Skip to content

A Study Of The Efficacy Of Gabapentin In Neuropathic Pain Patients As Measured By Quantitative Sensory Testing

A Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study To Assess The Reproducibility And The Effect Of Gabapentin On Quantitative Sensory Testing In Neuropathic Pain Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00674687
Enrollment
23
Registered
2008-05-08
Start date
2004-07-31
Completion date
2006-06-30
Last updated
2021-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neuralgia, Neuralgia, Postherpetic

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the reproducibility and the effect of gabapentin on quantitative sensory testing assessments in neuropathic pain subjects.

Interventions

DRUG2-weeks placebo then gabapentin

Placebo for 2 weeks followed by gabapentin 300 mg oral capsule once daily titrated over 1 week to gabapentin 600 mg three times daily for 1 week

DRUG1-week placebo then gabapentin

Placebo for 1 week followed by gabapentin 300 mg oral capsule once daily titrated over 1 week to gabapentin 600 mg three times daily for 2 weeks

Sponsors

Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Neuropathic pain of peripheral origin as a consequence of either post-herpetic neuralgia or post-traumatic neuropathic pain * Well-defined skin area of mechanical allodynia to punctate (von Frey filament) stimuli * Pain intensity score of ≥ 4/10 for von Frey filament-evoked allodynia at the skin area

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who have undergone neurolytic or neurosurgical therapy, including skin excisions, for neuropathic pain * Patients who have trigeminal neuralgia, central pain, chronic radiculopathy, or peripheral neuropathy of non-mechanical or unknown origin * Patients with any other co-existing pain which cannot be differentiated from the neuropathic pain of peripheral origin

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Presence/intensity of punctate allodynia (von Frey filament), measured on the pain numeric rating scale (NRS)Weeks 2 and 4

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Pain NRS score for temporal summation to dynamic brush allodynia (soft and coarse brush)Weeks 2 and 4
Pressure pain tolerance thresholdWeeks 2 and 4
Pain NRS scores for pressure painWeeks 2 and 4
Subject assessed quality of evoked pain for temporal summation to dynamic brush allodynia (soft and coarse brush)Weeks 2 and 4
Tactile thresholdWeek 4
Pressure pain detection thresholdWeeks 2 and 4
Area of punctate and dynamic (soft and coarse brush) allodyniaWeeks 2 and 4
Pain NRS score for punctate allodyniaWeeks 2 and 4
Pain NRS scores for temporal summation to punctate stimuliWeeks 2 and 4
Subject assessed quality of evoked pain for temporal summation to punctate stimuliWeeks 2 and 4
Subject assessed quality of evoked pain for punctate allodyniaWeeks 2 and 4
Test-day global pain scaleWeek 4
Pain diary cardWeek 4
Pain NRS score for dynamic brush allodynia (soft brush)Weeks 2 and 4
Subject assessed quality of evoked pain for dynamic brush allodynia (soft brush)Weeks 2 and 4
Presence of metabonomic biomarkersWeeks 1 and 4
Physical examination1 week after 4-week treatment period
Adverse eventsThroughout study duration
Clinical laboratory tests1 week after 4-week treatment period
Subject assessed quality of pressure painWeeks 2 and 4
Neuropathic pain scaleWeek 4

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026