Skip to content

Evaluating Renal Masses Using Ultrasound Intravenous Microbubble Contrast

Evaluation of Renal Masses Using Ultrasound Intravenous Microbubble Contrast

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00671411
Enrollment
42
Registered
2008-05-05
Start date
2008-03-31
Completion date
2011-11-30
Last updated
2015-12-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Cancer, Renal Cancer

Keywords

Ultrasound, 07-165

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the blood flow in kidney masses by using ultrasound microbubble contrast material, and to see if results from ultrasound contrast studies can predict if a kidney mass is benign or malignant. Patterns of blood flow in the kidney mass will be examined to see if: 1. benign kidney masses can be distinguished from kidney cancers and 2. if slow growing, lower risk cancers have different blood flow compared to clear cell cancer which is the most common type of kidney cancer.

Interventions

DRUGUltrasound with intravenous microbubble contrast injection

Intravenous line will be inserted. After the ultrasound microbubble contrast has been suspended into solution, contrast will be injected intrav via hand bolus with a total activated suspension of 0.2 mL (30 uL octaflouropropane),followed by 10 mL saline flush, with option to rebolus 4 addit time's for tot dose of 150 uL. Post contrast cine images of renal mass will be obtained on commercially available US units primarily using low mechanical index settings & Contrast Pulsed Sequence (CPS®) technique. Images will be acquired at predetermined intervals, for up to 8 min post contrast admin. Manufacturer's guidelines incl immediate post flush image capture, as well as post admin image capture at intervals as 1 min, 2 , 4 & 8 mins. Additional, temporary higher mechanical index imaging of kidney for the purpose of flash bubble destruction may be optionally triggered using manufacturer's preset settings & energy w/i FDA guidelines. This will only be performed while imaging the kidney.

Sponsors

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Any adult patient who is planned or scheduled for surgical excision or biopsy of a solid or complex cystic renal mass would be eligible for the study * Histology of the renal mass must be unknown at the time of enrollment * Patients who have renal masses that are evident on conventional US imaging * Patients will have a correlative abdominal CT and/or MRI

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with any history of cardiac shunts. * Patients with history of pulmonary hypertension or unstable cardiopulmonary conditions, including patients on mechanical ventilation. * Patients without peripheral IV access * Pregnant patients and children * Patients with any known contrast allergies, allergy to perflutren, or any components of Definity or microbubble contrast * Patients who have renal masses that are not evident on conventional US imaging

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To determine the accuracy of contrast enhanced ultrasound of renal masses to predict benign vs. malignant histologyconclusion of study

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To determine if clear cell renal malignancies can be predicted, or differentiated, from other less aggressive malignant subtypes, based on analysis of the data.conclusion of study
To determine if contrast enhanced ultrasound of renal masses provides added value in predicting benign vs. malignant histology, when compared to the current routine evaluation of CT or MRI, and standard grey scale and Doppler USconclusion of the study

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026