Skip to content

β-D-Glucan (BDG) Surveillance With Preemptive Anidulafungin vs. Standard Care for Invasive Candidiasis in Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) Patients

Randomized Comparison of β-D-Glucan Surveillance With Preemptive Anidulafungin Versus Standard Care for the Management of Invasive Candidiasis in Surgical Intensive Care Unit Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00672841
Enrollment
64
Registered
2008-05-06
Start date
2008-06-30
Completion date
2011-01-31
Last updated
2015-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Invasive Candidiasis

Keywords

candidemia, invasive candidiasis, preemptive antifungal therapy, surveillance, β-D-Glucan (BDG)

Brief summary

This is a single center, prospective, open label assessment of β-D-glucan surveillance with preemptive anidulafungin therapy versus standard care for the prevention of invasive candidiasis in at-risk surgical intensive care unit (SICU) patients. Subjects will be stratified by APACHE II score and randomized in 3:1 fashion to either biweekly surveillance using the β-D-glucan assay or standard care. Subjects in the active monitoring arm will receive intravenous anidulafungin should the β-D-glucan exceed 60 pg/mL on a single determination. Subjects in the standard care arm will have biweekly blood draws for β-D-glucan, but the specimens will be batched and tested retrospectively. Antifungal use in the standard care arm is at the discretion of the treating physicians. The primary study end-points are the feasibility of a preemptive antifungal strategy in a SICU setting, β-D-glucan test characteristics, and the safety and tolerability of preemptive anidulafungin. Risks associated with study participation include the risks associated with blood draws, study drug related side effects, and the potential for loss of confidentiality.

Interventions

DRUGPreemptive Therapy with Anidulafungin

Subjects in the active surveillance arm who develop a single positive β-D-glucan test will receive preemptive anidulafungin intravenously. Preemptive therapy will include a loading dose of 200mg followed by 100mg maintenance therapy once a day. The loading and maintenance doses are derived from the FDA cleared schedule for Invasive Candidiasis and candidemia. Preemptive therapy will continue for 14 days.

DRUGEmpiric antifungal therapy based on physician discretion.

Patients in the standard care group may receive antifungal prophylaxis and/or treatment at any time based on the discretion of the treating physician.

Sponsors

Pfizer
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 years * Admission to the intensive care unit for ≥ 72 hours and expected to stay an additional 48 hours * IV access for administration of study drug * Subject (or subject's legal representative) able to give written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* History of hypersensitivity or intolerance to echinocandin antifungals * Liver function test (ALT, AST (aspartate aminotransferase), and/or total bilirubin) greater than 10 times the upper limits of normal (ULN) * Pregnant or lactating women * Treatment with systemic antifungal therapy within the preceding 7 days * Documented invasive fungal infection at baseline/screening * Life expectancy less than 2 days or moribund

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Utility of Biweekly β-D-glucan (BDG) Testing in At-risk Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients.Participants were followed until ICU discharge, an average of 17 daysClinical utility was defined as β-D-glucan test performance. Biweekly βDG testing used a threshold of ≥ 60 pg/ml to indicate a positive test for invasive candidiasis. True and false positives, and true and false negatives were confirmed using a composite clinical definition of invasive candidiasis that combines physical symptom/signs and microbiology. Cases of proven/probable invasive fungal infection (IFI) were adjudicated by a single reviewer blinded to group assignment and BDG results.
Safety and Tolerability of Preemptive Anidulafunginweekly until ICU dischargereported as the Number of Adverse Events Possibly Related to Study Drug

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Validate Gene Expression Signatures Predictive of ICStudy Completion, an average of 17 days
Incidence of Proven or Probable Invasive Fungal Infection (IFI)Participants were followed until ICU discharge, an average of 17 daysInstitution specific criteria were used to establish a diagnosis of proven or probable invasive candidiasis. Other IFIs were classified according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycosis Study Group (EORTC/MSG) criteria. However, BDG results were not factored into the EORTC/MSG criteria.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were recruited from June 2008 to December 2010 on three intensive care units.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Standard Care, Empiric Treatment
Standard care group. Empiric antifungal therapy initiated by physician preference for the treatment of suspected invasive candidiasis.
17
Active Surveillance, Preemptive Therapy
Active surveillance group. Preemptive therapy initiated in response to a positive 1,3-beta-D glucan test for the presumptive early treatment of invasive candidiasis
47
Total64

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event03
Overall StudyAntifungal therapy, negative glucan04
Overall StudyComfort care14
Overall Studyicteric specimens03
Overall StudyPregnancy01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicActive Surveillance, Preemptive TherapyStandard Care, Empiric TreatmentTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
17 Participants6 Participants23 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
30 Participants11 Participants41 Participants
Age, Continuous53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20
53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19
53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19
Region of Enrollment
United States
47 participants17 participants64 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants4 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants13 Participants44 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1710 / 47
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 170 / 47

Outcome results

Primary

Clinical Utility of Biweekly β-D-glucan (BDG) Testing in At-risk Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients.

Clinical utility was defined as β-D-glucan test performance. Biweekly βDG testing used a threshold of ≥ 60 pg/ml to indicate a positive test for invasive candidiasis. True and false positives, and true and false negatives were confirmed using a composite clinical definition of invasive candidiasis that combines physical symptom/signs and microbiology. Cases of proven/probable invasive fungal infection (IFI) were adjudicated by a single reviewer blinded to group assignment and BDG results.

Time frame: Participants were followed until ICU discharge, an average of 17 days

Population: Two study subjects in the preemptive therapy arm were excluded from the analysis of assay sensitivity and specific due to icteric serum specimens.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Active Surveillance, Preemptive TherapyClinical Utility of Biweekly β-D-glucan (BDG) Testing in At-risk Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients.True BDG Positives3 participants
Active Surveillance, Preemptive TherapyClinical Utility of Biweekly β-D-glucan (BDG) Testing in At-risk Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients.True BDG Negative19 participants
Active Surveillance, Preemptive TherapyClinical Utility of Biweekly β-D-glucan (BDG) Testing in At-risk Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients.False BDG Positives23 participants
Active Surveillance, Preemptive TherapyClinical Utility of Biweekly β-D-glucan (BDG) Testing in At-risk Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients.False BGD Negatives0 participants
Standard Care, Empiric TreatmentClinical Utility of Biweekly β-D-glucan (BDG) Testing in At-risk Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients.False BGD Negatives0 participants
Standard Care, Empiric TreatmentClinical Utility of Biweekly β-D-glucan (BDG) Testing in At-risk Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients.True BDG Positives3 participants
Standard Care, Empiric TreatmentClinical Utility of Biweekly β-D-glucan (BDG) Testing in At-risk Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients.False BDG Positives5 participants
Standard Care, Empiric TreatmentClinical Utility of Biweekly β-D-glucan (BDG) Testing in At-risk Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients.True BDG Negative9 participants
Comparison: Clinical sensitivity of the BDG test was calculated for both study groups combinedSensitivity %
Comparison: Clinical specificity of the BDG test was calculated for the study groups combined% Specificity
Primary

Safety and Tolerability of Preemptive Anidulafungin

reported as the Number of Adverse Events Possibly Related to Study Drug

Time frame: weekly until ICU discharge

Population: Subjects receiving at least 1 dose of anidulafungin were assessed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Active Surveillance, Preemptive TherapySafety and Tolerability of Preemptive Anidulafungin0 events
Standard Care, Empiric TreatmentSafety and Tolerability of Preemptive Anidulafungin10 events
Secondary

Incidence of Proven or Probable Invasive Fungal Infection (IFI)

Institution specific criteria were used to establish a diagnosis of proven or probable invasive candidiasis. Other IFIs were classified according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycosis Study Group (EORTC/MSG) criteria. However, BDG results were not factored into the EORTC/MSG criteria.

Time frame: Participants were followed until ICU discharge, an average of 17 days

Population: 4 subjects in the preemptive therapy were excluded from this analysis. These subjects were treated with empiric antifungal therapy despite repeatedly negative glucan results.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Active Surveillance, Preemptive TherapyIncidence of Proven or Probable Invasive Fungal Infection (IFI)3 participants
Standard Care, Empiric TreatmentIncidence of Proven or Probable Invasive Fungal Infection (IFI)3 participants
Comparison: The clinic sensitivity of the BDG test was calculated for both study groups combinedSensitivity
Comparison: The clinical specificity of the BDG test was calculated for both study groups combinedSpecificity
Secondary

Validate Gene Expression Signatures Predictive of IC

Time frame: Study Completion, an average of 17 days

Population: Data was not collected for this outcome measure.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 25, 2026