Skip to content

Initial Local Anesthetic Dose With Continuous Interscalene Analgesia

The Effect Of Initial Local Anesthetic Dose With Continuous Interscalene Analgesia On Postoperative Pain And Diaphragmatic Function In Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery Patients: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel Group, Dose-Ranging Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00672100
Enrollment
36
Registered
2008-05-06
Start date
2009-01-31
Completion date
2010-08-31
Last updated
2017-03-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post-operative Pain

Keywords

Peripheral Nerve Infusion,, continuous brachial plexus block,, post-operative pain, diaphragmatic paresis

Brief summary

Objective: To determine a minimally effective initial local anesthetic bolus required to provide satisfactory analgesia using continuous brachial plexus infusion following arthroscopic shoulder surgery using a double-blind, randomized, study comparing 3 initial doses.

Detailed description

Aims: 1. To compare pain ratings and supplemental analgesic requirements at discharge from PACU, 24 hours, and 48 hours and 12 weeks following 5, 10, and 20 ml boluses. 2. To compare adverse events including clinical dysphonia, Horner's syndrome, dyspnea, unexpected hospitalization, evidence of local anesthetic toxicity, and hand weakness at discharge from PACU following 5, 10, and 20 ml boluses. 3. To compare impairment in diaphragmatic excursion at discharge from PACU following 5, 10, and 20 ml boluses. 4. To compare patients' satisfaction with analgesia at 24 and 48 hours following 5, 10, and 20 ml boluses. 5. To compare patient rating of functional outcome at baseline and at 12 weeks following 5, 10, and 20 ml boluses. 6. To compare the rate of general anesthesia required following 5, 10, and 20 ml boluses.

Interventions

DRUGRopivacaine

Initial Bolus 5 ml Ropivacaine via interscalene injection

Sponsors

Beaumont Foundation of America
CollaboratorOTHER
Corewell Health East
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Provide written informed consent prior to participation in the study. * Is scheduled to undergo Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair, defined as arthroscopically assisted repair of any of the muscles or tendons comprising the rotator cuff. * If subject is a female of childbearing potential, have a negative pregnancy test on the day of surgery per standard of care * Be at least 18, but not more than 80 years of age * Have an ASA risk class of I, II, or III according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA). * Have the ability to read and understand the study procedures and the use of the pain scales. Must have the ability to communicate meaningfully with the Study Investigator and staff. * Be free of other physical, mental, or medical conditions, which in the opinion of the Investigator, makes study participation inadvisable.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects requiring daily opioids equivalent to greater than 40 mg oxycodone for over 2 weeks prior to the study. * Has significant preexisting pulmonary (respiratory/breathing) disease, diaphragmatic paralysis or history of phrenic nerve injury (problems with the diaphragm causing breathing difficulties). * Has significant medical disease(s), laboratory abnormalities or condition(s) that in the Investigator's judgment could compromise the subject's welfare, ability to communicate with the study staff, complete study activities, or would otherwise contraindicate study participation. * Has known significant hypersensitivity to opioids, Ropivacaine, or the inactive ingredients (excipients) of the study medications. * Has known or suspected history of alcohol or drug abuse or dependence within the previous 2 years. * Has clinically significant liver disease, or other condition (e.g., alcoholism, cirrhosis, or hepatitis) based on medical history and examination. * Has participated in another clinical Study (investigational or marketed product within 30 days of surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Measurements Via Numeric Pain Rating Scales (NRS)Discharge, 24 h, 48h, 12 weeksPain was reported via NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable)
Change in Diaphragmatic Displacement From Baseline to Post-surgeryBaseline, Post anesthesia care unit (PACU) - within 8 hoursDiaphragm displacement from exhale to inhale. The baseline diaphragm measurement was obtained pre-operatively before the block was administered prior to surgery. This was again measured post-operatively before the patient's discharge from the Post-anesthesia Care Unit.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Considered the Analgesic Technique Helpful or Extremely Helpfulat 24 and 48 hours after discharge from the hospitalParticipants were asked to rate the helpfulness of their infusion: 1. extremely harmful 2. harmful 3. neutral 4. not harmful, but not helpful 5. helpful 6. extremely helpful
Functional Outcome - Simple Shoulder Test (SST)Baseline, 12 weeksAt baseline and again at 12 weeks subjects completed the Simple Shoulder Test. This test is a series of 12 (yes/no) questions. Participants get 1 point if they answer yes (they can perform the task) and 0 if they answer no. Total possible range is from 0-12. This has been shown to be a valid, reliable and consistent for subjects up to and including 60 years of age when similar injuries (rotator cuff dysfunction) are assessed.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were identified from the surgical schedule. Subjects consented using the most current IRB-approved consent form. Informed consent were administered in the pre-operative suites prior to receiving any treatment. Recruitment started after approval was obtained from the IRB. Recruitment period was Jan 2009 to Dec 2009.

Pre-assignment details

Subjects were screened per protocol, those that met all inclusion criteria and did not meet any exclusion criteria were randomized per protocol.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ropivacaine 5 mL
Initial Bolus 0f 5 ml Ropivacaine 0.75% administered as interscalene peripheral nerve block prior to surgical procedure performed with ultrasound guidance followed by a continuous infusion of Ropivacaine 0.2% using the Stryker Pain Pump II with the following setting: 3 ml bolus/demand, 4ml/hr continuous infusion with a 20 min lock-out.
12
Ropivacaine 10 mL
Initial Bolus 0f 10 ml Ropivacaine 0.75% administered as interscalene peripheral nerve block prior to surgical procedure performed with ultrasound guidance followed by a continuous infusion of Ropivacaine 0.2% using the Stryker Pain Pump II with the following setting: 3 ml bolus/demand, 4ml/hr continuous infusion with a 20 min lock-out.
12
Ropivacaine 20 mL
Initial Bolus 0f 20 ml Ropivacaine 0.75% administered as interscalene peripheral nerve block prior to surgical procedure performed with ultrasound guidance followed by a continuous infusion of Ropivacaine 0.2% using the Stryker Pain Pump II with the following setting: 3 ml bolus/demand, 4ml/hr continuous infusion with a 20 min lock-out.
12
Total36

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRopivacaine 10 mLTotalRopivacaine 20 mLRopivacaine 5 mL
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
12 Participants36 Participants12 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants36 participants12 participants12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants11 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants25 Participants9 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 120 / 120 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 120 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Diaphragmatic Displacement From Baseline to Post-surgery

Diaphragm displacement from exhale to inhale. The baseline diaphragm measurement was obtained pre-operatively before the block was administered prior to surgery. This was again measured post-operatively before the patient's discharge from the Post-anesthesia Care Unit.

Time frame: Baseline, Post anesthesia care unit (PACU) - within 8 hours

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Ropivacaine 5 mLChange in Diaphragmatic Displacement From Baseline to Post-surgery% change in diaphragm displacement ipsilateral66 percent change
Ropivacaine 5 mLChange in Diaphragmatic Displacement From Baseline to Post-surgery% change in diaphragm displacement contralateral-28 percent change
Ropivacaine 10 mLChange in Diaphragmatic Displacement From Baseline to Post-surgery% change in diaphragm displacement ipsilateral60 percent change
Ropivacaine 10 mLChange in Diaphragmatic Displacement From Baseline to Post-surgery% change in diaphragm displacement contralateral-56 percent change
Ropivacaine 20 mLChange in Diaphragmatic Displacement From Baseline to Post-surgery% change in diaphragm displacement ipsilateral65 percent change
Ropivacaine 20 mLChange in Diaphragmatic Displacement From Baseline to Post-surgery% change in diaphragm displacement contralateral-39 percent change
Primary

Pain Measurements Via Numeric Pain Rating Scales (NRS)

Pain was reported via NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable)

Time frame: Discharge, 24 h, 48h, 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Ropivacaine 5 mLPain Measurements Via Numeric Pain Rating Scales (NRS)NRS at Discharge2.67 units on a scale
Ropivacaine 5 mLPain Measurements Via Numeric Pain Rating Scales (NRS)NRS at 24 hours post discharge3.67 units on a scale
Ropivacaine 5 mLPain Measurements Via Numeric Pain Rating Scales (NRS)NRS at 48 hours post discharge2.67 units on a scale
Ropivacaine 5 mLPain Measurements Via Numeric Pain Rating Scales (NRS)NRS at 12 weeks post discharge (n=11, 12, 12)1.5 units on a scale
Ropivacaine 10 mLPain Measurements Via Numeric Pain Rating Scales (NRS)NRS at 12 weeks post discharge (n=11, 12, 12)2.42 units on a scale
Ropivacaine 10 mLPain Measurements Via Numeric Pain Rating Scales (NRS)NRS at Discharge1.58 units on a scale
Ropivacaine 10 mLPain Measurements Via Numeric Pain Rating Scales (NRS)NRS at 48 hours post discharge2.08 units on a scale
Ropivacaine 10 mLPain Measurements Via Numeric Pain Rating Scales (NRS)NRS at 24 hours post discharge3.33 units on a scale
Ropivacaine 20 mLPain Measurements Via Numeric Pain Rating Scales (NRS)NRS at 12 weeks post discharge (n=11, 12, 12)1.15 units on a scale
Ropivacaine 20 mLPain Measurements Via Numeric Pain Rating Scales (NRS)NRS at 24 hours post discharge2.54 units on a scale
Ropivacaine 20 mLPain Measurements Via Numeric Pain Rating Scales (NRS)NRS at 48 hours post discharge2.15 units on a scale
Ropivacaine 20 mLPain Measurements Via Numeric Pain Rating Scales (NRS)NRS at Discharge0.62 units on a scale
Secondary

Functional Outcome - Simple Shoulder Test (SST)

At baseline and again at 12 weeks subjects completed the Simple Shoulder Test. This test is a series of 12 (yes/no) questions. Participants get 1 point if they answer yes (they can perform the task) and 0 if they answer no. Total possible range is from 0-12. This has been shown to be a valid, reliable and consistent for subjects up to and including 60 years of age when similar injuries (rotator cuff dysfunction) are assessed.

Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Ropivacaine 5 mLFunctional Outcome - Simple Shoulder Test (SST)SST at Baseline (n=36)6.3 units on a scale
Ropivacaine 5 mLFunctional Outcome - Simple Shoulder Test (SST)SST at 12 weeks (n=35)8.2 units on a scale
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Considered the Analgesic Technique Helpful or Extremely Helpful

Participants were asked to rate the helpfulness of their infusion: 1. extremely harmful 2. harmful 3. neutral 4. not harmful, but not helpful 5. helpful 6. extremely helpful

Time frame: at 24 and 48 hours after discharge from the hospital

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ropivacaine 5 mLPercentage of Participants Who Considered the Analgesic Technique Helpful or Extremely HelpfulPercentage of participants at 24 hours83 percentage of participants
Ropivacaine 5 mLPercentage of Participants Who Considered the Analgesic Technique Helpful or Extremely HelpfulPercentage of participants at 48 hours83 percentage of participants
Ropivacaine 10 mLPercentage of Participants Who Considered the Analgesic Technique Helpful or Extremely HelpfulPercentage of participants at 24 hours83 percentage of participants
Ropivacaine 10 mLPercentage of Participants Who Considered the Analgesic Technique Helpful or Extremely HelpfulPercentage of participants at 48 hours75 percentage of participants
Ropivacaine 20 mLPercentage of Participants Who Considered the Analgesic Technique Helpful or Extremely HelpfulPercentage of participants at 24 hours92 percentage of participants
Ropivacaine 20 mLPercentage of Participants Who Considered the Analgesic Technique Helpful or Extremely HelpfulPercentage of participants at 48 hours85 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 26, 2026