Skip to content

Comparison of Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive and Suture for Closure of Cardiac Device Pockets

Prospective Comparison of Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive (Dermabond) and Suture (Vicryl) for Closure of Cardiac Device Pockets

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00674128
Enrollment
103
Registered
2008-05-07
Start date
2008-05-31
Completion date
2009-05-31
Last updated
2010-12-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular Disease

Keywords

pacemaker, cardioverter-defibrillator, ICD, cardiac resynchronization device, cyanoacrylate, suture, Dermabond, Vicryl

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive is as effective as polyglactin 910 suture for surgical closure of cardiac device pockets.

Interventions

DEVICECyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (Dermabond)

Skin closure will be performed with cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive.

DEVICEPolyglactin 910 suture (Vicryl)

Skin closure will be performed with polyglactin 910 suture.

Sponsors

Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Scheduled for implantation of a pacemaker or ICD in the deltopectoral region at Mayo Clinic Hospital in Phoenix.

Exclusion criteria

* Allergy to one of the closure materials.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Reported Here Are the Number of Participants With Devices That Developed InfectionWithin 3 months after surgery.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were recruited sequentially at a tertiary care medical center between 2 June 2008 and 19 February 2009.

Pre-assignment details

33 patients did not meet inclusion criteria. 16 eligible patients did not consent. 103 patients were eligible and consented. 55 were assigned to Adhesive and 48 to Suture. The procedure was aborted for 5 patients in the Adhesive group and 4 patients in the Suture group.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Adhesive
Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive.
50
Suture
Polyglactin 910 suture.
44
Total94

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2523

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAdhesiveSutureTotal
Age Continuous77 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
77.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
77 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants13 Participants29 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
34 Participants31 Participants65 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 251 / 21
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Reported Here Are the Number of Participants With Devices That Developed Infection

Time frame: Within 3 months after surgery.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AdhesiveReported Here Are the Number of Participants With Devices That Developed Infection2 participants
SutureReported Here Are the Number of Participants With Devices That Developed Infection1 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026