard uptake value ratio (SUVr) in prespecified regions of interest (ROI) assessed by PIB PET imaging in a subset of participants.
Change From Baseline in Dependence Scale Total Score at Week 78Baseline and 78 WeeksThe Dependence Scale (DS) is a 13-item, caregiver-rated instrument for determining the amount of support required by a participant with AD. The DS total score ranges from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating more need for assistance. The DS was administered as an interview to the caregiver at scheduled study visits.
Percentage of Participants With Worsening From Baseline in ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score at Week 78 (EU Analysis Plan)Baseline and 78 WeeksPercentage of participants with worsening from baseline to Week 78 in ADAS-Cog/11 total score of ≤0, ≤3, and ≤7 points were reported. In order to calculate time to first median placebo deterioration in ADAS-Cog/11, the median change from baseline to Week 78 among the placebo participants of the mITT analysis population were determined. The median changes were used as the cutpoints for determining deterioration for Alzheimer's disease participants in the study. If the median change from baseline to Week 78 in the ADAS-Cog/11 total score among the placebo participants of the mITT Analysis Population is 7 points, then the first median placebo deterioration is the first time where there is a worsening on the ADAS-Cog/11 total score of 7 points or more and the worsening is confirmed by the ADAS-Cog/11 assessment at the next non-missing visit.
Percentage of Responders for ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score at Week 78 (US Analysis Plan)Baseline and 78 WeeksPercentage of participants whose increase (worsening) from baseline to Week 78 in ADAS-Cog/11 total score was \<7.
Percentage of Participants With Worsening From Baseline in DAD Total Score at Week 78 (EU Analysis Plan)Baseline and 78 WeeksPercentage of participants whose decrease (worsening) from baseline to Week 78 in DAD total score of ≤ 0, ≤ 6, and ≤ 12 points. In order to calculate time to first median placebo deterioration in DAD, the median change from baseline to Week 78 among the placebo participants of the mITT analysis population were determined. The median changes were used as the cutpoints for determining deterioration for Alzheimer's disease participants in the study. If the median change from baseline to Week 78 in the DAD total score among the placebo participants of the mITT Analysis Population is 7 points, then the first median placebo deterioration is the first time where there is a worsening on the DAD total score of 7 points or more and the worsening is confirmed by the DAD assessment at the next non-missing visit.
Percentage of Responders for DAD Total Score at Week 78 (US Analysis Plan)Baseline and 78 WeeksPercentage of participants whose decrease (worsening) from baseline to Week 78 in DAD total score was \<12.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB) Total Score at Week 78Baseline and 78 WeeksThe CDR-SOB is a global clinical staging instrument that sums 6 clinical ratings: 1) memory, 2) orientation, 3) judgment and problem solving, 4) involvement in community affairs, 5) home and hobbies, and 6) personal care based on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) interview. The CDR includes discussions with the participant and caregiver using a structured format. This scale had to be administered by a trained and certified global rater who did not have access to any information regarding adverse events experienced by the participant. CDR-SOB total score range is 0 (least impairment) to 18 (most impairment); a negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Time to First Clinically Meaningful Deterioration on DAD Total Score (US Analysis)Baseline and 78 WeeksThe time to first clinically meaningful deterioration was defined as the first time a participant experienced a decrease (worsening) from baseline in DAD total score of \>=12.
Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Phospho-tau Levels at Week 71Baseline and 71 WeeksBiomarkers CSF phospho-tau is an indicator of neuronal injury and neurodegeneration. An elevation in levels of tau, as well as specific p-tau species, is thought to be a marker for progressive cellular degeneration in AD. Accordingly, a reduction from baseline in levels of CSF tau in participants who received bapineuzumab compared with participants who received placebo may be indicative of a reduction in neuronal loss in participants treated with bapineuzumab.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Chile, Croatia, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal, Serbia, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 218 centers across the world. The study was terminated early by the sponsor on 06 August 2012. Enrollment had already been completed at the time of this decision. Participants who were still participating at that time were asked to complete an early withdrawal visit.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo by intravenous (IV) infusion every 13 weeks up to 6 doses (65 weeks). Participants were followed up until 78 weeks.
439
Bapineuzumab
Participants received bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kg by IV infusion every 13 weeks up to 6 doses (65 weeks). Participants were followed up until 78 weeks
654
Total1,093

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event3460
Overall StudyDeath44
Overall StudyDiscontinuation of study by sponsor6588
Overall StudyFailed to return21
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy06
Overall StudyLoss of caregiver53
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up013
Overall StudyOther1120
Overall StudyParticipant participation unknown14
Overall StudyPhysician Decision58
Overall StudyProtocol Violation48
Overall StudyVasogenic edema recurrence13
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2442

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboBapineuzumabTotal
Age, Continuous70.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.75
71.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.67
70.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.71
Age, Customized
<65 years
97 Number of participants132 Number of participants229 Number of participants
Age, Customized
>=65 years
342 Number of participants522 Number of participants864 Number of participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
262 Participants421 Participants683 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
177 Participants233 Participants410 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
198 / 439298 / 654
serious
Total, serious adverse events
77 / 439137 / 654

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog)/11 Subscale Total Score at Week 78

The ADAS-Cog is a multi-item, objective measure of cognitive function. The scale evaluates memory, language, and praxis with items such as orientation, word recall, word recognition, object identification, comprehension, and the completion of simple tasks. Analysis of the ADAS-Cog for this study was based upon an 11 item score from the following items 1) word recall task, 2) naming objects and fingers, 3) following commands, 4) constructional praxis, 5) ideational praxis, 6) orientation, 7) word recognition, 8) remembering test instructions, 9) spoken language ability, 10) word finding difficulty in spontaneous speech, and 11) comprehension. This scale had to be administered by a trained and certified psychometric rater who did not have access to any information regarding adverse events experienced. The ADAS-Cog/11 ranged from 0 to 70 points, with higher scores indicating a greater degree of impairment. A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in cognitive impairment.

Time frame: Baseline and 78 weeks

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) total score.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog)/11 Subscale Total Score at Week 787.31 Unit on a scaleStandard Error 0.47
BapineuzumabChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog)/11 Subscale Total Score at Week 787.32 Unit on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
Comparison: Change in ADAS-Cog/11 total score was analyzed using a restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed model for repeated measures.~The number of participants in each group gave 90% power to detect a 2.21 point advantage for the bapineuzumab group over placebo on the ADAS-Cog/11 total score, at the primary time point (Week 78). This calculation was based on a two-sided test with an alpha of 0.05.p-value: 0.97995% CI: [-1.18, 1.22]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) Total Score at Week 78

The DAD measures instrumental and basic activities of daily living in participants with Alzheimer's Disease (AD). The DAD is administered to the participants'caregiver in the form of an interview. This scale had to be administered by a trained and certified psychometric rater who did not have access to any information regarding adverse events experienced by the participant. This scale assesses a participants' ability to initiate, plan, and perform activities related to hygiene, dressing, continence, eating, meal preparation, telephoning, going on an outing, finance and correspondence, medications, leisure, and housework. Each item can be scored as 1 = yes, 0 = no, non applicable = NA. A total score is obtained by adding the rating for each question and converting this total score out of 100. Higher scores indicate better function; a positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and 78 weeks

Population: The mITT included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) Total Score at Week 78-14.94 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
BapineuzumabChange From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) Total Score at Week 78-14.89 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Comparison: Change in DAD total score was analyzed using a restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed model for repeated measures.~The number of participants in each group gave 90% power to detect a 5.39 unit advantage for the bapineuzumab group over placebo on the DAD total score, at the primary time point (Week 78). This calculation was based on a two-sided test with an alpha of 0.05.p-value: 0.97395% CI: [-2.51, 2.6]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Brain Amyloid Burden at Week 71

Brain amyloid burden as imaged by 11C-Pittsburgh compound B (PIB) positron emission tomography (PET). The latter is a semi-quantitative measure of the extent of fibrillar amyloid in the brain. PIB PET measurements were made in cortical regions found to have the highest burden of fibrillar amyloid at autopsy in participants diagnosed as having Alzheimer's pathology, and also regions reported to have the highest average retention of PIB signal in previous PET studies enrolling participants with probable AD. This parameter reflects overall brain amyloid deposition as indexed by imaging. The change from baseline was measured as average standard uptake value ratio (SUVr) in prespecified regions of interest (ROI) assessed by PIB PET imaging in a subset of participants.

Time frame: Baseline and 71 weeks

Population: PIB PET population included all randomized participants who enrolled in the PET substudies and who met the following criteria: a) received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug, b) had a baseline and at least one postbaseline PIB PET assessment, and c) had an SUVr for the global cortical average (GCA) ROI ≥1.35 at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Brain Amyloid Burden at Week 710.03 standard uptake value ratioStandard Error 0.04
BapineuzumabChange From Baseline in Brain Amyloid Burden at Week 71-0.04 standard uptake value ratioStandard Error 0.03
Comparison: Change in PIB PET SUVr was analyzed using a restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed model for repeated measures.~The number of participants gave 90% power to detect a 0.152 unit advantage for the bapineuzumab group over placebo for PiB PET binding at Week 71. The calculations were based on 2-sided tests with alpha set at 0.05.p-value: 0.15995% CI: [-0.17, 0.03]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Brain Volume, as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Boundary Shift Integral (MRI BBSI), at Week 71

Cerebral atrophy correlates closely with the gradual cognitive decline in AD and can be visualized by MRI. The BBSI technique involves positional matching of serial 3-dimensional MRI brain images, such that brain MRI-image volumes were first registered and then subtracted from each other. Atrophy rates would generally be expected to be lower if the underlying disease was attenuated by effective treatment.

Time frame: Baseline and 71 Weeks

Population: vMRI population included all randomized participants who enrolled in the vMRI substudies, received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug, and had a baseline and at least one postbaseline vMRI that passed quality control and was satisfactory for volumetric analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Brain Volume, as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Boundary Shift Integral (MRI BBSI), at Week 7117.64 Milliliter (mL)/yearStandard Error 0.69
BapineuzumabChange From Baseline in Brain Volume, as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Boundary Shift Integral (MRI BBSI), at Week 7117.51 Milliliter (mL)/yearStandard Error 0.56
Comparison: Change in MRI BBSI was analyzed using a restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed model for repeated measures.~The number of participants gave 90% power to detect a 4.15-cm3 advantage for the bapineuzumab group over placebo on reduction in brain volume as measured by the BBSI at Week 71. The calculations were based on 2-sided tests with alpha set at 0.05.p-value: 0.88495% CI: [-1.89, 1.63]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Phospho-tau Levels at Week 71

Biomarkers CSF phospho-tau is an indicator of neuronal injury and neurodegeneration. An elevation in levels of tau, as well as specific p-tau species, is thought to be a marker for progressive cellular degeneration in AD. Accordingly, a reduction from baseline in levels of CSF tau in participants who received bapineuzumab compared with participants who received placebo may be indicative of a reduction in neuronal loss in participants treated with bapineuzumab.

Time frame: Baseline and 71 Weeks

Population: CSF population included all randomized participants who enrolled in the CSF substudies, received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug, and had a baseline and at least one postbaseline CSF measurement (CSF phospho-tau).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Phospho-tau Levels at Week 710.83 pg/mLStandard Error 2.04
BapineuzumabChange From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Phospho-tau Levels at Week 71-0.55 pg/mLStandard Error 1.84
Comparison: Change in CSF phospho-tau was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model. The analysis was based on the treatment difference estimated at Week 71 based on appropriate contrasts or LS means. The number of participants gave 90% power to detect a 13-ng/L advantage in phospho-tau for the bapineuzumab group over placebo at Week 71. The calculations were based on 2-sided tests with alpha set at 0.05.p-value: 0.6295% CI: [-6.89, 4.13]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB) Total Score at Week 78

The CDR-SOB is a global clinical staging instrument that sums 6 clinical ratings: 1) memory, 2) orientation, 3) judgment and problem solving, 4) involvement in community affairs, 5) home and hobbies, and 6) personal care based on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) interview. The CDR includes discussions with the participant and caregiver using a structured format. This scale had to be administered by a trained and certified global rater who did not have access to any information regarding adverse events experienced by the participant. CDR-SOB total score range is 0 (least impairment) to 18 (most impairment); a negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and 78 Weeks

Population: The mITT included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB) Total Score at Week 782.59 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
BapineuzumabChange From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB) Total Score at Week 782.44 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Comparison: Change in CDR-SOB total score was analyzed using a restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed model for repeated measures.p-value: 0.44895% CI: [-0.55, 0.24]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Dependence Scale Total Score at Week 78

The Dependence Scale (DS) is a 13-item, caregiver-rated instrument for determining the amount of support required by a participant with AD. The DS total score ranges from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating more need for assistance. The DS was administered as an interview to the caregiver at scheduled study visits.

Time frame: Baseline and 78 Weeks

Population: The mITT included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Dependence Scale Total Score at Week 781.33 Unit on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
BapineuzumabChange From Baseline in Dependence Scale Total Score at Week 781.22 Unit on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Comparison: Change in DS total score was analyzed using a restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed model for repeated measures.p-value: 0.46295% CI: [-0.41, 0.13]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Divergence of Effect on the ADAS-Cog/11 Total Scores From Week 39 to Week 78

Treatment differences are estimated using least-squares (LS) means with factor levels weighted according to overall analysis population proportions. ADAS-Cog/11 total score range is 0 (least impairment) to 70 (most impairment); a negative treatment difference (bapineuzumab minus placebo) favors bapineuzumab. Within the MMRMs for ADAS-Cog/11 described for the primary analyses, linear contrasts were formed to test increasing trend of the differences between bapineuzumab and placebo from Week 39 (the 9-month visit) through Week 78 (the 18 -month visit) for each variable, which is equivalent to testing a positive slope of the differences between each bapineuzumab dose group and placebo from Week 39 through Week 78. Results are from a restricted maximum likelihood (REML)-based mixed model for MMRM.

Time frame: Week 39 to Week 78

Population: The mITT included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboDivergence of Effect on the ADAS-Cog/11 Total Scores From Week 39 to Week 78Week 524.40 Units/YearStandard Error 0.34
PlaceboDivergence of Effect on the ADAS-Cog/11 Total Scores From Week 39 to Week 78Week 392.95 Units/YearStandard Error 0.3
PlaceboDivergence of Effect on the ADAS-Cog/11 Total Scores From Week 39 to Week 78Week 655.76 Units/YearStandard Error 0.39
PlaceboDivergence of Effect on the ADAS-Cog/11 Total Scores From Week 39 to Week 78Week 787.31 Units/YearStandard Error 0.47
BapineuzumabDivergence of Effect on the ADAS-Cog/11 Total Scores From Week 39 to Week 78Week 787.32 Units/YearStandard Error 0.39
BapineuzumabDivergence of Effect on the ADAS-Cog/11 Total Scores From Week 39 to Week 78Week 392.68 Units/YearStandard Error 0.25
BapineuzumabDivergence of Effect on the ADAS-Cog/11 Total Scores From Week 39 to Week 78Week 524.08 Units/YearStandard Error 0.29
BapineuzumabDivergence of Effect on the ADAS-Cog/11 Total Scores From Week 39 to Week 78Week 655.16 Units/YearStandard Error 0.32
Comparison: Treatment Difference: Bapineuzumab - Placebop-value: 0.795% CI: [-0.97, 1.45]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Divergence of Effect on the DAD Total Scores From Week 39 to Week 78

Treatment differences are estimated using least-squares (LS) means with factor levels weighted according to overall analysis population proportions. DAD total score range is 0 to 100; a positive treatment difference (bapineuzumab minus placebo) favors bapineuzumab. Within the MMRMs for ADAS-Cog/11 described for the primary analyses, linear contrasts were formed to test increasing trend of the differences between bapineuzumab and placebo from Week 39 (the 9-month visit) through Week 78 (the 18 -month visit) for each variable, which is equivalent to testing a positive slope of the differences between each bapineuzumab dose group and placebo from Week 39 through Week 78. Results are from a restricted maximum likelihood (REML)-based mixed model for MMRM.

Time frame: Week 39 to Week 78

Population: The mITT included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboDivergence of Effect on the DAD Total Scores From Week 39 to Week 78Week 65-12.14 Units/YearStandard Error 0.91
PlaceboDivergence of Effect on the DAD Total Scores From Week 39 to Week 78Week 39-6.60 Units/YearStandard Error 0.65
PlaceboDivergence of Effect on the DAD Total Scores From Week 39 to Week 78Week 52-9.34 Units/YearStandard Error 0.73
PlaceboDivergence of Effect on the DAD Total Scores From Week 39 to Week 78Week 78-14.94 Units/YearStandard Error 1
BapineuzumabDivergence of Effect on the DAD Total Scores From Week 39 to Week 78Week 65-13.04 Units/YearStandard Error 0.76
BapineuzumabDivergence of Effect on the DAD Total Scores From Week 39 to Week 78Week 52-9.34 Units/YearStandard Error 0.61
BapineuzumabDivergence of Effect on the DAD Total Scores From Week 39 to Week 78Week 78-14.89 Units/YearStandard Error 0.84
BapineuzumabDivergence of Effect on the DAD Total Scores From Week 39 to Week 78Week 39-6.93 Units/YearStandard Error 0.54
Comparison: Treatment Difference: Bapineuzumab - Placebop-value: 0.94995% CI: [-2.61, 2.78]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Worsening From Baseline in ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score at Week 78 (EU Analysis Plan)

Percentage of participants with worsening from baseline to Week 78 in ADAS-Cog/11 total score of ≤0, ≤3, and ≤7 points were reported. In order to calculate time to first median placebo deterioration in ADAS-Cog/11, the median change from baseline to Week 78 among the placebo participants of the mITT analysis population were determined. The median changes were used as the cutpoints for determining deterioration for Alzheimer's disease participants in the study. If the median change from baseline to Week 78 in the ADAS-Cog/11 total score among the placebo participants of the mITT Analysis Population is 7 points, then the first median placebo deterioration is the first time where there is a worsening on the ADAS-Cog/11 total score of 7 points or more and the worsening is confirmed by the ADAS-Cog/11 assessment at the next non-missing visit.

Time frame: Baseline and 78 Weeks

Population: The mITT included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening From Baseline in ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score at Week 78 (EU Analysis Plan)Worsening of 7 points42.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening From Baseline in ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score at Week 78 (EU Analysis Plan)Worsening of 0 points18.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening From Baseline in ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score at Week 78 (EU Analysis Plan)Worsening of 3 points30.4 Percentage of participants
BapineuzumabPercentage of Participants With Worsening From Baseline in ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score at Week 78 (EU Analysis Plan)Worsening of 0 points15.5 Percentage of participants
BapineuzumabPercentage of Participants With Worsening From Baseline in ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score at Week 78 (EU Analysis Plan)Worsening of 3 points25.5 Percentage of participants
BapineuzumabPercentage of Participants With Worsening From Baseline in ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score at Week 78 (EU Analysis Plan)Worsening of 7 points38.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Worsening From Baseline in DAD Total Score at Week 78 (EU Analysis Plan)

Percentage of participants whose decrease (worsening) from baseline to Week 78 in DAD total score of ≤ 0, ≤ 6, and ≤ 12 points. In order to calculate time to first median placebo deterioration in DAD, the median change from baseline to Week 78 among the placebo participants of the mITT analysis population were determined. The median changes were used as the cutpoints for determining deterioration for Alzheimer's disease participants in the study. If the median change from baseline to Week 78 in the DAD total score among the placebo participants of the mITT Analysis Population is 7 points, then the first median placebo deterioration is the first time where there is a worsening on the DAD total score of 7 points or more and the worsening is confirmed by the DAD assessment at the next non-missing visit.

Time frame: Baseline and 78 Weeks

Population: The mITT included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening From Baseline in DAD Total Score at Week 78 (EU Analysis Plan)Worsening of 0 points17.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening From Baseline in DAD Total Score at Week 78 (EU Analysis Plan)Worsening of 6 points29.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening From Baseline in DAD Total Score at Week 78 (EU Analysis Plan)Worsening of 12 points39.7 Percentage of participants
BapineuzumabPercentage of Participants With Worsening From Baseline in DAD Total Score at Week 78 (EU Analysis Plan)Worsening of 0 points18.6 Percentage of participants
BapineuzumabPercentage of Participants With Worsening From Baseline in DAD Total Score at Week 78 (EU Analysis Plan)Worsening of 6 points27.4 Percentage of participants
BapineuzumabPercentage of Participants With Worsening From Baseline in DAD Total Score at Week 78 (EU Analysis Plan)Worsening of 12 points34.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Responders for ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score at Week 78 (US Analysis Plan)

Percentage of participants whose increase (worsening) from baseline to Week 78 in ADAS-Cog/11 total score was \<7.

Time frame: Baseline and 78 Weeks

Population: The mITT included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Responders for ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score at Week 78 (US Analysis Plan)42.2 Percentage of participant
BapineuzumabPercentage of Responders for ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score at Week 78 (US Analysis Plan)37.1 Percentage of participant
p-value: 0.086Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Responders for DAD Total Score at Week 78 (US Analysis Plan)

Percentage of participants whose decrease (worsening) from baseline to Week 78 in DAD total score was \<12.

Time frame: Baseline and 78 Weeks

Population: The mITT included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Responders for DAD Total Score at Week 78 (US Analysis Plan)39.7 Percentage of participant
BapineuzumabPercentage of Responders for DAD Total Score at Week 78 (US Analysis Plan)34.9 Percentage of participant
p-value: 0.12Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Time to First Clinically Meaningful Deterioration on ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score (United States [US] Analysis Plan)

The time to first clinically meaningful deterioration was defined as the first time a participant experienced an increase (worsening) from baseline in ADAS-Cog/11 total score of \>=7.

Time frame: Baseline and 78 Weeks

Population: The mITT included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboTime to First Clinically Meaningful Deterioration on ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score (United States [US] Analysis Plan)NA Days
BapineuzumabTime to First Clinically Meaningful Deterioration on ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score (United States [US] Analysis Plan)546.0 Days
p-value: 0.383Log Rank
Secondary

Time to First Clinically Meaningful Deterioration on DAD Total Score (US Analysis)

The time to first clinically meaningful deterioration was defined as the first time a participant experienced a decrease (worsening) from baseline in DAD total score of \>=12.

Time frame: Baseline and 78 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboTime to First Clinically Meaningful Deterioration on DAD Total Score (US Analysis)546.0 Days
BapineuzumabTime to First Clinically Meaningful Deterioration on DAD Total Score (US Analysis)546.0 Days
p-value: 0.478Log Rank
Secondary

Time to First Median Placebo Deterioration on ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score (European Union [EU] Analysis Plan)

The time to first median placebo deterioration, defined as the first time a participant experienced an increase (worsening) from baseline in ADAS-Cog/11 total score greater than or equal to the median worsening observed at Week 78 in the placebo group. The Kaplan Meier estimate of median time to first median placebo deterioration was presented.

Time frame: Baseline and 78 Weeks

Population: The mITT included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboTime to First Median Placebo Deterioration on ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score (European Union [EU] Analysis Plan)463.0 Days
BapineuzumabTime to First Median Placebo Deterioration on ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score (European Union [EU] Analysis Plan)457.0 Days
p-value: 0.684Log Rank
Secondary

Time to First Median Placebo Deterioration on DAD Total Score (EU Analysis Plan)

The time to first median placebo deterioration was defined as the first time a participant experienced a decrease (worsening) in DAD total score greater than or equal to the median worsening at Week 78 in the placebo group.

Time frame: Baseline and 78 Weeks

Population: The mITT included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboTime to First Median Placebo Deterioration on DAD Total Score (EU Analysis Plan)464.0 Days
BapineuzumabTime to First Median Placebo Deterioration on DAD Total Score (EU Analysis Plan)456.0 Days
p-value: 0.191Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 13, 2026